Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-10 Thread Michal Hlavinka
Adding my whishlist 1) /etc/abrt/conf.d/ directory - like httpd ones. So I can drop there configuration for my packages. For example when dovecot crashes, I'd like to see doveconf -n output 2) better notification for crashes. I have one application that crashes when I'm ending desktop

Re: ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

2010-12-10 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/09/2010 08:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 14:53 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: On 12/09/2010 12:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: Just a wild idea - ABRT

Re: ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

2010-12-10 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/09/2010 08:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:53:20 -0500 Przemek Klosowskiprzemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote: On 12/09/2010 12:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: Just

Re: ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

2010-12-10 Thread Camilo Mesias
Hi, On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: if it just invisibly doesn't run, I'd try it again, but if I'm running it from the console and it spits out a clear fatal error and crashes, yeah, I'm not going to run it again. That'd be pointless. I would hope

Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-10 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/10/2010 09:24 AM, Michal Hlavinka wrote: Adding my whishlist 1) /etc/abrt/conf.d/ directory - like httpd ones. So I can drop there configuration for my packages. For example when dovecot crashes, I'd like to see doveconf -n output - I can promise the /etc/abrt/conf.d/ only for

Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-10 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: snip 4) Reporting to bugzilla without being able to scrape the bz username and password out of the firefox credential store is just cruel. - added as: share bz credential with other apps - not sure if we can share the credentials

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Thomas Moschny
2010/12/10 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com: [...] the problem is just the dependencies added by executable %doc files, then rpmbuild can be taught to not scan the %doc files for generating dependencies. That seems by far the cleanest solution to me. Especially development-oriented

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Thomas Moschny wrote, at 12/10/2010 08:19 PM +9:00: That seems by far the cleanest solution to me. Especially development-oriented packages often contain example directories; removing x-bits there only puts extra-burden on someone trying to play with the examples. Indeed some examples/

rawhide report: 20101210 changes

2010-12-10 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Dec 10 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit) beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)

Re: Firewall

2010-12-10 Thread Phil Knirsch
On 12/10/2010 04:00 AM, Curtis Doty wrote: Yesterday Miloslav Trma said: Curtis Doty píÿÿe v St 08. 12. 2010 v 01:02 -0800: Monday Miloslav Trma said: Just disable the firewall and you'll get pretty much equivalent functionality. How? Now that the filter table and stateful connection

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/08/2010 01:03 PM, James Ralston wrote: Riddle me this. We want to provide a server for developers within our organization to build RPM packages for use within our organization. These are our requirements: 1. The developers must

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:07:32PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 13:03 -0500, James Ralston wrote: Riddle me this. We want to provide a server for developers within our organization to build RPM packages for use within our organization. These are our requirements:

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread seth vidal
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:02 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:07:32PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 13:03 -0500, James Ralston wrote: Riddle me this. We want to provide a server for developers within our organization to build RPM packages

Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-10 Thread Tom Tromey
Jan == Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com writes: Jan GDB on client side would need something like readonly NFS-like Jan service to load the .debug files byte-wise. And this NFS-like Jan service network protocol must be signed by Fedora project like the Jan current rpms are. Jan Then the

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 09:17:27AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:02 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:07:32PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 13:03 -0500, James Ralston wrote: Riddle me this. We want to provide a

Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-10 Thread gia...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jiri Moskovcak jmosk...@redhat.com wrote: Gathering the RFEs at: https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/wiki/Wishlist Is it true report plugins are written in C++ ? if so, I'd love to RFE python wrapper to the plugins API so we can write plugins more easily -- Gianluca

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Tom Callaway
On 12/10/2010 01:03 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: rpmbuild can call either chmod -x on the %doc files at the end; or if the problem is just the dependencies added by executable %doc files, then rpmbuild can be taught to not scan the %doc files for generating dependencies. If no, why not? While I'm

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:40:23PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Thomas Moschny wrote, at 12/10/2010 08:19 PM +9:00: That seems by far the cleanest solution to me. Especially development-oriented packages often contain example directories; removing x-bits there only puts extra-burden on

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/10/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:40:23PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Thomas Moschny wrote, at 12/10/2010 08:19 PM +9:00: That seems by far the cleanest solution to me. Especially development-oriented packages often contain example directories; removing

File Test-Exception-0.31.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by steve

2010-12-10 Thread Steven Pritchard
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Exception: adb57ca7614d15e5b307bf5e024b35a8 Test-Exception-0.31.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:40:23PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Thomas Moschny wrote, at 12/10/2010 08:19 PM +9:00: That seems by far the cleanest solution to me. Especially development-oriented packages often contain example directories; removing

[perl-Test-Exception] Update to 0.31.

2010-12-10 Thread Steven Pritchard
commit 47e224a3357bb26417d7dc3388db65fe9b490152 Author: Steven Pritchard steven.pritch...@gmail.com Date: Fri Dec 10 11:23:22 2010 -0600 Update to 0.31. .gitignore |1 + perl-Test-Exception.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread James Ralston
On 2010-12-08 at 21:00+00 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: To the original poster: even a VM isn't a completely robust way of preventing root escalations. This is a certainly true. If an attacker manages to gain control of a VM guest, he can attempt to attack the VM host. (In

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 15:06 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Adding CLONE_NEWPID would be worthwhile to stop the mock process seeing any other PIDs on the machine. It's critical, or mock could ptrace some process running as root on the host and inject arbitrary code. -- Matt -- devel

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:43:04PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 15:06 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Adding CLONE_NEWPID would be worthwhile to stop the mock process seeing any other PIDs on the machine. It's critical, or mock could ptrace some process running as

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread James Ralston
On 2010-12-10 at 14:02+00 Daniel P Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: I'm not familiar with what attacks you can do on mocks' chroot setup offhand http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock describes an easy one: $ /usr/bin/mock --init -r fedora-10-i386 $ /usr/bin/mock --shell -r

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:06:59PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: The theory is as follows though 1. clone() with the CLONE_NEWNS set [...] There are various other CLONE flags that lock down more things if desired, eg to hide all host network interfaces. I don't think CLONE_* can stop

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:06:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:06:59PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: The theory is as follows though 1. clone() with the CLONE_NEWNS set [...] There are various other CLONE flags that lock down more things if desired,

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 01:01:56PM -0500, James Ralston wrote: On 2010-12-10 at 14:02+00 Daniel P Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: I'm not familiar with what attacks you can do on mocks' chroot setup offhand http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock describes an easy one: $

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Toshio Kuratomi wrote, at 12/11/2010 02:00 AM +9:00: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:40:23PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Thomas Moschny wrote, at 12/10/2010 08:19 PM +9:00: That seems by far the cleanest solution to me. Especially development-oriented packages often contain example directories;

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Jesse Keating
On 12/10/2010 10:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Oh fun, I didn't notice the permissions in /var/lib/mock/$NAME/root were so open as to allow access from non-root users outside the chroot. That could be locked down though, so that stuff inside the chroot was only visible while on the inside.

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Thomas Moschny
2010/12/10 Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net: On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 15:06 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Adding CLONE_NEWPID would be worthwhile to stop the mock process seeing any other PIDs on the machine. It's critical, or mock could ptrace some process running as root on the host

[Guidelines] MUST: use ExcludeArch over ExclusiveArch

2010-12-10 Thread Alex Hudson
Hi everyone, I have a small issue with the review of the v8 package that I'm currently looking at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634909#c18 The short story is this; the packaging guidelines state that for every architecture a package doesn't build on, the .spec should list

Re: [Guidelines] MUST: use ExcludeArch over ExclusiveArch

2010-12-10 Thread Tom Callaway
On 12/10/2010 02:00 PM, Alex Hudson wrote: Obviously for expeditious reasons the change to the .spec could be made to dance the dance as it were, but would I really get put on the naughty step if I thought it should be approved as-is? No, this seems like a reasonable exception to me. ~tom ==

Re: [Guidelines] MUST: use ExcludeArch over ExclusiveArch

2010-12-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Alex Hudson wrote: It doesn't make a lot of sense to me to ask Lubomir, the packager, to change the current ExclusiveArch, because I think that is the more correct expression of what this software supports. However, as a MUST: requirement this is a review blocker. ExclusiveArch is a

Re: abrt wishlist

2010-12-10 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 12/10/2010 04:27 PM, gia...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jiri Moskovcakjmosk...@redhat.com wrote: Gathering the RFEs at: https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/wiki/Wishlist Is it true report plugins are written in C++ ? if so, I'd love to RFE python wrapper to the plugins API

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Steve Traylen
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote: Toshio Kuratomi wrote, at 12/11/2010 02:00 AM +9:00: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:40:23PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Thomas Moschny wrote, at 12/10/2010 08:19 PM +9:00: That seems by far the cleanest solution to

Stomped by buildsys mail

2010-12-10 Thread Michael J Gruber
Got this: impressive has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: impressive-0.10.3-3.el6.noarch requires pygame On i386: impressive-0.10.3-3.el6.noarch requires pygame On ppc64: impressive-0.10.3-3.el6.noarch requires pygame Please resolve this as soon as

[Bug 624308] Package pre-dates the discovery of fire.

2010-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624308 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 624308] Package pre-dates the discovery of fire.

2010-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624308 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-10 15:31:03 EST ---

[Bug 658453] use JSON::RPC::Common::TypeConstraints in perl script leads to error (fix inside)

2010-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658453 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-10 15:30:44 EST --- perl-Moose-1.12-2.fc14 has been

[Bug 658453] use JSON::RPC::Common::TypeConstraints in perl script leads to error (fix inside)

2010-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658453 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Stomped by buildsys mail

2010-12-10 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Friday, December 10, 2010 02:31:33 pm Michael J Gruber wrote: Got this: impressive has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: impressive-0.10.3-3.el6.noarch requires pygame On i386: impressive-0.10.3-3.el6.noarch requires pygame On ppc64:

Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-12-10

2010-12-10 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2010-12-10/fedora_releng.2010-12-10-20.01.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2010-12-10/fedora_releng.2010-12-10-20.01.txt Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-

[389-devel] Please Review: (588791) Allow anonymous rootDSE access only

2010-12-10 Thread Nathan Kinder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588791 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=468061action=edit -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Stomped by buildsys mail

2010-12-10 Thread Xavier Lamien
-Xavier On 10 Dec 2010 21:32, Michael J Gruber m...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Got this: impressive has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: impressive-0.10.3-3.el6.noarch requires pygame On i386: impressive-0.10.3-3.el6.noarch requires pygame On ppc64:

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
Mamoru Tasaka wrote: So, when a package - contains some example scripts - the packager thinks that such scripts are useful and many people actually want to execute them - but such scripts need additional dependencies then the packager actually may want to add additional dependencies.

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

2010-12-10 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: On 12/10/2010 01:03 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: rpmbuild can call either chmod -x on the %doc files at the end; or if the problem is just the dependencies added by executable %doc files, then rpmbuild can be taught to not scan the %doc files

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bruno Wolff III wrote: I am concerned about that. If my karma is going to be treated differently because I become a proventester, I'd want to know what I am supposed to be doing differently and not mark something +1 by mistake. I think this concern goes away in the unicorn filled world where

Re: Unresponsive maintainer for libical

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Milan Crha wrote: so I added myself to the package, and it's waiting for a review now. It might be done by 'robert' [1], who is the only maintainer of libical at the moment. robert is Robert Scheck. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: mpfr soname bump in rawhide

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Josh Boyer wrote: Encouraging openness and cooperation by threatening verbal abuse in the event of a mistake is not something the Fedora project wants to condone. Education and cooperative resolution of the problem is. Uhm, no, bureaucracy and stubborn-by-design software is. :-( I'd much

Re: Fedora as semantic desktop (nautilus and tracker integration) ?

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501227 I'm writing to devel list just if anybody can say will there be any chance to get nautilus and tracker integration working? Is this on anybody's radar? Well, try Dolphin with Nepomuk integration. :-)

Re: Fedora default services (was: Re: F15 Feature - convert as many service init files as possible to the native SystemD services)

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: Right. To do this in systemd implies that you're patching openssh to do socket-based activation... hence why I asked about upstream's opinion on it. Why would we care? It's our goal to have ALL network daemons be socket-activated eventually. This is a distribution-wide

Re: Firewall

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Chris Adams wrote: Congrats, you have re-invented UPnP, although a local-only version maybe (not that I think that is necessarily a bad thing). Hmmm, indeed, KDE is moving towards using UPnP for more and more things, it'd be nice if it were used throughout Fedora, or at least supported by

Re: Firewall

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
seth vidal wrote: what network games? Heck, what network games do we HAVE? Wesnoth! And a few others, too. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Firewall

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
seth vidal wrote: ah, printing. Is there anything that's not last century? Uh, you'd be surprised how much many users out there in the real world still print! Sure, I don't use my printer much anymore, and there might even be people not printing anything at all anymore, you might be one of

Re: Firewall

2010-12-10 Thread Domingo Becker
2010/12/10 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: seth vidal wrote: ah, printing. Is there anything that's not last century? Uh, you'd be surprised how much many users out there in the real world still print! In these days I've been printing 2+ pages, all of them different, and I do it

Re: Fedora default services (was: Re: F15 Feature - convert as many service init files as possible to the native SystemD services)

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Chris Adams wrote: The only thing you need a firewall by default for is to prevent services that are listening on the network from being accessible. The better solution is to stop having services listen on the network by default. FWIW, this is what Ubuntu has been doing for ages (they call it

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Matt Domsch wrote: Last built on Fedora 12 (52): Huh? The right metric is not when was this last built but when was this last BUILDABLE. We don't randomly rebuild stuff which doesn't need to be rebuilt. E.g.: celestia-1.5.1-2.fc12 [u'631077 NEW'] (build/make) steve,mmahut (the first one on

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: Have you considered training up some bugzappers to help triage your components? They could at least work on de-duping abrt reports. Uh, I've pretty much given up on handling ABRT reports entirely. Even if they were deduped, there are so many different Gnash crashes that's

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: They shouldn't have to go through a re-review unless they've let the package sit in retirement for (I believe it's six months but someone else might have the policy URL handy). Only 3 months. And if the package doesn't build, the maintainer is probably not going to

Re: ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

2010-12-10 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:51:39AM +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: The problem is entirely cosmetic. No data is harmed, the program exits after that, it's just a child thread and the main process don't communicate the exit quite right. So, pretty much everyone who uses calibre sees

Re: Is there any value to per-Fedora branch ACLs?

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jesse Keating wrote: Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there real value in ACLs for f13, f14, devel, etc...? No. But the real question is: Is there any value to ACLs at all? Before the big

Re: ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
drago01 wrote: Well ABRT should stop filing bugs in bugzilla, it does not scale PERIOD. IMHO it should file bugs in the upstream bug tracker (even if that tracker is not Bugzilla, so it'd have to learn as many different bug tracker APIs as possible). Gnash upstream actually MIGHT be able to

Re: Vacation/devaway system

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: I know we have [1], but as you can see, there are 4 people listed on that page. That leads me to believe two things: 1. Most people don't know the page exists (I didn't until tibbs pointed it out to me) 2. It's cumbersome to edit wiki for things like this

Re: hosted reproducible package building with multiple developers?

2010-12-10 Thread Kevin Kofler
Till Maas wrote: I guess giving someone a shell account in a VM is usually not less safe than giving someone shell access on the host of the VM, as long as the VM does not use kvm and does not run as root. By does not use kvm, you mean pure software emulation? Enjoy the factor 50 slowdown!

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-10 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 01:44:54AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Matt Domsch wrote: Last built on Fedora 12 (52): Huh? The right metric is not when was this last built but when was this last BUILDABLE. We don't randomly rebuild stuff which doesn't need to be rebuilt. E.g.:

Re: Fedora default services (was: Re: F15 Feature - convert as many service init files as possible to the native SystemD services)

2010-12-10 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote: Bill Nottingham wrote: Right. To do this in systemd implies that you're patching openssh to do socket-based activation... hence why I asked about upstream's opinion on it. Why would we care? It's our goal to

[perl-DBD-Multi] Update to 0.16

2010-12-10 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
commit 80291020263c737c62f7a55ddcee1684435fb5d6 Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com Date: Fri Dec 10 09:06:16 2010 +0100 Update to 0.16 - 0.16 bump (bug #631224) - Correct spelling .gitignore |1 + perl-DBD-Multi.spec | 12 sources

[Bug 631224] FTBFS perl-DBD-Multi-0.14-6.fc14

2010-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631224 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 661027] FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Server-0.062-2.fc14

2010-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661027 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added

File File-Comments-0.08.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-12-10 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Comments: e2074a4a2cbc32c86ac9d92ab4481d1c File-Comments-0.08.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-File-Comments] Update to 0.08

2010-12-10 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 7af1e4011899269abc7df913099e00fef2250add Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Fri Dec 10 09:09:12 2010 + Update to 0.08 - New upstream release 0.08: - Adapt to HTML::Element =4 change that omits trailing newline in generated HTML (CPAN RT#63788)

[perl-File-Comments] Created tag perl-File-Comments-0.08-1.fc15

2010-12-10 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-File-Comments-0.08-1.fc15' was created pointing to: 7af1e40... Update to 0.08 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-File-Comments/el6/master] (7 commits) ...Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into el6/master

2010-12-10 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes: 5a36f86... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) a5fa4ae... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*) d8a94d7... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*) 6e4b676... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*) b9550da... dist-git conversion (*) 7af1e40...

[perl-File-Comments/el6/master: 7/7] Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into el6/master

2010-12-10 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 6a750f064fa5467ec6c895611e8b964915149fd0 Merge: 177073d 7af1e40 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Fri Dec 10 09:18:50 2010 + Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into el6/master Conflicts: .gitignore .gitignore |2 +-

[perl-File-Comments] Created tag perl-File-Comments-0.08-1.el6

2010-12-10 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-File-Comments-0.08-1.el6' was created pointing to: 6a750f0... Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into el6/master -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 661088] FTBFS perl-File-Comments-0.07-7.fc14

2010-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661088 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added

File IO-Socket-SSL-1.37.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-12-10 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL: a75c962ce989865213ca4320766fdb77 IO-Socket-SSL-1.37.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Update to 1.37

2010-12-10 Thread Paul Howarth
commit f86243aa588d6624a57c3ca5fc8ed86b73c1ecac Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Fri Dec 10 14:16:39 2010 + Update to 1.37 - New upstream release 1.37: - don't complain about invalid certificate locations if user explicitly set SSL_ca_path and

[perl-IO-Socket-SSL] Created tag perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.37-1.fc15

2010-12-10 Thread Paul Howarth
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.37-1.fc15' was created pointing to: f86243a... Update to 1.37 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rebuild of some perl packages

2010-12-10 Thread Marcela Maslanova
Hello, because of bug in paths (vendorarch), there will be needed rebuild of some packages (~1300). I choose only those which weren't rebuild with vendorarch in Perl. [1] I've asked for testing dist tag, so nothing will be broken [2]. Rebuild will start next week. Best regards, Marcela [1]

Broken dependencies: perl-Text-vFile-asData

2010-12-10 Thread buildsys
perl-Text-vFile-asData has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Text-vFile-asData-utils-0.05-4.el6.noarch requires perl(DateTime::Span) perl-Text-vFile-asData-utils-0.05-4.el6.noarch requires perl(DateTime::Format::ICal) On i386:

Broken dependencies: rt3

2010-12-10 Thread buildsys
rt3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-RT-Test-3.8.8-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Test::Email) On i386: perl-RT-Test-3.8.8-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Test::Email) On ppc64: perl-RT-Test-3.8.8-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Test::Email) Please resolve

Broken dependencies: perl-AnyEvent

2010-12-10 Thread buildsys
perl-AnyEvent has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-AnyEvent-5.27-1.el6.noarch requires perl(Event::Lib) perl-AnyEvent-5.27-1.el6.noarch requires perl(IO::Async::Handle) On i386: perl-AnyEvent-5.27-1.el6.noarch requires perl(Event::Lib)

[perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage] - Add BR: perl(CGI) (Fix FTBFS: BZ 660961).

2010-12-10 Thread corsepiu
commit dfe31f1d3f4abca3c6f4212e7ed7270ef885af2d Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Sat Dec 11 05:07:43 2010 +0100 - Add BR: perl(CGI) (Fix FTBFS: BZ 660961). perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage.spec |6 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) ---

[Bug 660961] FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage-1.21-5.fc14

2010-12-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660961 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added