Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Christoph Wickert
Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2011, 19:50 -0800 schrieb Eric Smith: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. MATE is just replacing gnome with mate everywhere, whether or not it was

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a chance to include this DE in Fedora? Unlike the MATE, TD is well maintained and there is a development community. -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Frank Murphy
On 09/12/11 07:03, Eric Smith wrote: I tried switching to Xfce, and found it to be a lot better than Gnome 3, but it was still missing a lot of things I'm accustomed to in Gnome 2. I'm not trying to start another advocacy thread. I'm just trying to package up an alternative for people like

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michał Piotrowski wrote: What do you think about Trinity Desktop? I liked KDE3. Is there a chance to include this DE in Fedora? Please NO! We worked hard on making kdelibs3 apps work well in KDE Plasma 4 sessions. Trying to support Trinity sessions too is going to make a big mess. Another big

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to package the remaining MATE packages. Would anyone

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 12/09/2011 05:17 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/09/2011 04:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 12/09/2011 09:20 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2.

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: one developer? I am worried about sustainability. How can you be worried about maintainability given that we already have unmaintained and poorly maintained packages in the distribution? When you have problems, the solution is to fix

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 12/09/2011 12:50 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/09/2011 03:50 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I've submitted review requests for the first two packages for the MATE desktop environment, mate-doc-utils and mate-corba. MATE is a fork of GNOME 2. I expect that it will take me a few months to

Fedora 16 Beta on Power ready for testing!

2011-12-09 Thread Phil Knirsch
Long time in the making, but at long last after 6 weeks of hard work the Fedora Secondary Arch Team for Power finally managed to get the Fedora 16 Beta release done! Available from mirrors now here: https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/16/ppc64/ under releases/test/16-Beta/ or

[Bug 765792] New: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.023 is available

2011-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.023 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765792 Summary: perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.023 is available Product: Fedora

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 12/09/2011 05:42 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: one developer? I am worried about sustainability. How can you be worried about maintainability given that we already have unmaintained and poorly maintained packages in the

License change in LibRaw due to inclusion of demosaic packs

2011-12-09 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
Hi, I got a request to include demosaic packs into the LibRaw build to support some digital cameras: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760638 With this inclusion, the LibRaw package will have a GPLv3+ license since the demosaic packs are released under GPLv2+ and GPLv3+. Currently

Review swap: indimpc - A minimalist MPD client with support for the gnome-shell and multimedia keys

2011-12-09 Thread Ankur Sinha
hello, Would any one want to swap reviews please? This is a rather simple package to review :) Review Request: indimpc - A minimalist MPD client with support for the gnome-shell and multimedia keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765802 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: FranciscoD

Fedora 17 Test Days

2011-12-09 Thread John Dulaney
Greetings, y’all! This release cycle I am the Test Day Coordinator. That means it is my job to help you, my fellow Fedorians, to set up test days for your packages/projects. We have about two and a half months until Alpha release (1). The sooner I receive test day proposals, the easier my

File JSON-RPC-1.01.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2011-12-09 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JSON-RPC: 802d5bb488f3587f16aa69e8c002132b JSON-RPC-1.01.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Coro] 6.07 bump

2011-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 071b0341c8b89029f779a7ce634fc2c8d440db34 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Dec 9 15:46:17 2011 +0100 6.07 bump .gitignore |1 + .rpmlint |3 +++ perl-Coro.spec |7 +-- sources|2 +- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Re: License change in LibRaw due to inclusion of demosaic packs

2011-12-09 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2011/12/9 Siddhesh Poyarekar spoya...@redhat.com: Hi, I got a request to include demosaic packs into the LibRaw build to support some digital cameras: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760638 With this inclusion, the LibRaw package will have a GPLv3+ license since the demosaic

Re: Boost build failure

2011-12-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 12/05/2011 05:29 PM, Petr Machata wrote: Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes: I'm seeing the following boost related build error building paraview in rawhide. Do any boost gurus know what the issue might be the issue? Hi there, please do not hesitate to file bugs for such

Re: Heads up: bumping libnl to v3 in rawhide/F17 soon

2011-12-09 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: The compatibility report between 1.1 and 3.2.2 versions of libnl generated by abi-compliance-checker [1] tool (see attachment: abi_compat_report.html) may be of help. [1] http://forge.ispras.ru/projects/abi-compliance-checker now back online: *API

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Test Days

2011-12-09 Thread John Dulaney
Greetings, y’all! This release cycle I am the Test Day Coordinator. That means it is my job to help you, my fellow Fedorians, to set up test days for your packages/projects. We have about two and a half months until Alpha release (1). The sooner I receive test day proposals, the easier my

Re: Boost build failure

2011-12-09 Thread Petr Machata
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com writes: On 12/05/2011 05:29 PM, Petr Machata wrote: Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes: I'm seeing the following boost related build error building paraview in rawhide. Do any boost gurus know what the issue might be the issue? Hi there, please

DWARF 4

2011-12-09 Thread Jerry James
Are there known obstacles in the way of replacing -g with -gdwarf-4 -fvar-tracking-assignments in our %{optflags}? I'm eager to be rid of gdb telling me that the one value I really have to know to diagnose a crash has been optimized away. Are there bits of the toolchain that can't handle DWARF

Re: DWARF 4

2011-12-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:16:42PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: Are there known obstacles in the way of replacing -g with -gdwarf-4 -fvar-tracking-assignments in our %{optflags}? I'm eager to be rid of gdb telling me that the one value I really have to know to diagnose a crash has been optimized

Re: DWARF 4

2011-12-09 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:22:20 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: F16 gdb doesn't support DW_OP_entry_value and typed DWARF stack extensions I think, you need to wait for F17 for that. These features are not yet in Rawhide, they are in FSF GDB HEAD, it should be in Rawhide in a week or so. I do not

Re: gdbm license change

2011-12-09 Thread Tom Callaway
On 11/15/2011 03:19 AM, Honza Horak wrote: If there are some license issues not easy to solve, there is still a compat-gdbm package, which ships gdbm-1.8.3 with GPLv2+. The problem is that compat-gdbm has no -devel package, and we cannot use the gdbm-devel package for this. Since Thorsten

Re: gdbm license change

2011-12-09 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com wrote: PS: why the hell are we still shipping this crap ? Ruby 1.9.x has been the stable branch for almost three years, now. Upstream has decided to stop providing bugfixes for Ruby 1.8.7 by june 2012 and CVE fixes by june

Re: What must I do for libquvi in F16

2011-12-09 Thread Nicoleau Fabien
Le 04/12/2011 07:14, Kevin Kofler a écrit : Nicoleau Fabien wrote: - open a bz ticket to create git access for libquvi-scripts and libquvi in F16 (quvi already exists) Actually, the new branch request should be filed in the existing review ticket, see:

Re: ruby 1.9

2011-12-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 12/09/2011 02:11 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Haïkel Guémarkarlthe...@gmail.com wrote: PS: why the hell are we still shipping this crap ? Ruby 1.9.x has been the stable branch for almost three years, now. Upstream has decided to stop providing bugfixes for

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Rahul Sundaram wrote: It is not useful to generalize. There are lots of software components which aren't actively maintained but are useful to have in the distribution and all distributions have them however a desktop environment is a lot of work to maintain (as seen for instance in

Re: orphaning gdk-pixbuf

2011-12-09 Thread Eric Smith
Matthias Clasen wrote: Yes, gdk-pixbuf2 is not going away. gdk-pixbuf is the gtk1-era incarnation and not really used by anything anymore. Whew, that's a relief! Thanks! Eric -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

How to prevent a binary from being stripped by rpmbuild?

2011-12-09 Thread David Howells
Hi, How do I prevent rpmbuild from attempting to strip a particular binary? The problem is that the binary was cross-compiled and is not of the same architecture as the normal Fedora binutils. Thus the strip program used (from the wrong binutils) appears to corrupt the binary. David -- devel

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

2011-12-09 Thread Heiko Adams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 10.12.2011 01:20, schrieb Kevin Kofler: So I'm sceptical about MATE (seeing what's going on with Trinity) and I can only strongly discourage attempting to package Trinity. I agree to that point of view. IMHO MATE is a waste of time and

Re: How to prevent a binary from being stripped by rpmbuild?

2011-12-09 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:32 PM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, How do I prevent rpmbuild from attempting to strip a particular binary?  The problem is that the binary was cross-compiled and is not of the same architecture as the normal Fedora binutils.  Thus the strip program

Re: libpng mass rebuild status, 2011-12-06

2011-12-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Jackson wrote: 8 qt3-3.3.8b-37.fc17.src.rpm Fixed. This was poking a round a lot in the png_info structure. Thankfully, the NetBSD folks had already prepared a patch, which I applied in qt3-3.3.8b-40.fc17, which built successfully in Rawhide. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list

Re: ruby 1.9

2011-12-09 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
Orion Poplawski wrote: But isn't that why Fedora exists, to push everyone along :) Sounds like it needs to be in at least F18 for that timetable. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.3 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/2011-September/000658.html

[Test-Announce] 2011-12-12 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting provisionally CANCELLED

2011-12-09 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks. As no agenda items other than the standard catch-ups have been proposed via the list or on the Wiki page, and we have no action items from last week's meeting to catch up with, the 2011-12-12 meeting is provisionally cancelled, per the meeting SOP: there's no point having a meeting just

File Color-Calc-1.072.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

2011-12-09 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Color-Calc: a056998edcb1b55e71fa7f023dd682c5 Color-Calc-1.072.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-Color-Calc] Update to 1.072 clean up specfile

2011-12-09 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
commit 2197d0367dd4573f18b9a641c285b65fc2e879b3 Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr Date: Fri Dec 9 11:41:24 2011 +0100 Update to 1.072 clean up specfile .gitignore |1 + perl-Color-Calc.spec | 15 ++- sources |2 +- 3

File PPIx-Regexp-0.023.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2011-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPIx-Regexp: 6d5c92445c63087ea9563d5cc999c59e PPIx-Regexp-0.023.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-PPIx-Regexp] 0.023 bump

2011-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit ed66f2f34bb043f67b9c3bf10c208da2cfb6f257 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Fri Dec 9 14:18:00 2011 +0100 0.023 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) ---

[Bug 765792] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.023 is available

2011-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765792 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 753416] perl-Coro-6.07 is available

2011-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753416 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 765934] New: build for EPEL 6

2011-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: build for EPEL 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765934 Summary: build for EPEL 6 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6

[Bug 765934] build for EPEL 6

2011-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765934 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 765950] build for EPEL 6

2011-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765950 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 765934] build for EPEL 6

2011-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765934 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 765950] New: build for EPEL 6

2011-12-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: build for EPEL 6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765950 Summary: build for EPEL 6 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5