On 10 January 2014 21:54, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, there's a comprehensible error message! Anyway, does anybody have
an alternate means of contacting Mark?
Apologies for the delay in responding (and thanks to Michael for poking me
through other channels) I'm hideously
If you continue reading the thread you'll see what happened (short story:
too late fo rme)
--alec
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:43:13 +0100
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, this is not, and have never
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:36:38 +0100
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
If you continue reading the thread you'll see what happened (short
story: too late fo rme)
--alec
Refreshing my email would have helped, too early for me :(
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:06:30 -0500
Garry T. Williams gtwilli...@gmail.com wrote:
sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing clean expire-cache
sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade kernel\*
You can also after some research
modify the dnf-makecache.service file
to change the
On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
to be certain you can do dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all
if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
Not true if you ever used --releasever option.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
On 01/13/2014 07:32 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
Let leave yum as is, but let try to redefine this behavior for dnf:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052020
If you want this change please vote for this bug (by adding yourself to CC of
that bug). Otherwise it will stay as
CLOSED
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:53:53 +0100
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
to be certain you can do dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all
if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
Not true if you ever used --releasever option.
dnf
On 13/01/14 08:45, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:06:30 -0500
Garry T. Williams gtwilli...@gmail.com wrote:
sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing clean expire-cache
sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade kernel\*
You can also after some research
modify the
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:33:09 +
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
the expire_metadata setting still applies,
Where is this setting?
besides metadata expire in *.repos.
I couldn't find in on the wiki
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:51:27 +
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is this setting?
besides metadata expire in *.repos.
I couldn't find in on the wiki
Duh! man 8 dnf.conf,
so behaviour can be changed without running
dnf clean * dnf update
for those that may want it,
by adding
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:33:09 +
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
You can also after some research
modify the dnf-makecache.service file
to change the frequency of makecache.
I don't think that will help as that service simply controls when it
considers updating - the
On 01/10/2014 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 14:30 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 01/02/2014 11:32 PM, Jean François Martinez wrote:
I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last thing
I would want is a distribution I am _testing_, that is
Am 13.01.2014 09:57, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:53:53 +0100
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
to be certain you can do dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all
if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
Not true if you ever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021855
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052197
Bug ID: 1052197
Summary: perl-Test-Most-0.33 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Most
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/12/2014 08:17 AM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
I just wonder why `authconfig` creates: /etc/pam.d/system-auth -
system-auth-ac /etc/pam.d/postlogin - postlogin-ac
/etc/pam.d/password-auth - password-auth-ac etc.
Why those links and why -ac
On 01/13/2014 09:57 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:53:53 +0100
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 08:56 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
to be certain you can do dnf(yum) --enablerepo=* clean all
if your intention is truly to remove all cache.
Not true if you
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 04:39:12PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
You're preaching to the choir. But if in practice people really don't
deploy things via the distribution packages, it doesn't matter how
awesomely secure the distribution packages are. Something that you're
not using is never
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:37:57AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
that's included into other PAM stacks that require authentication. By
default, this is prepared by authconfig, but there are situations
where an admin would like to take control (and not risk that later
passes of authconfig
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:38:39 +0100
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
No. This command is accepted (to my surprise). But it delete nothing.
And just create new directory sturcture in '/var/cache/yum/x86_64/*'.
That does suck then
if someone with more that F20 cache needs to clean.
as
Compose started at Mon Jan 13 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[OpenEXR_CTL]
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libImath.so.6
OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-16.fc20.i686 requires libIlmThread.so.6
I built compton, a compositing manager for X. I've had strange problems
with xcompmgr before and I've since switched to compton, so I thought it
would be a good idea to build it. I just looked in koji, but it seems to
be in there, just not updated for f20. Should I contact the current
Adam Williamson wrote:
So to bring it to the context of Fedora.next - if some of the
'Fedora.next' products want to have the capability to deploy 'stable',
i.e. bundled, stacks, then I think they should be 'allowed' to do so (in
the sense that we can't really stop them), but the mechanisms
Hi all,
Long time ago I submitted a package written in go, then we found that
no guidelines at that moment, it's hard to review it properly.
Now since docker and many golang tools are accepted in Fedora, can
someone prepare a guideline for Go?
I got some ideas from SUSE's, but not sure if it's
Hi,
there's a draft, i suggest that you start checking it.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
Taking a peek at Debian and OpenSuSE Go guidelines might be worthy:
http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Go
Best regards,
H.
--
devel
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse
youtube ;-)) but may work as a preview.
I'll provide Fedora builds and repo later.
ma.
--
devel mailing list
The lightweight tag 'perl-Digest-MD4-1.9-1.el7' was created pointing to:
85a130e... Update to 1.9
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube
;-)) but may work as a preview.
I'll provide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/10/2014 10:47 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
El Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:31:13 -0700 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com escribió:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:35:59 -0800 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 17:33 -0600, Dennis
My apologies for linking opensuse guidelines, i missed that point in your
mail.
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Matt Robinson wrote:
I built compton, a compositing manager for X. I've had strange problems with
xcompmgr before and I've since switched to compton, so I thought it would be a
good idea to build it. I just looked in koji, but it seems to be in there, just
not updated for f20. Should I contact
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0100, H. Guémar wrote:
there's a draft, i suggest that you start checking it.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go
Taking a peek at Debian and OpenSuSE Go guidelines might be worthy:
http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html
The lightweight tag 'perl-aliased-0.31-1.el7' was created pointing to:
8f4b999... Update to 0.31
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
It's just a src.spm and plugin support it not finished (don't browse youtube
;-)) but may work as a preview.
I'll provide
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
http://stransky.fedorapeople.org/FirefoxGtk3/
It's
Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
first $SUBJ is available at:
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're not interested.
Ok, I'll rephrase.
I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different from every
other Firefox build that Fedora provides. Could you elaborate on the
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're not interested.
Ok, I'll rephrase.
I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different
On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi
On 01/09/2014 04:04 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/09/2014 01:23 PM, William Cohen wrote:
On 01/09/2014 01:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/09/2014 10:48 AM, William Cohen wrote:
PAPI-5.3.0 came out at the beginning of December 2013
(http://icl.cs.utk.edu/papi/news/news.html?id=331). I
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins and so.
I have Xfce but is it ok
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:39:10PM +0100, H. Guémar wrote:
As far as i'm concerned, the draft is good enough to be submitted to the
FPC.
Still, i'm not confident enough in my go skills to suggest it :)
Me either, but I won't let that stop me.
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
--
Am 13.01.2014 16:55, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use
Yeah I opened that awhile ago, so hopefully someone will respond to that
soon and I'll get a sponsor soon. In the meantime I also built xcape.
-Matt
On 01/13/2014 10:28 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Matt Robinson wrote:
I built compton, a compositing manager for X. I've had strange
problems
tflink added a dependency: T39: Investigate documentation systems for taskotron
and related sub-projects
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T28
To: tflink
Cc: qa-devel, tflink
___
qa-devel mailing list
On 01/13/2014 04:55 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100
Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should
better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
3 packages were orphaned
eclipse-subclipse [devel] was orphaned by akurtakov
Subversion Eclipse plugin
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/eclipse-subclipse
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:20:22AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Secondly we prevent even unconfined_t from putting down labels on
the file system that the kernel does not understand. IE If I am
building a F21 image on a RHEL6 box, it would blow up in enforcing
mode if run as unconfined_t. We
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're not interested.
Ok, I'll rephrase.
I'm interested but I have no idea how this is different
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 08:39 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 04:39:12PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
You're preaching to the choir. But if in practice people really don't
deploy things via the distribution packages, it doesn't matter how
awesomely secure the
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:21:28 -0700
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
# Fedora QA Devel Meeting
# Date: 2014-01-13
# Time: 17:00 - 19:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net
There was some miscommunication about the
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Probably this needs to go to FESCo/FPC, but what about
package-specific CAs? For example, I have a pattern I was thinking
about adding to the tog-pegasus that causes it to do the following:
1. Create an x509v3
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 08:45 +, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:06:30 -0500
Garry T. Williams gtwilli...@gmail.com wrote:
sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing clean expire-cache
sudo dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing upgrade kernel\*
You can also after some
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 08:42 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:37:57AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
that's included into other PAM stacks that require authentication. By
default, this is prepared by authconfig, but there are situations
where an admin would like to
jdulaney added a comment.
Done, pushed to git.
TASK DETAIL
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T20
To: jdulaney
Cc: qa-devel
___
qa-devel mailing list
qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:16:52 -0800
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
You can also after some research
modify the dnf-makecache.service file
to change the frequency of makecache.
It's a lot cleaner to just define a metadata expiry time in the
repository config file.
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 14:29 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[obexfs]
obexfs-0.12-7.fc20.i686 requires libopenobex.so.1
So, this is orphaned, and the code has now actually been rolled into
obexftp upstream. The build of obexftp I did yesterday includes the
obexfs and obexautofs
On Jan 13, 2014, at 5:24 AM, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/10/2014 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 14:30 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
That's the reason we came up with
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/
and even have a
On 01/13/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're not interested.
Ok, I'll rephrase.
I'm
On Jan 13, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Jean François Martinez jfm...@free.fr wrote:
It is refreshing to see I am not alone. Grub2 has the syndrome of
developpers becaming infatuated and not hiving a hoot about erfs err, I
meant users.
In a sense, they're right, because they're making something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2014 11:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:20:22AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Secondly we prevent even unconfined_t from putting down labels on the
file system that the kernel does not understand. IE If I am
Am 13.01.2014 20:50, schrieb Martin Stransky:
On 01/13/2014 05:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I don't say it's important/newsworthy. It's just FYI. Please ignore if
you're
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052435
Bug ID: 1052435
Summary: Missing RPM dependencies
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: amavisd-new
Assignee: st...@silug.org
Reporter: d...@mrns.nl
QA Contact:
On Seg, 2014-01-13 at 16:53 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:29 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Seg, 2014-01-13 at 16:53 +0100, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/13/2014 04:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.01.2014 16:41, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com
Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent
official
ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should better fit to
Gnome 3
desktop, use themes/skins and so.
The long term plan is to switch Fedora Firefox to Gtk3 so this is just a
tech preview. Full of bugs, of
Greetings.
Packages currently using the _hardened_build macro that also use
libtool may have been built only with partial RELRO instead of full
RELRO protections.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Features_Matrix#Built_with_RELRO
A workaround has been added today to the redhat-rpm-config
[Moving this to the libguestfs mailing list]
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:05:14PM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/13/2014 11:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:20:22AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Secondly we prevent
I just deployed new version of Copr at:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org
It have only one feature: you can now build in epel-7-x86_64!
To be precise - the name epel is little bit misleading, because it is
right now based on RHEL 7 Beta and does not include EPEL repo, because
it does not exists
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.ukwrote:
On 10 January 2014 21:54, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, there's a comprehensible error message! Anyway, does anybody have
an alternate means of contacting Mark?
Apologies for the delay in
Greetings.
The following packages have been orphaned due to their former
maintainer removing themselves from the packager group:
NetPIPE
checkdns
pxe-kexec (epel5/6 only)
Thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
Greetings.
The following packages have been orphaned due to their former
maintainer removing themselves from the packager group:
NetPIPE
checkdns
taken, co-maintainers welcome
pxe-kexec (epel5/6 only)
Thanks,
kevin
--
devel mailing list
On 01/13/2014 03:26 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
I just deployed new version of Copr at:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org
It have only one feature: you can now build in epel-7-x86_64!
To be precise - the name epel is little bit misleading, because it is right
now based on RHEL 7 Beta and does
I've taken rawhide/f20 and el6 branch of netpipe, anyone else
comaintainers are welcome.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 01/06/2014 05:40 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Holmstrom
gho...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2014-01-02 16:38, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Go for it. Do I need to re-orphan it?
I believe so.
Done. I didn't see any obvious way to directly transfer
Dear Sir
I am a new subscriber to the devel list. I want to introduce myself to the list
and break some ice. I am a young and humble C programmer, although I have
experience programming in other languages as Basic and Java. I am using Linux
since it was only Red Hats (before the blue Fedora),
Hi all,
I've gotten a build tag f21-llvm for attempting to rebase rawhide to llvm 3.4,
so far I've started just getting llvm built into the buildroot,
and once it gets past arm it seems like it should succeed.
That leaves the fun of rebasing and fixing all the llvm dependant packages:
mesa
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:54:36 -0700
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Jean François Martinez jfm...@free.fr wrote:
It is refreshing to see I am not alone. Grub2 has the syndrome of
developpers becaming infatuated and not hiving a hoot about erfs
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 07:13 +0100, Jean François Martinez wrote:
A GUI program would not fix your problem. If os-prober isn't finding your
CentOS install, a GUI boot manager wouldn't either. I suggest filing a bug
and attaching the following;
In fact when run grub2-mkconfig then
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-Catalog:
5c04659a9d8057fb4e9541bb3fbde397 XML-Catalog-v1.0.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 91b09a64db3bfd734e063524bbd045c756dff936
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 13 09:44:33 2014 +0100
1.0.1 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-Catalog.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
commit 0c0a1093a1a592f1d71a681ae2a03113b0be74ff
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 13 09:56:09 2014 +0100
1.0.1 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-Catalog.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051980
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-XML-Catalog-1.0.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Catalog-1.0.1-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051981
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-XML-Catalog-1.0.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Catalog-1.0.1-1.fc19
--
You are receiving
commit 58d83e853711dfcbd3499912c163556c27b020a2
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 13 10:13:50 2014 +0100
1.0.1 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-Catalog.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660652
Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051542
--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
Ok, I've requested a new branch for you.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
Summary of changes:
24ca145... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
ed875e1... Specify all dependencies (*)
22dc39a... Attempt at saner SPEC file formatting (*)
fb2b8a0... Bump version (*)
0fd0958... Add missing BRs (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052139
Bug ID: 1052139
Summary: ctstream-11 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: ctstream
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for ctstream:
a9c2d1cd9be56fbcd7d1ab9615a97809 ctstream-11
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5b324f2f39fd72d1a2b290942845c3e09b6d11aa
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 13 13:01:52 2014 +0100
Version 11 bump
.gitignore|1 +
ctstream.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
5b324f2... Version 11 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c27e27f8188c0af68d0744f62b755e0878d552fc
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 13 13:01:52 2014 +0100
Version 11 bump
.gitignore|1 +
ctstream.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit bc5b9945541ae0c37c0fb1669f54bc9c1e8fe430
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 13 13:01:52 2014 +0100
Version 11 bump
.gitignore|1 +
ctstream.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052139
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050042
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 91987
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052139
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ctstream-11-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ctstream-11-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052139
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ctstream-11-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ctstream-11-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052139
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ctstream-11-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ctstream-11-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
