Hi,
We're releasing 0.4.12 today. See all the information at the usual
places: blog [1], release notes [2] and f20 update [3].
Ales
[1] http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/01/21/dnf-0-4-12-released/
[2] http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html#id23
[3]
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 05:09 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 03:18 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
-mga is probably also still relevant in some small number of cases.
Don't we've a kms driver for those? Or you mean for mga
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 07:19 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 03:18 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:08:01AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
So now it is time to start looking into some of
I have a half-working setup: I use a bridge on my home server to connect
via vpn like if i was at home, but i am unable to create a tap device with
NetworkManager.
I have bridge0 and em1 managed by NetworkManager and an ifcfg-tap0 file to
bring up tap0 before openvpn start.
2014/1/16 Steve
On Mo, 2014-01-20 at 15:58 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:18:22PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
We can probably kill -cirrus.
qemu? (I know that people should be using QXL, but cirrus is still
the default in plain qemu, and IMHO simpler and more secure.)
qemu
On Tue, 21.01.14 09:26, Hans de Goede (hdego...@redhat.com) wrote:
Probably. TBH I'm not that interested in the binary drivers I know the nvidia
one
is actually quite decent and it has a lot of users. So I don't want to break
them,
but beyond that my interest stops. I assume they are still
I first thought it was just kind of something like what gentoo packages do
in their ebuilds, but then I also found that it's useless sometimes as
described by Richard.
Hereby comes a question, do we have any plans of let users install packages
from sources(crazy of course...) with bcond defined
Well, lpf ( in package lpf) is about this: it downloads, builds and
installs a target package from sources. As of now, there are no
user-defined options; no usecase so far. Wouldn't be hard to add if need be.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote:
I first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/2014 02:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:06:09PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
A couple of questions and comments. I think overall, the approach
works. # Packaging Libraries This does not mention libraries which use
Hi,
The author of recode moved the source tarballs to Github. There he provides
release tags, see below:
https://github.com/pinard/Recode/releases
What 'Source tag' should I use in the recode.spec file for version 3.6
tarball?
Zoltan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
3b28241... Update to 0.025 (*)
bfee890... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
b52c75d... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
931c6a5... Update to 0.026 (*)
a5dd1a7... Update to 0.027 (*)
8bc552f... Update to 0.028 (*)
(*) This commit already existed
=
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-01-21)
=
Meeting started by tjanez at 13:03:19 UTC. The full logs are available
at
See [1], in particular the section on %version
--alec
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Zoltan Kota zolt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The author of recode moved the source tarballs to Github. There he
provides release tags, see
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Build-Tiny-0.028-1.el7' was created pointing
to:
8bc552f... Update to 0.028
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 23:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 01:01 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 01/20/2014 11:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The bug currently under discussion was caused by a change that came in
inadvertently, not intentionally, and was actually intended
On 01/21/2014 03:45 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
While I've been packaging Python apps for Fedora for a long time, I'm a
complete novice to Django. I've just completed my first app (using the
built-in development server) and now want to get it packaged. Thus far
I've followed my normal
commit abc17401e5c68bea6f310bec7a452252f9f1115d
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 21 16:28:47 2014 +0100
Initial import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Lingua-EN-Sentence.spec | 52 ++
sources
- Original Message -
From: Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com
To: Fedora QA Development qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org, Josef
Skladanka jskla...@redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:00:33 PM
Subject: Re: Taskotron wiki page
I also updated
These don't have an epel7 branch yet. Please let me know if you intend
to request the branch for the package you maintain.
perl-DBD-CSV (devel:psabata, EL-6:steve)
perl-MIME-Lite (devel:psabata, EL-6:stevetraylen)
perl-MLDBM (devel:steve, EL-6:spot)
perl-SQL-Statement (devel:psabata,
The latest LibRaw is landing momentarily. The soname has changed so I'll
be rebuilding evas-generic-loaders, libkdcraw, oyranos and shotwell. If I
missed anything I'll fix that up as well.
Thanks,
J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 23:18 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
My old notes at
https://wikis.uit.tufts.edu/confluence/display/TUSKpub/Configure+Pair+Bonding,+VLANs,+and+Bridges+for+KVM+Hypervisor
were pretty good.
If you want stable KVM bridging, pair bonding, jumbo frames, or
consistent
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:23:40 -0500 (EST)
Martin Krizek mkri...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
As a general note, I'm not fully happy when the source code lives
somewhere else than the issues do. It confuses people. But if we
want to keep easy-to-browse-and-fork functionality (bitbucket) and
Summary of changes:
553df2d... Update to 0.305 (*)
eb64f0f... Update to 0.306 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/21/2014 03:45 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
While I've been packaging Python apps for Fedora for a long time, I'm
a
complete novice to Django. I've just completed my first app (using
the
built-in development server) and now want to get it packaged. Thus
far
I've followed my
The lightweight tag 'perl-ExtUtils-Depends-0.306-1.el7' was created pointing to:
eb64f0f... Update to 0.306
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Take, for example, https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases,
where there's a button for Source code (tar.gz) pointing at
https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/archive/V2.0.0.tar.gz
Note V2.0.0.tar.gz versus nfs-ganesha-2.0.0.tar.gz.
If I click on that link the downloaded
On 01/21/2014 06:01 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
Take, for example, https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases, where
there's a button for Source code
(tar.gz) pointing at
https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/archive/V2.0.0.tar.gz
Note V2.0.0.tar.gz versus
2014/1/21 Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com:
Take, for example, https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases,
where there's a button for Source code (tar.gz) pointing at
https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/archive/V2.0.0.tar.gz
I'm using a different scheme (there are few at
On 01/21/2014 12:09 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Interesting... However, if you're working with an actual release tag, I
would think Peter's method would be much better.
I agree, but practice has shown that few projects on github are using
release tags.
~tom
==
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸(((º OSAS @
Is anybody addressing the output of Swig WRT this problem? Our project
(Qpid) generates language bindings using Swig during the build process.
Our build is now failing on F21. For example:
/builddir/build/BUILD/qpid-0.24/cpp/bindings/qpid/ruby/rubyRUBY_wrap.cxx:2237:38:error:
format not a string
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/21/2014 06:01 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote:
Take, for example, https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/releases,
where there's a button for Source code
(tar.gz) pointing at
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Font-TTF:
ae3349a2259429c9327e183d8564d34a Font-TTF-1.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4efddf58f5641f3bf777fffc8602a0ce2195e2d2
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 21 18:25:07 2014 +0100
1.04 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Font-TTF.spec | 22 +-
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10
Actually, the GL are pretty clear here: the source should be referenced
using the full commit, nothing else. There is some reasoning why. The tag
should got to Version: (as long its 'sane').
Besides that this is the existing GL, there is also a subtle difference in
git-archive (which supposedly
On 01/21/2014 12:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, the GL are pretty clear here: the source should be
referenced using the full commit, nothing else. There is some
reasoning
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, the GL are pretty clear here: the source should be referenced
using the full commit, nothing else. There is some reasoning why. The tag
should got to Version: (as long its 'sane').
Besides that this is the
You could file a issue at the FPC trac, preferably with a proposal for new
GL.
That said, I notice that we use what works for me, despite any GL so
maybe it doesn't matter. Dunno.
--alec
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/21/2014 12:39 PM,
Package perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by lkundrak
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Lingua-Stem-Snowball
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/2014 11:22 AM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
On 01/21/2014 03:45 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
While I've been packaging Python apps for Fedora for a long
time, I'm a complete novice to Django. I've just completed my
first app (using
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:08:01 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
I just tried to create a ticket in Phab. I understand that the
Project field is similar to Component field that we used in Trac.
(It's a bit unfortunate that a project can't be further separated
into components).
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-qpid_proton has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid_proton)
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
perl(qpid::proton::ExceptionHandling)
On i386:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.i686 requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2014 08:33 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Environment and Stacks Working Group approved the first version of
PRD. Feel free to comment what is missing or what should be
altered.
From: sgall...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: 01/21/2014 13:24
Subject: Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging
Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/2014
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:14:21AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
# rpm -ql libselinux-devel | grep go
/usr/share/gocode/src/selinux
/usr/share/gocode/src/selinux/selinux.go
Is the correct way for C libraries that we ship to provide go bindings?
libguestfs has shipped go bindings in Fedora
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:01:24PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 17:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 15:35 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:28AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'd suggest this test should be a high
commit dab9364ebbb11e6e8966ec97e3f16cc1e58970df
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Jan 21 19:40:13 2014 +
Fix bogus date in changelog
perl-Text-Reform.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Text-Reform.spec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/2014 02:12 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
From: sgall...@redhat.com To: Development discussions related to
Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: 01/21/2014 13:24 Subject: Re: Best Practices for Django App
Packaging Sent by:
On 01/21/2014 05:22 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
[1]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-django-horizon.git/tree/
openstack-dashboard.conf
[2]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-django-horizon.git/tree/
openstack-dashboard-httpd-2.4.conf
[3]
Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said:
The first deliverable that the Fedora Server Working Group was tasked
with was the production of a Product Requirements Document. This
document is intended to provide a high-level view of the goals and
primary deliverables of the Fedora Server
Hi,
Looks like yet another unannounced soname bump has occurred in
Rawhide, this time libdbi. If there was an announcement, I haven't
noticed it, and neither apparently have maintainers of dependent
packages, and they haven't been addressed by anyone else either except
for rrdtool which is
Marcela Mašláňová (mmasl...@redhat.com) said:
Environment and Stacks Working Group approved the first version of
PRD. Feel free to comment what is missing or what should be altered.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Requirements_Document
I don't see anything necessarily
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said:
The first deliverable that the Fedora Server Working Group was tasked
with was the production of a Product Requirements Document. This
document is intended to provide a
Hi:
A few hours ago I submitted requests to push perl-MARC-XML directly to
stable (by filling out the fedpkg update request with type=security
and request=stable)
I tried following
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Tracking_Bugs?rd=Security/TrackingBugs
but it appears to depend on waiting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Dan Scott wrote:
I tried following
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Tracking_Bugs?rd=Security/TrackingBugs
but it appears to depend on waiting on a CVE, which upstream did not
yet have... but
On 01/21/2014 03:53 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Hi,
Looks like yet another unannounced soname bump has occurred in
Rawhide, this time libdbi. If there was an announcement, I haven't
noticed it, and neither apparently have maintainers of dependent
packages, and they haven't been addressed by
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:26:19 -0500
Dan Scott deni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
A few hours ago I submitted requests to push perl-MARC-XML directly to
stable (by filling out the fedpkg update request with type=security
and request=stable)
You cannot push any update directly to stable.
Security
From: mru...@matthias-runge.de
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: 01/21/2014 15:38
Subject: Re: Best Practices for Django App Packaging
Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/21/2014 05:22 PM, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
[1]
Hello,
A while ago, I wrote a trio of gnome-shell search providers:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-fedora-packages
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-github-repositories
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-pinboard
They
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Casper fan...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Mauricio Tavares a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Casper fan...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
Greetings.
The following packages have been orphaned due to their former
maintainer removing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:31:10PM -0500, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Dan Scott wrote:
I tried following
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Tracking_Bugs?rd=Security/TrackingBugs
but it appears to
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/18/2014 01:40 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Mo Morsi wrote:
Yes as others have
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:26:19 -0500
Dan Scott deni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
A few hours ago I submitted requests to push perl-MARC-XML directly to
stable (by filling out the fedpkg update request with type=security
and
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:38:54 -0500
Dan Scott deni...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, then I'll remove the conflicting information from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO that says: If you
feel that community testing is unnecessary for your update, you can
choose to push it straight to
On 21.01.2014 08:30, Colin Walters wrote:
Hi Dennis,
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:40 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Interesting. I've downloaded the VM Image and tried to understand the
setup.
Some bits are documented here
https://people.gnome.org/~walters/ostree/doc/layout.html
On 21.01.2014 20:07, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 07:40:00AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Interesting. I've downloaded the VM Image and tried to understand
the setup. Apparently there exist sort of two root trees / and
/sysroot in the system with some links targeting
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-01-22 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
One of the packages I maintain is mercurial. Frequently (e.g., now), there
is a rc version available for test. It will probably break some other package
that depends on it.
I am thinking of a model like google uses for chrome. I could install any of:
google-chrome-{stable,beta,unstable}
I
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the packages I maintain is mercurial. Frequently (e.g., now), there
is a rc version available for test. It will probably break some other package
that depends on it.
I am thinking of a model like google uses for
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Mauricio Tavares raubvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Fedora:
o bleeding edge, where new stuff comes
Cutting edge. Let's not ride the metaphor overly far [1]. We do
actually test a fair bit before releasing Fedora or package updates.
[1]
Seriously, it's harmful to provide unstable packages to users.
And I don't think Fedora has a long term support.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously, it's harmful to provide unstable packages to users.
Still, it makes sense to have a place to beta test either the
package or the packaging (how to create a proper package?) itself.
And I don't think
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 21:03 -0500, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
Seriously, it's harmful to provide unstable packages to users.
Still, it makes sense to have a place to beta test either the
package or the packaging
On Jan 22, 2014 10:03 AM, Mauricio Tavares raubvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Still, it makes sense to have a place to beta test either the
package or the packaging (how to create a proper package?) itself.
It's hard to say how to create a proper package testing in one slot of
pkgdb. Also it may
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 19:33 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
One of the packages I maintain is mercurial. Frequently (e.g., now), there
is a rc version available for test. It will probably break some other package
that depends on it.
I am thinking of a model like google uses for chrome. I could
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JavaScript-Minifier:
4ae40e970f657792720d42c92fe58cd1 JavaScript-Minifier-1.08.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2fb5065183ebf6174ddfa5fafbbc47ffe8ea914f
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 21 10:35:15 2014 +0100
1.08 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-JavaScript-Minifier.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055291
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055945
Bug ID: 1055945
Summary: perl-DBI-1.631 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055947
Bug ID: 1055947
Summary: perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.27 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-IO-Socket-IP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-MySQL:
b18dc2795ec8628a9b84b6e5f1b58775 DBD-mysql-4.026.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 8b3744b00445cfa08dc582510e2f78a6d64af8a9
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 21 11:00:53 2014 +0100
4.026 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBD-MySQL.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-SSLGlue:
25823d8e45eefacc291e3373f84b27df Net-SSLGlue-1.052.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054111
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
commit 6c0021b1e3db4d9109653458d17fcb5f49211c2c
Author: Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 21 11:19:43 2014 +0100
update to 1.052
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-SSLGlue-test.patch | 31 +--
perl-Net-SSLGlue.spec |9
Summary of changes:
6c0021b... update to 1.052 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fedora-Rebuild:
c9a76f94fff4abe96961727a2ba132eb Fedora-Rebuild-v0.11.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5b802b4439f39f4171967bd8a286ff37e1b376ed
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 21 11:25:53 2014 +0100
0.11.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Summary of changes:
5b802b4... 0.11.0 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 33f28df47bb5e40ef27c373e2c12fd1cc9113e61
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 21 11:25:53 2014 +0100
0.11.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
commit 2e4aa0075c2c4ccb59df83121734caed9d90c826
Author: Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue Jan 21 11:19:43 2014 +0100
update to 1.052
(cherry picked from commit 6c0021b1e3db4d9109653458d17fcb5f49211c2c)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-SSLGlue-test.patch |
Summary of changes:
2e4aa00... update to 1.052 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBI:
444d3c305e86597e11092b517794a840 DBI-1.631.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 768627669ac187b8e3e406f2dc11b76d89a650e7
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 21 12:08:00 2014 +0100
1.631 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-DBI.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055945
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Sys-Virt:
6203ae7a5f1e62d27fba4ad4a168ad12 Sys-Virt-1.2.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 932b359029b77fb56e418fdf15f98a497dfb9ad0
Author: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jan 21 12:19:47 2014 +
Update to 1.2.1 release
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
perl-Sys-Virt.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
2 files
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-IP:
2bc43f6fb1e8c1c6350fe507cf5413e2 IO-Socket-IP-0.27.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
