-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/2014 10:31 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Dave Johansen
davejohan...@gmail.com mailto:davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
The EL6 build of llvm 3.4 is currently in testing and it was just
pointed out that there's a
Summary of changes:
c73598e... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
75efdda... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
dd8b89e... Update to 1.61 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Summary of changes:
e8b4be3... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
538f55a... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
5423c80... Update to 0.47 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 01:41 -0500, David wrote:
On 2/5/2014 12:52 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 21:47 -0500, David wrote:
On 2/4/2014 5:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 14:29 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
and my suggestion is now to just create
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/04/2014 10:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 10:21 +0100, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 02/01/2014 11:07 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Right now, the vision essentially looks like:
Fedora Products: This
Matthew Miller (mat...@fedoraproject.org) said:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 08:48:12AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I'd also like to see some of the restrictions on spins loosened a little
bit. I think the spin/remix distinction (Fedora-only software vs. combined
with other things) is
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:18:27PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Does anyone know why the convention is to create the ESP as the first
partition?
Because that's the only configuration anyone's likely to have tested.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:45:29PM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
You're making a fatal mistake: assuming some kind of sense on the part
of firmware authors. ;)
Not really -- I figure that either the firmware is
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:27:44AM +0100, Bill Nottingham wrote:
That was a particularly gray area because it's simply a matter of
installing a package or not. Installing rsyslog but configuring it to
log differently than the standard is another level of change (although
of course also
On 02/04/2014 05:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a (hopefully) not too long and not too technical help for
installing Fedora on UEFI systems. Should cover the 'greatest hits' that
show up in bug reports, forums and IRC the most.
What about installations on systems which only offer 32-bit
- Original Message -
bkabrda python3 amcnabb,bkabrda,mstuchli,tomspur
Fixed in python3-3.3.2-9.fc21
bkabrda python bkabrda,dmalcolm,ivazquez,jsteffan,mstuchli,tomspur,tradej
Fixed in python-2.7.6-2.fc21
--
Regards,
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda.
--
devel mailing list
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
List of affected packages follows (maintainer package comaintainers):
Wouldn't it be better to mass-file bugs? Yes, it's more work initially,
but the work would have a larger impact (the bug would keep being
On 5 February 2014 10:20, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to mass-file bugs?
For stuff like this, I think just getting a provenpackager to fix up
the packages is the best thing to do. It's obviously correct and a
simple change.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
On 01/31/2014 09:23 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
msuchy rhn-client-tools mzazrive
Filed upstream bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061013
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 11:20:15AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to mass-file bugs?
There is a rough Guideline about mass bug filing:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mass_bug_filing
If not all packages are fixed after a while, the bugs can still be
filed. However it is also
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:40:20AM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 5 February 2014 10:20, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to mass-file bugs?
For stuff like this, I think just getting a provenpackager to fix up
the packages is the best thing to do. It's obviously
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 February 2014 10:20, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to mass-file bugs?
For stuff like this, I think just getting a provenpackager to fix up
the packages is the best thing to do. It's
On 02/05/2014 11:40 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
For stuff like this, I think just getting a provenpackager to fix up
the packages is the best thing to do. It's obviously correct and a
simple change.
Usually yes. But e.g. in rhn-client-tools this path is used in code and the
change is
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/04/2014 05:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a (hopefully) not too long and not too technical help for
installing Fedora on UEFI systems. Should cover the 'greatest hits' that
show up in bug reports, forums and
On 02/05/2014 01:09 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/04/2014 05:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a (hopefully) not too long and not too technical help for
installing Fedora on UEFI systems. Should cover the 'greatest hits'
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com writes:
On 02/05/2014 11:40 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
For stuff like this, I think just getting a provenpackager to fix up
the packages is the best thing to do. It's obviously correct and a
simple change.
Usually yes. But e.g. in rhn-client-tools this path
May take on the Spins
1) Spins have given us a great way to show people what is in Fedora
without installing
2) We have been producing Multi-Live media for several years to give out
at events.
3) The multi-lives make the display machines very easy to maintain (new
release wipe hd and
I've built cogl 1.17.2 in rawhide (required by clutter, in turn
required by mutter, in turn required by gnome-shell) and I'm just in
the process of building clutter 1.17.2 also.
Due to the vast number of things that depend on cogl I'm going to need
some help. At least for cogl, this is the
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/2014 10:31 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Dave Johansen
davejohan...@gmail.com mailto:davejohan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:56:02PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Yeah it's really a mistake for us to be using the linux/initrd commands
under any circumstances.
I have created the following bug report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055157
which was reverted because the
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 10:44 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 02/04/2014 05:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a (hopefully) not too long and not too technical help for
installing Fedora on UEFI systems. Should cover the 'greatest hits' that
show up in bug reports, forums and IRC the most.
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 13:30 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 02/05/2014 01:09 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/04/2014 05:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a (hopefully) not too long and not too technical help for
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 08:54:15 -0500,
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
Seems to be pretty outdated (*), we're past many things written there aka Live
CD size - for example for desktop and KDE spins. So the CD part could be
removed,
I know several spins doing changes in defaults
On 02/05/2014 03:34 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
It's not just that, actually. It has to do with the fact that the
majority of the scientific-focused applications are built atop the QT4
and other KDE libraries, making it much better suited to operating
atop the KDE desktop environment. Certainly
On 02/04/2014 06:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
And then we can definitely justify making them bigger. 550MB, or even
1GB. It's neutral to plus for performance for either HDDs or SSDs
(faux short stroked in the former, and overprovisioned for the
latter). Does anyone know why the convention is to
Are there official guidelines on how to handle selinux contexts in
packaging? I can still only find the draft which seems way more complicated
than necessary for my needs.
I'm working on a package that uses mongodb internally (runs it's own
instance). Selinux is complaining because it has mongodb
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there official guidelines on how to handle selinux contexts in
packaging? I can still only find the draft which seems way more complicated
than necessary for my needs.
I'm working on a package that uses mongodb
We no longer have valid contact information for the following packagers due
to changes in their work duties:
* npajkovs
* fkocina
* zpavlas
For packages that they own we have orphaned the packages and made them
comaintainers. In the future, if their current fas email addresses start to
bounce,
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 February 2014 10:20, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to mass-file bugs?
I do keep track of the affected packages and may end up doing that,
depending on what happens in a week or two since
Like this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959071
I specifically followed up to say the issue continues in Fedora 19,
and nothing changed. The bug tracker should not expire bugs if there's
been a comment after the EOL warning.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:51:41 -0800
David Timothy Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net wrote:
Like this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959071
I specifically followed up to say the issue continues in Fedora 19,
and nothing changed. The bug tracker should not expire bugs if there's
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Susi Lehtola
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
You just need to change the Version tag.
That is not something I appear to have access to do. And, if I don't,
very few people do.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984185
Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
David Timothy Strauss wrote:
That is not something I appear to have access to do. And, if I don't,
very few people do.
If you'd like to help update bugs then apply for the Bugzappers group in FAS and
you'll get editbugs access to be able to change the version in the future.
As far as the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987706
Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 16:09 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
David Timothy Strauss wrote:
That is not something I appear to have access to do. And, if I don't,
very few people do.
Rather a lot do, actually - see below.
If you'd like to help update bugs then apply for the Bugzappers group
Adam Williamson wrote:
Please don't. This is not accurate. Bugzappers has been inactive for
years now. Packagers and QA team members (and possibly other groups I
don't know about) get editbugs privileges via automatic inheritance into
the 'fedorabugs' group, and 'fedorabugs' group admins can
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 16:36 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
Please don't. This is not accurate. Bugzappers has been inactive for
years now. Packagers and QA team members (and possibly other groups I
don't know about) get editbugs privileges via automatic inheritance
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Quite a lot of people have editbugs - I think it's in the hundreds or
thousands
I mean few people in the sense that it requires a specific grant of
permissions, more than to just report bugs.
Telling me to join a group
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:39 PM, David Timothy Strauss
da...@davidstrauss.net wrote:
Telling me to join a group is also not addressing my complaint. My
complaint is that Fedora is auto-setting EOL on bugs with no clear way
for even the users who reported the bugs to stop it from happening.
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 14:39 -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Quite a lot of people have editbugs - I think it's in the hundreds or
thousands
I mean few people in the sense that it requires a specific grant of
David Timothy Strauss wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:39 PM, David Timothy Strauss
da...@davidstrauss.net wrote:
Telling me to join a group is also not addressing my complaint. My
complaint is that Fedora is auto-setting EOL on bugs with no clear way
for even the users who reported the bugs to
On 05/02/14 22:42, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
This is also not the first time this has happened to me.
I'll chime in: when I first switched to Fedora (F14/15 era), I found
this quite obnoxious, enough that I remember it.
So there is also an issue of being a welcoming community to
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 22:48 +, Colin Macdonald wrote:
On 05/02/14 22:42, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
This is also not the first time this has happened to me.
I'll chime in: when I first switched to Fedora (F14/15 era), I found
this quite obnoxious, enough that I remember it.
So
On 05/02/14 22:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
The problem is that no-one seems to come up with an alternative that's
any better. Leaving bugs on EOL versions open to rot away and be ignored
is no use. We *could* give everyone privs to re-open closed bugs, I
guess, and I personally don't think that
On 05/02/14 22:57, Tom Hughes wrote:
TBH I thought the whole point was that the reporter was expected to
update the version if they wanted it to stay open so I'm a bit surprised
to hear that they can't unless they are also a packager.
In fact the first message actually tells the reporter to
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
The idea of not closing bugs that have comments after the EOL
notification doesn't necessarily make things better, I don't think; we'd
just have errors in the other direction. Say someone dropped a note 'oh
yeah, this
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
TBH I thought the whole point was that the reporter was expected to update
the version if they wanted it to stay open so I'm a bit surprised to hear
that they can't unless they are also a packager.
Regular bug reporters
On 05/02/14 23:02, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
In fact the first message actually tells the reporter to do that:
: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not
: be able to fix it before Fedora 18 is end
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:59:46 +
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 05/02/14 22:57, Tom Hughes wrote:
TBH I thought the whole point was that the reporter was expected to
update the version if they wanted it to stay open so I'm a bit
surprised to hear that they can't unless they are
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 22:57 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 05/02/14 22:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
The problem is that no-one seems to come up with an alternative that's
any better. Leaving bugs on EOL versions open to rot away and be ignored
is no use. We *could* give everyone privs to
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 15:04 -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
TBH I thought the whole point was that the reporter was expected to update
the version if they wanted it to stay open so I'm a bit surprised to hear
that they
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Sure it does - it tells them to update the version if the problem still
occurs.
Those instructions start with Package Maintainer: so they are not
directed at the people experiencing the bug.
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 15:04 -0800, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
TBH I thought the whole point was that the reporter was expected to update
the version
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 14:50 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
The problem is that no-one seems to come up with an alternative that's
any better. Leaving bugs on EOL versions open to rot away and be
ignored
is no use. We *could* give everyone privs to re-open closed bugs, I
guess, and I personally
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
Everyone does not need reopen: just the ability to change the version
would suffice. (Unless there are serious worries about the risk of
allowing users to deface version fields?) I think auto-expiration would
work
Add in Keywords field:
FutureFeature
Or edit the title with [RFE] prefixed?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 02/05/2014 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Are there official guidelines on how to handle selinux contexts in
packaging? I can still only find the draft which seems way more
complicated than necessary for my needs.
I'm working on a package that uses mongodb internally (runs it's own
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 13:24 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
Are there official guidelines on how to handle selinux contexts in
packaging? I can still only find the draft which seems way more
complicated than necessary for my needs.
I'm working on a package that uses mongodb internally (runs
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 13:24 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
Are there official guidelines on how to handle selinux contexts in
packaging? I can still only find the draft which seems way more
complicated than necessary
On 05/02/14 05:46 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 02/04/2014 06:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
And then we can definitely justify making them bigger. 550MB, or even 1GB. It's
neutral to plus
for performance for either HDDs or SSDs (faux short stroked in the former, and
overprovisioned for
the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061604
Bug ID: 1061604
Summary: Upgrade to new upstream version
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: stompclt
Assignee: massimo.pala...@gmail.com
Reporter:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-threads-shared:
b17841a6f1c60f06ebf1a0290530b266 threads-shared-1.46.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f9dbe7ed2c9c25109e1e7cc40fdfc1789a746268
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Feb 5 09:02:24 2014 +0100
1.46 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-threads-shared.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Summary of changes:
f9dbe7e... 1.46 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5523abc10bf04487007ca55a54344c3abb004b1d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Feb 5 09:02:24 2014 +0100
1.46 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-threads-shared.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
dspam has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On ppc64:
dspam-3.10.2-9.el7.ppc64 requires perl(Mail::MboxParser)
On x86_64:
dspam-web-3.10.2-9.el7.x86_64 requires perl(GD::Graph::lines3d)
perl-SOAP-Lite has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-1.el7.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP)
On ppc64:
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.716-1.el7.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras
w3c-markup-validator has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires perl(HTML::Template)
On ppc64:
w3c-markup-validator-1.3-4.el7.noarch requires
perl(SGML::Parser::OpenSP) = 0:0.991
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the epel-7 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.x86_64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
On ppc64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(Prima::MsgBox)
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.el7.1.ppc64 requires perl(PDL::Slatec)
Please resolve this as
The lightweight tag 'perl-HTTP-DAV-0.47-1.el7' was created pointing to:
5423c80... Update to 0.47
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-HTTP-BrowserDetect-1.61-1.el7' was created pointing
to:
dd8b89e... Update to 1.61
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-Aligner:
3bd3688114a5d442f41e6d886d3aa1a7 Text-Aligner-0.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 79e374a9ea89ad75d05fb2fd9c53654b0152855d
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Feb 5 10:51:03 2014 +0100
0.10 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Text-Aligner.spec |8 +---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 06:51:43PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Good news to hear that cnucnu has supported glob, I've seen Jens has
enabled all hackage packages from a horrible long list to ghc-* one
line only.
Should we do this for Perl packages also?
Not all packages are from CPAN,
On 02/05/2014 12:36 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 06:51:43PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Good news to hear that cnucnu has supported glob, I've seen Jens has
enabled all hackage packages from a horrible long list to ghc-* one
line only.
Should we do this for Perl packages
On 02/05/2014 12:44 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 12:36:12PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 06:51:43PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Good news to hear that cnucnu has supported glob, I've seen Jens has
enabled all hackage packages from a horrible long list to
Package perl-SOAP-Lite in Fedora EPEL 7 was orphaned by psabata
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-SOAP-Lite in Fedora EPEL 7 is now owned by averi
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML-Tiny:
b206daf7e3cbf1be15e069081a09ff29 YAML-Tiny-1.58.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
averi has set the approveacls acl on perl-SOAP-Lite (Fedora EPEL 7) to Obsolete
for perl-sig
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
averi has set the approveacls acl on perl-SOAP-Lite (Fedora EPEL 7) to Approved
for perl-sig
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-SOAP-Lite
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit d1f2c8ab23f8646ad2d8671cca49d312c668f503
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Feb 5 12:00:50 2014 +
Update to 1.58
- New upstream release 1.58
- 1.57 omitted a change entry for the following change:
Incompatible change:
- Previously,
Summary of changes:
de25d98... Add a comment about the bundled IO modules (*)
97fdf6c... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
6713845... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
438410f... Adjust tests for Perl 5.18 (*)
28143ad... 1.06 bump (*)
66d02c3... Add a missing,
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On i386:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA)
On armhfp:
mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm)
On i386:
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-qpid_proton has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires perl(qpid_proton)
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
perl(qpid::proton::ExceptionHandling)
On i386:
perl-qpid_proton-0.6-1.fc21.i686 requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871442
Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871442
--- Comment #9 from Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org ---
Fedora 18 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2014-01-14. Fedora 18 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates.
Package perl-IO-SessionData in Fedora EPEL 7 was orphaned by psabata
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-IO-SessionData
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-IO-SessionData in Fedora EPEL 7 is now owned by averi
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-IO-SessionData
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On 02/05/2014 01:21 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/05/2014 12:44 PM, Till Maas wrote:
If someone does not want notifications for their packages, they can add
their name to this list:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Synopsis:
f661ccae395008e4b6a2888e6cd331a3 Test-Synopsis-0.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907704
Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
