How can I get it to go there and stay there? When starting F21 in multi-user, logging
in on tty3 and running startx, KDE shows up on tty3, where, as it's currently
broken[1], it needs to be killed to escape it. Ctrl-Alt-BS fails to kill it (in spite
of xorg.con* entries intended that
- Original Message -
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 03.05.2014 15:51, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 9:27 AM, alex diavatis wrote:
From Fedora Docs (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Wayland)
To
I am pretty sure HTTP(s) is the right choice
Hi Lennart,
The choice of HTTPS does complicate the network infrastructure moving log
records into a network management QoS class (ie, making sure that remote
logging works during a DoS attack caused by malware).
If you feel that HTTPS is the
Many of the polkit policy files services ship in Fedora have lines that
look like this:
defaults
allow_anyno/allow_any
allow_inactiveno/allow_inactive
allow_activeauth_admin_keep/allow_active
/defaults
The allow_anyno/allow_any prevents use of the service from remote
On Mon, 05.05.14 03:23, Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net) wrote:
How can I get it to go there and stay there? When starting F21 in
multi-user, logging in on tty3 and running startx, KDE shows up on
tty3, where, as it's currently broken[1], it needs to be killed to
escape it. Ctrl-Alt-BS
On Mon, 05.05.14 18:54, Glen Turner (g...@gdt.id.au) wrote:
I am pretty sure HTTP(s) is the right choice
Hi Lennart,
The choice of HTTPS does complicate the network infrastructure moving log
records into a network management QoS class (ie, making sure that remote
logging works
Broken deps for i386
--
[0ad]
0ad-0.0.15-4.fc21.i686 requires libenet.so.2
[MegaMek]
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
MegaMek-0.30.11-13.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
[PyKDE]
On 05/05/2014 12:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
If you feel that HTTPS is the correct protocol then please consider using
another port number than 443.
It's port 19531 by default.
Have you requested official assignment? It's not yet listed in
On Mon, 05.05.14 12:49, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 05/05/2014 12:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
If you feel that HTTPS is the correct protocol then please consider using
another port number than 443.
It's port 19531 by default.
Have you requested official
On 05/05/2014 12:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Have you requested official assignment? It's not yet listed in
http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.txt.
No I have not. What's the benefit of doing so?
It avoids collisions, and tools like
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 16:33 +0200, drago01 wrote:
Ouch. Yeah. How did that happen? How can we make it not happen in
the
future?
Well bodhi could simply not allow anyone other then the submitter to
press the push button.
Other then that ... better
Next week I am going to update log4j in rawhide from version 1.2 to
version 2.0-rc1 [2].
2.0 ships with a module providing limited 1.2 compatibility.
For more info see [1].
List of 105 components which require or build-require log4j (and
therefore are possibly affected by this update) follows.
Hi,
On 05/05/2014 11:47 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
Many of the polkit policy files services ship in Fedora have lines that
look like this:
defaults
allow_anyno/allow_any
allow_inactiveno/allow_inactive
allow_activeauth_admin_keep/allow_active
/defaults
The
Il 05/05/2014 13:41, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
Next week I am going to update log4j in rawhide from version 1.2 to
version 2.0-rc1 [2].
2.0 ships with a module providing limited 1.2 compatibility.
For more info see [1].
List of 105 components which require or build-require log4j (and
Il 05/05/2014 13:41, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
Next week I am going to update log4j in rawhide from version 1.2 to
version 2.0-rc1 [2].
2.0 ships with a module providing limited 1.2 compatibility.
For more info see [1].
List of 105 components which require or build-require log4j (and
On 05.05.2014 13:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 05/05/2014 11:47 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
Many of the polkit policy files services ship in Fedora have lines that
look like this:
defaults
allow_anyno/allow_any
allow_inactiveno/allow_inactive
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 03:59 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
The whole confusion is because the feature was initially written for
3.12 but then the whole .next thing happened.
In short the text needs to be updated.
Matthias updated it, I asked him but probably it needs more updates.
Sorry,
On 04/29/2014 05:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
As part of the F21 Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud Feature[1],
I've committed and pushed the kernel packaging split up into
kernel-core and kernel-drivers subpackages. For those of you running
rawhide, this really shouldn't be a major impact
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Gene Czarcinski gczarcin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/29/2014 05:41 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
Hi All,
As part of the F21 Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud Feature[1],
I've committed and pushed the kernel packaging split up into
kernel-core and kernel-drivers
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 14:21 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
The allow_anyno/allow_any prevents use of the service from remote
sessions such as ssh or Cockpit.
The poorly named allow_any tag controls the default policy for users
logged in from any non-monitor+keyboard session. That is,
Am 05.05.2014 14:36, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:26:59 -0400,
Gene Czarcinski gczarcin...@gmail.com wrote:
[1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modular_Kernel_Packaging_for_Cloud
I think you need a little work on this. Ok, to update (install) a new
kernel you
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:15:59PM +, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Tomasz Torcz
to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Risking being totally offtopic, but would TCB solve all most of
this issues?
www.openwall.com/tcb/ or
commit a4e5863df4931057c30efe68866331871b33dcdf
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon May 5 15:27:47 2014 +0200
0.106 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Mixin-Linewise.spec | 32 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 19
On 05/05/2014 03:27 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I think it would be better if we could declaratively say which user
accounts an RPM needs, and RPM can add or remove users from the system
based on this. eg. Apache httpd.spec would contain just:
%user apache
%group apache
And if we
On 05/05/2014 02:11 PM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 05/05/2014 13:41, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
Next week I am going to update log4j in rawhide from version 1.2 to
version 2.0-rc1 [2].
2.0 ships with a module providing limited 1.2 compatibility.
For more info see [1].
List of 105
Am 05.05.2014 15:27, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
I think it would be better if we could declaratively say which user
accounts an RPM needs, and RPM can add or remove users from the system
based on this. eg. Apache httpd.spec would contain just:
%user apache
%group apache
(This
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 10:14 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Well then you've misread, and now people trying to search for
information on rpm collections will be even more confused...
Like said elsewhere in this thread, collections are experimental, not
enabled in Fedora and will never be in
On 05.05.2014 14:44, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 14:21 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
The allow_anyno/allow_any prevents use of the service from remote
sessions such as ssh or Cockpit.
The poorly named allow_any tag controls the default policy for users
logged in from
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
binaries which should not be overriden because a binary
with the same name exists in /usr/bin
My memory is that the s was more for static not superuser.
There's some conceptual
On 05/05/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
binaries which should not be overriden because a binary
with the same name exists in /usr/bin
My memory is that the s was more for
On Fri, 2 May 2014 04:32:52 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/w/taskotron-papercuts/
Thanks, I was thinking about this. It's very unfortunate that
Phabricator doesn't support arbitrary tags/keywords as in
Bugzilla or
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:05 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Is this about integrating this work in Fedora? Or more porting work? Or
even make Wayland the default in F21? The section How To Test sounds
as if the later is the case, but it's not entirely clear to me.
I've tried to clarify the
On Mon, 05.05.14 10:35, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY (kkeit...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 05/05/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
binaries which should not be overriden because a binary
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said:
/usr/sbin is an invention of Linux.
Hmm, I think Solaris had it, and I know DEC Unix had it.
IIRC /sbin came about for static bins, but then also to move config
binaries out of /etc. The bins not needed for early system startup
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:39:42AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Florian Weimer wrote:
I don't think openssl genrsa 2048 has this issue on today's
machines. (I know I saw it with GNUTLS.)
I was sceptical, so I tried this on a freshly booted VM:
root@bofh:~# virsh
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:43:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
We really should get rid of the destinction, and make all of /bin,
/sbin, /usr/sbin a symlink to /usr/bin, and then never bother again
about $PATH orders and namespace collisions...
This -- and the current approach of having
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:43:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
We really should get rid of the destinction, and make all of /bin,
/sbin, /usr/sbin a symlink to /usr/bin, and then never bother again
about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094395
Bug ID: 1094395
Summary: perl-IPC-Run make check failure for ppc64le archi
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-IPC-Run
Severity: medium
Assignee:
On 05/05/2014 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 05.05.14 10:35, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY (kkeit...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 05/05/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
binaries
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 16:43 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 05.05.14 10:35, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY (kkeit...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 05/05/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain
On 05/05/2014 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
/usr/sbin is an invention of Linux.
Strange that you would claim this.
Here's a list of what's in /usr/sbin on NetBSD 1.0 (and there's no
overlap between what's in /usr/sbin and any other subdir.)
drwxr-xr-x root/wheel 0
Hi,
That's my recollection as well. Heard that confusion about sbin being for
superuser before.
Jon
On 5 May 2014 15:29, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
binaries which
On 2014-05-05 12:34 (GMT+0200) Lennart Poettering composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
How can I get it to go there and stay there? When starting F21 in
multi-user, logging in on tty3 and running startx, KDE shows up on
tty3, where, as it's currently broken[1], it needs to be killed to
escape it.
On Mon, 05.05.14 11:32, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 16:43 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 05.05.14 10:35, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY (kkeit...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 05/05/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/05/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
binaries which should not be overriden because a binary
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 11:00:05AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:43:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
We really should get rid of the destinction, and make all of /bin,
/sbin, /usr/sbin a symlink to /usr/bin, and then never bother again
about $PATH orders and
On Mon, 05.05.14 11:45, Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net) wrote:
On 2014-05-05 12:34 (GMT+0200) Lennart Poettering composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
How can I get it to go there and stay there? When starting F21 in
multi-user, logging in on tty3 and running startx, KDE shows up on
tty3,
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 05:55:17PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
The full-scope cleanup looks very tempting:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ojgzJOfWB8XaC5kqyrv4IhR9snZKBI77a02R4cj1QM8/edit#slide=id.i0
That seems to cover a lot of what I'd like to see, yeah, including moving
daemons out
On 2014-05-05 17:55 (GMT+0200) Lennart Poettering composed:
On Fedora tty1 is the graphical login, since a long time.
I've managed to avoid that in order that my boot messages tail stays there
undisturbed until such time as I've run out of vttys and need to use a sixth, the way
I like it,
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
There's a new devel release of the above just landed. I'll be looking
to get them into rawhide over the new couple of days but there's been
quite some change so I'm going to deal with it all locally first to
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 03:47:21PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.05.2014 15:27, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
I think it would be better if we could declaratively say which user
accounts an RPM needs, and RPM can add or remove users from the system
based on this. eg. Apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094440
Bug ID: 1094440
Summary: perl-libwww-perl: incorrect handling of SSL
certificate verification
Product: Security Response
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094440
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1094441
--
You are
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
There's a new devel release of the above just landed. I'll be looking
to get them into rawhide over the new couple of days but
I've got a pair of odd build failures that I'm probably missing something
obvious on. I'm trying to update both openvpn and dietlibc to their latest
upstreams for rawhide. They build fine locally on f20, in mock for f20,
and fail locally in rawhide and mock for rawhide. Looking at the logs, the
There's a new devel release of the above just landed. I'll be looking
to get them into rawhide over the new couple of days but there's been
quite some change so I'm going to deal with it all locally first to
see what the impact is before I push it.
Slightly later than planned but this
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
There's a new devel release of the above just landed. I'll be looking
to get them into rawhide over the new couple of days but there's been
quite some change so I'm going to deal with it all locally first to
On 05/05/2014 11:34 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I've got a pair of odd build failures that I'm probably missing something
obvious on. I'm trying to update both openvpn and dietlibc to their latest
upstreams for rawhide. They build fine locally on f20, in mock for f20, and
fail locally in rawhide and
On Mon, 05.05.14 12:24, Felix Miata (mrma...@earthlink.net) wrote:
On 2014-05-05 17:55 (GMT+0200) Lennart Poettering composed:
On Fedora tty1 is the graphical login, since a long time.
I've managed to avoid that in order that my boot messages tail stays
there undisturbed until such time
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 05/05/2014 11:34 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I've got a pair of odd build failures that I'm probably missing something
obvious on. I'm trying to update both openvpn and dietlibc to their
latest
upstreams for rawhide.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
And calling /usr/libexec Fedora-only is of course kind of
funny.
libexec is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB
allowed it.
It makes no sense to ever have that, and the rest of the world
Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
And calling /usr/libexec Fedora-only is of course kind of
funny.
libexec is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB
allowed it.
you systemd-guys
The subject performance regression:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77372
Hello everyone!
This is my first use of mailing lists. I'm a novice-to-intermediate linux user.
I've been contributing only by sharing basic knowledge and solutions on
askubuntu.com and ask.fedoraproject.org.
Am 05.05.2014 22:03, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
And calling /usr/libexec Fedora-only is of course
2014-05-05 22:03 GMT+02:00 Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
And calling /usr/libexec
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
And calling /usr/libexec Fedora-only is of course kind of
funny.
libexec is Fedora-only, no
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 22:03 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
And calling /usr/libexec
Am 05.05.2014 22:19, schrieb Simo Sorce:
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 22:03 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:45:38PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
And calling /usr/libexec Fedora-only is of course kind of
funny.
libexec is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB
allowed it.
Well, Red Hat Linux, before Fedora. And I believe we got it from BSD (it
seems to
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 16:19 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
It's a practical way to keep helpers out of path and autocomplete
without polluting /usr/lib[64] and having to deal with multilib issues,
what's pointless about it ?
It causes pointless configure and Makefile complications in every
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:24:03PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
It causes pointless configure and Makefile complications in every single
upstream project that wants to install something into that location and
has to differentiate between Fedora (/usr/libexec) and the rest of the
world
On 05/05/2014 10:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:24:03PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
It causes pointless configure and Makefile complications in every single
upstream project that wants to install something into that location and
has to differentiate between Fedora
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:38:10PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 05/05/2014 10:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:24:03PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
It causes pointless configure and Makefile complications in every single
upstream project that wants to install
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 11:45:31AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I might not even care about the location of X sessions if only it
wasn't so complicated to kill a broken one. Why doesn't Ctrl-Alt-BS
not work any more?
http://who-t.blogspot.com.au/2009/04/zapping-server.html
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 16:43 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
We really should get rid of the destinction, and make all of /bin,
/sbin, /usr/sbin a symlink to /usr/bin, and then never bother again
about $PATH orders and namespace collisions..
Arch made exactly this change this last year. [1]
On 2014-05-06 11:04 (GMT+1000) Peter Hutterer composed:
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 11:45:31AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
I might not even care about the location of X sessions if only it
wasn't so complicated to kill a broken one. Why doesn't Ctrl-Alt-BS
not work any more?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094169
Bug ID: 1094169
Summary: perl-Params-Validate make check error
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Params-Validate
Severity: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094169
--- Comment #1 from Michel Normand norm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 892456
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=892456action=edit
tstspell.input.pm data used by tstspell.pl
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094169
Michel Normand norm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1051573
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Uploader:
a0e45898c6d981cd8232a37584644be4 CPAN-Uploader-0.103007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 6c6d9210cde02b6f37200c23a576f1716cb068d9
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon May 5 10:52:09 2014 +0200
0.103007 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-CPAN-Uploader.spec | 40 +---
sources |2 +-
3 files
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094169
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
Well, I am pretty much clueless about what to do with this BZ.
perl-Params-Validate has always had problems with its pod-checks.
In Fedora, I have been trying to work around these by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094283
Bug ID: 1094283
Summary: 1.019 version is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Perl-PrereqScanner
Assignee: iarn...@gmail.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085211
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1094283
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094283
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-PrereqScanner:
ea7ae5c1d7a5fc494410375aafb59045 Perl-PrereqScanner-1.019.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085211
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1094289
Referenced
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mixin-Linewise:
d4699cde97d8286f44624c1d19663334 Mixin-Linewise-0.106.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Dist-Zilla:
576948ec0e2a3f53f53b4471da578e9a Dist-Zilla-5.015.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085211
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094395
Michel Normand norm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1051573
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094169
Menanteau Guy menan...@linux.vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094442
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com ---
Use the following update submission link to create the Bodhi request for
this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this
tracking bug. This will ensure that all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094440
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1094442
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094442
Bug ID: 1094442
Summary: perl-libwww-perl: incorrect handling of SSL
certificate verification [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-libwww-perl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-General:
8cf9dd044d016f27b4dc26077606736d Config-General-2.56.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 88435397324584dad7e066a21f3163d865da7048
Author: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Mon May 5 15:18:10 2014 -0600
upstream release
perl-Config-General.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093676
Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094169
--- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Menanteau Guy from comment #3)
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #2)
Hi, I tried also to understand this problem without success (seems relative
to the way
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
