This one is going to be a setup and low hanging fruit bug day. With the
holidays and never having set up a bug day before, I expect we will find
many many kinks
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
954
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
172
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1616/puppet-2.7.26-1.el6
43
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
954
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
408
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
172
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
34
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3621/php-Smarty-3.1.21-1.el7
18
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
17
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
think of anything
Dne 29.11.2014 v 12:56 Pádraig Brady napsal(a):
On 29/11/14 09:44, Ali AlipourR wrote:
Hi
Is there any statistics about How many developers Fedora has?
Considering just packages:
https://www.openhub.net/p/fedora-packages
Of course there are many more behind the scenes of the programs
Compose started at Mon Dec 1 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[NetworkManager-openconnect]
NetworkManager-openconnect-0.9.8.4-4.fc22.i686 requires
Compose started at Mon Dec 1 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client
[openstack-nova]
While we're on it (in the form how many devs do we have): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate on the #
of users, per package?
Here are so many problems, technical, policy, resources, (others?). That
said, feedback in the form How many users uses/installs my
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
While we're on it (in the form how many devs do we have): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate on the #
of users, per package?
Here are so many problems, technical, policy, resources, (others?). That
said, feedback in
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage from a download
counter or so. Can we have something similar?
no - you have no clue which mirror was used without explicit tracking in
YUM/DNF and given
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage from a download
counter or so. Can we have something similar?
no - you have no clue which mirror was used
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage from a download
counter or so. Can we have
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:57 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the
On 01/12/14 12:57, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy those who can measure the usage
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:05:46PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:57 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26
On 01/12/14 13:10, Alec Leamas wrote:
So we come back to the question: is any number better than no number
at all?
Even to get a trend?
Yes, I think so. Even a bad number can be used for trends and comparisons.
That said, let's not limit this discussion to the download counter
concept.
On 1. 12. 2014 at 12:26:07, Alec Leamas wrote:
While we're on it (in the form how many devs do we have): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate on the #
of users, per package?
Here are so many problems, technical, policy, resources, (others?). That
said,
On 12/01/2014 01:10 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
That said, let's not limit this discussion to the download counter
concept. There are other approaches, perhaps some kind of reporting app
which send reports on installed sw to a central server, like the abrt
thing. Or something else, which I cannot
That said, let's not limit this discussion to the download counter
concept. There are other approaches, perhaps some kind of reporting app
which send reports on installed sw to a central server, like the abrt
thing. Or something else, which I cannot imagine.
Well, if you target end users with
Gentlemen packagers, resting on your laurels?
Update to Parole 0.6.x stable series - completed port to GTK+3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169240
poma
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
2 packages were orphaned
perl-Object-Accessor [el6, el5] was orphaned by psabata
Interface to create per object accessors
QtSingleApplication
http://doc.qt.digia.com/solutions/4/qtsingleapplication/
Does GTK+ has such functionality?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Till, let me help you a bit to finally engage latest USB_ModeSwitch and data
package in Fedora 21.
- Refer to proper usb_modeswitch-data version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169234
- Add missed REFERENCE file refer to proper usb_modeswitch version
On Monday, December 1, 2014, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
QtSingleApplication
http://doc.qt.digia.com/solutions/4/qtsingleapplication/
Does GTK+ has such functionality?
Yes https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkApplication.html
--
devel mailing list
Hi,
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 07:39 +0100, poma wrote:
Gentlemen packagers, resting on your laurels?
You should try being less snarky in your future communications, it
usually leads to better results.
Update to Parole 0.6.x stable series - completed port to GTK+3
On Monday, December 1, 2014, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, December 1, 2014, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pomidorabelis...@gmail.com'); wrote:
QtSingleApplication
http://doc.qt.digia.com/solutions/4/qtsingleapplication/
Does GTK+ has such
On 01/12/14 14:34, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/01/2014 01:10 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
That said, let's not limit this discussion to the download counter
concept. There are other approaches, perhaps some kind of reporting app
which send reports on installed sw to a central server, like the abrt
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
at all), where
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:39:14 +0100
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
Gentlemen packagers, resting on your laurels?
Update to Parole 0.6.x stable series - completed port to GTK+3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169240
This is a duplicate of:
On 01/12/14 15:20, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 1. 12. 2014 at 14:40:44, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 01/12/14 13:56, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 1. 12. 2014 at 12:26:07, Alec Leamas wrote:
While we're on it (in the form how many devs do we have): How
hard/impossible/unsuitable would it be to get a usable estimate
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:19:48PM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
- Original Message -
One suggestion was to install it as a dependency of the NTP packages.
Is this a good idea? Should this first go through the Fedora change
process or at least be documented somewhere?
I think
On Mon, 01.12.14 15:55, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
Beside the selection of the NTP service that should enabled/disabled,
there are some minor differences in the functionality. For instance,
when setting the time, timedatex compensates for the time spent in the
polkit
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:18:36PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
Summary of changes:
e5efed4... Escape slashes in filters (#544738) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21.
Thursday, December 04, 2014 17:00 UTC (12 AM EST, 9 AM PST, 18:00 CET)
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine if
On Sun, 2014-11-30 at 13:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
at all), where people
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 08:59 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
to be pretty common with
A new version of sympy is available, with a new dependency. Who would like
to swap reviews? I need this one:
python-fastcache: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166919
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel
On 12/01/2014 07:28 PM, Jerry James wrote:
A new version of sympy is available, with a new dependency. Who would like
to swap reviews? I need this one:
python-fastcache: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166919
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thanks,
Taken.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
Taken.
Please, review this package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114737.
Taken, thanks!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 29.11.2014 v 12:56 Pádraig Brady napsal(a):
On 29/11/14 09:44, Ali AlipourR wrote:
Hi
Is there any statistics about How many developers Fedora has?
Considering just packages:
https://www.openhub.net/p/fedora-packages
CVC4 has a new version with a new dependency. How about yet another
review swap, this time for abc:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169492
Let me know what I can review in exchange. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
On 1 December 2014 at 05:37, Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
wrote:
On 01/12/14 13:10, Alec Leamas wrote:
So we come back to the question: is any number better than no number
at all?
Even to get a trend?
Yes, I think so. Even a bad number can be used for trends and
On 1 December 2014 at 05:05, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:57 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 14:34 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
We've had something of this kind many years go. It was called smolt and
had proven to be worthless and the origin of heated controversials.
smolt did hardware stats, not software. It proved to be useless
merely because it was badly
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 14:34 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
We've had something of this kind many years go. It was called smolt and
had proven to be worthless and the origin of heated controversials.
smolt did hardware stats,
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
good, it would have been very useful indeed. And it was controversial
because you can't wipe your nose on fedora-devel without someone
accusing you of a conspiracy to destroy Linux.
We're actively working to improve that last
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 01/12/14 22:45, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
good, it would have been very useful indeed. And it was controversial
because you can't wipe your nose on fedora-devel without someone
accusing you of a conspiracy to destroy Linux.
We're
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:38:24PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:36 schrieb Alec Leamas:
On 01/12/14 12:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.12.2014 um 12:26 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Lets face it: I envy
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:24 PM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
So, I'm willing to bet it's more of an Anaconda problem. I'm just not sure
how to even begin tracking it down. ...
File a bugzilla report, and attach each file in /var/log/anaconda
as a separate text/plain attachment.
Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that
I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it
stinks on Fedora 20.
OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4
Chrome OS on Chromebook gets 9-10 Fedora gets about 6
Tried powertop - see slight
On 1 December 2014 at 17:57, john.tiger john.tigernas...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that
I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it
stinks on Fedora 20.
OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4
Chrome OS on
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 08:29:27PM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
think of anything
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Feedback why this is impossible isn't really helpful here, most of us are
aware of the limitations. Given that we agree on the overall goals (?),
useful input is what can be done, and how.
I don't think it's fair to say
On 1 December 2014 at 19:57, john.tiger wrote:
Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that
I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it
stinks on Fedora 20.
OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4
Chrome OS on Chromebook gets 9-10 Fedora
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:46:39PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
That's not to say that there aren't useful questions that could be
answered, but so far they haven't been asked. I think if you start
with the right question, it will be easier to find a route to the
answer.
Okay, this seems like a
Hi
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Okay, this seems like a good start. What _are_ the right questions?
* Which packages are part of the default installation for various products
or spins that users actively remove?
* Which packages are not part of the installation
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 17:57 -0700, john.tiger wrote:
Obviously priority is now on F21 bugs but looking beyond that
I want to work with someone more knowledgeable on power consumption - it
stinks on Fedora 20.
OSX on mac air gets 11-12 hrs Fedora gets 4
Chrome OS on Chromebook gets 9-10
perl-Git-Repository has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Git-Repository-1.312-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_version='5.20.1';)
On i386:
perl-Git-Repository-1.312-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_version='5.20.1';)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166504
--- Comment #12 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Doug Maxey from comment #11)
The issue is not the quality of the error message, the issue is that there
should be none. I have some code with my PERL5LIB which has nothing
user: limb set for ddick acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Net-Pcap from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Pcap
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb created branch epel7 on package perl-Net-Pcap
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Pcap
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
user: limb set for ddick acl: approveacls of package: perl-Net-Pcap from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Pcap
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb set for ddick acl: commit of package: perl-Net-Pcap from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Pcap
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
user: limb set for ddick acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Net-Pcap from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Pcap
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
user: limb set for pghmcfc acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Regexp-Assemble
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Regexp-Assemble
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-Regexp-Assemble from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Regexp-Assemble
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for pghmcfc acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Regexp-Assemble
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Regexp-Assemble
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
user: limb created branch epel7 on package perl-Regexp-Assemble
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Regexp-Assemble
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: limb set for pghmcfc acl: approveacls of package: perl-Regexp-Assemble
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Regexp-Assemble
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb created branch epel7 on package perl-Cache-Memcached
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Cache-Memcached
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: limb set for eseyman acl: approveacls of package: perl-Cache-Memcached
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Cache-Memcached
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for eseyman acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Cache-Memcached
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Cache-Memcached
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for eseyman acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Cache-Memcached
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Cache-Memcached
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for eseyman acl: commit of package: perl-Cache-Memcached from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Cache-Memcached
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb created branch el6 on package perl-Tangerine
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Tangerine
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
user: limb set for psabata acl: approveacls of package: perl-Tangerine from:
to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Tangerine
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb set for psabata acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Tangerine from:
to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Tangerine
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb set for psabata acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Tangerine from:
to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Tangerine
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb set for psabata acl: commit of package: perl-Tangerine from: to:
Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Tangerine
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169369
Bug ID: 1169369
Summary: CVE-2014-9130 libyaml: assert failure when processing
wrapped strings
Product: Security Response
Component: vulnerability
Keywords: Security
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169369
Martin Prpic mpr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1169371
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169369
Martin Prpic mpr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1169374
--
You are
user: limb set for pghmcfc acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Apache-Session
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Apache-Session
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for pghmcfc acl: approveacls of package: perl-Apache-Session
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Apache-Session
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160799
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160799
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
user: limb set for pghmcfc acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Apache-Session
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Apache-Session
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb created branch epel7 on package perl-Apache-Session
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Apache-Session
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: limb set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-Apache-Session from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Apache-Session
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163236
Bug 1163236 depends on bug 1168612, which changed state.
Bug 1168612 Summary: Review Request: perl-List-Pairwise - Map/grep arrays and
hashes pairwise
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168612
What|Removed
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-ParseDistribution:
5d0042be71b2a2c6aaf223f7c61fc4d5 CPAN-ParseDistribution-1.52.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo