- Original Message -
Yeah, now that it all comes back to me, naming conflicts with SCLs is
probably
the biggest issue. The fact SCLs weren't given a prefix is a major issue for
many possible EPEL packages.
On 12/11/2014 09:46 AM, Carl George wrote:
One thing to look out for would
Hi all,
I am using CentOS 7 and I have noted that the project tinyproxy is not
present in the EPEL 7 repository. It was part of the repository until EPEL
6.
Also I have noted that the 'tinyproxy' package is still present in the last
version of Fedora, so I was wondering why is not present in the
On 12 December 2014 at 04:42, Cesare Bellini cesar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am using CentOS 7 and I have noted that the project tinyproxy is not
present in the EPEL 7 repository. It was part of the repository until EPEL
6.
Also I have noted that the 'tinyproxy' package is still present
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Cesare Bellini cesar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am using CentOS 7 and I have noted that the project tinyproxy is not
present in the EPEL 7 repository. It was part of the repository until EPEL
6.
Also I have noted that the 'tinyproxy' package is still
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
45
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3621/php-Smarty-3.1.21-1.el7
29
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
23
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
965
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
419
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
183
Hi,
tl;dr: I just submitted a major update of libhtp to EPEL6 testing,
testing and feedback are more than welcome:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libhtp-0.5.16-1.el6
-
A security bug has been opened today against libhtp in EPEL6:
On 12/11/2014 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 15:06:25 +0100,
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained: Preupgrade Assistant =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Preupgrade_Assistant
Change owner(s): Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com
The
On 2014-12-12, Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/11/2014 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Will this handle packages that have been dropped but not obsoleted in
the next release?
Yes definitely. The tool or respectively contents (which are part of
this tool) can be used for
On 12/11/2014 05:39 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 05:15:25PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I quite often start new instances from images in Cloud (either
OpenStack or EC2) and do yum upgrade. But because root partition is
very limited (e.g. 3GB) and yum upgrade needs XX
- Original Message -
Dear developers,
On 12/12/2014 01:27 AM, James Antill wrote:
==
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
==
Meeting started by geppetto at 17:01:37 UTC. The full logs are available
at
Hi Bastien,
On 12/12/2014 04:25 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:37)
* #476 Requesting copylib exemption for libgnome-volume-control
(geppetto, 17:06:19)
* ACTION: General agreement that it should be made at least a static
On 12/12/2014 08:32 AM, Satyajit Sahoo wrote:
Wireless might not be a strict requirement, but still essential.
I have some machines which does not have internet at all.
So for some user it is not essential at all.
It is hard to please everybody :)
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 05:37:52PM -0700, john.tiger wrote:
7) Give option to save successful install in a simple install
config file for multiple similar machines
FWIW, tbis is actually done every time, automatically -- you'll find a
kickstart file in ~root on the installed system.
8) team
Compose started at Fri Dec 12 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[bibletime]
W dniu 12.12.2014 o 08:32, Satyajit Sahoo pisze:
Okay, forget Macbook Air. I don't have ethernet at my office, and it's the
only place where I have internet. What can I do then?
You can boot one machine to any other OS, grab ISO from Fedora website
and put it on DVD or USB stick (there are
W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
by Monday. Test feedback would be particularly appreciated on
secondary arches and radeonsi 3D hardware.
Can
On 12/12/2014 10:01 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2014-12-12, Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/11/2014 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Will this handle packages that have been dropped but not obsoleted in
the next release?
Yes definitely. The tool or respectively contents (which are
Hi All,
In effort to resolve a security related BZ[0] I have attempted to contact
the active package maintainer(s) (rwmjones was listed but is not an active
member of the SIG) as well as the mailing list[1] with no response. We
discussed this BZ as well as some other MinGW related security BZ's
Due to several members who can't make it to todays meeting we're
officially canceling the Base WG meeting today.
Next Friday will be the last meeting for this year too.
Thanks everyone!
Regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services|
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:04:36AM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell -
Spell checking for Qt text widgets [*]
-
Hi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:49 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Is there an upvote mechanism for that? I'd like to join the chorus if I
can. ;-)
No. Voting is limited to FESCo members. However, if you feel you have
something more to add than the in-numerous responses already in this
Am Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:00:07 +
schrieb devel-announce-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:42:11 +0100
From: Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use
Hi everyone,
let me again share with you crash statistics for Fedora 20 and 21, that were
collected using ABRT.
First the big number: 4,838,888 total crashes in Fedora 20 and 21 in the last
30 days. That's over 161k every day and by far the record amount. About 95% of
them are kerneloopses,
On 12/12/2014 06:26 AM, Jason Taylor wrote:
In effort to resolve a security related BZ[0] I have attempted to contact the
active package maintainer(s) (rwmjones was listed but is not an active member of
the SIG) as well as the mailing list[1] with no response. We discussed this BZ
as well as
user: limb set for ddick acl: watchcommits of package: perl-CPAN-Reporter from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-CPAN-Reporter
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
- Original Message -
Hi Bastien,
On 12/12/2014 04:25 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:37)
* #476 Requesting copylib exemption for libgnome-volume-control
(geppetto, 17:06:19)
* ACTION: General agreement that it
Hi all,
anybody knows if the webrtc support in firefox will be released in F21?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
Kernel-3.17.6-300.fc21.x86_64
Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On 12/12/2014 04:25 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:37)
* #476 Requesting copylib exemption for libgnome-volume-control
(geppetto, 17:06:19)
* ACTION:
- Original Message -
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On 12/12/2014 04:25 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:37)
* #476 Requesting copylib exemption for libgnome-volume-control
On 12/12/2014 03:18 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Agreed, a static library is a waste of time. What about a normal
shared library? Do you think patches to do that would be accepted?
How does a shared
- Original Message -
On 12/12/2014 03:18 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Agreed, a static library is a waste of time. What about a normal
shared library? Do you think patches to do that
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
by Monday. Test feedback would
= Proposed System Wide Change: UEFI Secure Boot Blacklist Updates =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UEFISecureBootBlacklistUpdates
Change owner(s): Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com
Currently our implementation of UEFI Secure Boot does not include a facility
to apply blacklist (dbx) updates
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
by Monday. Test feedback would
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 13:01 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
by Monday. Test feedback would be particularly
= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby on Rails 4.2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_4.2
Change owner(s): Josef Stříbný jstrib...@redhat.com, Vít Ondruch
vondr...@redhat.com, ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ruby on Rails 4.2 is the latest version of well know web framework
I've updated docker to 1.4.0 for fedora and fedora epel. This release fixes:
CVE-2014-9357: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9357
CVE-2014-9358: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9358
CVE-2014-9356: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9356
It'd be great if
On Friday, December 12, 2014 03:05:42 PM Joachim Backes wrote:
anybody knows if the webrtc support in firefox will be released in F21?
I am under the impression WebRTC already works on Firefox.
--
Regards,
Sudhir Khanger,
sudhirkhanger.com,
github.com/donniezazen,
5577 8CDB A059 085D 1D60
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 04:36:09 PM Przemek Klosowski wrote:
icedtea-web-1.5.2-0.fc20.x86_64 requires
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.71-2.5.3.0.fc20.x86_64
OpenJDK 7 has been dropped from F21. You would get prompt answer from fedora-
java mailing list.
$ rpm -qa | grep icedtea
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report
rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
stunnel-5.08-1.fc22
---
* Thu Dec 11 2014 Avesh Agarwal avaga...@redhat.com - 5.08-1
- 1163349: New upstream release 5.08
This is a downgrade:
$ rpmdev-vercmp 5.08b6-1.fc22 5.08-1.fc22
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
icedtea-web-1.5.2-0.fc20.x86_64 requires
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.71-2.5.3.0.fc20.x86_64
OpenJDK 7 has been dropped from F21. You would get prompt answer from fedora-
java mailing list.
$ rpm -qa | grep icedtea
icedtea-web-1.5.1-1.fc21.x86_64
$
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:38:52AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/12/2014 03:18 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Agreed, a static library is a waste of
Good Day!
On 12/12/2014 9:05 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
anybody knows if the webrtc support in firefox will be released in F21?
It does currently work and has been supported prior to the current
release. You can test using a site like palava.tv
Here are webrtc and Mozilla resources
Working here on F21 - karma logged!
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar
l...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I've updated docker to 1.4.0 for fedora and fedora epel. This release fixes:
CVE-2014-9357: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9357
CVE-2014-9358:
On 12/12/2014 07:04 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'm guessing the FPC hasn't found out about the libgd git-submodule yet...
Apparently not as I don't see any FPC tickets for it nor listed here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_granted_exceptions
gnome-music
Dave Johansen wrote:
I would like to create Qwt and QwtPolar packages for Qt5 and before
opening the Bugzilla I wanted to check if there was any feedback on here.
I have spec files and source RPMs available at:
https://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/qwt-qt5/qwt-qt5.spec
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:14:50AM -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Working here on F21 - karma logged!
Thanks. Btw, could you also check if things work fine after restarting
docker.service (if not tested already)? I see database locked errors after a
restart on rawhide :\
On Fri, Dec
tl;dr: AppStream builder will reject AppData screenshots smaller than 312x175.
If you want things to be pixel-crisp and your application ships only
one screenshot use 752x423. If you've got multiple screenshots use
624x351, or integer multiples thereof. You can still ship random sized
screenshots
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 13:01 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
everything built by this Friday and the update
Recently, I've ended up interacting with Fedora packages that use several
different higher order or layered tools on top of fedpkg.
I created this page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Layered_build_scripts_for_package_maintainers
which attempts to enumerate the ones I know of. It's certainly
Mr. Hughes, I have a complaint.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want things to be pixel-crisp and your application ships only
one screenshot use 752x423. If you've got multiple screenshots use
624x351, or integer multiples thereof. You can
Michael DePaulo wrote:
I too come from an Ubuntu/Debian background. Like other major pieces
of software, Ubuntu and Debian both make multiple 2.x or 3.x versions
of LLVM available for each release of their OS. They do the
following:
1. The major version is specified in the package name. For
Bastien Nocera wrote:
So it won't be changed upstream, or downstream.
It MUST be changed downstream according to our policies. If you refuse to do
it, then you should get removed from that package's Fedora maintainership.
Sometimes, it's better to have a packager who's not also an upstream
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:53:01PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
Mr. Hughes, I have a complaint.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want things to be pixel-crisp and your application ships only
one screenshot use 752x423. If you've got multiple
Jaroslav Reznik posted (and
Change owner(s): Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
wrote):
KDE: limits itself to standard X11 mouse config interfaces, no changes
needed.
Not true. We ship kcm_touchpad on the KDE spin, which definitely does depend
on synaptics interfaces (search for synaptics in:
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-12-15
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! Let's follow up on the action items
from last week, and also
On 13 December 2014 at 01:10, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
An additional objection I have to this change proposal is that libinput
(deliberately) only implements a small subset of the configurability of the
old drivers, and thus, if we are going to remove the old drivers entirely,
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik posted (and
Change owner(s): Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com
wrote):
KDE: limits itself to standard X11 mouse config interfaces, no changes
needed.
Not true. We ship kcm_touchpad on the KDE spin,
commit 56ffd4a6c2fb33a075c25614119376b8aabf7807
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Dec 12 08:55:28 2014 +0100
Do not build-require non-core Socket6 module when bootstrapping
perl-IO-Socket-IP.spec |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 881a150738ff5273ed671f3674f4adc8c57b27d3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Dec 12 09:35:13 2014 +0100
Remove unused build-time dependency on YAML
perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
eb8e3de... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5984ed343da00b33d88781f4591ecb9ecb427a86
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Dec 12 11:01:51 2014 +0100
Move optional dependencies to one place
perl-DBI.spec | 31 ---
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 797dd6a9249860d3543c00bc28b1616a1a9c4960
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:21:59 2014 +0100
Remove Win32 files in prep section
perl-DBI.spec |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBI.spec b/perl-DBI.spec
index
commit 1a598aef6a437d36b42b8302298e7186145c8386
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Dec 12 11:16:56 2014 +0100
Prune MANIFEST when deleting PlRPC-using modules
perl-DBI.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBI.spec
commit 512c6d3b5174cf3809f6a490539ec99e96d5cf10
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:35:34 2014 +0100
Fix shell bangs in prep section
The dbixs_rev.pl should not be installed probably. It looks like
an upstream mistake because EU::MM installs everything with
commit 6f5e213d835d4c851f43f2f1e92346f19b1ce72b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:37:25 2014 +0100
Fix permissions by macro
perl-DBI.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBI.spec b/perl-DBI.spec
index
commit b909a25b12953359753bbc517378b806b9282b25
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:40:38 2014 +0100
Preserve time stamp when fixing encoding
perl-DBI.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DBI.spec b/perl-DBI.spec
user: limb created branch epel7 on package perl-CPAN-Reporter
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-CPAN-Reporter
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: limb set for ddick acl: approveacls of package: perl-CPAN-Reporter from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-CPAN-Reporter
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
user: limb set for ddick acl: commit of package: perl-CPAN-Reporter from: to:
Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-CPAN-Reporter
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: limb set for ddick acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-CPAN-Reporter
from: to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-CPAN-Reporter
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166382
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Data-Munge-0.091-1.fc2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159516
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-SMTPS-0.04-1.fc21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163231
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-File-ConfigDir-0.014-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163231
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-File-ConfigDir-0.014-1
Brett Cannon recently published an updated version of the Python 3
migration guide: https://docs.python.org/3/howto/pyporting.html
One addition I found particularly noteworthy is the pylint --py3k
mode, which is designed to allow a project to keep their own code
Python 3 ready, even if their
I found the 'futurize' package very helpful
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Brett Cannon recently published an updated version of the Python 3
migration guide: https://docs.python.org/3/howto/pyporting.html
One addition I found particularly noteworthy
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:10:55PM -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
Almost forgot about this, even though I was talking about it earlier
today.
The current plan for bodhi2, as I understand it, is shooting for
production deployment in January or February. This affects us because
we will no longer be
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:59:30 -0500
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:10:55PM -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
Almost forgot about this, even though I was talking about it earlier
today.
The current plan for bodhi2, as I understand it, is shooting for
production
= Proposed System Wide Change: UEFI Secure Boot Blacklist Updates =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UEFISecureBootBlacklistUpdates
Change owner(s): Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com
Currently our implementation of UEFI Secure Boot does not include a facility
to apply blacklist (dbx) updates
81 matches
Mail list logo
