[Bug 1194637] perl-constant-defer-6 is available

2015-02-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194637 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-constant-defer-6-1.fc22 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=613442 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1194637] perl-constant-defer-6 is available

2015-02-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194637 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-constant-defer-6-1.fc20 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=613443 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.02.2015 um 18:21 schrieb Peter Robinson: I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network aware services should be PIEs, after all, why would we (Ulrich Drepper and myself) add the PIE support into the toolchain otherwise? I'm just not convinced most of the

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

2015-02-20 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:11:38 +0100 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Fri, 20.02.15 11:04, Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:36:17 +0100 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Fri, 20.02.15 16:24, Peter Robinson

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-20 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/20/2015 07:55 PM, Till Maas wrote: than the technical change to implement it, there's no mention that it will have an impact on performance, with numbers to back it up, across the three primary architectures. So how much performance impact is acceptable? None - Seriously, people will

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

2015-02-20 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: communication would have avoided some of the discussion in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149568 Which btw, caused https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192276 Could you review? I'm fixing this in OSTree too,

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

2015-02-20 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:12:29 +0100 Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote: On Fri, 20.02.15 11:07, Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:04:13 -0600 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:36:17 +0100 Lennart Poettering

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-20 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Also I've seen no performance analysis across all three architectures to see the impact. I'll happily send you an XO-1 to test on (our lowest supported device on i686 and also one of our most widely deployed Fedora

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-20 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:21:59PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network aware services should be PIEs, after all, why would we (Ulrich Drepper and myself) add the PIE support into the toolchain otherwise? I'm just not

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-20 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: (XO-4). There's the whole Android angle now to, which frankly makes a lot of sense for them. Even the latest OLPC OS development release is based on Fedora 20 and is targeted at the XO-4 hardware. Android already uses ASLR, see eg

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Also I've seen no performance analysis across all three architectures to see the impact. I'll happily send you an XO-1 to test on (our

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:21:59PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network aware services should be PIEs, after all, why would we (Ulrich Drepper and

Re: So everything in Rawhide must be compiled with -fPIC?

2015-02-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.02.2015 um 20:28 schrieb Peter Robinson: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: So how much performance impact is acceptable? Well you've not documented any of the impact so how can we discuss that? We have no idea if the impact is going to be 0.1% 1% or

[Bug 1194947] New: perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs-0.05 is available

2015-02-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194947 Bug ID: 1194947 Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs-0.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1194947] perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs-0.05 is available

2015-02-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194947 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9009270 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Branched 20150218 nightly compose nominated for testing

2015-02-20 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 02/19/2015 07:38 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 02/18/2015 01:21 PM, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Installation Text-mode installation does not work - noted in the matrix. The installation source spoke does

<    1   2