https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194637
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-constant-defer-6-1.fc22 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=613442
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194637
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-constant-defer-6-1.fc20 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=613443
--
You are receiving this mail
Am 20.02.2015 um 18:21 schrieb Peter Robinson:
I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network aware
services should be PIEs, after all, why would we (Ulrich Drepper and myself)
add the PIE support into the toolchain otherwise?
I'm just not convinced most of the
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:11:38 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Fri, 20.02.15 11:04, Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:36:17 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Fri, 20.02.15 16:24, Peter Robinson
On 02/20/2015 07:55 PM, Till Maas wrote:
than the technical change to implement it, there's no mention that it
will have an impact on performance, with numbers to back it up, across
the three primary architectures.
So how much performance impact is acceptable?
None - Seriously, people will
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
communication would have avoided some of the discussion in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149568
Which btw, caused
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192276
Could you review?
I'm fixing this in OSTree too,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:12:29 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Fri, 20.02.15 11:07, Dennis Gilmore (den...@ausil.us) wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:04:13 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:36:17 +0100
Lennart Poettering
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I've seen no performance analysis across all three architectures
to see the impact. I'll happily send you an XO-1 to test on (our
lowest supported device on i686 and also one of our most widely
deployed Fedora
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:21:59PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network
aware
services should be PIEs, after all, why would we (Ulrich Drepper and
myself)
add the PIE support into the toolchain otherwise?
I'm just not
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
(XO-4). There's the whole Android angle now to, which frankly makes a
lot of sense for them. Even the latest OLPC OS development release is
based on Fedora 20 and is targeted at the XO-4 hardware.
Android already uses ASLR, see eg
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I've seen no performance analysis across all three architectures
to see the impact. I'll happily send you an XO-1 to test on (our
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:21:59PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
I've never argumented against the goal that web browser or all network
aware
services should be PIEs, after all, why would we (Ulrich Drepper and
Am 20.02.2015 um 20:28 schrieb Peter Robinson:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
So how much performance impact is acceptable?
Well you've not documented any of the impact so how can we discuss
that? We have no idea if the impact is going to be 0.1% 1% or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194947
Bug ID: 1194947
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs-0.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Perl-Critic-StricterSubs
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194947
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9009270
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On 02/19/2015 07:38 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 02/18/2015 01:21 PM, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150218_Installation
Text-mode installation does not work - noted in the matrix.
The installation source spoke does
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo