https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205692
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206053
Bug ID: 1206053
Summary: Please branch perl-Data-Validate-Domain for EPEL7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Data-Validate-Domain
Assignee: fedora...@rule.lv
Thank you Petr,
Le 25/03/2015 13:20, Petr Pisar a écrit :
On 2015-03-23, Hoggins! fucks...@wheres5.com wrote:
Le 23/03/2015 16:56, Petr Pisar a =C3=A9crit :
Actually, no. I've always had this error, but it was working okay.
Now, when I try to launch rollerd with : rollerd -rrfile
Hi all,
I want to draw your attention to new editor Kakoune.
-- Vim inspired — Faster as in less keystrokes — Multiple selections —
Orthogonal design --
It's now under heavy development by the mawww and I think it has a
bright future. I think it's now stable enough to be used and mawww wants
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:52 -0400, David Airlie wrote:
Otherwise I think this feature is a bit half baked as is.
I don't understand how you can make *any* decisions based on HTTP
reachability, without *first* picking up proxy settings from
DHCP/VPN/WPAD etc., poking them into PacRunner, and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205692
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-SOAP-Lite-1.14-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=623700
--
You are receiving this mail
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 07:57:25PM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 19:45 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:30:25PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
If the compiler is single-threaded, and increasing the stack ulimit
fixes the problem, that implies
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 08:57 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Is pthread_create used even for the main thread in the process (I
thought the kernel created that). In any case threads aren't being
used explicitly by this process.
Anyway I guess the guard page is just a hole that causes the
I've got few messages from people who cannot attend today's meeting, but
still there may be something to discuss. Sorry for very late announcement.
WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 9:00 Boston,
22:00 Tokyo, 23:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
*
Compose started at Thu Mar 26 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6
Hi folks! It's everyone's favourite time of the year - time for QA to
make you feel bad about blocker bugs!
We're still six days out from Beta freeze, but I wanted to try and get
out ahead of the blocker list and try to keep up the 'shipping on
time' trend we started with Alpha...
If you're
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206169
Bug ID: 1206169
Summary: perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.040 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Regexp-Grammars
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206169
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9333777
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100706
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206159
Bug ID: 1206159
Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.75 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-GitHub
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206159
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9333750
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
I have submitted a proposal to the Fedora Project. Please find it here:
http://harshadjs.github.io/2015/03/27/Fedora-BTRFS-Content-Storage-Mode/
I hope that a mentor finds me and we could kick-start the development of
content-based-storage mode for BTRFS, this summer!
Cheers,
Harshad.
On Thu,
Thanks, and I am on top of it. Will post here, once I upload it to Google
Melange.
- Harshad.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
On Mar 24, 2015 10:04 PM, harshad shirwadkar
harshadshirwad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am a CS
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Jakub Jelen jje...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I know that it is quite late in F22 schedule and freeze is coming, but we
decided to push recent upstream version into F22 before beta freeze to keep
up with upstream.
I spent some time with testing various use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206408
Bug ID: 1206408
Summary: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL-1.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206408
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9341818
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding how things work, but I think every package in
updates-testing is signed by a human, on an offline machine (i.e. someone
has to walk the RPM to it using physical media, sign it and then bring it
On 26 March 2015 at 17:28, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com writes:
If you wish to test something before it's fully pushed to testing, you
can download it directly from the buildsystem via the web interface,
koji command line or bodhi client command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206423
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9342488
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206423
Bug ID: 1206423
Summary: perl-Wx-0.9927 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Wx
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
Thank you, I've received the notifications.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Once upon a time, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com said:
Also, heads up on OpenSSH releases: they're planning to disable ssh-1
compilation by default in a near future release, so the maintainer at
Fedora will need to decide whether to manually enable it.
Please don't disable it in the
- Original Message -
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:52 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This was most likely caused by some issues with out proxy servers this
evening. We
On 25 March 2015 at 19:40, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
-- I can't promise cookies, but I'll really appreciate it and it means
the applications won't disappear from Fedora 23. Yell if you have any
questions.
So, the overwhelming amount of help I received (one person) meant I
spent
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 18:29 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote:
You can edit /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-fedora.conf to
disable it.
Is there a *proper* way to do that so that there aren't any
- Original Message -
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This was most likely caused by some issues with out proxy servers this
evening. We were adding 3 new proxy servers into the rotation and there
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote:
You can edit /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-fedora.conf to
disable it.
Is there a *proper* way to do that so that there aren't any conflicts with
future updates, e.g. commenting the lines out,
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 12:24 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:52 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This was most likely caused
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 11:21 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 04:15 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Lots of people have been seeing it, it may be related to some
issues
with
On 03/26/2015 12:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
You can edit /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-fedora.conf
to disable it.
It would probably be better (if NM respects it) to add a higher-
numbered file to override it; that way you aren't changing the
contents of a packaged file.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:40:29PM +, Richard Hughes wrote:
So, the overwhelming amount of help I received (one person) meant I
spent the whole of today fixing up 230 packages. Most of the packages
Looks like about 22 hours since you asked for help, so... I dunno, one
person seems pretty
Recall that the infrastructure team has been working on a new notifications
system[1] in an attempt to unify some of the notifications that get pushed out
by our infrastructure. As the new system improves (and as we get time to clean
house), we will be turning off the native notifications of
Recall that the infrastructure team has been working on a new notifications
system[1] in an attempt to unify some of the notifications that get pushed out
by our infrastructure. As the new system improves (and as we get time to clean
house), we will be turning off the native notifications of
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
As Adam implied, you can add your own, higher-numbered file with the
same options and NM will use those in preference to the Fedora-installed
one. See 'man NetworkManager.conf' for specifics.
Thanks, I found your blog post
As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 5
(TC5) is now available for testing.
Content information, including changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6132#comment:7 (and comment 8). Please
see the
following pages for download links and testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206169
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
wfp's perl-Regexp-Grammars-1.040-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=623743
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206169
Bill Pemberton wf...@worldbroken.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197915
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.49-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
Hi,
I'd appreciate a quick* review on owncloud-client, so we can push the new
version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202805
(*) It's an existing package that got renamed upstream, so it should fairly
easy to be reviewed.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202793
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201074
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Capture-Extended-0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203933
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200062
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200070
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200066
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199969
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Format-DateMa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204433
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204323
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Hi there,
I've been a bit perplexed by the Fedora updates recently (talking about
F-21 specifically). Many of them appear to be obsolete the moment they
hit stable, sometimes even testing.
Take the kernel, for instance. 3.19.2-201.fc21 replaced the previous
build in bodhi on the 24th. It is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201074
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Capture-Extended-0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199532
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DBI-1.630-3.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204321
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204431
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201574
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Moose-More-0.028-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201780
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Moose-More-0.028-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199969
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-Format-DateMa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202002
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Inline-0.80-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 09:06 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Hi there,
I've been a bit perplexed by the Fedora updates recently (talking
about
F-21 specifically). Many of them appear to be obsolete the moment
they
hit stable, sometimes even testing.
Take the kernel, for instance.
Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com writes:
If you wish to test something before it's fully pushed to testing, you
can download it directly from the buildsystem via the web interface,
koji command line or bodhi client command line.
I am fully aware of that. I'm making a different point entirely
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com writes:
If you wish to test something before it's fully pushed to testing, you
can download it directly from the buildsystem via the web interface,
koji command line or bodhi client
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky znmeb at znmeb.net writes:
As a bleeding-edge user I'd be in favor of this, although I thought
that was what 'updates-testing' was.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding how things work, but I think every package in
updates-testing is signed by a human, on an offline machine (i.e.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Hi there,
I've been a bit perplexed by the Fedora updates recently (talking about
F-21 specifically). Many of them appear to be obsolete the moment they
hit stable, sometimes even testing.
Take the kernel, for
On 03/23/2015 10:17 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi all,
Finally, the long wait is over and the 3.16.0 release is here! Or almost
over, first we have to get those pesky tarballs out upstream and builds
done downstream. :)
... and it's now in F22 updates-testing. Testing and karma appreciated:
1) Things take awhile most times as its using a queue system.2) Just
because it's available in testing or stable does not mean its ready as it
still takes time for the mirrors (where you are likely grabbing from unless
not using the meta link) to see and sync with them and the fact that these
Chris Murphy lists at colorremedies.com writes:
That might be normal in that it takes a while for mirrors to update,
although I'm not sure how long (it could be days).
Just to avoid confusion, I am not talking about mirrors. I am talking about
updates not appearing at all (i.e. here:
those ARE mirror list links the master mirror servers to be exact.
Corey W Sheldon
Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor
(p) 310.909.7672
G+: https://www.plus.google.com/+CoreySheldon
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=70127804
Github: https://www.github.com/linux-modder
Corey Sheldon sheldon.corey at gmail.com writes:
those ARE mirror list links the master mirror servers to be exact.
Really not a file distribution problem I'm trying to get at here. If you
check out these two URLs:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4457/kernel-3.19.2-201.fc21
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 23:15:16 + (UTC)
Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote:
Corey Sheldon sheldon.corey at gmail.com writes:
those ARE mirror list links the master mirror servers to be exact.
Really not a file distribution problem I'm trying to get at here. If
you check out these
On Mar 24, 2015 10:04 PM, harshad shirwadkar harshadshirwad...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello all,
I am a CS graduate student at Carnegie Mellon University, and past
contributor to the Fedora Project via Google Summer of Code 2011.
For my research, I would like to have btrfs with content based
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205913
--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
I'm not particularly interested in EPEL branches. Feel free to request and
maintain it yourself. When doing so, please, add perl-sig to InitialCC.
This package is very old and there
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205954
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
ppisar's perl-Proc-Guard-0.07-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=623667
--
You are receiving this mail
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-8.fc22.x86_64 requires libproj.so.0()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-8.fc22.i686 requires libproj.so.0
On armhfp:
perl-PDL-2.7.0-8.fc22.armv7hl requires libproj.so.0
Please resolve this as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205954
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-03-26)
==
Meeting started by hhorak1 at 13:00:40 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 04:15 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Lots of people have been seeing it, it may be related to some
issues
with the Fedora infrastructure this afternoon (the check works by
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
No, it still makes sense for wired networks. Have you ever used an
ethernet wall-jack at a hotel? It generally goes through a captive portal,
just like wireless.
Yes, I realized that later on and I discovered the
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Text-Hunspell.git/commit/?h=perl-Text-Hunspell-2.10-1.fc23id=582287329f8a2c9683cdce4c590d54aa6bc04951
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
Hi all,
I know that it is quite late in F22 schedule and freeze is coming, but
we decided to push recent upstream version into F22 before beta freeze
to keep up with upstream.
I spent some time with testing various use cases with our downstream
patches and I would like to point out that I did
From 582287329f8a2c9683cdce4c590d54aa6bc04951 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:24:32 +
Subject: Update to 2.10
- New upstream release 2.10
- Fix ExtUtils::PkgConfig usage in metadata and Makefile.PL
From 582287329f8a2c9683cdce4c590d54aa6bc04951 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:24:32 +
Subject: Update to 2.10
- New upstream release 2.10
- Fix ExtUtils::PkgConfig usage in metadata and Makefile.PL
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:52 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This was most likely caused by some issues with out proxy servers this
evening. We were adding 3 new proxy servers into
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This was most likely caused by some issues with out proxy servers this
evening. We were adding 3 new proxy servers into the rotation and there
were some config issues with some of them. ;(
This would have only affected some folks in
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Text-Hunspell.git/commit/?h=perl-Text-Hunspell-2.10-1.fc23id=582287329f8a2c9683cdce4c590d54aa6bc04951
--
You received this message due to your preference settings at
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:57:31PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
12. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185604 - systemd -
fedup upgrade fails within the initramfs-fedup env
Both the cause and the fix for this seem to be known at this point,
and we're waiting on the systemd
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This was most likely caused by some issues with out proxy servers this
evening. We were adding 3 new proxy servers into the rotation and there
were some config issues with some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206159
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
91 matches
Mail list logo
