On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> This means that for the vast majority of Python packages (those using PyPI
> to download sources) the Source0 link needs to be updated.
Has there been any discussion about having a provenpackager change all
the URLs in
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:03:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 May 2016, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> >It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between
>> >a program that's
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
447 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
209 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
75
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
717 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
566 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849
sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5
209
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
343 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
325 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
319
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336411
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305061
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305061
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
bugzilla-4.4.12-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336672
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
bugzilla-4.4.12-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336411
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-1.3.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336671
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
bugzilla-4.4.12-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336596
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-1.3.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336672
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|bugzilla-5.0.3-1.fc24
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336596
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-1.3.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336672
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|bugzilla-5.0.3-1.fc24
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336411
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336671
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
bugzilla-4.4.12-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336411
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Algorithm-CheckDigits-1.3.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336672
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
bugzilla-4.4.12-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Ter, 2016-05-24 at 09:15 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > Changing the subject title. Previous subject archive is here: https
> > ://goo.gl/erzW2s
>
>
>
> I don't know if you are aware but just in case , I think we
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:04 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
> Huh? The bug has multiple comments referring to dnf mark install to set a
> package to user installed (eg comment 4) and the actual bug text says to
> call dnf mark install ...
Yeah, it refers to it, but seems to
On Sex, 2016-05-27 at 08:53 +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
>
> copr-backend msuchy, frostyx, praiskup 13
> weeks ago
I think copr-backend will be fixed soon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337001
So, IMHO, shouldn't be removed.
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M.
On Sex, 2016-05-27 at 08:53 +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
> copr-backend msuchy, frostyx, praiskup 13
> weeks ago
I think copr-backend is be fixed soon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1337001
So, IMHO, shouldn't be removed
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Ter, 2016-05-24 at 09:15 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Changing the subject title. Previous subject archive is here: https
> ://goo.gl/erzW2s
I don't know if you are aware but just in case , I think we also got
another bug report with same problem :
On 28 May 2016 16:54, "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:20 PM, James Hogarth
wrote:
>>
>> I'm not entirely certain of the answer to that, though it should be
quick to test when I get to a machine later.
>>
>> But in terms of
On 28 May 2016 14:42, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:03:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 May 2016, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > >It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between
> > >a program that's zombie
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:20 PM, James Hogarth
wrote:
> I'm not entirely certain of the answer to that, though it should be quick
> to test when I get to a machine later.
>
> But in terms of efficiencies reinstall does a full reinstall of the
> package, including
On May 28, 2016 6:42 AM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
wrote:
> Once you have at least one process staying around, the login session
> remains in "closing" state. As long as the session stays around, the
> user's user@.service stays around, and this means many more processes
>
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 34/67 (x86_64), 8/16 (i386)
ID: 19289 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL:
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 9/73 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386)
ID: 19375 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/19375
ID: 19377 Test: x86_64
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:03:23PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2016, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> >It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between
> >a program that's zombie or unresponsive but isn't doing anything or is
> >unresponsive but is doing something; and
OLD: Fedora-24-20160527.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160528.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:18
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 53
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 21.19 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 24 Branched 20160528.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:40:15PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2016, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:05:04AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>It's easy to know when this is the case, as the 'compose report' mails
> >>are sent to this very
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 06:20:44PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:51:23AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >> This breaks the storage of ssh-agent credentials for te
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160527.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160528.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:15
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 44
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.72 KiB
Size of dropped packages
perl-Task-Moose has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Task-Moose-0.03-11.fc24.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Task-Moose-0.03-11.fc24.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Scope-Upper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Scope-Upper-0.28-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Scope-Upper-0.28-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Scope-Upper-0.28-2.fc24.i686 requires
rt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RT-Test-4.4.0-1.fc25.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-RT-Test-4.4.0-1.fc25.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On armhfp:
perl-RT-Test-4.4.0-1.fc25.noarch requires
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
perl-TryCatch has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-TryCatch-1.003002-9.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-TryCatch-1.003002-9.fc24.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-TryCatch-1.003002-9.fc24.i686 requires
perl-Algorithm-Permute has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
342 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
324 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
318
Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:09:33AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said:
Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has
Martin Kolman wrote:
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 18:15 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Dominique Martinet wrote:
Just noticed this change on rawhide...
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L29
* systemd-logind will now by default terminate user processes
On 27 May 2016 19:25, "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:15 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
>>
>> On the bug you said a dnf reinstall ... that's not the best thing to
do... you need to dnf mark installed as per the earlier comments on the bug
48 matches
Mail list logo