https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537829
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.17-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-658002dca0
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536730
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.17-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-658002dca0
--
You are receiving
Dne 20.1.2018 v 12:27 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> Why I'm writing this? I want to hear from you if you think it would be good to
> prohibit (or advise, or whatever mechanism would work) usage if conditionals
> in
> (at least) master branch to allow us to develop features faster. Thoughts?
>
= Proposed Self Contained Change: GifLib5 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GifLib5
Change owner(s):
* Sandro Mani
Update the giflib package to the latest giflib-5.x version (currently 5.1.4).
== Detailed Description ==
Update the giflib package to the latest giflib-5.x version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537829
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.17-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-82beb331e5
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536730
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.17-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-82beb331e5
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537829
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536768
Bug 1536768 depends on bug 1537071, which changed state.
Bug 1537071 Summary: Review Request: perl-curry - Create automatic curried
method call closures for any class or object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537071
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Rawhide 20180123.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 01/22/2018 11:58 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
I'd like to notify you that today I've finished my works on date
formatting in glibc, that means upstream. These changes are already
arriving to Fedora Rawhide (they should be there tomorrow) and will
be part of Fedora 28. They will be included in
On 01/23/2018 05:44 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 08:00 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/22/2018 10:15 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 19:19 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Redeclarations in system headers are expected. Do you compile with
-Wsystem-headers? Or
On 01/24/2018 12:10 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I've proposed a change to update to giflib-5.x for F28+ [1] (which is an
incompatible update from the current giflib-4.x). I did some initial
testing in this COPR repo [1], and have hit a problem with
java-1.8.0-openjdk, which has a BR on itself
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Wednesday at 2018-01-24 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Wednesday =
2018-01-24 10:00
PST US/Pacific
2018-01-24
at times it can be fast but for me i find it slow
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Christian Glombek
wrote:
> Hello World!
>
Hi Chris!
> My name is Christian Glombek (or simply Chris :) and I'd like to join the
> Fedora Packagers Group. I'm currently a student of Electrical Engineering
> and Business Management at
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> Due to that last line, issued su and password and ran it again:
> # lshw
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> #
>
Due to the fact that you're having segfaults in command-line programs as
well, I'm tempted to say
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537838
Bug ID: 1537838
Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.005 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sereal-Decoder
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537839
Bug ID: 1537839
Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.005 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sereal-Encoder
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537837
Bug ID: 1537837
Summary: perl-Sereal-4.005 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sereal
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537834
Bug ID: 1537834
Summary: perl-MCE-1.834 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MCE
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537829
Bug ID: 1537829
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 12:35 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 01/23/2018 12:22 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
> > I thought there was a tool to list installed boards, but can't
> > find it. Any thoughts there, other than opening up the system and
> > getting the label information?
>
> lshw and/or
Re-sending my contact request with Josef added to Cc: because looks
like zodbot IRC bot on #fedora-admin lies :P
kloczek .whoowns net-snmp
zodbot kloczek: jsafrane
kloczek .fas jsafrane
zodbot kloczek: jsafrane 'Jan Šafránek'
On https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/net-snmp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536767
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.46-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536701
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536773
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20180120-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536730
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.16-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531386
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.40-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535729
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535738
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 21:25 +, Philip Kovacs wrote:
>> Can someone please elaborate on how I can control the abi tests
>> directly?Where exactly can I access these and refine them on a per-
>> package basis?
>That text isn't talking about "fixing the tests", but about fixing the
>*bugs*. It
Hi
I've proposed a change to update to giflib-5.x for F28+ [1] (which is an
incompatible update from the current giflib-4.x). I did some initial
testing in this COPR repo [1], and have hit a problem with
java-1.8.0-openjdk, which has a BR on itself (java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel),
resulting in it
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:42:29 -
"Greg Evenden" wrote:
> i'd Add it but IMO COPR is to Damm slow
I didn't notice any special slowness. Maybe I was just lucky.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536773
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536730
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536767
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
i'd Add it but IMO COPR is to Damm slow
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
> From: "Christian Glombek"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 4:39:55 PM
> Subject: Self-Introduction Christian Glombek (lorbus) / NEEDSPONSOR /
> NEEDREVIEWs / Let's Meet @ DevConf or FOSDEM!
> Hello
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:06:59 +0100
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 09:42:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:28:14AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > > Good Morning Fedorans!
> > >
> > > On Thursday, a new
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
924 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
814 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
786
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1051 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
814 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
396
Hi,
With valgrind-3.13.0-15.fc28 the valgrind-devel package only contains
the development headers needed for building valgrind aware applications.
So it only contains the stand alone headers valgrind.h, callgrind.h,
drd.h, helgrind.h and memcheck.h that have the client request macros
that give
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 18:12 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The problem for the OCaml packages is missing tests or tests that
> haven't been run:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-932548462e
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ecd3541af9
>
> BTW these
Hi,
I'm following
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
I'm asking for any reaction on:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529716
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/net-snmp/pull-request/2
List of proposed changes is quite long.
* Thu Dec 28
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 21:25 +, Philip Kovacs wrote:
> Can someone please elaborate on how I can control the abi tests
> directly?Where exactly can I access these and refine them on a per-
> package basis?
> How to fix the tests?
That text isn't talking about "fixing the tests", but about
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 14:16 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:25:56PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to stable:
> > > 0. dist.depcheck - to make sure the update's dependencies are available.
> > > 1.
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:17:29 +0100
Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> If you're interested, I provide a weekly release of Firefox Nightly
> on COPR (with the latest NSPR and NSS), compiled from source and with
> the Fedora patches:
>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 09:01:56PM -, François Cami wrote:
> Okay, so I'm officially confused.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master
> says:
> "For updates to rawhide packages, Maintainers SHOULD:
> (...)
> A week in advance, notify maintainers who
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534083
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529804
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mock-Sub-1.09-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533867
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mail-Box-3.004-1.fc27, perl-Mail-Message-3.005-1.fc27 has been pushed to
the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531885
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532230
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533513
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Mail-Box-3.004-1.fc27, perl-Mail-Message-3.005-1.fc27 has been pushed to
the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 20:16, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:25:56PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to stable:
> > > 0. dist.depcheck - to make sure the update's dependencies are available.
> > > 1.
Can someone please elaborate on how I can control the abi tests directly?Where
exactly can I access these and refine them on a per-package basis?
How to fix the tests?
The tests are all in your hand, you can fix the dist.depcheck and dist.abicheck
by adjusting the update or the build and you
On mardi 23 janvier 2018 21:30:07 CET stan wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:02:47 +0100
> Kai Engert wrote:
>
>
> > The change
> > of default has been applied to the NSS library in Fedora 28
> > (currently Rawhide).
>
>
> I compile nightly (future 59) from a local hg repository.
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 16:39, Christian Glombek wrote:
> Hello World!
Hello, Chris! Welcome to Fedora!
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop
On 23 Jan 2018 15:39, "Jonathan Wakely" wrote:
As happens for most releases, I'm updating Boost in rawhide and
rebuilding the affected packages in a side tag (f28-boost).
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F28Boost166
If you maintain a package that depends on
> announcement should be made here too
Okay, so I'm officially confused.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master says:
"For updates to rawhide packages, Maintainers SHOULD:
(...)
A week in advance, notify maintainers who depend on their package to rebuild
when
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:42:57AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > We could either look at modifying the ExternalRedirecct
> > extension to be something like DocsRedirect and hard-code the
Annnd https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6650
--
Matthew Miller
> "nm" == nicolas mailhot writes:
nm> I don't know about EPEL6, but we use it as-is in EL7 and it works
nm> just as well (except maybe for the %autosetup bits but IIRC that's
nm> autosetup which is broken in EL7).
I had ported autosetup to EPEL6 and then at the
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:03:26PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> In the end there was basically no good argument for _not_ doing it but
> every time I touch something like this someone crawls out of the
> woodwork to flame me. So I end up hesitating instead of doing anything
> and then I
On 01/18/2018 10:13 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But whom does this help? There are still updates going out daily, the
> repodata download cost is still there, the notifications too if you aren't
> doing client-side batching (and if you are, you don't need server-side
> batching to begin with).
On 01/23/2018 12:22 PM, Howard Howell wrote:
I thought there was a tool to list installed boards, but can't
find it. Any thoughts there, other than opening up the system and
getting the label information?
lshw and/or lshw-gui
___
devel
On 01/23/2018 01:19 PM, Ralph Bean wrote:
> Hopefully the Bodhi maintainers can have a look; Bodhi may be caching
> the decision here. IIRC, there's a cronjob to synchronize on the
> Bodhi side.
Correct - currently Bodhi polls Greenwave every 6 hours, so it could
take a bit for it to notice the
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:02:47 +0100
Kai Engert wrote:
> The change
> of default has been applied to the NSS library in Fedora 28
> (currently Rawhide).
I compile nightly (future 59) from a local hg repository. After I
install it, when I try to start it, it tells me XPCOM not
- Mail original -
De: "Jason L Tibbitts III"
> "nm" == nicolas mailhot writes:
>nm> And the forge macros are now available since
>nm> redhat-rpm-config-73-1.fc28 (I had missed the push due to upstream
>nm> renaming the file). Heartfelt thanks to Jason
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 14:03 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
>
> SB> Can't we fix things on EPEL, to speed up Fedora devel ?
>
> We can try. See the macro work I've done (though the real work there
> was against EPEL5, which is
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 19:53 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 22/01/18 15:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I have a dual monitor setup with both monitors rotated, using an
> > NVIDIA
> > adapter (9600 GT). Works fine, uses Wayland. Again, you need to be
> > *very specific* about graphics issues. They
> "SR" == Samuel Rakitničan writes:
SR> I think conditionals should be documented with more examples as well
SR> [1], in order to minimize such bugs.
Specific examples of what you'd like to see are certainly welcome. Feel
free to file tickets at
> "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
SB> Can't we fix things on EPEL, to speed up Fedora devel ?
We can try. See the macro work I've done (though the real work there
was against EPEL5, which is fortunately forgotten now).
SB> another story that is bugging me is python2
There will be no EPEL meeting tomorrow. Steering committee members who
are at DevConf in BRNO will be meeting at some point.
On 23 January 2018 at 13:00, wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-01-24 from
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:25:56PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to stable:
> > 0. dist.depcheck - to make sure the update's dependencies are available.
> > 1. dist.abicheck - to make sure the update's ABI remains stable in a
> >
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> What needs to be done for this ? I see my package "libvirt" present
> in its UI
>
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/libvirt
>
> but it says
>
> "Package is currently ineligible for scheduling due to following reasons:
From 73c40e29eb31d195edb379c8563d39f00c3f2cbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Jan 23 2018 18:49:42 +
Subject: Update to 1.835
- New upstream release 1.835
- Added max_workers method to MCE::Hobo
- Improved Queue await and dequeue performance on the
- Mail original -
De: "Mátyás Selmeci"
Hi,
> This looks pretty cool!
Thanks for the feedback!
> One thing I notice in the limitations section of
> your draft is a lot of "we can't do XXX due to lack of release
> discipline..."
> Do you have any recommendations for Go programmers
On 23 January 2018 at 17:04, wrote:
[..]
>> Strange only is that looks like this bug already is known more than year!
>
>
> Looks like two years... I followed the chain of links in the Red Hat bugs,
> which claim this is already reported as
>
François Cami wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tinyxml2/c/3600750a8f1b0eaa6cab346496fd75a07
>> ea749cb
>
> This was announced to all
On 23 January 2018 at 19:22, Ralph Bean wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:35:45PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote:
> > I get this error after clicking the authorization link:
> >
> > [16450:16491:0123/182437.407698:ERROR:browser_gpu_
> channel_host_factory.cc(120)]
> > Failed
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thursday, a new version of Bodhi was deployed that enabled Bodhi to
> gate updates based on test results. You may notice a "Test Gating
> Status" message in the right have side of the page.
...
> There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:35:45PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote:
> I get this error after clicking the authorization link:
>
> [16450:16491:0123/182437.407698:ERROR:browser_gpu_channel_host_factory.cc(120)]
> Failed to launch GPU process.
> Created new window in existing browser session.
>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:37:56PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote:
> On 23 January 2018 at 18:20, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> I've removed the abicheck requirement from the greenwave policies for
> > now until we know more:
> >
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:13:02AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> >
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 08:42 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > Where are the instructions? Why is informing packagers, the group
> > most affected by this change, an afterthought? We should have been
> > told about all of this, in
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:56:47PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/01/18 15:38 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > We could deactivate -z defs for F28 and reactivate it after the branch
> > for F29, giving packagers more time to fix issues.
>
> I think that might be a good idea (given how late
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-01-24 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks
and problems needed to keep EPEL
On 23/01/18 15:38 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
We could deactivate -z defs for F28 and reactivate it after the branch
for F29, giving packagers more time to fix issues.
I think that might be a good idea (given how late in the F28 process
we are) but for many packages it will just mean we have
On 01/23/2018 01:28 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to stable:
>
> 0. dist.depcheck - to make sure the update's dependencies are available.
> 1. dist.abicheck - to make sure the update's ABI remains stable in a
>given Fedora
On 23 January 2018 at 18:20, Ralph Bean wrote:
I've removed the abicheck requirement from the greenwave policies for
> now until we know more:
> https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/commit/?id=
> 465f155d140a9fbe34f0f51dbfc2137b2900a6f8
>
Do we have to do
I get this error after clicking the authorization link:
[16450:16491:0123/182437.407698:ERROR:browser_gpu_channel_host_factory.cc(120)]
Failed to launch GPU process.
Created new window in existing browser session.
127.0.0.1 - - [23/Jan/2018 18:24:37] "GET
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:21:02PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this.
> >
> > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install
> >
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:57:34PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > Here's something I didn't expect from the new ABI gate. Which, before
> > I go further, I think will be a great idea nearly all of the time. I
> > think avoiding
- Mail original -
De: "nicolas mailhot"
> Now that the non-Go part in redhat-rpm-macros is merged in devel I'll try to
> do a clean PR on go-srpm-macros.
> Then once Jan or Jakub accepts it it will be possible to play with the
> automation in devel and I'll be able to share my specs
- Mail original -
De: "Neal Gompa"
> For snipping, use "[...]" notation to indicate skipped stuff. It's
> hard to tell otherwise.
Ok, that was easy to fix :)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
Strange only is that looks like this bug already is known more than
year!
Looks like two years... I followed the chain of links in the Red Hat
bugs, which claim this is already reported as
I wish this message wasn't crossposted everywhere, but I don't want to
lose any discussion by trimming the CC list. Sorry if replies generate
bounces for some.
> "nm" == nicolas mailhot writes:
nm> And the forge macros are now available since
nm>
On 23 January 2018 at 16:24, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 23 January 2018 at 15:59, wrote:
> [..]
>> That said... has the patch been proposed for inclusion upstream? It looks
>> like Nick Wellnhofer is taking care of libxml2 upstream these days, so
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo