[Bug 1537217] perl-gettext: Obsoletes work by package name, not by provides

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537217 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1550748] perl-Date-Manip-6.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550748 Jan Pazdziora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Kernel marking files in /boot as %ghost

Dear list, I've stumbled upon a serious issue that has not been discussed before. Somewhere around May 2015 kernel files was moved to /usr/lib/modules/, which are then copied to /boot in post scriptlets [1]. The issue is that such files are marked with %ghost because they don't exist

Need assistance to build openvdb for both Blender and LuxRender

Hello team, openvdb currently failed for some odd reasons (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25408808) on both Rawhide and F28 in order to rebuild for boost 1.66. Looking for tail result from build.log, it seems the mockbuild hit a bug:

Re: Add ability to check ABI compliance from fedpkg?

On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 12:55 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > I don't have to do it for many of my packages, but I do regularly > check ABI compliance before performing an update so I know if I need > to rebuild dependencies or not. > Currently my workflow is something like: > $ cd abicompare/$ mkdir

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On 02/28/2018 05:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 12:14 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: Once again,

Fedora 28-20180301.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 17/127 (x86_64), 7/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 196470 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/196470 ID: 196483 Test: x86_64

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Something needs to be done to make the compose process more robust, e.g.: >> * running createrepo on a stable release, so that we do not have to be >> able >> to init a chroot of the target system to compose a repository. A broken >> dependency, even in systemd or rpm,

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:29:45 - "Farhad Mohammadi Majd" wrote: > Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories > metadata is maximum 10MB, while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" > for first time after installing Fedora 27 >

Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > I ran some check on latest compose and found that quite a few packages > in repo can't be installed due to being obsoleted. What do we do about > those packages? Should I submit

[Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Branched 20180301.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 28 Branched 20180301.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

[Bug 1550755] New: perl-Mozilla-CA-20180117 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550755 Bug ID: 1550755 Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20180117 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mozilla-CA Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1550752] New: perl-Locale-Codes-3.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550752 Bug ID: 1550752 Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.56 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Locale-Codes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1550748] New: perl-Date-Manip-6.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550748 Bug ID: 1550748 Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.70 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Date-Manip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:19:48 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Note that there was a completed compose for March 1st, so you don't need this today. I'm not sure what happened, but it looks like the compose only got copied over to the secondary architecure. So i386 has

[Bug 1550305] perl-Net-FTPSSL-0.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550305 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1550518] perl-CGI-Application-4.60 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550518 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1550533] perl-Mojolicious-7.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550533 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

On 03/01/2018 11:01 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > I know Pierre-Yves warned us about the bug that the tests will be > reported as a failure if the tests are still being run, but there was > absolutely no indication that there were more tests that were still > being run. So this could

Re: [RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)

On 03/01/2018 08:46 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I ran some check on latest compose and found that quite a few packages > in repo can't be installed due to being obsoleted. What do we do about > those packages? Should I submit bugs for each of them? I would say so yes. Then after some time just

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide=$basearch > > #baseurl=http://bruno.wolff.to/fedora/development/rawhide/$basearch/os/ > #baseurl=file:///home/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/$basearch/os/ > baseurl=https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawh

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

On 02/28/2018 06:19 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Fabio Valentini wrote: >> AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a >> compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so >> breakage is sometimes allowed to sit unnoticed (and grow increasingly >>

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1088 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 851 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 433

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 961 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 851 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 822

Re: Call for users of darkserver

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:04:11PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:02:25 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > So what do you advice as course of action here, should we fix darkserver or > > move > > its functionality to ABRT? > > "move its functionality to ABRT" > > > >

Re: can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28

Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > It probably comes from your patch FreeSOLID-2.1.1-pkgconfig.patch: I recommend dropping that patch entirely. IMHO, we should not add pkg-config files downstream for upstream libraries not using pkg-config. But of course that may break other packages expecting the

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

Dusty Mabe wrote: > FYI: atomic ostree composes are not release blocking so that is not why a > compose will fail. In the past we had composes failing due to something Atomic failing to compose, I guess that changed since. Kevin Kofler ___

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

On 02/25/2018 08:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:12:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:50:38PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote: Hi! During the last days there

Re: can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28

On jeudi 1 mars 2018 16:37:17 CET Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > > can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28 > > [root@f28 tmp]# dnf install FreeSOLID-devel > Last metadata expiration check: 1:45:49 ago on Thu Mar 1 14:49:33 2018. > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

On 03/01/2018 04:00 PM, Petr Šplíchal wrote: To sum up what I've heard so far from the developer side: * I would like to enable tests for my component (yes, I want) * I will take care of them (really, I see the benefit in CI) * I want to easily collaborate on tests with qe (direct commits) * I

Re: can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28

Martin Gansser wrote: > can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28 > > [root@f28 tmp]# dnf install FreeSOLID-devel > Last metadata expiration check: 1:45:49 ago on Thu Mar 1 14:49:33 2018. > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides pkgconfig(qhull) needed by >

Re: qarte - compilation fails

Try this: BuildRequires: python3-devel # bytecompile with Python 3 %global __python %{__python3} in your specfile to force it to bytecompile your Python code with Python 3. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

On 03/01/2018 11:52 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Speaking of that, it seems that the Rawhide compose failed yesterday due >> to some KDE/QT soname bump: > [actually a typo in a Requires, as was already pointed out] >> >>

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

Vít Ondruch wrote: > Speaking of that, it seems that the Rawhide compose failed yesterday due > to some KDE/QT soname bump: [actually a typo in a Requires, as was already pointed out] > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/logs/global/pungi.global.log >

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

Simo Sorce wrote: > It could be accomplished by changing our tooling[*] to use overlay > filesystems to figure out exactly what a make install did and pick only > those files. Why is the overlay filesystem needed? We already install to a DESTDIR. The whole contents of the DESTDIR should be

[RFC] Packages which are not installable (obsoleted by other pacakges)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I ran some check on latest compose and found that quite a few packages in repo can't be installed due to being obsoleted. What do we do about those packages? Should I submit bugs for each of them? can't install

Re: qarte - compilation fails

"Martin Gansser" wrote: > when compiling qarte-4.4.0 with this spec file > https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/test/qarte.spec > '[' noarch = noarch ']' > + case "${QA_CHECK_RPATHS:-}" in > + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot > + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress > +

[Bug 1547288] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: qarte - compilation fails

- Original Message - > From: "Martin Gansser" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 11:35:25 AM > Subject: qarte - compilation fails > > Hi, > > when compiling qarte-4.4.0 with this spec file >

Re: Proposal: new really minimal 'System' group (Core reduced more)

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:57 AM, David Demelier wrote: > Hello all, > > I was searching a very possible minimal dnf group for chroot builds. It > looks like the 'Core' group already minimal contains lots of packages > that may be unneeded in containers/chroot scenarios. For

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:49 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: It does not appear to be blocked currently. There is a bug. Yesterday it was red and said tests failed; the result changed itself. I see there are many more test results now than there were yesterday. It

Proposal: new really minimal 'System' group (Core reduced more)

Hello all, I was searching a very possible minimal dnf group for chroot builds. It looks like the 'Core' group already minimal contains lots of packages that may be unneeded in containers/chroot scenarios. For example: - sssd, - cronie, - selinux packages, - NetworkManager, - firewalld

[Bug 1547288] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547288 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.48-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1546073] Upgrade perl-Text-Template to 1.50

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546073 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28

Hi, can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28 [root@f28 tmp]# dnf install FreeSOLID-devel Last metadata expiration check: 1:45:49 ago on Thu Mar 1 14:49:33 2018. Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides pkgconfig(qhull) needed by FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.i686 - nothing

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide=$basearch #baseurl=http://bruno.wolff.to/fedora/development/rawhide/$basearch/os/ #baseurl=file:///home/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/$basearch/os/ baseurl=https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180301.n.0/c

[Bug 1546069] Upgrade perl-Proc-ProcessTable to 0.55

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546069 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Re: rawhide: Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:33:25AM +, Paul Howarth wrote: > That'll be because Server-Starter's Build.PL has > > "c_source => [qw()]," > > And that's generated by Minilla, so all non-XS Minilla-based dists are > likely to be affected. > Indeed. I reported a bug against Minilla

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

>> To sum up what I've heard so far from the developer side: >> >> * I would like to enable tests for my component (yes, I want) >> * I will take care of them (really, I see the benefit in CI) >> * I want to easily collaborate on tests with qe (direct commits) >> * I don't want to give qe commit

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 06:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:29:38PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > I used to agree with this, but I've come around to thinking that spec > > > files should be smaller, less complicated, and more automatable. I > > > think we'd be better

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

Dne 1.3.2018 v 14:47 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): > Vít Ondruch wrote on 03/01/2018 06:44 PM: >> >> >> Dne 1.3.2018 v 03:19 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): >>> Fabio Valentini wrote: AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a compose, and during the past weeks,

Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories metadata is maximum 10MB, while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" for first time after installing Fedora 27 (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-27-1.6) and it took 20+58MB for two official repositories! It is really too high,

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote: > > > > My worries are basically that this mechanism is hiding the > > > > tests from the package maintainers. It splits the concerns > > > > between people maintaining the artifacts and people > > > > maintaining the tests, which is

Fedora Rawhide-20180301.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 29/129 (x86_64), 8/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 196035 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/196035 ID: 196038 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL:

Re: rawhide: Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm

On 03/01/2018 11:33 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:17:18 +0100 Petr Pisar wrote: On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:38:08AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Hi, perl-Plack fails to build in rawhide with this error[1] Sorry, of course this was perl-Server-Starter, not

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

Vít Ondruch wrote on 03/01/2018 06:44 PM: Dne 1.3.2018 v 03:19 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): Fabio Valentini wrote: AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so breakage is sometimes allowed to sit

Re: New "tests" namespace to share test code

> > > My worries are basically that this mechanism is hiding the > > > tests from the package maintainers. It splits the concerns > > > between people maintaining the artifacts and people > > > maintaining the tests, which is exactly what the original > > > plan to bring CI was *not* about. > > >

[Bug 1546068] Upgrade perl-Net-OpenSSH to 0.77

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546068 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1550538] perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550538 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1550538] New: perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550538 Bug ID: 1550538 Summary: perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN-0.12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-String-ToIdentifier-EN Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1548609] perl-Mojolicious-7.69 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548609 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1550533] New: perl-Mojolicious-7.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550533 Bug ID: 1550533 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-7.70 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1347302] Please build perl-Crypt-SMIME for EPEL 7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347302 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(steve.traylen@cer |

[Bug 1331520] Please update perl-Crypt-SMIME to at least 0.15 in EPEL 6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331520 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(steve.traylen@cer |

[Bug 1550531] New: perl-DBD-ODBC-1.57 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550531 Bug ID: 1550531 Summary: perl-DBD-ODBC-1.57 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBD-ODBC Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a

glibc-2.27.9000-7.fc29 will hopefully fix this. It will take some time to build, so if anyone wants to untag -6 in the meantime, please do so. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1550526] New: Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 10.80

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550526 Bug ID: 1550526 Summary: Upgrade perl-Image-ExifTool to 10.80 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Image-ExifTool Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com Reporter:

Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a

On 03/01/2018 12:29 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: Hi, Just got a koschei report about perl-perl5i failing to build: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/perl-perl5i?collection=f29 It seems the linker can't find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a: + perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor

[Bug 1550520] New: Upgrade perl-Crypt-SMIME to 0.25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550520 Bug ID: 1550520 Summary: Upgrade perl-Crypt-SMIME to 0.25 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Crypt-SMIME Assignee: steve.tray...@cern.ch Reporter:

[Bug 1550518] New: perl-CGI-Application-4.60 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550518 Bug ID: 1550518 Summary: perl-CGI-Application-4.60 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CGI-Application Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

/usr/bin/ld: cannot find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a

Hi, Just got a koschei report about perl-perl5i failing to build: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/perl-perl5i?collection=f29 It seems the linker can't find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a: + perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor '--optimize=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall

Re: News in net-snmp package

On 27 February 2018 at 18:04, Adam Williamson wrote: [..] > Do you just mean the python2-net-snmp package will go away and anything > using it has to migrate to python3-net-snmp? If so, have you actually > looked at the things that use it and considered how difficult

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:29:38PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > I used to agree with this, but I've come around to thinking that spec > > files should be smaller, less complicated, and more automatable. I > > think we'd be better having a post-build test warning that this package > > has files

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:38:36PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > The further down the workflow a problem is detected the more time expensive > / disruptive it is to fix it. So while having post-build tests to validate > lots of things is great (and I wish we had more of it in Fedora), I see

Re: Exclude paths for elfdeps dependency generator

On 02/20/2018 05:33 PM, Till Hofmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question regarding the the RPM dependency generator scripts. > I'm working on packaging the ROS stack [1,2] and I'm currently dealing > with the dependency generation. My goal is to wrap all Provides and > Requires for sonames

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

fixed in sox, passwd, and usermode ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

qarte - compilation fails

Hi, when compiling qarte-4.4.0 with this spec file https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/test/qarte.spec '[' noarch = noarch ']' + case "${QA_CHECK_RPATHS:-}" in + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip +

Re: rawhide: Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm

On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 11:17:18 +0100 Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:38:08AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Hi, > > > > perl-Plack fails to build in rawhide with > > this error[1] > > > > ... > > + /usr/bin/perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor > > Can't locate

Re: rawhide: Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm

On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:38:08AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > perl-Plack fails to build in rawhide with > this error[1] > > ... > + /usr/bin/perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor > Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm in @INC (you may need to install the > ExtUtils::CBuilder module) (@INC

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

Dne 1.3.2018 v 03:19 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > Fabio Valentini wrote: >> AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a >> compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so >> breakage is sometimes allowed to sit unnoticed (and grow increasingly >>

Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

Dne 28.2.2018 v 18:56 Bruno Wolff III napsal(a): > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:35:11 +0100, >  Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at >> >>

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 21:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : > On 28 February 2018 at 10:03, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : > > > > > > On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > > > These are all _very_ edge use-cases. > > > >

rawhide: Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm

Hi, perl-Plack fails to build in rawhide with this error[1] ... + /usr/bin/perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor Can't locate ExtUtils/CBuilder.pm in @INC (you may need to install the ExtUtils::CBuilder module) (@INC contains: /builddir/build/BUILD/Server-Starter-0.34/_build/lib

[Bug 1550049] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550049 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed