Re: Fw: fedmsg notification

Hi Pierre, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:28:02PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: >> On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 13:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> [...] >>> Finally the reason this has not been correctly announced is that we are >>> still >>>

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-04-12 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-04-12 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-04-12 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific 2018-04-12

Help with strict-aliasing warning

I'm getting: /builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp: In function 'void lib::linkimage(EnvT*)': /builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp:159:36: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] (BaseGDL* &)

[Bug 1401482] biber-2.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482 --- Comment #21 from Colin Macdonald --- Thanks! I found a way to test on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers Unfortunately, build-in tests are disabled :( I have pushed to rawhide,

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL 7.5 fallout

On 04/11/2018 03:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > These were koschei builds of my epel7 packages. Seems to have cleared up now > though so perhaps just an import issue. > > On 04/10/2018 08:18 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Do you have any information that htis is EPEL packages or just EL7.5

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1fbdf7f103 chromium-65.0.3325.181-1.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2074629ed3 drupal7-7.58-1.el7 12

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-e4e96fbf3f drupal7-7.58-1.el6 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b5d9f8f571 wordpress-4.9.5-1.el6 7

[Bug 1401482] biber-2.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482 --- Comment #20 from Miro Hrončok --- Perl version problems on f28. Nevertheless: nothing provides texlive-biblatex >= 7:2017 needed by biber-2.7-1.fc28.noarch My texlive-biblatex is 7:svn42680-1.fc28 -- You are

[Bug 1401482] biber-2.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482 --- Comment #19 from Colin Macdonald --- Test on F28 would be fine? You can get the rpm file from the link I pasted above -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1551668] perl-Verilog-Perl-3.448-1.fc29 FTBFS: t/ 35_sigparser.t crashes

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551668 Filipe Rosset changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1560182] Concurrent Gtk2::Unique execution causes shutter to crash

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-23.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1560182] Concurrent Gtk2::Unique execution causes shutter to crash

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-22.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1401482] biber-2.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482 --- Comment #18 from Miro Hrončok --- Me neither. Building in https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/texlive/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL 7.5 fallout

These were koschei builds of my epel7 packages. Seems to have cleared up now though so perhaps just an import issue. On 04/10/2018 08:18 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Do you have any information that htis is EPEL packages or just EL7.5 items? > > On 10 April 2018 at 09:57, Orion Poplawski

Re: libqalculate soname change

Since 2.4.0 is out, soname change will be to libqalculate.so.16. I will submit pull requests for the affected packages. I might miss F28. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 11 April 2018 at 10:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy >> wrote: >> >>> I'm not in Ansible engineering or product

[Bug 1560182] Concurrent Gtk2::Unique execution causes shutter to crash

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1401482] biber-2.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482 --- Comment #17 from Colin Macdonald --- Here's a bump with tests disabled. Can you test if its functional? I don't have a rawhide system https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26313474 -- You are receiving

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On 11 April 2018 at 20:32, Dylan Silva wrote: > I am very afraid I am jumping into a lion's den here... However, I am going > to try to alleviate some concerns. > > Our move from EPEL to Extras was actually to solve for the needs of RHEL and > the RHEL System Roles. We

Re: New gdl segfaults with gcc 8 in antlr

On 03/28/2018 12:56 PM, John Reiser wrote: >> I've just discovered that gdl appears to be segfaulting a lot now deep in >> the antlr c++ generated parser code with the switch to gcc 8. > > A bugzilla report would be nice.  Run under gdb, report register contents > and the instruction stream

Fedora 28-20180411.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 220589 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/220589 ID: 220592 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL:

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180411.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Python 2 will be replaced with Python 3 in the next RHEL major release

> "RG" == Raphael Groner writes: RG> what to do with packages that can not be ported to python3? Can anything really not be ported to python3? I suppose if there was something which messed with the internals of the python interpreter in some way then that would

Re: Python 2 will be replaced with Python 3 in the next RHEL major release

Miro Hrončok wrote: > This is important for those who like to maintain a single spec for > everything. Previously, there have been messages on the devel list that > encouraged people to change the python3 conditional from "if fedora" to > "if fedora or rhel > 7" [5]. Please make a note that it

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

I am very afraid I am jumping into a lion's den here... However, I am going to try to alleviate some concerns. Our move from EPEL to Extras was actually to solve for the needs of RHEL and the RHEL System Roles. We needed to be in a channel that customers could consume from that wasn't EPEL.

Re: Python 2 will be replaced with Python 3 in the next RHEL major release

Hi Miro, what to do with packages that can not be ported to python3? For instance ecryptfs-utils … an orphan process will also orphan some dependencies like ecryptfs-simple etc. And therefore sirikali is going to loose some of its features that are available by help from ecryptfs tools. RFE

[Bug 1563022] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563022 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.52-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180411.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180410.n.1 NEW: Fedora-28-20180411.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 93 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 11.45 MiB Size of dropped packages:9.25 MiB Size

Package Joplin - FLOSS todo/notes app with NextCloud integration

Hi, I saw Joplin[1], which recently got NextCloud integration[2], is not packaged in Fedora. Maybe one could do so? Best regards, rugk [1] https://joplin.cozic.net/ [2] https://nextcloud.com/blog/mobile-note-taking-with-your-private-cloud-announcing-joplinnextcloud-integration/

[Bug 1563022] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563022 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.52-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On 11 April 2018 at 10:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy > wrote: > >> I'm not in Ansible engineering or product management so take this with a >> grain of salt. My understanding is that cadence of Ansible

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On 11 April 2018 at 10:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy > wrote: > >> I'm not in Ansible engineering or product management so take this with a >> grain of salt. My understanding is that cadence of Ansible

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On 11 April 2018 at 15:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy > wrote: > >> I'm not in Ansible engineering or product management so take this with a >> grain of salt. My understanding is that cadence of Ansible

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > I'm not in Ansible engineering or product management so take this with a > grain of salt. My understanding is that cadence of Ansible releases and > its aggressiveness in API changes makes it a bit less suitable to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On 11 April 2018 at 14:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 04/11/2018 04:52 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> >> Especially if EPEL7 now has a clash with an optional repo that is available >> to all subscribers... >> >> There are priority or exclude filters people will need to add to their

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On 04/11/2018 04:52 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > Especially if EPEL7 now has a clash with an optional repo that is available > to all subscribers... > > There are priority or exclude filters people will need to add to their yum > repository configurations that they may not be otherwise aware of

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On 04/10/2018 11:05 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > At this point, no offense to Nirik and the maintenance he does on the > package, I'm actually tempted to just grab it from upstream directly at > https://releases.ansible.com/ansible/rpm/ Feel free. Do whatever you feel is best for you. > > At

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On 04/10/2018 11:05 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > At this point, no offense to Nirik and the maintenance he does on the > package, I'm actually tempted to just grab it from upstream directly at > https://releases.ansible.com/ansible/rpm/ Feel free. Do whatever you feel is best for you. > > At

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On 04/11/2018 02:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > There probably should be an announcement sent to the epel announce > list then it gets to a wider audience so more people know this. Yep. But the RH announcement only went out monday, and I am at a hackfest this week. I'll try and get something out

F28 Self Contained Change: java-openjdk 10 - rolling release for Short Term Support releases of OpenJDK

This is a late proposal for F28 release, mostly to spread awareness of the availability of java-openjdk 10 in Fedora. It is not closely tied to the F28 release however it would be good to have this in the formal F28 scope. That is the reason, why after a discussion with the Change owner, this is

[Bug 1565607] perl-Class-Adapter-1.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565607 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 10:05 Peter Robinson, wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > James Hogarth wrote: > >> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible > >> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 10:05 Peter Robinson, wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > James Hogarth wrote: > >> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible > >> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in

[Bug 1565385] perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-2.03 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565385 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Re: Fw: fedmsg notification

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:28:02PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 13:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > [...] > > Finally the reason this has not been correctly announced is that we are > > still > > investigating the capacity of the system and the

Re: Release rpkg-1.53

Dne 11.4.2018 v 04:34 Chenxiong Qi napsal(a): > This is the first version delivering Python 3 package, which is > python3-rpkg. Thanks Miro Hrončok for making the patch. Is it possible to rename the source package to python-rpkg? (I will happily do the package review). Because we have source

[Bug 1560182] Concurrent Gtk2::Unique execution causes shutter to crash

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-19.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c6eb0045b6 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1560182] Concurrent Gtk2::Unique execution causes shutter to crash

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-22.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-93d73fbeb9 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1560182] Concurrent Gtk2::Unique execution causes shutter to crash

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1560182] Concurrent Gtk2::Unique execution causes shutter to crash

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gtk2-Unique-0.05-23.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a7e8520db9 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1565384] perl-HTML-FormFu-2.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565384 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1565864] perl-Mojolicious-7.75 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565864 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > James Hogarth wrote: >> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible >> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL >> policy is not to conflict. >> >> I was surprised just

Re: [EPEL-devel] Ansible in EL7

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > James Hogarth wrote: >> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible >> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL >> policy is not to conflict. >> >> I was surprised just

Re: updates in stable branches introducing new dependencies

On Wednesday, 11 April 2018 at 10:35, Michal Schorm wrote: > For fetaures, that are optional, weak dependencies is the best solution I > can think of. > Even when "Recommends" is used, which means it will try to pull the > dependency as well, if not said specifically opted-out. That's fine. The

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On ti, 10 huhti 2018, Todd Zullinger wrote: James Hogarth wrote: On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote: Red Hat announced today that Ansible was being deprecated from the extras channel. Their advice is that those who have "previously installed Ansible and its

Re: updates in stable branches introducing new dependencies

For fetaures, that are optional, weak dependencies is the best solution I can think of. Even when "Recommends" is used, which means it will try to pull the dependency as well, if not said specifically opted-out. > 2 considerations: > * is the user experience significantly affected? > * is the

[Bug 1560182] Concurrent Gtk2::Unique execution causes shutter to crash

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560182 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180411.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1563208] perl-IO-Async-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563208 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 114376 -- You

[Bug 1563208] perl-IO-Async-0.72 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563208 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 796143] perl-PAR-Packer-1.013 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796143 Bug 796143 depends on bug 796298, which changed state. Bug 796298 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-EntryCheck - Interface to Tk::Entry for controlling its length and content https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796298 What

[389-devel] Please review: ns-deadlock

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49636 I'll write up a page for the wiki soon about the content of the patch. -- Thanks, William Brown ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 01:26 Todd Zullinger, wrote: > James Hogarth wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote: > >> Red Hat announced today that Ansible was being deprecated > >> from the extras channel. Their advice is that those who > >> have

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Ansible in EL7

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 01:26 Todd Zullinger, wrote: > James Hogarth wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote: > >> Red Hat announced today that Ansible was being deprecated > >> from the extras channel. Their advice is that those who > >> have