Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:40 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2 > > The "how to test" section for this Change seems a

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 10:07:55PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > But, my gut feeling is that about half of those are not using a current > release _anyway_. Honest question: do you think that 12k would still > count as a healthy number? I mean, it's not peanuts. But maybe it'd be Ooh, I should

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 03:50:34PM -0400, Jeff Backus wrote: > Thanks for the data. 25k is still a pretty healthy number. :) I realize Yeah, absolutely. And it's likely that those mirror numbers undercount, because not every system checks in daily, and then there's also NAT. But, my gut feeling

Re: Release criteria proposal: drop kickstart package criterion

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! > > We currently have a Final release criterion that reads as follows: > > "A spin-kickstarts package which contains the exact kickstart files > used to build the release must be present in the release repository. > The included

[Bug 1585854] New: perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-Util-4.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585854 Bug ID: 1585854 Summary: perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-Util-4.001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Locale-TextDomain-OO-Util Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1585853] New: perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585853 Bug ID: 1585853 Summary: perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-FFI-CheckLib Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1585850] New: perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585850 Bug ID: 1585850 Summary: perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Devel-NYTProf Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Release criteria proposal: drop kickstart package criterion

Hi, folks! We currently have a Final release criterion that reads as follows: "A spin-kickstarts package which contains the exact kickstart files used to build the release must be present in the release repository. The included kickstarts must define the correct set of release repositories.

Re: equivalent of Debian config-package?

Il gio 31 mag 2018, 13:42 Neal Gompa ha scritto: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 6:54 AM Dave Love > wrote: > > > > Is there any existing system for rpm like the Debian one > > for building local > > configuration packages? If not, would it be feasible

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2018-06-05 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us on

Re: [X86] Re: Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Jeff Backus wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: >> >> On 4 June 2018 at 14:18, Matthew Miller wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:01:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> >> > >>support long NOPs, for Intel CET. However,

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Jeff Backus wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > >> Jeff Backus wrote: > >> > >> > >> > Until (unless?) we have data indicating that this is a major drain on > >> > community resources, I'd push back on a change

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

Jeff Backus wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Jeff Backus wrote: >> >> >> > Until (unless?) we have data indicating that this is a major drain on >> > community resources, I'd push back on a change that actively excludes >> part >> > of the community. Now, if we do

Re: equivalent of Debian config-package?

On 4 June 2018 at 14:29, Dave Love wrote: > You wrote: > >> I think generally the Fedora/RH-ecosystem answer is to use Ansible for >> configuration, rather than configuration packages. >> >> That's not sayin' there can't be another answer, but in general that's >> the route *I'd* take to solve

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 06/04/2018 02:50 PM, Jeff Backus wrote: > >> Thanks for the data. 25k is still a pretty healthy number. :) I realize >> that there are a lot of unknowns in the data, so it is difficult to draw >> any hard conclusions, but 25k is

Re: [X86] Re: Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 4 June 2018 at 14:18, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:01:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> > >>support long NOPs, for Intel CET. However, the majority of > >> > >>installations of i686 packages is for

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On 06/04/2018 02:50 PM, Jeff Backus wrote: Thanks for the data. 25k is still a pretty healthy number. :) I realize that there are a lot of unknowns in the data, so it is difficult to draw any hard conclusions, but 25k is still much larger than 0. Splitting into i686 into i586 and i686 would

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:01:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > >>support long NOPs, for Intel CET. However, the majority of > > > >>installations of i686 packages is for use on x86_64 systems, as > > > >>multi-lib RPMs. > > > >Based

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On 4 June 2018 at 14:18, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:01:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> > >>support long NOPs, for Intel CET. However, the majority of >> > >>installations of i686 packages is for use on x86_64 systems, as >> > >>multi-lib RPMs. >> > >Based on what

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 04:04:30PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > >>only addition over the i686/Pentium Pro baseline is a requirement to > > >>support long NOPs, for Intel CET. However, the majority of > > >>installations of i686

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Jeff Backus wrote: > > > > Until (unless?) we have data indicating that this is a major drain on > > community resources, I'd push back on a change that actively excludes > part > > of the community. Now, if we do have data indicating that

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:55 PM Jeff Backus wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Florian Weimer > wrote: > >> > >> On 06/04/2018 05:55 PM, Jeff Backus wrote: > >>> > >>> Would you please provide more detail on what problem

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu

On Thu, 2018-05-31 at 12:43 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HiddenGrubMenu We (QA) would like to note that the "How to test" section of this Change seems heavily under-developed: "1. Install Fedora in a fresh

Fedora Rawhide-20180604.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 12/137 (x86_64), 5/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180603.n.1): ID: 244870 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/244870 Old failures (same test

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2

On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:40 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2 The "how to test" section for this Change seems a little worryingly barebones: "Applications which follow the

Re: equivalent of Debian config-package?

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:29 PM Dave Love wrote: > > You wrote: > > > I think generally the Fedora/RH-ecosystem answer is to use Ansible for > > configuration, rather than configuration packages. > > > > That's not sayin' there can't be another answer, but in general that's > > the route *I'd*

Re: equivalent of Debian config-package?

You wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: >> No such thing currently exists, because an equivalent to `dpkg-divert` >> does not exist in RPM. > > You are probably aware of this, but for the other readers of this thread: I wasn't anyhow, thanks! > File triggers can be (ab)used to do something like that,

Re: equivalent of Debian config-package?

You wrote: > I think generally the Fedora/RH-ecosystem answer is to use Ansible for > configuration, rather than configuration packages. > > That's not sayin' there can't be another answer, but in general that's > the route *I'd* take to solve this problem on my systems. I guess we disagree

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:01:13PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > >>support long NOPs, for Intel CET. However, the majority of > > >>installations of i686 packages is for use on x86_64 systems, as > > >>multi-lib RPMs. > > >Based on what data? > > The mirror data I've seen, but it's really

Re: Introduction

Hi and thank you. :) L. T. Dne 04.06.2018 v 18:55 Matthew Miller napsal(a): On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:21:22AM +0200, Lukáš Tyrychtr wrote: My name is Lukáš Tyrychtr and i am a student currently having an intership at Red Hat. The objective of the internship is mainly fixing accessibility

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 04:04:30PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >>only addition over the i686/Pentium Pro baseline is a requirement to > >>support long NOPs, for Intel CET. However, the majority of > >>installations of i686 packages is for use on x86_64 systems, as > >>multi-lib RPMs. > >Based

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:55 PM Jeff Backus wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >> On 06/04/2018 05:55 PM, Jeff Backus wrote: >>> >>> Would you please provide more detail on what problem or problems we are >>> trying to solve? Is this purely for efficiency

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

Jeff Backus wrote: > Until (unless?) we have data indicating that this is a major drain on > community resources, I'd push back on a change that actively excludes part > of the community. Now, if we do have data indicating that supporting > non-SSE2 systems with the i686 architecture is a

xpa license change

The license in xpa has changed from LGPLv2+ in version 2.1.15 to MIT in xpa 2.1.18 Regards, Sergio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Introduction

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:21:22AM +0200, Lukáš Tyrychtr wrote: > My name is Lukáš Tyrychtr and i am a student currently having an > intership at Red Hat. The objective of the internship is mainly > fixing accessibility bugs and overall improving the situation in > Fedora, so in the future you can

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/04/2018 05:55 PM, Jeff Backus wrote: > >> Would you please provide more detail on what problem or problems we are >> trying to solve? Is this purely for efficiency reasons? >> > > Mainly developer efficiency. There will be fewer

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu

On 05/31/2018 04:54 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Plus, there's an upside: if you're hammering F11 or F8 or F12 or Esc or whatever to try and get into the BIOS, and you miss it, then at least you stop in grub instead of going straight into the OS. A big part of the 'dark pattern' of the

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > My proposal was for the instructions to recommend pressing a certain key > but still accepting any key in grub, then there is no lie, since "Press > space to enter grub" is still true when other keys allow the same. I'm still not a fan

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

* Chris Adams [04/06/2018 10:58] : > > I think you are missing a some of The Atom chips that are 32-bit only; > there are versions that were released as late as 2010 that don't support > 64-bit (I don't know when they were discontinued). You're thinking of the Lincroft series of Intel CPUs:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180604.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180603.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180604.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 36 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On 06/04/2018 05:55 PM, Jeff Backus wrote: Would you please provide more detail on what problem or problems we are trying to solve? Is this purely for efficiency reasons? Mainly developer efficiency. There will be fewer test suite problems due to excess precision (a bunch of packages carry

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 06/04/2018 05:07 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 16:04 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > > > > This proposal suggests to accept this reality and build

Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 08:59 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 06/04/2018 04:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon > MP > > > supports both. But the intent is what the subject

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

Once upon a time, Adam Jackson said: > Certainly, I'm no netburst fan either. But the last[*] 32-bit-only > Intel chip was Yonah (Core 1), which went out of production in 2008- > ish, so there's about seven years worth of CPUs between the > introductions of SSE2 and AMD64. I think you are

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/i686_Is_For_x86-64 > > > Owner(s): > * Florian Weimer > > > Fedora builds its i686 packages for use on x86-64 systems as multi-lib > RPMs. > > >

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/04/2018 05:07 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 16:04 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > > This proposal suggests to accept this reality and build the i686 > > > > > packages in such a way that they require the

Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Monday, June 4, 2018, 4:35:34 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/i686_Is_For_x86-64 > Owner(s): > * Florian Weimer > Fedora builds its i686 packages for use on x86-64 systems as multi-lib RPMs. > == Detailed

Re: Hiding the grub menu by default on single OS installs

Dne 1.6.2018 v 19:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a): >> "TK" == Tomas Kovar writes: > TK> - this one is on the polish side of things: > [don't keep bouncing to text mode] > > I might also add that as part of this, we'd also need to get rid of the > very early message about EFI secure boot

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On 06/04/2018 05:07 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 16:04 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: This proposal suggests to accept this reality and build the i686 packages in such a way that they require the ISA level of (early) x86-64 CPUs. On which x86 CPU families will Fedora continue

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu

Dne 1.6.2018 v 16:29 Ken Coar napsal(a): > On 06/01/2018 05:06 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> It is irony, that people, who are capable to get into the grub menu if >> they need, complain about it being hidden. So to say, I am 100% for >> hiding the grub menu, speeding up the boot process, and if

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 16:04 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > This proposal suggests to accept this reality and build the i686 > > > packages in such a way that they require the ISA level of (early) > > > x86-64 CPUs. > > > > On which x86 CPU families will Fedora continue to work? > > Based on

Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 08:59 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 06/04/2018 04:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon MP > > supports both. But the intent is what the subject says: i686 binaries > > are for running legacy software on

Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 10:09 AM Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 06/04/2018 11:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 06/04/2018 10:50 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon MP > > supports both. But the intent is what the subject says: i686

[Bug 1585352] perl-Locale-Codes-3.57 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585352 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Locale-Codes-3.57-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1585518] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.58 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585518 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1585175] perl-Log-Report-1.27 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585175 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1582962] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582962 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1585179] perl-Perl-Critic-1.132 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585179 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On 06/04/2018 02:39 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: == Detailed description == Currently, the i686 RPM packages are built in such a way that they are compatible with very old i686 systems, such as the Pentium III. The only addition over the i686/Pentium Pro baseline is a requirement to support

Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On 06/04/2018 04:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon MP supports both.  But the intent is what the subject says: i686 binaries are for running legacy software on x86-64 systems, and nothing more. So the 32-bit x86 SIG would be

Re: CPAN Search Going Away

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 01:53:07PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > I can mass update spec files for all Perl packages. I submitted this Fedora > > 29 > > change request > > >

[Bug 1585352] perl-Locale-Codes-3.57 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 57 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2c81054303 remctl-3.14-1.el7 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-860176245e gifsicle-1.91-1.el7 9

[Bug 1585179] perl-Perl-Critic-1.132 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585179 Bug 1585179 depends on bug 1585587, which changed state. Bug 1585587 Summary: Review Request: perl-PPIx-QuoteLike - Parse Perl string literals and string-literal-like things https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585587 What

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN

On 2018-06-04, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2018-05-25, Jan Kurik wrote: >>= Proposed System Wide Change: Perl Move to MetaCPAN = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Perl_Move_to_MetaCPAN >> > This change was approved and I will start updating the packages in a few > moments. > > Each affected

Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

On 06/04/2018 11:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: On 06/04/2018 10:50 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote: It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon MP supports both.  But the intent is what the subject says: i686 binaries are for running legacy software on x86-64 systems, and

Re: Change in Copr retention policy?

Dne 4.6.2018 v 10:03 Jan Pazdziora napsal(a): > In any case, it'd be nice to notify the owners of those repos to give > them chance to review what they have and potentially rebuild their > content on newer buildroots, or just mark their repos "alive" and > extend the expiration for another 180

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 13:16:58 UTC From ae1817d41a6268fd739e6a5151f69782684753d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 13:16:55 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-HTTP-MultiPartParser (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 13:16:42 UTC From a7a206872ad9d104930033be13fd47bcce007894 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 13:16:39 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

Re: Hiding the grub menu by default on single OS installs

Hi, On 04-06-18 09:16, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, Note I've dropped the fedora-devel list (-ETOOMUCHBIKESHED) and added Javier and Jan to the Cc. Ugh, so clearly I failed to remove fedora-devel from the CC. Ah well. I hope this mistake shows that there is nothing nefarious going on here and

ppisar pushed to perl-Specio (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 13:10:19 UTC From 2c0f3a05b46996643943a1c18bc49b43a3fc4336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 13:10:17 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Module-Extract-Use (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 13:08:21 UTC From 8d337ab05cbc19a92843e79d83b0dbecab0de1ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 13:08:19 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-MCE-Shared (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 13:07:24 UTC From bc19e7ba29c58125b33cc5b4e3d8039130e0c932 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 13:07:22 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Net-LDAP-SID (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 13:07:59 UTC From 66b989437fdc456d90efc3d80aabf23ba5fd1989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 13:07:57 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Ref-Util (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 13:05:29 UTC From 6dd560a7ff0cd245e7bfb106bbc5ed972ceff2fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 13:05:27 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

Ask for help with packaging of Pipenv deps

Hi, we added Pipenv, The higher level Python packaging tool [0], to Fedora recently. It is a nice tool and it is also officially recommended from Python.org. This is why we wanted to make it available to Fedora users as soon as possible. The upstream Pipenv project contains a lot of bundled

ppisar pushed to perl-Mail-Message (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 13:04:31 UTC From a4f62f8ce92227c378677080fad359041a72a763 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 13:04:29 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-IO-FDPass (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:54:49 UTC From 59f2aa14a5a296720914ba8b57e99c39fe80c536 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:54:46 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Sub-Infix (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:55:01 UTC From a450bacd0aa8e1a0253c9579d7e09b06c897191c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:54:58 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Type-Tie (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:51:31 UTC From 68c41f461a7e173ddbf7846ffc3b0d92f81831f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:51:29 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Return-Type (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:48:54 UTC From 09616976992a0b2edfda915808f7fca661e5e300 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:48:52 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:47:11 UTC From 774598f9ab96efe6c893aa74e4dbf4e050955979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:47:09 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Code-TidyAll-Plugin-Test-Vars (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:46:09 UTC From f50a3d4709d6c33eb3e6518dfff548bbd0f1513a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:46:07 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Net-LDAP-Server (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:45:48 UTC From 526f506fd74fe541fa9c8d2681da769bfbeec58a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:45:45 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:43:50 UTC From f3edab4c7d0a0f9dde15dccf4b9b16136669d1f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:43:47 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Cookie-Baker (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:42:42 UTC From f07cf7651c417df5e71030bbf645f1248b93d6a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:42:40 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64

> == Detailed description == > Currently, the i686 RPM packages are built in such a way that they are > compatible with very old i686 systems, such as the Pentium III. The > only addition over the i686/Pentium Pro baseline is a requirement to > support long NOPs, for Intel CET. However, the

ppisar pushed to perl-List-MoreUtils-XS (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:37:28 UTC From da9ad3dd3d1ba22a65265be3c7f6d7fbf5a9c662 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:37:25 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Class-Std-Fast (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:37:27 UTC From 2905bacaa9ff10b900b5597165183e1670482b78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:37:24 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Validation-Class (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:37:09 UTC From be063ebf36a2c63eee9442d41da989a427e77872 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:37:07 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-namespace-sweep (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:31:12 UTC From 8fa32462b569ac2aba0ff7f754567fc88c88b19e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:31:10 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:29:38 UTC From dd9337cfeaa78e1732877be68b13394be62a2005 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:29:36 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:24:02 UTC From f9ff2be4bdc4bf683364e2ee345316fd1e3e2530 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:24:00 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer: guidograzioli

On 06/04/2018 10:14 AM, Till Hofmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to get in contact with Guido Graizoli (FAS guidograzioli). He > has not responded to a bug report requesting an update of bibtex2html > [1]. The package is currently also FTBFS [2], where he did not respond > either. I also

ppisar pushed to perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:21:15 UTC From 707df564df74c29247704e497b2aac5e7ed8d358 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:21:12 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Ref-Util-XS (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:20:03 UTC From be980a5a1d20bdd94abe24e879397548a2bb0302 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:20:01 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Params-ValidationCompiler (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:18:53 UTC From 2dc52d32eb22341abb0910bb4b613f628b46de53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:18:51 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:17:16 UTC From 11ba8e64ec05c0926d15170ad556c4d98efe9abd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:17:14 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Mock-Config (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:15:32 UTC From 19c07c3f5f446721fb69b5e8dd45a3779f1a9772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:15:29 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Mail-Transport (master). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2018-06-04 12:14:02 UTC From 2eec826ce4fa3fb3c966464090b585a4cf0c460f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:13:59 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

  1   2   >