https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640987
Colin Macdonald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512848
Colin Macdonald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532636
Colin Macdonald changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
On 10/19/18 6:19 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On samedi 20 octobre 2018 00:31:50 CEST Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>> I'm trying to build duperemove[1] for epel7[2], and it's building on
>> all the arches except aarch64.
>>
>> I'm BR'ing libatomic, but the error it gives in build.log[3] for
>>
On samedi 20 octobre 2018 00:31:50 CEST Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> I'm trying to build duperemove[1] for epel7[2], and it's building on
> all the arches except aarch64.
>
> I'm BR'ing libatomic, but the error it gives in build.log[3] for
> aarch64 is:
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -latomic
>
> All
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/133 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181018.n.0):
ID: 298438 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/298438
Old failures (same test
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/133 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 298500 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/298500
ID: 298513 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL:
Gerald, I'm the person who designed Hyperkitty's concept on a napkin on a
shuttlebus with Luke Macken some years ago. Your characterization of it here is
incorrect.
I say this with respect, please try to listen more than you post. Hyperkitty
stats show you're dominating this conveesation.
~m
I'm trying to build duperemove[1] for epel7[2], and it's building on
all the arches except aarch64.
I'm BR'ing libatomic, but the error it gives in build.log[3] for
aarch64 is:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -latomic
All current Fedora release builds were fine.
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious,
> I just couldn't use it for day-to-day communication. Not necessarily any
> single thing, but lots and lots of fundamentals. How do I get a list of new
> threads? How do I get a list of threads I've read but which have new
> responses, and ideally show only the new responses? How can I mute a
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 3:58 PM stan wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 08:58:57 -0700
> "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> > Software is a tool for me. I don't get emotionally attached to it -
> > as some people apparently are. It's a bit telling that
> > many people seem to be afraid that Discourse will be
Re: teenagers and timelines, I'm just addressing the specific concerns that
were raised to me.
~m
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 13:05 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> For example, github and bugzilla work because they
> have full email messages. I don't have to go to the website to get
> the
> rest of the message.
You actually can reply to the e-mails from GitHub (not sure about
Bugzilla). They do
On 10/19/18 8:58 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Software is a tool for me. I don't get emotionally attached to it - as
some people apparently are. It's a bit telling that
many people seem to be afraid that Discourse will be a success.
I'm not emotionally attached to it, but I am somewhat afraid
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 08:58:57 -0700
"Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:31 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > Once upon a time, R P Herrold said:
> > > This seems very tone deaf and lacking in introspection, Matt
> > >
> > > perhaps by reading the subject line you chose to start this
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 01:51:02PM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> On 10/17/18 2:38 PM, Anderson, Charles R wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:12:37PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 14:48:52 -0400,
> >> "tonynel...@georgeanelson.com" wrote:
> ... For html only
Hi,
EPEL is a set of packages which work for CentOS and RHEL versions 6
and 7. In the version 7, we are currently using python34 and would
like to move this to python36. In doing so, we need help in both our
packaging rules and in updating a lot of packages to work for
python36.
First problem:
Hi,
EPEL is a set of packages which work for CentOS and RHEL versions 6
and 7. In the version 7, we are currently using python34 and would
like to move this to python36. In doing so, we need help in both our
packaging rules and in updating a lot of packages to work for
python36.
First problem:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181018.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181019.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 207
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.93 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 10/17/18 2:38 PM, Anderson, Charles R wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:12:37PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 14:48:52 -0400,
>> "tonynel...@georgeanelson.com" wrote:
... For html only messages you would either need to reject them or rewrite
them, both
OLD: Fedora-29-20181017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20181018.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, R P Herrold said:
> > This seems very tone deaf and lacking in introspection, Matt
> >
> > perhaps by reading the subject line you chose to start this
> > thread with
>
> Matt didn't choose that - that subject was set by Gerald B.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi - lurking on this thread but wanted to share;
> > and GCC are not? > > > > Should we keep it upon individual maintainer
> discretion? Should
we > > somehow evaluate all the cases one by one? > > What about a
"Command Line tools for
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
131 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
69 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f21474267b
condor-8.6.11-1.el6
22
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:20 PM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:02:27PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02 PM Lokesh Mandvekar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 06:50:51PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640572
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.27-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 07:49:41AM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> Oh really... I said that... perhaps you should take 5 seconds and read the
> subject of the thread.
Hey, let's please keep this friendly.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 07:28 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> And if this conversation were in Discourse, we could simply move it to a
> new topic ;-)
Some people see it as history rewriting ... one of the reasons I like
email is that *you* can't change stuff after the fact, because *I* have
it
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:40:18AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I don't like saying this, but what it comes down to is that our
> relationship with RHEL has evolved into a one-sided affair. I wish
> someone who is empowered to do something about it would, but the rest
> of us can't.
>
> Frankly, I
On 10/19/18 6:43 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:16 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>>
>> Again, I believe some are trying to do an apples to apples comparison with
>> Discourse and mailing list technologies. Discourse was build from the
>> ground up with the goal of fostering
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640572
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:19:43PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I'm more afraid that it'll be a success with casualties. In other
> words, it'll be a failure but not look like one at a glance. Driving
> people away and making it harder to keep track of topics of import is
> going to necessarily
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:00 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:31 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>>
>> Once upon a time, R P Herrold said:
>> > This seems very tone deaf and lacking in introspection, Matt
>> >
>> > perhaps by reading the subject line you chose to start this
>> >
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:02:27PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02 PM Lokesh Mandvekar
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 06:50:51PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm confused by this podman build. Especially so with my Packaging
> > > Committee
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:31 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, R P Herrold said:
> > This seems very tone deaf and lacking in introspection, Matt
> >
> > perhaps by reading the subject line you chose to start this
> > thread with
>
> Matt didn't choose that - that subject was set by
Once upon a time, R P Herrold said:
> This seems very tone deaf and lacking in introspection, Matt
>
> perhaps by reading the subject line you chose to start this
> thread with
Matt didn't choose that - that subject was set by Gerald B. Cox.
--
Chris Adams
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> Neal Gompa:
>> because you're dead set on this anyway.
> Matt Miller:
> I ... don't know how to engage constructively with this accusation, because
> it it seems to come from absolutely nowhere. Yes, we're *definitely* trying
This seems very tone
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2018 à 07:54 -0700, Gerald B. Cox a écrit :
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:43 AM Nicolas Mailhot <
>
> You really should try it, you might like it. BTW, there are no ads in
> the Fedora Discourse instance, so
> not sure what you are talking about there. As far as email is
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639574
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Fr, 19.10.18 09:12, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> (cross-posting to devel and desktop lists, ideally reply to both)
> >
> > Coincidentally, at All Systems Go! in Berlin last week I had some
> > discussions with kernel people about RLIMIT_NOFILE defaults. They
> > basically
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:39 PM Dridi Boukelmoune <
dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:21 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
> >
> > Steam is currently available from rpmfusion, fwiw/fyi/ymmv :
> > https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/steam.git/
>
> It is, and as usual, thanks
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:43 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Le vendredi 19 octobre 2018 à 07:28 -0700, Gerald B. Cox a écrit :
> > And if this conversation were in Discourse, we could simply move it to
> > a new topic ;-)
>
> And if it where is discourse I would’t participate in it.
>
>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:41 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>
> I'm not talking about you in the Fedora sense. I'm talking about
> Gerald and his saying "we must move everything to Discourse".
>
Oh really... I said that... perhaps you should take 5 seconds and read the
subject of the thread.
As far as
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2018 à 07:28 -0700, Gerald B. Cox a écrit :
> And if this conversation were in Discourse, we could simply move it to
> a new topic ;-)
And if it where is discourse I would’t participate in it.
Basically, as others said, not interested in shiny tech that has no
notion
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:11 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:43:48AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It's also bad for archiving, since threads are inherently unstable.
> > Conversation splitting and merging is very awkward (as I've observed
> > in the Snapcraft Discourse).
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:10:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I ... don't know how to engage constructively with this accusation, because
> it it seems to come from absolutely nowhere. Yes, we're *definitely* trying
> out Discourse. That's not a conspiracy — it's live! We're also trying out
>
# F29 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-10-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hey everyone,
We currently (as of 2018-10-18 at 22:00UTC) have 10 accepted blockers, 5
proposed freeze exceptions, and 11 accepted freeze exceptions. Let's take
Monday to
And if this conversation were in Discourse, we could simply move it to a
new topic ;-)
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:21 AM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Le vendredi 19 octobre 2018 à 14:55 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé a écrit :
> >
> > I don't know why Red Hat's mailman impl isn't upgraded, but it is
>
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2018 à 14:55 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé a écrit :
>
> I don't know why Red Hat's mailman impl isn't upgraded, but it is
> not blocked by lack of Python 3 on RHEL.
>
> Red Hat Software Collections have been providing Python 3.x versions
> that run on RHEL since ~2013. They
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:43:48AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It's also bad for archiving, since threads are inherently unstable.
> Conversation splitting and merging is very awkward (as I've observed
> in the Snapcraft Discourse). I can keep going, but it doesn't matter,
> because you're dead set
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:45 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:16 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> >
> > Again, I believe some are trying to do an apples to apples comparison
> with Discourse and mailing list technologies. Discourse was build from the
> ground up with the goal of
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:43:48AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> That *completely* handicapped adoption of HyperKitty, because
> HyperKitty requires Mailman 3. What's worse, because it's almost
> impossible to run on RHEL due to the lack of Python 3 (which continues
> to anger and frustrate me), Red
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:16 AM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> Again, I believe some are trying to do an apples to apples comparison with
> Discourse and mailing list technologies. Discourse was build from the ground
> up with the goal of fostering communication and collaboration. Hyperkitty is
>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:26 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:53:06AM -, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > But we can file bugs against Discourse and they will be magically and
> > quickly fixed to our satisfaction, yes?
>
> Of course not. However: development is very active.
>
Again, I believe some are trying to do an apples to apples comparison with
Discourse and mailing list technologies. Discourse was build from the
ground up with the goal of fostering communication and collaboration.
Hyperkitty is a bolt on HTML to mailing list archives. It's good for what
it is,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:53:06AM -, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:27:02PM -, Ray Strode wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, all is not rosy there. See this thread on the users' list
> > from this fall about confusion with hyperkitty quoting:
> >
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:39 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:34:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > So apparently, some CLI apps should probably go into Software, but how
> > are we going to decide that Vagrant and Powertop are fine while Python
> > and GCC are not?
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640993
Bug ID: 1640993
Summary: Upgrade perl-WWW-Mechanize to 1.89
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640990
Bug ID: 1640990
Summary: Upgrade perl-DateTime-TimeZone to 2.20
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640988
Bug ID: 1640988
Summary: perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90120 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640987
Bug ID: 1640987
Summary: Upgrade perl-Business-ISMN to 1.201
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Business-ISMN
Assignee: c...@m.fsf.org
Reporter:
> On 2018-10-17 13:41, John Florian wrote:
>
> How does Discourse handle posts you've already read in a
> thread that's still active. With things like reddit or LWN, you get to
> read it over and over and over again if you really want to see whats new
> now.
It handles it very well.
You
> On Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 23:04, Dominik wrote:
> [...]
>
> So, I tried to answer in one of the threads and it's quite difficult,
> in my opinion. The message compose pop-up doesn't quote the message
> I'm replying to, so I can't write my comments in response to specific
> passages by the
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:53:06AM -, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> But we can file bugs against Discourse and they will be magically and
> quickly fixed to our satisfaction, yes?
Of course not. However: development is very active.
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commits/master
> I'm
Hey, my name is Kefu Chai, and my nick name on IRC is kefu.
I am a software developer using C++ and Python. I found that fmt[0] is a very
good C++ library for C++ developers like me who whats to have python's
str.format() in C++. But its package[1] was recently orphaned. I've been using
fedora
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2018 à 11:48 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le vendredi 19 octobre 2018 à 04:58 -0400, Jakub Cajka a écrit :
> > And what about backing up the breaking change in Rawhide? At least
> > until there is a backward compatible way of doing that(or it is
> > backported in to
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 11:38, Matthew Miller wrote:
> What about a "Command Line tools for Developers" section in Software?
We've got a developers top level, so I think a CLI tools subsection
would be fine.
Richard.
___
devel mailing list --
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:34:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> So apparently, some CLI apps should probably go into Software, but how
> are we going to decide that Vagrant and Powertop are fine while Python
> and GCC are not?
>
> Should we keep it upon individual maintainer discretion? Should
So apparently, some CLI apps should probably go into Software, but how
are we going to decide that Vagrant and Powertop are fine while Python
and GCC are not?
Should we keep it upon individual maintainer discretion? Should we
somehow evaluate all the cases one by one?
V.
Dne 19. 10. 18 v
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 09:36, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I was always under impression, that we don't want to show CLI apps in
> Software. Not sure what was the reasoning behind, but I can imagine that:
> * we don't want Python to show up in Software (for example)
Right, agreed.
> * screenshots of
Le vendredi 19 octobre 2018 à 04:58 -0400, Jakub Cajka a écrit :
>
> And what about backing up the breaking change in Rawhide? At least
> until there is a backward compatible way of doing that(or it is
> backported in to the stable releases)?
We're talking about redhat-rpm-config there. No one
Máirín,
On 2018-10-19 14:43, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I'm open to all of those suggestions as well as committing to design
and CSS work for them. I would need a web dev to help me though; I'm
not great with Django.
Please note, the reason Hyperkitty didn't cause this sort of thread or
honestly any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640572
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.27-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c06406ea2f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640572
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.27-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5908a39c91
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Fabio Valentini"
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 11:56:45 AM
> Subject: Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide
>
> Le 2018-10-15 09:09, Fabio Valentini a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640572
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.27-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9709d3a8fa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 10:16:48 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> > On 19.10.2018 00:28, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm still at a loss to why this is so. Would someone be able to shed
> > > some light on this please?
>
> That’s
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/551
>
>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 00:52:51 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>
> The debugsourcefiles.list is constructed from files in the current folder
> the build is in. In your case, that's the %{name}-%{commit} folder from
> %autosetup.
>
> Anything you create outside that folder is not included.
Ah,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640572
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
(Adding fedora-devel on CC)
The question is not how to do it but if we should do it on the first place.
I was always under impression, that we don't want to show CLI apps in
Software. Not sure what was the reasoning behind, but I can imagine that:
* we don't want Python to show up in Software
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 03:43 +, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> I'm open to all of those suggestions as well as committing to design and CSS
> work for them. I would need a web dev to help me though; I'm not great with
> Django.
>
> Please note, the reason Hyperkitty didn't cause this sort of thread
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640572
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
> On 19.10.2018 00:28, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > I'm still at a loss to why this is so. Would someone be able to shed
> > some light on this please?
That’s
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/551
for bad old historical reasons the main directory rpmbuild works in is a
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:18 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 4:03:56 PM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Or should I do quick'n'dirty "if 'rawhide' in
> > os-release['REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION']" in our copr plugin?
>
> Or REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION.
>
> I'd
Hi, Máirín.
On Friday, 19 October 2018 at 05:43, Máirín Duffy wrote:
[...]
> I believe quite strongly (and have from the start when I first heard
> of the project) that Discourse's basic UX model is fundamentally
> flawed. If we deploy discourse and roll it out, we *may* get new
> users, but as
Randy Barlow writes:
> On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 13:14 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> Discourse is *definitely* not a smooth, drop-in mailing list
>> replacement
>> like Hyperkitty is.
>
> I'm curious what is insufficient about Hyperkitty that Discourse does
> well at.
Badges, those are super
On Thursday, 18 October 2018 at 23:04, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
[...]
> I wouldn't expect it to be a "drop-in" mailing list replacement.
> Yes, it allows some backward compatibility by providing
> "mailing-list mode" - but you're going to get a richer
> experience if you use native interfaces.
So, I
Hi,
C10K is a scalability problem that a server can face when dealing with
events of thousands of connections (i.e. clients) at the same time.
Events can be new connections, new operations on the established
connections, closure of connection (from client or server)
For 389-ds, C10K problem
* Lennart Poettering:
> On Fr, 05.10.18 19:31, Kamil Paral (kpa...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> (cross-posting to devel and desktop lists, ideally reply to both)
>
> Coincidentally, at All Systems Go! in Berlin last week I had some
> discussions with kernel people about RLIMIT_NOFILE defaults. They
>
* Kamil Paral:
> From a technical point of view I'm not able to judge whether raising
> the fileno limits by default is a trivial change or something with
> important security implications.
It has implications for reliability (and perhaps security). File
descriptors can refer to sockets, and
90 matches
Mail list logo
