On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 06:37:56PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Thursday, September 10, 2020 4:42:24 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:27:30PM +0200, alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 12:06 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878018
Bug ID: 1878018
Summary: perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.19-3.fc34 FTBFS: Can't call
method "rating" on an undefined value at
t/20-driver-sqlite.t line 47
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875827
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 133309
--
You are receiving this
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/09/11/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200910gitf9638bb.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:51 PM Micah Shennum wrote:
> I have been using Fedora for a long time (circa 24), and have been
> providing feedback to bodhi / updates-testing for a while now. I was
> looking for a way to get more involved, and was surprised at how fairly
> straight forward creating
Hello,
I have been using Fedora for a long time (circa 24), and have been
providing feedback to bodhi / updates-testing for a while now. I was
looking for a way to get more involved, and was surprised at how fairly
straight forward creating rpm packages seems when looking into locally
bumping
This is just a data point:
F31 Workstation clean installed (Live ISO), then updated to current
F31, then upgraded to F33 (no interim F32).
/etc/nsswitch.conf
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] resolve
[!UNAVAIL=return] myhostname dns
And
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root39 Sep 10
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:34 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 10, 2020 1:36:18 AM MST alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 01:02 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > A quick reminder that we're about to release with the system
> > >
On Thursday, September 10, 2020 4:42:24 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:27:30PM +0200, alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 12:06 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > These DNS addresses are bundled upstream in systemd.
On Thursday, September 10, 2020 4:27:30 AM MST alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 12:06 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
>
> > >
> > > These DNS addresses are bundled upstream in systemd. And they are
> > > used
> > > in the event of a misconfiguration of your network settings,
On Thursday, September 10, 2020 1:36:18 AM MST alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 01:02 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > A quick reminder that we're about to release with the system
> > configured to use
> > Google DNS when no DNS servers are configured. If privacy
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 6/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On 11. 09. 20 1:11, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Side note 0: I see the tox config also has:
[testenv]
extras =
dev
This is something the %pyproject_buildrequires don't understand yet, I'll open a
bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877977
Side note 1: I see you have:
On 11. 09. 20 0:23, Felix Schwarz wrote:
My main problem is shown at the end of this mail: Somehow the Python extras
subpackage name is bad but I don't know how to debug this (without spending a
lot of time).
The error is:
Error: The package name contains an extras name `easyname` that was
> Il giorno 10 set 2020, alle ore 16:53, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> ha scritto:
>
> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>> Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
>> access to a way bigger install base.
>
> Flathub is a third-party repository and
Hi,
I wanted to update python-dns-lexicon. Version 3.4 uses poetry and tox so I
thought it would be a good idea to get a grip on %generate_buildrequires, %tox
etc.
Unfortunately I'm a bit stuck at the moment. Maybe this is just because I'm
starring for too long on some spec file (and probably my
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:12:05PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Mikolaj Izdebski writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
> >> Hi Joe,
> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
> >> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 20:49 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick heads up that the 3.37.92 megaupdate is all lined up and
> queued to F33 updates-testing:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7f57486c95
For the record, this currently fails openQA tests because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877444
--- Comment #4 from Todd Cullum ---
External References:
Advisory:
https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/DBI/Changes#Changes-in-DBI-1.632-9th-Nov-2014
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877444
Todd Cullum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1877964
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877402
--- Comment #5 from Todd Cullum ---
External References:
Advisory:
https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/DBI/Changes#Changes-in-DBI-1.643-...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877427
Todd Cullum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1877963
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877447
Todd Cullum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1877962
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877409
--- Comment #4 from Todd Cullum ---
External References:
Advisory:
https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/DBI/Changes#Changes-in-DBI-1.643-...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 13:31, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4. The benefit we want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877409
Todd Cullum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1877959, 1877956, 1877957,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877409
--- Doc Text *updated* by Todd Cullum ---
A buffer overflow was found in perl-DBI < 1.643 in DBI.xs. A local attacker who
is able to supply a string longer than 300 characters could cause an
out-of-bounds write, affecting the availability of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877402
Todd Cullum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |low
Severity|medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877403
Todd Cullum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|medium |low
--
You are receiving this mail
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-09-11 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname EPEL
#topic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877447
Todd Cullum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |low
Severity|medium
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 22:19 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> >
> > So conceptually, one way we can solve this problem by implementing a way
> > to mark certain non-modular RPMs as "build root only" packages and thus
> > composing them into a separate "build root" yum repo, that is not enabled
> >
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:02 pm, Christopher Engelhard
wrote:
I'll file a bug - would this be against authselect or systemd?
I would start with authselect, even if it might turn out to be a
systemd RPM issue.
That said, it would be really helpful if someone could find a way to
reproduce
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:31 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4. The benefit we want
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:44 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 08. 09. 20 17:52, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Note1: Not everything has been implemented yet. package.cfg is still
> > in the epel repos. fedpkg has not been updated. This documentation
> > will go out when those changes are implemented.
> >
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> maintain the non-modular packages. We are not going to promise to
> commit time and resources to maintain the non-modular packages.
Joe, here's a part I hope you can help me understand better. Modularity
isn't an entirely new
Version 2.7.1 of ocaml-dune is out, with a bug fix that I want.
However, upstream has started unbundling other projects. They were
bundled in the first place so that dune could be built with nothing
more than the OCaml compiler. However, upstream has now unbundled
csexp, and has hinted that more
Hi all,
Just a quick heads up that the 3.37.92 megaupdate is all lined up and
queued to F33 updates-testing:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7f57486c95
This is likely not going to be pushed through the beta freeze, so next
week I'll prepare a final .0 release to
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:23 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:09 am, Mikhail Gavrilov
> wrote:
> > # authselect apply-changes
> > [error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
> > [error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
> >
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 2:04 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:37:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:30 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-972f57ea6d
drupal7-7.72-1.el6
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b425525e83
mbedtls-2.7.17-1.el6
The following builds have been
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:08 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:54 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>> > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
>> > access to a way bigger
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:37:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:30 PM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at
On 10.09.20 17:53, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned that two different people are seeing this. I don't
> think we have any scriptlets tha writes to /etc/nsswitch.conf or
> /etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf on its own. But maybe, for non-live
> installs, that could happen if the systemd
I think there's a difference between libraries and applications though.
I for one think that not having Eclipse packaged in Fedora/RHEL etc.. would
be a big loss, the same goes for Mission Control which we maintain
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:00 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 9,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:30 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > >
> > > > 4. The benefit we want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872870
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Data-Validate-IP-0.27- |perl-Data-Validate-IP-0.27-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.65-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.65-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1874683
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > > 4. The benefit we want to preserve from modules is to maintain packages
> > > with varying
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872870
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:23 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:29 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 14:50, Joe Orton wrote:
> > [...]
> > > 1. The team has two missions in Fedora:
> > >
> > > a) We deliver, maintain and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831324
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831322
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831322
Bug 1831322 depends on bug 1831324, which changed state.
Bug 1831324 Summary: perl-POE: please add epel8 branch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831324
What|Removed |Added
Mikolaj Izdebski writes:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
>> > Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:27 PM Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> Ondrej,
>
> You need to install Kwin Wayland and another package that will provide the
> backend.
It seems all the necessary packages were pulled in as dependencies via
plasma-workspace-wayland.
$ sudo dnf info --installed *wayland* |
Ondrej Mosnacek writes:
> James Cassell wrote:
>> Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Support_For_SELinux_Runtime_Disable
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>> Remove support for SELinux runtime disable so that the LSM hooks can
>>> be hardened via
Dne 10. 09. 20 v 17:53 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:36 am, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mikhail Gavrilov
wrote:
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:58 PM Neal Becker wrote:
> Might be interesting to try logging in as a new user to see if some older kde
> settings are messing things up.
That's definitely possible... However this is a single-user machine
and I don't really feel like creating a new user :)
If I
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:36 am, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:54 AM Mikhail Gavrilov
wrote:
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
[error] Refusing to activate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877626
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
Ben,
Can Fedora first-party flatpaks be built from unsigned, untrusted
content outside of the Fedora Repos? Or can they only be built from
content otherwise already present in Fedora? Just curious what
benefits a first-party flatpak has versus an upstream one.
AFAIK, the last Fedora Container
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:54 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
> > access to a way bigger install base.
>
> Flathub is a third-party repository and not related to
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:24 am, Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Hi Michael,
Could you please provide more details? This is content of my
nsswitch.conf:
~~~
$ grep mdns4_minimal /etc/authselect/user-nsswitch.conf
hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns myhostname
~~~
How that
Ondrej,
You need to install Kwin Wayland and another package that will provide the
backend.
My experience wasn't the best, several apps crashed, effects stuttered or
were very slow, even typing felt slower. But at least my desktop looked
normal.
One comment: the logging out issue is not because
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:09 am, Mikhail Gavrilov
wrote:
# authselect apply-changes
[error] [/etc/authselect/nsswitch.conf] has unexpected content!
[error] Unexpected changes to the configuration were detected.
[error] Refusing to activate profile unless those changes are removed
or
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:38:04PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > >
> > > In modular Fedora that's (effectively) not true. Packages that only exist
> > > for the sake of building other packages (i.e. build-only dependencies)
> > > can be
> > > retained in the Fedora build system and never
On 10. 09. 20 16:53, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
I think FESCo should completely forbid modules without packaged
non-modular versions.
It did.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list --
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:54 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
> > access to a way bigger install base.
>
> Flathub is a third-party
On 09.09.2020 20:23, Christoph Karl wrote:
> Do you have a link, bugzilla or so?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390079
Known KDE-Wayland issues:
https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Wayland_Showstoppers
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
> access to a way bigger install base.
Flathub is a third-party repository and not related to Fedora at all.
> And the involvement on Java packaging in Fedora is so low that
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:05 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:58 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:48 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
> > > Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
> > No, no, don't worry, "setenforce 0" (i.e. switching SELinux to
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:35 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > In non-modular Fedora all packages that we have in Fedora build system
> > (Koji)
> > are tagged into Fedora repositories and made available to all users on their
> > computers
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
> > Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of Mikolaj Izdebski and Marian Koncek from my
>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:03:46PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> In non-modular Fedora all packages that we have in Fedora build system (Koji)
> are tagged into Fedora repositories and made available to all users on their
> computers for any purpose. That implies that all packages in Fedora build
>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:11 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
Hi all,
Bastien Nocera asked me to send a heads up that he has packaged up
'malcontent' library and it's available in rawhide buildroots in case
apps want to start using it. malcontent is a library that implements
parental control support.
He's not subscribed so I'm just relying the info :)
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:04 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > > 4. The benefit we want to preserve from modules is to maintain packages
> > > with varying
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:29 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 14:50, Joe Orton wrote:
> [...]
> > 1. The team has two missions in Fedora:
> >
> > a) We deliver, maintain and support Ant and Maven in Fedora. Our aim
> > is to provide developers with
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 03:46:38PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
No, setenforce will not be affected by this change.
> I use it quite a lot to examine the denials and audit2allow to
> generate updated rules which fixes my issues.
>
> I
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:46 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
> > Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of Mikolaj Izdebski and Marian Koncek from my
>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:35:13PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > 4. The benefit we want to preserve from modules is to maintain packages
> > with varying expectation of quality, specifically separating the
> >
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:58 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:48 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
> > Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
> No, no, don't worry, "setenforce 0" (i.e. switching SELinux to
> "Permissive" mode) would not be affected and would work as
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:48 PM Michal Schorm wrote:
> Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
No, no, don't worry, "setenforce 0" (i.e. switching SELinux to
"Permissive" mode) would not be affected and would work as before.
The proposal is only about fully disabling SELinux.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 2:28 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 12:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Because Red Hat customers put the SELinux policy developers into
> > no-win situations: they complain about AVC denials that don't actually
> > significantly break anything in *their* app
Does this mean, the "setenforce 0" won't work anymore?
I use it quite a lot to examine the denials and audit2allow to
generate updated rules which fixes my issues.
I would see the inability of such workflow as a major drawback for
*anyone* who doesn't just consume the default configuration.
e.g.
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:52 AM Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
> Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of Mikolaj Izdebski and Marian Koncek from my
> team. I want to give a broad response to some of the points here:
>
> 1.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/181 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20200909.n.0):
ID: 660789 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/660789
ID: 660818 Test: x86_64 universal
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:50:55PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> 4. The benefit we want to preserve from modules is to maintain packages
> with varying expectation of quality, specifically separating the
> build-time-only vs runtime dependencies. e.g. in that case that a web
> server like
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:24:00AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Generally, I would appreciate if the proposal was more readable to
> casual Fedora user/developer. I don't think there is clearly described
> the current state and what is going to be changed. Also, there is a lot
> of unclear
On Thursday, 10 September 2020 at 14:50, Joe Orton wrote:
[...]
> 1. The team has two missions in Fedora:
>
> a) We deliver, maintain and support Ant and Maven in Fedora. Our aim
> is to provide developers with the most popular Java build systems
> which are reviewed, tested, and updated through
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:38 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:33 AM Richard Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 10:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > > Speaking from personal experience, I've wasted days over the last
> > > > decade trying to debug a locally installed system
Hi all,
I'm writing as the Red Hat engineering manager responsible for Maven and
Ant in RHEL, and on behalf of Mikolaj Izdebski and Marian Koncek from my
team. I want to give a broad response to some of the points here:
1. The team has two missions in Fedora:
a) We deliver, maintain and
OLD: Fedora-33-20200909.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200910.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 12:38, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Because Red Hat customers put the SELinux policy developers into
> no-win situations: they complain about AVC denials that don't actually
> significantly break anything in *their* app
My response to that would be to ship a "AVC ignore-list"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877444
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ---
The fix was released by upstream in DBI-1.632.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877423
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877421
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ---
The only place where the deprecation is mentioned is a comment in a header
file.
-int dbd_db_login6 _((SV *dbh, imp_dbh_t *imp_dbh, char *dbname, char
*uid, char *pwd, SV*attribs));
+int
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:27:30PM +0200, alcir...@posteo.net wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 12:06 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > >
> > > These DNS addresses are bundled upstream in systemd. And they are
> > > used
> > > in the event of a misconfiguration of your network settings, isn't
>
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
