Orphaning perl-re-engine-RE2

Hello, folks. I've just orphaned the perl-re-engine-RE2 package. If someone wishes to take it up, it's yours. Be warned that the package has an open bug in Bugzilla: Bug #1922811 (perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available) Regards, Emmanuel ___ perl-devel

Orphaning perl-re-engine-RE2

Hello, folks. I've just orphaned the perl-re-engine-RE2 package. If someone wishes to take it up, it's yours. Be warned that the package has an open bug in Bugzilla: Bug #1922811 (perl-re-engine-RE2-0.14 is available) Regards, Emmanuel ___ devel

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210312.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210311.0): ID: 810259 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-03-12 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/12/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210312gitd5fdea905.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Python help needed: weechat-matrix issues with Python 3.9

Hello, With Python 3.9, weechat-matrix errors if other Python plug-ins are already loaded, such as wee-slack. While the devs have looked into it, they're not yet sure of what's causing it. The error does not apparently occur with Python 3.8. Would any Python ninjas in the community be able to

correct combination (arch & abi) for rebulding gcc SRPM for RV64IMAFD on top of RISC-V Fedora image

Dear All, I am trying to rebuild gcc SRPM for RISC-V architecture (without compressed instruction support). Can any one please give some clarity, about which combination is correct for native compiler without compressed instruction support.  These are the combinations: 1. --with-arch=rv64g

Re: Problem 1: cannot install both libvmaf-2.1.1-1.fc35.x86_64 and libvmaf-1.5.3-2.fc34.x86_64

Posted a bug of it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938037 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Problem 1: cannot install both libvmaf-2.1.1-1.fc35.x86_64 and libvmaf-1.5.3-2.fc34.x86_64

Problem 1: cannot install both libvmaf-2.1.1-1.fc35.x86_64 and libvmaf-1.5.3-2.fc34.x86_64 - package ffmpeg-libs-4.4-0.4.20210218gitc2bf1dc.fc35.x86_64 requires libvmaf.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package

[Bug 1890793] EPEL8 Request: perl-Devel-REPL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890793 Bug 1890793 depends on bug 1807857, which changed state. Bug 1807857 Summary: please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807857 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1807857] please build perl-Sys-SigAction on EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807857 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1933852] perl-Locale-Codes-3.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.67-1.fc

Re: Fedora CoreOS branched stream

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 5:14 PM Jonathan Lebon wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:54 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:45 PM Jonathan Lebon wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This was mentioned in an email on the coreos list[1], but wanted to > > > raise

[Bug 1933852] perl-Locale-Codes-3.67 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933852 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Issue is that sometimes people really don't want (first) to understand how > to use the exact tool (it starts from something like "I'm not going to > read anything because I want to just use it!!") or look at some already > working examples (those cases are even worse :)).

[Bug 1938015] New: perl-Mojolicious-9.07 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938015 Bug ID: 1938015 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.07 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: annobin breaks reproducibility?

Nick, Le 3/11/21 à 2:03 PM, Frédéric Pierret a écrit : Hi Nick, Le 3/11/21 à 12:57 PM, Nick Clifton a écrit : Hi Frédéric, I think this is indeed the right choice and probably the more relevant info with respect the original source file. If you need some help for testing/fixing that,

Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 11/03/2021 12:13, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > >> I really hope we don't remove the ability to connect to old servers > >> (eg. running RHEL 5). At the moment you have to opt-in by setting the >

Re: Interesting growth trend in Rawhide

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:14:22PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I’m looking at the mirror statistics, and in addition to the general > positive upward trend, I noticed something interesting. Rawhide was, > relatively speaking, at its peak in the early days — up to about 2010. From > there, it

Re: Fedora mirrors, some returning 404

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 05:06:30PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/33/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-33-1.2.x86_64.raw.xz > > You probably won't be able to observe this easily, but if you > repeatedly download this file (or

[Bug 1926925] Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926925 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 1929205] perl-Business-ISMN-1.202 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929205 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc

On 3/11/21 5:13 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: In the past (long, long ago), I had to enable Telnet on target devices to work around incompatible cryptography policies. I hope we are not going to return to that. I've had to enable http on my home switches for that very reason, so ... --

Fedora-IoT-34-20210311.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210310.0): ID: 809835 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/809835 ID: 809844 Test: aarch64

Fedora Linux 34 Beta is NO-GO

Due to an outstanding blocker bug, F34 Beta RC1 was declared NO-GO in today's meeting[1]. The next Fedora Linux 34 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at 1700 UTC on Thursday 18 March in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for the "target date #1" milestone of 23 March. The release schedule[3] has

[Test-Announce] Fedora Linux 34 Beta is NO-GO

Due to an outstanding blocker bug, F34 Beta RC1 was declared NO-GO in today's meeting[1]. The next Fedora Linux 34 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[2] will be held at 1700 UTC on Thursday 18 March in #fedora-meeting. We will aim for the "target date #1" milestone of 23 March. The release schedule[3] has

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:51:42PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 03. 03. 21 13:47, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 1:33 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 03. 03. 21 12:49, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Compat package prepared. > > Package

Interesting growth trend in Rawhide

I’m looking at the mirror statistics, and in addition to the general positive upward trend, I noticed something interesting. Rawhide was, relatively speaking, at its peak in the early days — up to about 2010. From there, it slowly declines to almost nothing by 2012, and has stayed flat like that …

Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc

On 3/11/21 1:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 11/03/2021 12:13, Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: I really hope we don't remove the ability to connect to old servers (eg. running RHEL 5). At the moment you have

Fedora mirrors, some returning 404

https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/33/Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-33-1.2.x86_64.raw.xz You probably won't be able to observe this easily, but if you repeatedly download this file (or ideally, just do a HEAD request) then occasionally you'll hit a mirror that

Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 11/03/2021 12:13, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > >> I really hope we don't remove the ability to connect to old servers > >> (eg. running RHEL 5). At the moment you have to opt-in by setting the >

Fedora-34-20210311.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 16/126 (aarch64), 7/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210310.n.0): ID: 809062 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/809062 ID: 809077 Test: aarch64

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2021-03-12 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname

Fedora-Rawhide-20210311.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 32/126 (aarch64), 19/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:38:13PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > 3. I think this changes defocuses the Fedora Project from its main product > (the GNU/Linux distribution) and will ultimately hurts its users (i.e., most > of us on this mailing list). It is going to turn "Fedora Linux"

Re: Fedora CoreOS branched stream

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:54 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:45 PM Jonathan Lebon wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > This was mentioned in an email on the coreos list[1], but wanted to > > raise visibility on this. > > > > In addition to the rawhide FCOS stream previously

Re: Fedora CoreOS branched stream

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:45 PM Jonathan Lebon wrote: > > Hi all, > > This was mentioned in an email on the coreos list[1], but wanted to > raise visibility on this. > > In addition to the rawhide FCOS stream previously discussed[2], we now > have a branched stream which tracks "Fedora CoreOS 34"

Orphaned rubygem-recaptcha

Hi, I don't have any use for rubygem-recaptcha, therefore I orphaned the package. Vít OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora CoreOS branched stream

Hi all, This was mentioned in an email on the coreos list[1], but wanted to raise visibility on this. In addition to the rawhide FCOS stream previously discussed[2], we now have a branched stream which tracks "Fedora CoreOS 34" (in quotes because this doesn't mean the same thing as "Fedora 34").

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 13:57 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Matthew Miller wrote: > > Check this out from back in the day: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Logo-history-variations.jpg > > > > Under that scheme, it was obvious that we did a number of different > > things, all of them

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-03-11 17:00 UTC)

Unfortunately I again have a scheduling conflict today, and won't be near a computer for an hour either side of the meeting. Sorry about this; for some reason things keep lining up badly. - J< ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Fedora-IoT-35-20210311.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210310.0): ID: 809270 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/809270 ID:

Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc

On 11/03/2021 12:13, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > >> I really hope we don't remove the ability to connect to old servers >> (eg. running RHEL 5). At the moment you have to opt-in by setting the >> crypto-policy to LEGACY and running update-crypto-policies(8), which >> is

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 12:04, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: [..] > I really do not understand why so many upstreams are still using autotools. Because ItWorks(tm) A build system that fails so badly at backwards compatibility (This is not > the first time

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210311.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210310.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210311.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210311.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210310.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210311.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:9 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 27 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 113 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 21.23 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: annobin breaks reproducibility?

Hi Nick, Le 3/11/21 à 12:57 PM, Nick Clifton a écrit : Hi Frédéric, I think this is indeed the right choice and probably the more relevant info with respect the original source file. If you need some help for testing/fixing that, please don't hesitate. I would be happy to help. I'm also on

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

Matthew Miller wrote: > Check this out from back in the day: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Logo-history-variations.jpg > > Under that scheme, it was obvious that we did a number of different > things, all of them "Fedora". But those things have one thing in common, they are all gone

tmt hint 00

Hi! For those who still haven't heard: tmt [1] is now fully supported in Packit [2], Fedora CI [3] and the RHEL CI. This means it is possible to use the same concise and consistent config to enable tests across all of them, more easily open source tests, share test coverage across releases and

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

Ben Cotton wrote: > "Fedora" is the name of our project. Our general-purpose Linux > distribution is "Fedora Linux". Let's refer to it that way in the OS > itself. > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:mattdm| Matthew Miller]] I am opposed to this change, for several reasons: 1. This kind of

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

I much prefer simple things, and referring to the distribution as "Fedora" does it for me on a few levels. FNU? Perhaps in the future the Linux kernel may fall out of favour for something else, hey why not just cut to the eventual chase and call it systemd-fedora. On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 22:21,

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Really .. instead wasting time on packaging stuff which is ~7 years old it > would be better to use that time to fix one of those handful packages > which are still not ac 2.71 compliant So autoconf upstream dropped 7 years (!) of incompatible changes at us in one single

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2021-03-12 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9920/ ___ devel

Re: annobin breaks reproducibility?

Hi Frédéric, I think this is indeed the right choice and probably the more relevant info with respect the original source file. If you need some help for testing/fixing that, please don't hesitate. I would be happy to help. I'm also on IRC #fedora-devel. Are you able to test using F34 rpms

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

> Fedora is. Linux isn't. Linux is just an OS kernel Linux (/ˈlinʊks/ (listen) LEEN-uuks or /ˈlɪnʊks/ LIN-uuks[9]) is a family of open-source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel. ср, 10 мар. 2021 г. в 01:35, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel : > > On 09.03.2021 16:43, Matthew Miller

Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc

* Richard W. M. Jones: > I really hope we don't remove the ability to connect to old servers > (eg. running RHEL 5). At the moment you have to opt-in by setting the > crypto-policy to LEGACY and running update-crypto-policies(8), which > is bearable. In the past (long, long ago), I had to

[Bug 1937686] New: Upgrade perl-Test-Script to 1.27

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937686 Bug ID: 1937686 Summary: Upgrade perl-Test-Script to 1.27 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Script Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de

[Bug 1926925] Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926925 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e4716d8f9a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e4716d8f9a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: OpenSSH SHA-1 deprecation, developing FAQ, etc

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 06:58:51PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > Hi all, > > I put some comments on the OpenSSH mailing list[1] about UpdateHostKeys > and other SHA-1 related changes. > > The OpenSSH release notes simply tell people to update OpenSSH. In > practice, people who use

[Bug 1926925] Upgrade perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext to 1.32

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1926925 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210311.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210310.0): ID: 808598 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 1937653] New: Upgrade perl-HTTP-OAI to 4.11

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937653 Bug ID: 1937653 Summary: Upgrade perl-HTTP-OAI to 4.11 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-HTTP-OAI Assignee: vano...@gmail.com

[Bug 1929205] perl-Business-ISMN-1.202 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929205 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-58e1fe89ca has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-58e1fe89ca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: Request to include package: coreboot

On Thursday, 11 March 2021 at 00:50, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > It has a build system in it to build the bios file then you flash it. > It system can make more than one bios/uefi to flash to many different > hardware. What is wrong with packaging the tool to do that? Nothing. In fact, the tools

[Bug 1929205] perl-Business-ISMN-1.202 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929205 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED CC|

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:26 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > Thanks for your advice. Already contacted maintainers of redhat-rpm-config to > discuss adding the appropriate command and see what their response is. > So are we coming back to the idea of (re)adding an %GNUconfigure or %autoreconfigure

Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Thanks for your advice. Already contacted maintainers of redhat-rpm-config to discuss adding the appropriate command and see what their response is. Ondrej On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:06 PM Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:15:23AM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Mar