https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812
Bug ID: 2007812
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.48 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature,
# F35 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2021-09-27
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 9 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a
review meeting on Monday.
If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2021-09-27
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
Fedora 35 Beta comes out next week, so let's check in and make sure
we're prepared.
If anyone has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f005e1b879
debmirror-2.35-1.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2f9b2cf4af
ckeditor-4.16.2-1.el7
2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002422
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-ab1b0ba45f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994629
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3 |perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001570
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.34 |perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999019
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> https://odcs.stream.centos.org/production/CentOS-Stream-9-20210924.0/compose/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/libuv-devel-1.42.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm
On the one hand, thank you for pointing out that this build is now
available. That's good to know.
On the
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > The RHEL 9 composes do not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
Steve Grubb kirjoitti 23.9.2021 klo 18.15:
On Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:34:17 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote:
From all the scan that we've done on fullish installs in the past,
there's
only 2 others that you might run across: application/x-elc (lisp) and
application/x-java-applet.
Maybe you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006106
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005703
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006089
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006104
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976778
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:03 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > The RHEL 9 composes do not
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:03 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer
> > > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000615
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003640
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Text-Template-1.60-1.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998462
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997110
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001345
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Calendar-Juli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975580
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000561
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc36 |perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc36
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-File-Find-Object-Rule- |perl-File-Find-Object-Rule-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997123
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
--- Comment #3 from
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:03 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > The RHEL 9 composes do not
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we
> > > cannot build python-gevent
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we
> > cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily.
>
>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we
> cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily.
Hi folks,
The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we
cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily.
(It's possible to package the missing -devel packages separately, and
I've been doing this by automatically following the NVR changes in
Stream 9's Koji for several weeks
F35 Beta is GO! Time to focus on the Final blockers.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. mesa — gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell
killed by SIGSEGV — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to revert the regression-causing commit
2. abrt — abrt-dbus
Even the porting to openbabel3 of 'xdrawchem' is done.
Please, can anyone that uses these software test them?
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/builds/
On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:>
xdrawchem
https://github.com/bryanherger/xdrawchem/pull/17
Best regards.
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/204 (x86_64), 5/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210923.n.0):
ID: 1000787 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000787
ID: 1000795 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
On Friday, 24 September 2021 16.14.23 WEST Titouan Bénard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm Titouan, I have made some contribution in open
> source and now I would like to contribute in Fedora.
>
> I would like to package python packages not present in Fedora.
>
> Thanks
Hi Titouan,
welcome to Fedora.
Hello.
I have a lot of unremoved directories and files in /usr/lib/jvm/:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm/
total 140
drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 Sep 10 14:32
java-11-openjdk-11.0.12.0.7-4.fc34.x86_64
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Mar 14 2017
java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.121-10.b14.fc25.x86_64
drwxr-xr-x. 3
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
Dne 24. 09. 21 v 11:59 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a):
sudo dnf remove $(dnf -C list extras | cut -d ' ' -f -1 | tail -n +3)
This will remove packages which are not in current repositories.
On my workstation, this will suggests to remove webex, which I installed manually as an rpm. And I
OLD: Fedora-35-20210923.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210924.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210923.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210924.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 104
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.69 MiB
Size of dropped packages
We have no items on the agenda, so I'll cancel the meeting unless
someone wants to propose something in the next three hours.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 8:00 AM wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>ELN SIG on 2021-09-24 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern
>At
'ghemical' and 'libghemical' should be okay, too.
On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
We must decide if go forward with most
On 24. 09. 21 12:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
But still I'd rather have this as part of distribution - a package
similar to fedora-obsolete-packages which would allow me to remove all
retired packages simply by installing it.
Oh there is already this proposal -
Dne 24. 09. 21 v 11:27 Marek Blaha napsal(a):
It seem that when python-foo is retired, the script will attempt to remove
python-foo instead of python3-foo (and python3-foo-docs etc.).
Oh. Silly me. I will fix this.
Another idea: The script currently needs fedora-packager (for the pkgname
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007313
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
I have not used this patch for getting 'gnome-chemistry-utils' working
in x11 and Wayland:
diff --git a/programs/3d/main.cc b/programs/3d/main.cc
index 9bd59a4..aa18e3e 100644
--- a/programs/3d/main.cc
+++ b/programs/3d/main.cc
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
On 24/09/2021 06:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using:
Much more simple script:
sudo dnf remove $(dnf -C list extras | cut -d ' ' -f -1 | tail -n +3)
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 20:10 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that the %_host macro is defined as armv7hl-redhat-linux-
> gnu on
> the arm builders. I believe this is coming from the mockhost config
> option in kojid.
>
> In /usr/lib/rpm/macros %_host is defined as
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210923.0):
ID: 1000205 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Should it query for removed packages instead of components?
> >
> > It seem that when python-foo is retired, the script will attempt to remove
> > python-foo instead of python3-foo (and python3-foo-docs etc.).
> >
> > PS That's why I
On 24. 09. 21 10:50, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 09. 21 6:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using:
$ sudo dnf copr enable msuchy/remove-retired-packages
$ remove-retired-packages
This script removes packages retired between Fedora
On 24. 09. 21 6:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using:
$ sudo dnf copr enable msuchy/remove-retired-packages
$ remove-retired-packages
This script removes packages retired between Fedora N and Fedora N-1. You can
run it with
> Shouldn't it be autoconf2.71, assuming that it is for autoconf 2.71?
Yes, but in the case of autoconf2.71, I am wondering how to deal with an
update since this package should be the latest version.
Creating package autoconf2.72 in the future doesn't make sense to me.
My thought was to use
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
Shouldn't it be somehow aligned with this ^^ chapter? Maybe the chapter
should be referenced at least, because it explains how to request the
side tag.
Vít
Dne 23. 09. 21 v 11:29 Miro Hrončok
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007313
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007254
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
I have two theories: Either the patched perl-Net-SSLeay is broken, or
perl-POE-Component-SSLify code does TCP shutdown instead of TLS shutdown and
thus OpenSSL server reports the "unexpected eof while
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210923.0):
ID: 115 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
66 matches
Mail list logo
