No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-2020.0):
ID: 1060928 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211109.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-2021.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 321
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 1.66 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Hi Dusty,
Dusty Mabe writes:
> - cgroups v2 is now the default [5]
> - 64-bit ARM (aarch64) artifacts are now available [8]
> - Raspberry Pi 4 install documentation is now available [9]
> - Switching to iptables-nft by default [14]
What a list! Thanks for all your work on these features that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021689
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-215ed55c1d has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
On 11/3/21 04:50, Zuzana Miklankova wrote:
> I already announced another protobuf 3.19.0 update and rebuild and on
> top of it there is PR open to enable the Java bindings again:
java support has been re-added to protobuf and mysql-connector-java rebuilt.
It looks like java support was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021689
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a0c5cdb30c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
54 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f005e1b879
debmirror-2.35-1.el7
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-39d32447db
openssl11-1.1.1k-1.el7
0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021689
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-9d26b4e6df has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021689
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-57f7e7ee94 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021689
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f89c59b568
botan2-2.12.1-4.el8
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-742db3f554
rpki-client-7.5-1.el8
The following builds have been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017168
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-libwww-perl-6.58-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021689
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-9d26b4e6df has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9d26b4e6df
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hi Yaakov,
Nov 9, 2021 10:22:12 PM Yaakov Selkowitz :
> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 03:56 +, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) via devel wrote:
> > Does anyone know if it's possible to set bugzilla.redhat.com to email me a
> > copy of new bugs or comments that I create?
>
> Try:
Over the next few weeks we're rolling out Fedora Linux 35 to the
`testing` and `stable` streams of Fedora CoreOS. During the Fedora 35
development cycle we followed the Fedora Change process more closely [1]
in order to provide a smoother transition of incoming Fedora Changes.
Current known
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021689
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-e21ab3707b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e21ab3707b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021689
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
--- Comment #5 from Michael Ballou ---
Haha, ya, but still, you could have sat on it for a week or two but you didn't!
There were so few previous issues with this component I was almost afraid there
was no one out there to make the fix, it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
--- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth ---
Well it wasn't exactly a difficult fix :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
--- Comment #3 from Michael Ballou ---
Wow, thanks for the amazingly fast response!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 17:50 +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/11/2021 17:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Be warned that none of the Matrix clients currently available in
> > Fedora
> > repositories (nheko, neochat, pidgin via purple-matrix) can handle
> > SSO
> >
Actually, it turns out that the chmod is still needed. Fixed with the following
specfile:
%define ver 0.2.8
%define rel 1%{?dist}
Summary: multiple mailbox buffy for GTK+
Name: gbuffy
Version: %ver
Release: %rel
License: GPL
Group: Applications/Communications
Source0:
On Wednesday, 10 November 2021 at 17:50, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/11/2021 17:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Be warned that none of the Matrix clients currently available in Fedora
> > repositories (nheko, neochat, pidgin via purple-matrix) can handle SSO
> >
My apologies, i spoke too soon.
I updated Makefile.in to be:
install: gbuffy
./mkinstalldirs $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)
$(INSTALL) gbuffy $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)
Here is my updated spec file:
%define ver 0.2.8
%define rel 1%{?dist}
Summary: multiple mailbox buffy for GTK+
Name:
Thanks!
> On Wednesday, November 10, 2021, 03:10:43 PM CST, David Cantrell
> wrote:
>This is common practice in older projects. You have a couple of options:
> 1) Patch Makefile.in to honor DESTDIR. Make the install target look ike this:
install: gbuffy
./mkinstalldirs
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:46:35PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
./mkinstalldirs /usr/bin
make: ./mkinstalldirs: Permission denied
This sounds like "mkinstalldirs" is not executable, perhaps a simple "chmod +x
mkinstalldirs" will be enough?
It looks like the install target in
> On Wednesday, November 10, 2021, 02:47:17 PM CST, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> wrote:
>> ./mkinstalldirs /usr/bin
>> make: ./mkinstalldirs: Permission denied
> This sounds like "mkinstalldirs" is not executable, perhaps a simple "chmod
> +x mkinstalldirs" will be enough?
Thanks very much!
Ah!
> ./mkinstalldirs /usr/bin
> make: ./mkinstalldirs: Permission denied
This sounds like "mkinstalldirs" is not executable, perhaps a simple "chmod +x
mkinstalldirs" will be enough?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:56:33PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > The old Fedora account system had a ‘irc nick’ field. The new Fedora
> > account system has
> > a ‘Chat nicknames’ section. In that section you can put IRC nick(s) or
> >
Hi,
I have been trying to create a rpm for gbuffy which I like. However, I am
hitting an error in the install directories.
The program is at:
http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/gbuffy/
Here is my specfile:
# Note that this is NOT a relocatable package
%define ver 0.2.6
%define rel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-071bae5fdc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-071bae5fdc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Finance-Quote-1.51-2.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:40:32AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 5:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Greetings everyone.
> >
> > As you know, we migrated a while back from freenode.net to libera.chat for
> > our IRC networks,
> > and we also migrated to a new account
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-11-11 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2021-11-11 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2021-11-11
> Troy Dawson writes:
> If I remember right, the spec file name needs to be in the format
> .spec Thus, the spec file needs to be
> openssl3.spec, and thus you aren't really renaming it. :)
Yes, assuming that EPEL doesn't deviate:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2018910
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 8:38 AM Michel Alexandre Salim <
mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 19:40 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Per
Hi
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:05 PM Lyes Saadi wrote:
>
> (Also, I just want to insist I am not pushing nor advising anyone to do
> something breaking Discord's TOS without their approval, I'm just
> thinking of examples of external demand for a Discord package in Fedora.)
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021942
Bug ID: 2021942
Summary: perl-Crypt-SSLeay: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-SSLeay
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021948
Bug ID: 2021948
Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021945
Bug ID: 2021945
Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA
Assignee:
I orphaned PyPAM. It was dependency of Spacewalk and nowadays I do not use it and I am not aware of any other project
using it.
The upstream is dead. And it fails to build with new python.
I thought about retiring directly... but maybe there is somebody who use it.
Miroslav
Le 10/11/2021 à 17:47, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel a écrit :
On 10/11/2021 16:33, Lyes Saadi wrote:
I could even imagine someone creating a repo (not in COPR hopefully,
due to legal issues) replacing in proprietary apps like Discord (or
Slack which happens to be relevant to other discussions
Nov 10, 2021 10:47:59 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
:
> On 10/11/2021 16:33, Lyes Saadi wrote:
[snip]
>> Just wanted to add that if Electron is packaged for Fedora, packaging the
>> rest of the electron apps would not necessarily happen in the official repos
>> (due to the enormous work
Hi
I'll be updating to gdal and mingw-gdal to version 3.4.0 in rawhide
shortly, submitting the builds in the f36-build-side-47614 side tag.
I'll be rebuilding the following packages:
bes-3.20.8-3.fc36.src.rpm
cloudcompare-2.9.1-15.fc36.src.rpm
dans-gdal-scripts-0.24-16.fc36.src.rpm
On 10/11/2021 17:03, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Be warned that none of the Matrix clients currently available in Fedora
repositories (nheko, neochat, pidgin via purple-matrix) can handle SSO
authentication like the one required to login to fedora.im (Home Server
is fedora.ems.host).
On 10/11/2021 17:34, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) via devel wrote:
Perhaps this would be appropriate for RPM Fusion?
RPM Fusion doesn't allow network access during the build either.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing
On 10/11/2021 16:33, Lyes Saadi wrote:
I could even imagine someone creating a repo (not in COPR hopefully, due
to legal issues) replacing in proprietary apps like Discord (or Slack
which happens to be relevant to other discussions here) the bundled
electron with Fedora's making things like
Hi Lyes,
Nov 10, 2021 9:34:17 AM Lyes Saadi :
> Le 10/11/2021 à 11:27, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel a écrit :
>> On 10/11/2021 09:44, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>>> Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and
>>> Debian have already done this), but what about Electron applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021755
Bug ID: 2021755
Summary: Unable to retrieve quotes
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Hardware: noarch
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Finance-Quote
On Wednesday, 10 November 2021 at 12:56, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > The old Fedora account system had a ‘irc nick’ field. The new Fedora
> > account system has
> > a ‘Chat nicknames’ section. In that section you can put IRC nick(s) or
> > Matrix
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:11 AM Sahana Prasad wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Reminder to kindly think about porting your packages to
> avoid build failures with OpenSSL 3.0.0.
> We will try a rebuild in the next 2 weeks, and report FTBFS bugs.
>
Hi all,
FTBFS bugs have been reported for all those
Le 10/11/2021 à 11:27, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel a écrit :
On 10/11/2021 09:44, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and
Debian have already done this), but what about Electron applications
(VS Code for example)?
By the way, which Electron app do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-18-1.fc3 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-18-1.fc3
FWIW I'm in favor of at least f35.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 10th, 2021 at 4:34
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Also Debian have ffmpeg package
>
> you may try :
> dget https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_4.4.1-1.dsc
>
> cd ffmpeg-4.4.1/debian
> vi README.Debian
> etc
Debian has much less strict rules for multimedia patents than Fedora. E.g.,
Debian has always
On 10/11/2021 11:54, Artem Tim wrote:
Indeed, and they are built from sources on Flathub and that exactly the point.
We can do the same for Fedora.
As far as I know, they just parsing yarn.lock file and downloading
assets. This is not suitable for Fedora.
Keep mislead people and twisting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021296
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-231f86b976 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021296
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Graphics-TIFF-18-1.fc3 |perl-Graphics-TIFF-18-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019091
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
looks to me (only?) buildvm-s390x-22.s390.fedoraproject.org is having
issues, so I have disabled it
Dan
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:03:14 -0500
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> For full details on the problems please see
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10302
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021689
Bug ID: 2021689
Summary: perl-DBD-Firebird-1.33 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-Firebird
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
For full details on the problems please see
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10302
synopsis: z15 move failed, we are still on z13?/z14? until next week
or so when this will be tried again.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 06:55, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Now they're back up and running
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 11:35 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The old Fedora account system had a ‘irc nick’ field. The new Fedora
> account system has
> a ‘Chat nicknames’ section. In that section you can put IRC nick(s) or
> Matrix Ids.
> If you do not qualify them, they are assumed to be for the
Now they're back up and running again. I think that when I started the
builds before, s390x did not appear in the output of "koji list-tasks
--mine".
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
The Fedora CoreOS Working Group [1] is looking to get feedback on how we
share our progress with the rest of the Community. The goal being to help
us understand which communication channel works best and also gather ideas
about things we could try.
Here is a link to our very short survey
On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 10:12 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are several packages in the distribution which require FFMPEG
> (libavformat, libavcodec, etc.), one of them being chromium. The
> package could
> be created in a way that you can easily replace it with a version from
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:57 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Hello Kevin,
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:26 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Planned Outage - build systems ( koji, osbs, mbs, src, pdc, kojipkgs, odcs,
> > registriy) - 2021-11-09 17:00 UTC
> […]
> >
> > We will be doing several
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021296
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-1dd42c7968 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1dd42c7968
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021296
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:34:14AM +0100, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
> 1) Notify maintainers of those 5 packages about
> python3-google-api-client update.
> 2) Backport python3-google-auth-httplib2 and python3-google-api-client
> to F35 and F34.
> 3) Add PyDrive2 to F35 and F34.
> 4) Ask deja-dup
Hello Kevin,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:26 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Planned Outage - build systems ( koji, osbs, mbs, src, pdc, kojipkgs, odcs,
> registriy) - 2021-11-09 17:00 UTC
[…]
>
> We will be doing several maint tasks during this outage:
>
> All the s390x builders will be moving from
> Yes, bundling is allowed only for sources. You can package all dependencies
> in source form into a single vendored tarball.
OP never talked about bundling blobs, only you. Also OP never talked about
vscode.
> Flathub != Fedora. All Fedora packages must be built from sources (except
>
Hi all,
tl;dr: Backups with deja-dup to GDrive require PyDrive2 that requires
some dep updates not available in F35 or F34
The backup software deja-dup[1] can backup to Google Drive using
PyDrive. PyDrive has been archived[2] by Google and PyDrive2[3] is an
active fork. There is a bug in PyDrive
On 10/11/2021 10:07, Artem Tim wrote:
No, they
don't.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault#Detailed_Description
Yes, bundling is allowed only for sources. You can package all
dependencies in source form into a single vendored tarball.
"Flatpaks" using
On 10/11/2021 09:44, Andreas Schneider wrote:
I'm sorry, but didn't we talk about electron and you're pointing to vscode?
My previous message was:
Electron core packaging is a quite trivial task (Arch Linux and
Debian have already done this), but what about Electron applications
(VS Code for
Dne 07. 10. 21 v 17:45 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetiredPackages
== Summary ==
Easy the task of removing packages, which were retired and no longer
receives updates.
Updates:
The change has been approved by FESCO.
The subpackage `remove-retired-packages`
El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 19:01, Sergio Pascual ()
escribió:
>
>
> El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 15:02, Sergio Pascual ()
> escribió:
>
>>
>>
>> El lun, 8 nov 2021 a las 14:36, Stephen John Smoogen ()
>> escribió:
>>
>>>
>>> Can you try downgrading to the F34 linux-firmware and see if the f34
>>>
Am 09.11.21 um 10:13 schrieb Michael J. Baars:
Hi All,
I've been working with Fedora for years now, and I just installed the newest
Fedora Workstation 35 on one of my computers.
Since I use gedit a lot for editing source codes, gedit was one of the first
programs I tried to launch. Now,
> All of them must be compiled from source on Fedora's infra.
No, they don't.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault#Detailed_Description
> Have you tested the build without network access? Because even Flatpaks
> download everything from npm.
"Flatpaks" using
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64), 1/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211109.0):
ID: 1059304 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL:
* Kevin Fenzi:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:41:16AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Kevin Fenzi:
>>
>> > Isn't this an ideal use case for copr?
>>
>> I don't know. I could piece together the Koji API fairly easily, and
>> had hoped to reuse some of the script logic.
>>
>> Or does COPR have
On Wednesday, November 10, 2021 8:55:53 AM CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 10/11/2021 08:01, Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> > Can you point me to those tons of bundled JS blobs in the source tarball
> > from
the above link please? I don't see them.
>
>
>
On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 12:49 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 18:59 +0100, Michael J. Baars wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > I didn't install any update, apparently the update is already included with
> > the release version of Fedora 35, because it won't install from the command
>
On 09/11/2021 16:06, Robbie Harwood wrote:
They have? What's it called? Asking because I don't see it:
Sorry, my mistake. Only Arch Linux[1] and openSUSE[2].
[1]: https://archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/electron/
[2]: https://software.opensuse.org/package/nodejs-electron
--
88 matches
Mail list logo
