Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 38.
For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused
around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results,
with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:37 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Can we please have gcc-rs also built (even though it's experimental)?
>
> Will gcc-rs be able to generate usable shared libraries for Rust crates?
>
If someone were to spend the time to build the
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Can we please have gcc-rs also built (even though it's experimental)?
Will gcc-rs be able to generate usable shared libraries for Rust crates?
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-65548d9891
w3m-0.5.3-58.git20220429.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
rsnapshot-1.4.5-1.el7
Details about builds:
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
NetworkManager-l2tp-1.20.8-1.el8
mlpack-4.0.1-1.el8
nextcloud-client-3.2.4-4.el8
rsnapshot-1.4.5-1.el8
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155345
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155351
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155351
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155345
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 7:57 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 12/30/22 14:12, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
> >>
> >> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 08:46:46PM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > -1 for this change.
> > I will ignore it if it's accepted.
>
> That's OK, the idea is to make this opt-in.
> Without any specific concerns, that's all I can say.
On 12/30/22 14:12, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
>>
>> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
>>
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 08:46:46PM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > -1 for this change.
> > I will ignore it if it's accepted.
>
> That's OK, the idea is to make this opt-in.
So if the change is opt-in how is this an actual
> Rpmautospec (`%autorelease` and `%autochangelog`) is recommended as
> the default approach.
> Packaging Guidelines and other documentation are adjusted to describe
> this approach first.
> Various tools that provide spec file templates are adjusted.
-1 to this proposal.
As I had already
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157115
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.10-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95687223
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157115
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1935028
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1935028=edit
Update to 1.10 (#2157115)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157115
Bug ID: 2157115
Summary: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX-1.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 4:48 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
> > Have we made sure that when Red Hat
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 08:46:46PM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> -1 for this change.
> I will ignore it if it's accepted.
That's OK, the idea is to make this opt-in.
Without any specific concerns, that's all I can say.
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list --
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:10:52PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
> Have we made sure that when Red Hat forks Fedora packages for RHEL
> that they don't truncate or eliminate the Git
-1 for this change.
I will ignore it if it's accepted.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132181
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-Net-DNS-1.36-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95685652
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132181
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1934989
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1934989=edit
Update to 1.36 (#2132181)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132181
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Net-DNS-1.35 is|perl-Net-DNS-1.36 is
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F38-FPC-repackaging
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NotoFontsForMoreLang
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F38-FPC-repackaging
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NotoFontsForMoreLang
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
by the Fedora Engineering Steering
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:02 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:59:19AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 7:01 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
> > > >
> > > > It is a good idea to make the timeout
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157099
Bug ID: 2157099
Summary: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-Format-Natural
Keywords:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 12:59:19AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 7:01 AM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> >
> > Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
> > >
> > > It is a good idea to make the timeout configurable. But the default
> > > timeout for servers must remain
I'm interested in following along with this as well. Just learning about
WebAssembly's potential at the moment. It does seem that a currently missing
component is to harness fedora's infrastructure to build wasm targets and
distribute wasm artifacts. Capturing the steps necessary to build and
On Fri, Dec 30 2022 at 10:42:29 AM +0100, Peter Boy
wrote:
But the **default* values must provide the most safe operation
possible and not require any intervention from the system
administrator to achieve that.
I think we need to find some way for Workstation to have different
defaults than
On 12/29/22 20:27, John Reiser wrote:
A years-earlier "by-hand" example of related coding in plain-C is
scripts/recordmcount.c in the source code for Linux kernel.
Yep, functions like htonl have been in use in C for decades.
It is sad to see this standardization to little-endian (e.g.
On 12/30/22 06:59, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
You've apparently not encountered the corruption of a database under
heavy load where the cache where swapspace has not yet been propagated
to disk. Imagine a server running a lot of virtual machines for an
image of what an overly aggressive shutdown
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221229.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221230.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 34
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.78 MiB
Size of dropped packages
> Am 29.12.2022 um 16:29 schrieb David Malcolm :
>
> On Thu, 2022-12-29 at 13:03 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 09:17:28PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
>>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 22. 12. 22 v 9:56 Olivier Fourdan napsal(a):
> When the connection fails, the
> Am 30.12.2022 um 06:59 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia :
>
>> Am 28.12.22 um 11:49 schrieb Peter Boy:
>>>
>>> It is a good idea to make the timeout configurable. But the default
>>> timeout for servers must remain unchanged.
>>
>> My problem is not "defined timeouts" it is systemd delaying
44 matches
Mail list logo
