https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156168
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 01:59:46AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> The application can pick the options with which each library is compiled?
> What a stupid idea! Now I understand why the language is called "Rust".
Okay. no. This is not how we do things here.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora
On 11/27/22 14:51, Aleksei Bavshin wrote:
Greetings,
Sometime within the next week, I'll be updating wlroots in rawhide to
0.16.0[1] and sway to the latest release candidate. As usual, the update
contains API/ABI breaking changes and soname will be bumped to
libwlroots.so.11. wlroots0.15
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1dfe84c7fe
GitPython-3.1.30-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
fluidsynth-2.3.1-1.el9
omniORB-4.3.0-6.el9
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Speaking for myself: Using rpmautospec has massively reduced the
> maintenance burden for the Rust stack, and also for other packages
> that I maintain.
>
> Due to the way optional dependencies / features are mapped to RPM
> subpackages (this works like with "extra"
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> - incompatible compile-time options (i.e. resulting in conditional
> compilation): different packages depend on crates with different sets
> of features enabled, sometimes with conflicting options. Even with a
> stable ABI, you'd need to build crates for all necessary
On 01.01.23 21:48, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:49:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
I've done the same with all the mingw packages I maintained just
before Fedora 37 branched. So the following native packages now
just contain mingw sub-RPMs:
libvirt,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 02:49:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> I've done the same with all the mingw packages I maintained just
> before Fedora 37 branched. So the following native packages now
> just contain mingw sub-RPMs:
>
> libvirt, libvirt-glib, libosinfo, osinfo-db,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 03:37:34PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2022 at 13:40, Kevin Kofler via devel <
> > https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autochangelog.html#changelog-entries-generated-from-commit-messages
> >
> > All in all a very complicated and error-prone
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 3:48 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 9:37 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Can we please have gcc-rs also built (even though it's experimental)?
> >
> > Will gcc-rs be able to generate usable shared libraries for Rust
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 9:38 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
> My main questions are what is this supposed to fix long term?
>
> I have guessed that it has to do with automation, the shrinking number of
> active packagers in operating systems, and the exploding number of packages
> in requested
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157195
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Pod-Coverage-TrustPod-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157212
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Perl-Critic-Lax-0.014-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157212
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:44 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:23:35AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 11:17 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 31. 12. 22 15:07, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:17 PM Neal Gompa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157247
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157247
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157274
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed. Details below:
BuilderException: Build failed:
Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157274
Bug ID: 2157274
Summary: perl-File-Find-Object-0.3.7 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-Find-Object
Keywords: FutureFeature,
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> On 30/12/2022 20:01, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
>> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
>> by the Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157237
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
While converting moolticute to SPDX licensing, I removed the "effective
licensing" strategy that was used. This change is already pushed to
rawhide, I forgot to notify the devel list.
The license changes from
GPLv3
to
GPL-3.0-or-later AND (GPL-3.0-only WITH Qt-GPL-exception-1.0) AND
Hi all.
Current and older 'qwtplot3d' sub-packages (0.2.7) will be obsoleted by
newer Qt5/Qt6 rpms of 'qwtplot3d' (0.3.0)
The rpm 'qwtplot3d-qt5' will be retired because replaced by 'qwtplot3d'
sub-packages.
Please, let me know if anyone still needs qwtplot3d (Qt4) 0.2.7
Regards.
--
---
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221231.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230101.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 34
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
24 matches
Mail list logo
