Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

2014-12-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Bastien Nocera wrote: You're free to select another firewall zone. How, when you don't even install the firewall configuration tool by default? Settings - Network, select your network - Identity - Firewall zone -- devel mailing list devel

Re: Review swap -- Budgie Desktop

2014-12-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:08:09AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: It's a sub-module because it's not a library. I know it does not have a stable api. But could it be compiled as a library? It could be, as long as it's not installed in a system-wide location. My

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

2014-12-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Bastien Nocera wrote: Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall settings was people disabling the firewall. And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the firewall for them, It's not disabled. and also for all

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

2014-12-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera: Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall settings was people disabling the firewall. And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the firewall for them

Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall

2014-12-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera: There's a few more items that will be opened I'm afraid. And one of the reasons why we block root ports is to avoid regressions like rpcbind listening by default, which was due to a bug in packaging. So what

Re: Power consumption with Fedora

2014-12-05 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:44:59 -0700 Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote: On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 21:47 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 06:30:57 +0100, Nathanael d. Noblet wrote: I don't know much about it but I hate how bad my

Re: Enable tapping by default

2014-11-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Björn Persson bjorn@rombobjörn.se wrote: drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: Things are not black and white there is a disable touchpad while typing option which would solve your problem while not making the impression that

Re: Join to Mozilla Location Service in Fedora

2014-11-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Hi Folks, as you may know [0] Firefox in Fedora [1] is using Mozilla Location service [2] as a location provider instead of the Google one. I'd like to ask you to join the project, install the Mozilla Stumbler application [3] and help to improve the location

Re: Join to Mozilla Location Service in Fedora

2014-11-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - stransky wrote: [...] I'd like to ask you to join the project, install the Mozilla Stumbler application [3] and help to improve the location accuracy. [...] Until Mozilla figures out how to publish this data [1], it seems premature to ask us to donate

Re: Overlayfs in rawhide

2014-10-27 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Hi All, A quick FYI for those that don't follow kernel news often. Overlayfs has been merged into the mainline kernel with 3.18-rc2. We've been carrying this in the kernel-playground COPR for a while and it is now enabled in the standard Fedora kernels.

Re: Wallpapers in portrait orientation

2014-09-29 Thread Bastien Nocera
Given that to generate them we would just crop the existing wallpapers, I'm not sure what the point is. - Original Message - Hi, I'm thinking can we ship for Fedora 22 some wallpapers in portrait orientation? We always shipped wallpapers in landscape mode. But I - and quite people

Re: Improving the offline updates user experience

2014-09-17 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Dne 16.9.2014 v 17:29 Matthias Clasen napsal(a): On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 16:21 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Has Fedora given up Unix ?? This thread has gone quite far out into the weeds. It started with a fairly concrete question: can we improve the

Re: New Group Calls For Boycotting Systemd

2014-09-09 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:36:21AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 22:18 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: - has tools for setting the system time and timezone, and locale Sure. They're useful. In GNOME, our settings panels

Re: blivet-gui announcement

2014-09-05 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) would like to introduce you the next generation tool for storage management -- the **blivet-gui** tool [1]_. It is a GUI tool based on the blivet python library (originally Anaconda's storage management and

Re: ModemManager update to 1.4.0 release

2014-08-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey, As much as I enjoy new ModemManager releases (I'm subscribed to NetworkManager-devel), could you please stop requesting new versions to be built by sending e-mails to fedora-devel? There's a Bugzilla for that, or email the maintainers directly. If we started doing that for every package,

Cc: on dead packages

2014-06-30 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey, Apparently, people can still file bugs for dead packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114180 And I (and many others) get CC:ed on those bugs files, with no possibility to remove ourselves from the CC: in pkgdb. Any idea where I should be filing a bug for this bug? Cheers

Re: RFC: httpd-filesystem proposal

2014-03-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:41:55AM +, Joe Orton wrote: We're proposing to add an httpd-filesystem subpackage which will simplify some dependency problems; particularly for packages which want to contain files owned by the apache user, but don't need a

Re: What will happen to XFCE, LXDE, Mate, Cinnemon in Fedora.Next

2014-03-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Workstation might implement easy installation of alternative desktops in the GNOME Software app at some point. Urgh. This is just moving the problem from the installer/media selection to the software installer. Just what would we gain by doing that given that there

Re: gnome-disk-utility orphaned ?

2014-02-17 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Hi, See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063259 It's not, and it's probably just an oversight. Feel free to cherry-pick the updates from F20 into master. Cheers -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

2014-01-24 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - snip I actually think Cinnamon used blueman in F19 for Bluetooth management, iirc. Nope. Which is why it broke when I bumped the soname of the gnome-bluetooth libraries. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

2014-01-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
. FWIW, the HFP/HSP support is missing in PulseAudio, not in BlueZ for F20. Cheers /Bastien Nocera - windmill tilter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Retiring my gnome-shell search providers

2014-01-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Hello, A while ago, I wrote a trio of gnome-shell search providers: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-fedora-packages This one is probably obsoleted by gnome-software's search feature. Maybe you could obsolete it instead of

Re: Unannounced soname bump: tracker

2014-01-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - snip Plus it wasn't just happening on its own; the state of Rawhide when everyone else bogged off for Christmas was that it was suffering from this, the borkage in libevdev, the gnome-bluetooth soname bump / library drop (which affects other desktops), library

Re: Unannounced soname bump: tracker

2014-01-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
One hiding in a private directory: /usr/lib64/gnome-bluetooth/ that gnome-shell explicitely adds to its path. It has no headers and is only usable through introspection. - Original Message - On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 05:52 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: - Original Message - snip

Re: Rawhide unannounced ABI bumps: gnome-bluetooth

2013-12-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Yep, it's that time again, folks. I see errors in my daily update indicating an unannounced API/ABI bump. gnome-bluetooth-3.11.3-1.fc21 (built yesterday) seems to have gone from libgnome-bluetooth.so.12 to libgnome-bluetooth.so.13 and dropped

Re: Rawhide unannounced ABI bumps: gnome-bluetooth

2013-12-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: snip vfrnav I didn't know this software, and I didn't know it used gnome-bluetooth. Even with older versions of gnome-bluetooth it throws: (vfrnav:1959): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid

Re: Fedora Workstation Desktop Environment Concept

2013-11-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - snip Document Link: http://goo.gl/0IzNgK *this is a Google Documents link I think it would have more of a chance to get discussed if you added the contents of your document in the body of a mail, rather than on Google Docs. It would make it easier for people to

Re: F20 Beta upgrade issues - network status gone

2013-11-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - - I don't have any Bluetooth status or display in gnome-shell now. I did previously. I do not know what I need to install or tweak to get it back, or where to report it. I'm not as sure about this one, but it's probably the same thing: no

Re: F20 Beta upgrade issues - network status gone

2013-11-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - but I do have a number of bluetooth devices (mouse, speakers, headset) that I use to be able to connect with a couple of clicks once paired but now every time I want to use them I have to go into the control panel which is a good dozen or more clicks.

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-12 Thread Bastien Nocera
No. - Original Message - On 2013-11-11, Branislav Blaskovic blaskovic.branis...@gmail.com wrote: Of course there have to be mentioned that the app is made for terminal. BTW, is there an XDG way how to spawn an user-preferred terminal emulator (and and application inside)? --

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - snip But they hardcode the terminal application to gnome-terminal, which is unacceptable! Just don't use GNOME? More seriously, this is the bug with the instructions on how to write the terminal chooser patch for glib:

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On 11/06/2013 11:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:55:30PM +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote: Has this sanboxed-bundled-from-upstream proposal been discussed with other distributions? If the final result is that the Universal Linux Package only

Re: unaccessability

2013-11-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
It's only for GUI applications, which BitchX isn't, and if it has become a GUI application in the ten years since I last looked at it, it's probably lacking AppData files. - Original Message - Is / was a rather political decision to make BitchX unavailable through this app-market /

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Bastien Nocera wrote: Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on the various bundling techniques that were explored and the API/ABI guarantees we want to offer? I'll stop short of paraphrasing you. The fact that bundling is even

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Am 06.11.2013 10:56, schrieb Bastien Nocera: - Original Message - Bastien Nocera wrote: Might not want to put answers in people's mouths. Did you read up on the various bundling techniques that were explored and the API/ABI guarantees we want

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-05 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 16:15 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: - Original Message - I don't get your example but I agree with Reindl Harald - Linux Distribution is a set of software that works as one coherent environment. Let it be 10, 100

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
That's fine. The apps would ship directly from upstream, not from Fedora :) - Original Message - On 03.11.2013 20:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz Do I understand correctly that first problem could be solved by

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On 11/04/2013 10:45 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: That's fine. The apps would ship directly from upstream, not from Fedora :) I realize Fedora throwing overboard it basic working principles (open source) Did I say that? No, I don't believe I did

Re: Is Gnome Software ready for primetime ?

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On 1 November 2013 19:27, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: Cleaned up the appdata xml Thanks, https://github.com/timlau/yumex/blob/master/misc/yumex.appdata.xml but I get errors from appdata-validate Can see what the problem is :( You've

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 11:16, Bastien Nocera a écrit : I want upstream to control their distribution of software and not be reliant on distributions shipping this or that update ie I don't want to make the api stabilization process in my software

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
You're confusing stand-alone applications and extensions to the core desktop. An easy mistake to make. - Original Message - Le Dim 3 novembre 2013 19:34, drago01 a écrit : On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: since it is a free operating

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
Unless the hammer has a cool new feature that you want to try out, or a bug that was hampering your work has been fixed and you want to test that the problem's solved. You can see that analogies only get us so far... - Original Message - On 04.11.2013 11:13, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Nov

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
Emacs is more than 30 years old, gnome-shell is nearing 3 years since its first stable release. When gnome-shell is this mature, I'm sure the extensions breaking will be less of a problem :) - Original Message - On 11/04/2013 12:32 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: On 04.11.2013 12:18,

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Bastien Nocera wrote: As an application developer, I'd sure be happy if I didn't have to wait 6 months for my app to show up in the distribution I use, and for that application to be usable on all compatible distributions. That's a problem with the distribution's update policies

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Bastien Nocera wrote: When my application runs on all Fedora distributions without changes? No. I wasn't talking about core apps that are tightly integrated to the desktop, just of the time it took for somebody to package up office-runner from my 1.0 release

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - I don't get your example but I agree with Reindl Harald - Linux Distribution is a set of software that works as one coherent environment. Let it be 10, 100 or 1000 different packages but they're chosen, compiled and adjusted to work together. This is the

Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

2013-11-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - And the application developer suddenly gains back control on how and when his app gets delivered to users. And this is supposed to be a good thing? Looking at much much crap distro packagers had to fix in the past I really can't think of it as that. You

Re: FYI: UPower soname bump

2013-10-29 Thread Bastien Nocera
It will need changes then. See: http://www.hadess.net/2013/10/more-power-management-changes.html and: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.devicekit.devel/1473 - Original Message - Dne 29.10.2013 14:10, Richard Hughes napsal(a): Hi, Although all interested parties

Re: New maintainer for lirc/Jarod Wilson's packages

2013-10-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - Hi, Jarod Wilson, the current lirc maintainer, announced that he wants someone else to maintain lirc due to lack of time/interest[0]. Probably his other four packages need a new maintainer as, well[1]:

Re: New maintainer for lirc/Jarod Wilson's packages

2013-10-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - 2013/10/1 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com - Original Message - Hi, Jarod Wilson, the current lirc maintainer, announced that he wants someone else to maintain lirc due to lack of time/interest[0]. Probably his other four packages need

Re: Release packages ownership

2013-08-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hi, - Original Message - Hi, due to a lack of time, I released the ownership of most of my packages : snip The following packages are used by Totem (directly or indirectly), so it would be good to have them find new owners: grilo-plugins

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

2013-08-19 Thread Bastien Nocera
The whole reason why the bluez5 package was proposed as a separate one was so that we didn't have to cater for every desktop under the sun that's included in Fedora. bluez5 would conflict with bluez. If you had both MATE and GNOME installed, you wouldn't be able to upgrade to the latest

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 30

2013-07-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:36 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 25.07.13 14:39, Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) wrote: Partially accepted Changes * No Default Sendmail - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSendmail -

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Remove deprecated calls of using ntpdate in favor of ntpd

2013-07-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com said: ntpdate is slowly being depricated. STIG enhancements for RHEL 6 penalize systems that make use of ntpdate. Also documentation from the NSA Hardening

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

2013-07-17 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On 07/16/2013 05:28 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: All the remix images to date have been created on the users own devices. If you are internal to Red Hat there's process to get access to internal infrastructure... There are 3 things I would like to add here:

Re: F20 System Wide Change: No Default Syslog

2013-07-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
Did you try the right arrow key when running journalctl? - Original Message - Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said: On Mon, 15.07.13 16:31, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote: Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de said: (also:

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

2013-07-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
If phones and tablets aren't the primary focus, what is? Development boards, for the sake of running Fedora ARM on something? Server systems that don't exist yet (or aren't widely available[1])? I'm interested in Fedora on phones, tablets, tiny dongly media centers, set-top boxes, Wi-Fi

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

2013-07-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: If phones and tablets aren't the primary focus, what is? Development boards, for the sake of running Fedora ARM on something? Server systems that don't exist yet (or aren't widely

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

2013-07-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - They're not the primary focus of mainline Fedora either. We're CURRENTLY focusing on development boards (100s of examples), desktop like systems (Trimslice and other similar systems), netbooks/laptop style systems and the various media centre style devices

Re: FYI: F20 Feature: Migrate to Bluez5

2013-06-21 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 17:16 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: 2013-05-06 11:13, Peter Robinson skrev: On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: Heya, In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices. Bluez5 uses a D-Bus API that's

FYI: F20 Feature: Migrate to Bluez5

2013-05-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
Heya, In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices. Bluez5 uses a D-Bus API that's not compatible with Bluez4[1] and as such, management applications and a number of libraries and daemons will need to be ported. For GNOME 3.10 (due September 2013), Gustavo Padovan and I

Re: FYI: F20 Feature: Migrate to Bluez5

2013-05-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:13 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: Heya, In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices. Bluez5 uses a D-Bus API that's not compatible with Bluez4[1

Re: FYI: F20 Feature: Migrate to Bluez5

2013-05-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:08 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com wrote: Heya, In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices. So your Subject says this is a Feature, yet there's no link to a Feature page. I can't

Re: fedora release name problem

2013-03-19 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 12:23 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mar 19 mars 2013 09:31, Adam Williamson a écrit : I don't object at all to fixing UTF-8 issues, but it seems needlessly stressful to force ourselves to do so as a part of release validation, with booby traps exploding all

Re: system freezes after loading gdm/gnome

2013-02-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 15:26 +0100, Jan Dvořák wrote: Hi, I am running rawhide for fun and since a few days ago a few seconds after starting gdm the whole system freezes. I am sorry that I can't really pinpoint the exact update as I suspend and this only manifested after a reboot. Intel

Orphaning gnome-media, gmyth, EOL'ing gnome-lirc-properties

2013-02-19 Thread Bastien Nocera
Heya, gnome-media is unmaintained upstream, and the only interesting thing left in that package is the sound recorder, for which I'm sure there are better alternatives (both in terms of UI and maintainership). gmyth is also unmaintained upstream as far as I know. I haven't used it in a long

Re: ConsoleKit and esound retirement

2013-02-15 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 20:39 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:28:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:53 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:49:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: DJ Delorie wrote: Disadvantage, if you ask me

Re: ConsoleKit and esound retirement

2013-02-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:53 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:49:23 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: DJ Delorie wrote: Disadvantage, if you ask me. First thing audacious did was spew random errors to the screen and change my Firefox and emacs cursors. So I suspect

Re: Gnome-shell workspaces

2013-02-12 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 15:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Olav Vitters wrote: This has been addressed various times. In brief: Advanced buttons do not work. They'll be clicked every time. Tweak tool provides a different guarantee of stability. For instance: if you change an option in System

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

2013-01-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
15baf34186c6b5886b26e5a37698893be36f510b Author: Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net Date: Tue Nov 6 19:13:12 2012 +0100 keyboard: Prevent potential infinite loop XKB would notify us in the same way if the lockedMods changed because of a programmatic, or a physical/human change

Re: Orphaned package: ushare

2013-01-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 19:24 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, On Ter, 2013-01-08 at 17:05 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: Nothing's using this in F18, and upstream is very much dormant. I don't want to maintain it and I'd honestly prefer people use gupnp, so I'm tossing ushare to the wolves.

Re: Fedora 18 laptop regression

2013-01-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 19:49 +, alex...@hushmail.com wrote: On 07/01/2013 at 7:40 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - And is it possible to disable suspend on lid close but still have GNOME lock the screen on lid close? No? Didn't think so...

Re: LibRaw: possible license issues

2012-11-26 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 20:13 +, Andrew Haley wrote: On 11/26/2012 06:29 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote: Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3. The package is GPLv3+. If the license of libraw changed significantly, the libraw package should be updated to reflect

Re: Replacing libusb1 with libusbx

2012-05-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 13:44 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, I plan to replace libusb1 with libusbx, libusx is a fork of and a drop in replacement for libusb1. The libusbx fork was started by various libusb-1.0 developers (almost all of them *), because the official maintainer of

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

2012-04-26 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:31 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: (Note: *DO NOT* run the installer that is on this image. You'll probably end up with a broken grub. Should be fixed soon) I've put a test image up at http://mjg59.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Mac-EFI-test.iso - this should work if

Re: Building the GNOME 3.4.1 Release

2012-04-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 11:13 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 13:53 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: If you're maintaining a GNOMEish package and you want it included in the 3.4.1 release, please build the package like normal and then add the build ID to:

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-02-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 00:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: As far as I'm aware, Canonical were reasonably good about proposing the libindicator patches for upstream inclusion, but many upstream projects - especially those that are part of GNOME - weren't exactly rushing

Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)

2012-01-27 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 04:16 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:05:37 Manuel Escudero wrote: And also I've been told this desktop is available for ArchLinux now as well... As for this facts I was wondering how feasible is to port

Re: Request update of shared-mime-info

2011-11-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 14:36 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: Folks, Can someone please push the update that I made (with permission) to shared-mime-info? I'm getting jcm does not have commit access when I try to make the F16 update. This fix is required to actually be able to play many MP3 files

Re: GNOME 3 - font point sizes now scaled?

2011-10-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 11:00 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, I'm working on bringing OLPC up-to-date with all the great efforts with GNOME 3, systemd, etc. On the OLPC XO laptops we have quite a strange screen - it is small (152mm x 114mm) but very high resolution (1200x900 i.e. 201 dots

Re: GNOME 3 - font point sizes now scaled?

2011-10-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:09 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the people in charge

Re: which video player for a package Requires ?

2011-05-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:26 +0200, Nicoleau Fabien wrote: Hi, I'm packaging a software that downloads videos from websites like youtube, dailymotion, etc ... This software also allow the user to launch a video player that will read the video as a stream. The default value in the

Re: GNOME 3 Fallback Mode

2011-04-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 16:27 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: On 04/27/2011 03:10 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: Lots of things are unfortunate. This is software, after all. I regret not working on this earlier, since it would probably have saved the effort invested in fallback mode entirely. I

Re: GStreamer Provides script updated

2011-03-21 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 07:55 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 03/21/2011 05:21 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: Third-party packagers of GStreamer, please make sure that gstreamer-0.10.32-3.fc15 (or newer) is in your buildroots when rebuilding GStreamer plugins, as it will add GStreamer element

GStreamer Provides script updated

2011-03-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
Third-party packagers of GStreamer, please make sure that gstreamer-0.10.32-3.fc15 (or newer) is in your buildroots when rebuilding GStreamer plugins, as it will add GStreamer element names to the packages' provides scripts, making it possible to auto-install through PackageKit. Cheers -- devel

Re: Orphaning and retiring HAL

2011-03-17 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 10:16 +, Richard Hughes wrote: On 16 March 2011 17:16, Michel Alexandre Salim sali...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I wonder why gimp depends on hal directly. For scanner, perhaps? It was for tablet support, but the code could never have worked. We've dropped the hal

Re: F15 Alpha impressions

2011-02-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 10:46 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 02/28/2011 08:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 23:18 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:03:02 +0100, drago01 wrote: Btw, I think the GNOME 3 roll-out in Fedora should be all or nothing,

Re: F15 Alpha impressions

2011-02-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 10:06 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 16:20 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: On 02/27/2011 03:55 PM, Mike Chambers wrote: When in a program (Evolution for example), it seems this is the only one I see in the task window/panel or whatever up

Re: rawhide report: 20110222 changes

2011-02-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 12:09 +0100, Alexandre Mazari wrote: Hi, The following update breaks gdm and gnome-session at runtime for me: gsettings-desktop-schemas-0.1. 7-1.fc16 -- * Mon Feb 21 2011 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 0.1.7-1 - Update

Re: rawhide report: 20110222 changes

2011-02-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Alexandre Mazari sca...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The following update breaks gdm and gnome-session at runtime for me: gsettings-desktop-schemas-0.1. 7-1.fc16 -- * Mon Feb 21 2011 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 0.1.7

Re: Trying to contact David Zeuthen for nonresponsive maintainer process

2011-02-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 13:52 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: On 22.02.2011 05:00, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 00:57 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: Is David still around? Yes, and hacking on GNOME 3. And no five minutes to care about older duties or at least reply? Too bad

Orphaning some (GNOMEy) packages

2011-02-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
Here's the list of packages, with reasons: - gnome-launch-box, replaced by gnome-shell's builtin features (mostly, filed bugs for the rest) - libgalago, libgalago-gtk, replaced within GNOME with session-wide features, but could still be used by supported applications. First come, first serve.

Re: Trying to contact David Zeuthen for nonresponsive maintainer process

2011-02-21 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 00:57 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: Hello fellow Fedorans. With this email I'm trying to contact David Zeuthen. There is a bug [1] filed for Festival speech synthesis which is open for almost four years now (besides a few others, but the particular one is bothering me).

Re: Backported gtk3 for F14 available

2011-02-10 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 16:28 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: snip Interesting idea. Note that I've _just_ released the stable GTK+ 3.0.0. We could think about updating the gtk3 package in F14 to 3.0.0 if that is useful for people. We had essentially abandoned this and a few other packages in F14

Re: NetworkManager doesn't start on boot

2011-02-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 21:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 02/08/2011 09:09 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: Why not fix it? That is, why should a user of this app care whether a service is SysV or systemd? Or, is this app being replaced by some other UI? Also is there a plan to modify

Re: Rawhide is annoying me!

2011-02-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 18:01 +, Paul F. Johnson wrote: Hi, I'm having two problems on two different boxes, both running rawhide. Problem 1 (my main box) - whoever decided to remove the default applications thing from the menu, please put it back. I can understand the rational, but it

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora GNOME 3 Test Day #1 coming up tomorrow

2011-02-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 22:16 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:09:41 +0100, Christoph wrote: * At the graphical login screen, I cannot log in. I did the useradd manually, and it appears as an empty entry to click on. Authentication fails. Cursor doesn't show any

Re: Preferred Startup applications gone?

2011-02-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 08:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of the desktop providing a central config point. To the GNOME developers

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:33 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: Hi, beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation for final release that should be out on 7th, just before the feature freeze.

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 15:41 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote: On 2/4/11 3:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:33 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: Hi, beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done

<    1   2   3   4   >