On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 05:32:41PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I agree that it's a little weird at first, but as Ben Cotton said,
> after the first hundred times or so it becomes natural.
This is not necessarily true. Our university IT department changed its
name about a decade ago, from three
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:45:29PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, you could still argue it's prettier than a wall-o-text boot. And
> it *does* hide the wall-o-text.
On the first boot after install that's maybe nice, but usually when I
look at the machine booting I either do need to see why
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:00:55PM +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > […]
>
> > The purpose here is to make the Fedora project a more welcoming place to
> > people who _do_ find those terms unwelcome. That doesn't mean everyone
> > does. It means we want to be welcoming
Another dot on the map:
Issues:
- rdma-core (known problem)
- jami (third party repo, does not have f34 yet)
- mpd (requires libupnp.so.16, but there seems to be only libupnp.so.17
in f34 available)
Error:
Problem 1: package jami-daemon-20210219.1.9530a07-1.fc33.x86_64 requires
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 06:29:13PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I also remember when this was a killer feature for Fedora, and without any
> real way of judging use and demand, I'm hesitant to kill it off. But that's
> definitely plan B. We can point people who are in low-bandwidth situations
>
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:35:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:43 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:49 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > > > >
> > >
> > > It does support it, but AFAIK does not require it.
> > >
> > > Arguably those with
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 06:11:09PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> That would be amazing! In order for it to remain as an edition, we (speaking
> generally for the Council) like to see regular meetings -- at least monthly.
I'll check the situation there - if there are more people interested in
a
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 11:11:02AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> One uncomfortable question that this raises: is it time to de-Edition
> Fedora Server?
Please don't, for me it is the Version I'm currently migrating my Centos
7 boxes to, so having it properly tested and being high on the "if it
I've taken:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> snownews orphan 0 weeks ago
> steghide orphan, s4504kr 1 weeks ago
> synergy dchen, opuk, orphan
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:36:38PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> So where is a global pool of volunteer-provided DNS resolvers similar
> to pool.ntp.org? I've never heard of one, and I suspect it's not
> advisable to do that with DNS.
There is currently no such thing that I know of, but lacking
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 06:11:58AM -0400, Pavel Valena wrote:
> TL;DR please, +1 for nano, as "trial by fire" is not a good first
> experience for someone who just wants to get something done.
This is not "trial by fire", it is just a different interface than
people are used from notepad.exe. Vi
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 03:42:39PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> "In the last year, How to exit the Vim editor has made up about .005%
> of question traffic: that is, one out of every 20,000 visits to Stack
> Overflow questions. That means during peak traffic hours on weekdays,
> there are about
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:15:58AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> The most user friendly solution is to have nano by default with a very easy
> way to revert to vim for anyone that knows what they are doing.
No, it is not. It is user friendly to the users only using the command
line a few times or
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 05:25:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> This is not generally true, only if RAM gets so tight that applications
>> start competing for swap.
>> This is why I've proposed test cases testing exactly that, as for
>> the case of persistent swap I'd expect the outcome to be a
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 05:36:15PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> To me this sounds like too much dependency on swap.
That's not what I meant, I wanted to emphasize the different values of
disk storage vs. RAM. As said in another email it doesn't matter at all
if there is 0% or 90% of disk swap
Hi!
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:15:35AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> 5GB of swap space that normally would be on disk is now taking less than 2G
> of RAM. Instead of the usual 6G in the disk swap, now I have less than 2.
What's bugging me about this thread is that quite a few people made
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:38:06PM +0200, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> I'm curious about this point, there is a security team[0] so it could be
> interesting to get one of them on the list? I'm not following quite
> close enough what they do...
Currently there is not too much activity in the
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:44:44PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The rules you propose there lead to the ridiculous effect that people who
> want to astain will instead actually leave the meeting […]
Yes, true, that could happen. Thats a good thought.
> The whole definition of an abstention or
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 05:36:06PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> One strong argument for the proposed change is that, currently, an
> abstention or recusal (TIL that's the proper term) is essentially
> equivalent to a negative vote. (As long as we require +5 to pass,
> any vote apart
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:51:57PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> If the threat model is just stolen/lost laptop/disk then encrypting the
> user data only would be sufficient.
Strictly speaking I'd say /etc/shadow, /var/lib/{pgsql,mysql}/,
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ and /etc/NetworkManager/ are
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> Ok let's scenario this out so as several people want us to restart […]
In this context of "restarting the scenario":
> How do we accommodate that when our other stakeholders' needs are now
> not being met as a whole and when the
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:38:16PM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> The decision is made and we are proceeding to engage with Gitlab and
> unfortunately that won't be reversed as a decision.
I haven't expected this situation, so I've read up a bit on the whole
thing.
From the outside it looks
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:21:48PM +0100, clime wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 10:00, David Kaufmann wrote:
>> Another idea would be generating a changelog-entry from git history when
>> creating an update in bodhi, and there is no pre-existing
>> changelog-entry fo
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:08:49AM +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
> For the changelog: yes please, generate it from the commit log! They are
> more or less the same for all my packages and I'm getting tired of copy
> pasting the same text into %changelog and git commit.
Another idea would be generating
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:05:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> […]Fedora reportedly has millions of users, but I have no way of telling how
> many of those are actually affected by the longer download time […]
To add another aspect, that cannot be counted properly (and thus being a
personal
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:49:55PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Currently opensmtpd has a high level remote CVE and several others from the
> release listed. I have tried to compile the updated version but […]
According to the oss-security list[1], this vulnerability has been made
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:20:15PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 10. 01. 20 v 18:21 Iñaki Ucar napsal(a):
> > Most of the time, I end up copying the spec changelog in the commit
> > message and I don't change the update template,
>
> +1
> Thou, occasionaly I *delete* some of those commits
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 09:25:06PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> The installer doesn't support such a configuration. No portion of the
> bootloader nor the boot volume, can be encrypted.
I do consider this a bug, but as there is no stable solution for that
right now we can't just "fix it".
>
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 07:58:07PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> Encrypting $HOME would certainly be "an incremental improvement", but it
> shouldn't be done unless the user chooses to do it, and it probably shouldn't
> be done using the same passphrase they use for their user account. That
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:45:44AM +0100, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> FWIW this has happened at an association I help at -- they had VMs with
> no root password set, and users created by puppet some of whom have
> sudo.
> They just expected no root password = no login possible, but it turns
> out
Hi!
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 09:10:24PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> vdirsyncer
I've requested this now: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9011
~astra
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:16:21PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> vdirsyncer
I've contacted the maintainer via email, but if that does not work in
time I'd like to take up the issue.
> Remember to set the bugzilla to ASSIGNED when you actually work towards
> fixing the build failure.
Is this
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 03:15:02PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what workflow do existing package maintainers user
> while packaging new software? Is it `fedpkg` based with a folder for the
> spec to work in? (I still use rpmbuild + mock/koji-scratch builds).
I'm only a packager
in the discussions.
I'm currently student and teach network security as study assistant.
Next to that I'm working as a system administrator in a research group
running almost exclusively fedora as operating system. :)
Thanks,
Astra
(David Kaufmann)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 06:58:06AM -0700, John Harris wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 4:37:24 AM MST David Kaufmann wrote:
>> Both option have their disadvantages - in the case of "maintainer opens
>> ports" the ports are open as soon as the package gets installed
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 08:54:57AM -0400, Dan Book wrote:
> That Gnome is intentionally sabotaging users and thinks they are too stupid
> to understand a port number associated with a service is just another
> example why I wish that Fedora and Redhat would put work into alternative
> desktops.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:28:33AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Anyway, it would be nice to get the security team's input on this.
As the security team currently does not have any meetings that I know of
I'll try to answer this from my point of view.
In my opinion this is a very difficult
37 matches
Mail list logo
