Re: How to clone subpackages during koji build stage

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:57 PM Julio Faracco wrote: > > Hi everybody! > > Koji mocks does not access the internet during the build stage. > What are the recommendations when my project has some content inside > CMake to clone subrepos to compile my code? > > Do you have any guidelines for this?

Re: Change of cronie and crontabs CIS compliance

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:17 AM Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > For F40 I would like to change file permissions of few files that are > provided by cronie and crontabs and swap deny list for allow list. I'm not > really sure if I should make a change proposal. I figured I'll send

Re: Rust bindings for Python (pyo3 versions <0.19, cpython) broken with Python 3.12

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 1:34 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:25:10PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Yup, I've mentioned that in the bug I filed for python-bcrypt - > > It might be as simple as bumping the dependency on pyo3 from v0.15 to v0.19.

Re: Rust bindings for Python (pyo3 versions <0.19, cpython) broken with Python 3.12

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 1:34 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:25:10PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Yup, I've mentioned that in the bug I filed for python-bcrypt - > > It might be as simple as bumping the dependency on pyo3 from v0.15 to v0.19.

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:08 PM David King wrote: > > The latest released versions of libxml2 have a couple of important > changes in header files that have unintentionally caused some packages > to fail to build without modification, including: > > * several functions now accept or return a

Planned un-retirements of Pantheon DE related packages

Hi all, With elementary OS / Pantheon desktop upstream having made progress with supporting newer versions of GNOME (i.e. support for newer versions of libsoup, webkitgtk, gcr, etc.), it is now again possible to build the Pantheon desktop components on Fedora 38+ (after I had retired them from

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-11-09)

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 1:30 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > * AGREED: Fedora explicitly declines to support the LSB 5.0 or > > earlier. Packagers will remove any information that implies > > otherwise. No implementation of an LSB package may expressly state > > or

Re: Rust bindings for Python (pyo3 versions <0.19, cpython) broken with Python 3.12

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:51 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 12:35 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 5:43 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > There are applications in Fedora that still rely on *ancient* versions

Re: Rust bindings for Python (pyo3 versions <0.19, cpython) broken with Python 3.12

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 5:43 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > There are applications in Fedora that still rely on *ancient* versions > of PyO3, potentially affected by this: > > - cpython: mercurial > - pyo3 v0.15: fapolicy-analyzer, python-bcrypt, python-cryptography > - py

Re: Rust bindings for Python (pyo3 versions <0.19, cpython) broken with Python 3.12

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 5:43 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > There are applications in Fedora that still rely on *ancient* versions > of PyO3, potentially affected by this: > > - cpython: mercurial > - pyo3 v0.15: fapolicy-analyzer, python-bcrypt, python-cryptography > - py

Re: Didn't get an email about a new merge request on a package

On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 1:03 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 06:49:19AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 6:39 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > Normally I get an email when someone creates a merge request on a > > > Fedora package that I'm

Re: Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 6:28 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > Am 06.11.23 um 17:17 schrieb Michael J Gruber: > > > > > > Am Mo., 6. Nov. 2023 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Fabio Valentini > > mailto:decatho...@gmail.com>>: > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023

Re: Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 5:09 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > Hello, > > I have accidentally built f39/rawhide branch of gnumeric and > gnome-chemistry-utils for f38 and f37 side tags (f39 too but rawhide and > f39 are the same commit). Can this be fixed? Or is the effort not worth > it? Thanks. Are

Re: Heads up: libunibreak 5.1 update coming to rawhide

On Thu, Nov 2, 2023, 01:31 Sandro wrote: > I have an update for libunibreak ready and plan to release that for > rawhide in a week (or slightly later). > > The new version bumps libunibreak from so.3 to so.5. > > I also intend to drop building for i686. > Note: Dropping builds for i686 is

Re: DNF5: Checking signatures of packages installed out of a repository?

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 4:24 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > Hello, > > DNF5 got a complaint > that "dnf update > https://...; skips verifying package signatures: > > $ sudo dnf update >

Non-responsive maintainer check for eneville

Hi all, Does anybody know if eneville is still contributing to Fedora and / or how to reach them? c.f. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246443 I see no activity in dist-git, bodhi, koji, or pagure.io in the last 365 days. Their packages seem to have been unmaintained for a while,

Re: Bodhi API does not list f39 in pending releases

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:17 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 12:55, Tomas Hrcka wrote: >> >> This looks like a bug in bodhi. >> >> the web UI lists correct releases pending and current. >> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 11:57 AM Pavel Březina wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > Fedora 39

Re: Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:06 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello folks, > > you might know I run a script that generates > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.json > > The script is located at >

Re: How to deal with COPR and RPMAutoSpec

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:47 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > I'm trying to test build packages before actually creating a side tag and > doing real builds. > > I'm using rpkg to do the test builds but openshading language uses > RPMAutoSpec. I've tried creating empty commits to bump the release but

Re: Canceled: FESCo Meeting (2023-10-12)

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023, 14:58 Major Hayden wrote: > Hello there, > > I'm not able to find any items in the FESCo Pagure queue that need > discussion today, so I'll cancel this week's meeting and we can regroup > next week on October 19 at 1700 UTC. > > Unless anyone is super excited to be the

Re: Strange(?) build failures for golang package

The log output from the go compiler is really bad for grepping for errors. I've learned that searching for ".go:" is a good way to do it. Looks like this is the error that causes the failure: """ # github.com/go-task/task/internal/orderedmap

Re: Occasional random Koji build failures only on ppc64le

On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 9:12 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Getting $SUBJECT. The errors are always of the form: > > DEBUG util.py:446:: Cannot download, all mirrors were > already tried without success > > for various s. Examples: > >

Re: -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=implicit-function-declaration coming to rawhide

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 9:12 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Stephen Gallagher: > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:59 PM Ron Olson wrote: > >> > >> I mean this sincerely: Where is the excellent documentation? I admit that > >> I’ve been frustrated that web searches leads me all over the place, >

Re: i386 leaf report

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:32 PM Jerry James wrote: > > Figuring out whether a given package is a leaf for i386 is a pain in > the neck when done manually. How about we have a computer figure it > out for us? > > Those of you who run regular reports, what would it take to run a > report every

Re: Self Introduction: Alberto Faria

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 5:51 PM Alberto Faria wrote: > > Hi, everyone! > > My name is Alberto Faria and I'm a software engineer from Portugal, > working at Red Hat. I plan on maintaining the libblkio package, to > which I've contributed a bunch over the last year and a half. Welcome! Let me know

Re: 16 packages still need a Python 3.12 rebuild, final freeze in 6 days

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > python-rust-update-set > == > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2220488 > Bugzilla ASSIGNED 2 months ago, no update since. > Maintainer NEEDINFOed last week. That NEEDINFO won't help, the maintainer apparently sends bugzilla

Re: Re: shotcut compilation fails with "error: ‘hasPro’ was not declared in this scope"

On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 1:36 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Martin Gansser writes: > > > I have copied the virtual machine from a Windows computer to my Fedora 38 > > computer and shotcut can no longer be compiled here, but it can on the > > Windows computer. > > Do I have to repair the file

Re: shotcut compilation fails with "error: ‘hasPro’ was not declared in this scope"

On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:39 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Sunday, 24 September 2023 at 11:11, Martin Gansser wrote: > > Hi, > > shotcut compilation [1] fails with "error: ‘hasPro’ was not declared in > > this scope" message > [...] > > In file included from

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-21)

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:55 PM Ian McInerney via devel wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 7:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> >> Minutes: >> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2023-09-21-17.03.html >> Minutes (text): >>

Re: GNOME 45.0 builds for Fedora

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:22 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:09 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:00 PM Kalev Lember wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:49 PM Fabio Valentini >> > wrote: >&g

Re: GNOME 45.0 builds for Fedora

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:00 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:49 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> I just prepared updates for rust-glycin-utils, rust-glycin, and >> glycin-loaders (from the current v0.1 pre-releases to the recently >> published s

Re: GNOME 45.0 builds for Fedora

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:26 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > > > Hi all, > > GNOME 45.0 upstream tarball date is this weekend and I'm coordinating > the downstream builds for F39 and rawhide. > > A quick note where we are in the release schedule: > > Fedora 39 Beta was declared GO yesterday and is

Upcoming bindgen / bindgen-cli update from v0.63 to v0.68

Hi all, I've prepared an update for the "bindgen" Rust crate and the associated CLI interface, bindgen-cli, from version 0.63.0 to the latest version, 0.68.1. New releases of bindgen releases are, for most purposes, backwards compatible. Due to the large number of dependent packages (list

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 8:29 PM Ian Pilcher wrote: > > On 9/14/23 11:15, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I am interested in learning where you're seeing screen sharing issues > > today. The main one people bring up with me is video conferencing > > systems, and because of completely unrelated reasons, I've

Re: Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-14)

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 6:19 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:14 PM David Cantrell wrote: > > > > On 9/14/23 12:10, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:02 PM Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > >> > > >&

Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-09-14)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.libera.chat. Note that the IRC <-> Matrix bridge is still disabled, so to join the meeting, please dust off your IRC client of choice. To convert UTC to your local time,

Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 2:42 PM Colin Walters wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:20:09AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> IIRC it was a condition of that proposal that we wind up on a hosted > >> version of the *open source* release

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:19 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: > > A question about this - the removal of X11 is listed on a change proposal for > KDE. Does the removal just apply to KDE or would it be distribution wide; > i.e. affecting all desktops? I assume the following is not meant literally:

Re: compilation of vdr-skindesigner fails with allocator.h:184:7: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 7:39 PM Martin Gansser wrote: > > Hi, > > when compiling vdr-skindesigner-1.2.21 [1] on fc38 it fails with this error > message: > > g++ -O3 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches > -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 12:53 PM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 11:36, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > All systemd services that have an "enabled by default" preset need to do > > that: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pa

Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:00 AM Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 21:32, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > There is no -lib package split in Fedora currently. The 'passim' > > package provides the libraries. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2278800 - there > >

Re: Manual step in upgrade process for a FSWC

On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 11:24 AM Iker Pedrosa wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 8:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 11:59:18AM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I intend to switch pam_userdb's database provider from BerkeleyDB to GDBM >> > and I'm

Re: process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?

t in practice. > I tried to unretire a few retired rust packages before the 2 month deadline > passed where re-review is not needed, but Fabio Valentini told me that I > cannot do that because he is still maintaining them for the f36 and f37 > branches (it was several months ago).

Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 4:39 AM Jilayne Lovejoy wrote: > > Top-posting a few comments related to this thread in total (instead of > multiple responses to separate posts) and in hopes that people will be more > likely to see/read :) > > As to Rust saying MPL-2.0+ is invalid - this is likely

Re: Add a push update mechanism for https://release-monitoring.org/

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 5:29 AM Ryan Bach via devel wrote: > > Faster updates are always as plus. There's a problem with an approach like this: You need to check *manually* that the new version builds and doesn't violate any of our policies, for example, that it doesn't contain any prohibited

Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:39 PM Richard Fontana wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 3:06 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:21 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > rust-bitmaps warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please > &g

Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:28 PM Richard Fontana wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:08 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 22. 08. 23 v 13:21 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > > > > 2) rust-btrd: > > License: GPL-2.0 > > > > This is not on SPDX list, it should be either GPL-2.0-only or > >

Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:05 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > (snip) > Looks like there are 7 packages that I can fix later today: > > - rust-docopt > - rust-procs > - rust-rustcat > - rust-tokei > - rust-tree-sitter > - rust-tree-sitter-cli > - rust-varlink-cli r

Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 1:21 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 22. 08. 23 v 1:08 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 9:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > (snip) Thanks for running the checks! I looked at all the packages you listed. > I run the statisti

Re: SPDX Statistics - Voyager 2 edition

On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 9:11 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > New projection when we will be finished is 2025-01-11 (we are slowing down. > Again. :( ). Pure linear approximation. It might not be as bad as you think! All rust-* packages had been excluded from tracking since the start, so the

Re: Broken Discrete/Dedicated GPU support

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 7:59 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 14 2023 at 07:19:05 PM +0200, Jan Drögehoff > wrote: > > I've looked into contributing to fix the issue, but from the outside, > > it > > appears that RedHat is no longer interested in spending resources on > > it, > >

Re: Intent to orphan several python packages

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 12:18 AM Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick > > them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the > > dependencies have become more and more complex

Re: Does a change approved for f39 need reapproval for f40?

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 9:43 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 2:56 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > This change got approved for f39 but couldn't be done in time: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB > > > > Does it need to be re-proposed and approved for

Rust bindings for Python (pyo3 versions <0.19, cpython) broken with Python 3.12

Hello Pythonistas and Rustaceans, TL;DR: Only PyO3 v0.19.2 (and later) will ever properly support Python 3.12. Port your Python projects to v0.19 **NOW**. Older versions of PyO3 (especially pyo3 v0.15, v0.16, v0.17, and v0.18) are *not* compatible with Python 3.12 due to some ABI changes in

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-08-10)

= #fedora-meeting-2: FESCo (2023-08-10) = Meeting started by decathorpe at 17:01:15 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-08-10/fesco.2023-08-10-17.01.log.html . Meeting

Schedule for Today's FESCo Meeting (2023-08-10)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Thursday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.libera.chat. Note that the IRC <-> Matrix bridge is down, so please join the meeting on IRC directly. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at

Re: GNOME 45.beta builds for Fedora

On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 12:26 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > (snip) > At the same time, on Fedora side we have the F39 branching tomorrow > (Tuesday) which hopefully shouldn't affect this too much. The plan is to > try to build things as much as possible in rawhide ahead of the > branching and then

How to: correctly use sysusers.d?

Hello packagers, I'm working on packaging ntpd-rs (an NTP service written in Rust), and I now have all dependencies available in Fedora, so I need to actually look into how to package ntpd-rs itself. This is the first time I'm packaging something that ships a systemd service *and* creates a

Re: Self Introduction: Felix Maurer

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:27 PM Felix Maurer wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > My name is Felix and I'm a software engineer from Germany. As long as > I'm working on software, I've always enjoyed contributing to the open > source projects I use. I have some experience creating RPMs for personal >

Re: Tracker bug for approved change proposals

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 7:00 PM Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > > I noticed that a few change proposals that have been approved still did > not get a bug tracker, e.g.: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-17 > > As things have changed this release, I'm wondering if the process >

Rust bindings for Python (pyo3 versions <0.19, cpython) broken with Python 3.12

Hello Pythonistas and Rustaceans, TL;DR: Only PyO3 v0.19.2 (and later) will ever properly support Python 3.12. Port your Python projects to v0.19 **NOW**. Older versions of PyO3 (especially pyo3 v0.15, v0.16, v0.17, and v0.18) are *not* compatible with Python 3.12 due to some ABI changes in

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:47 PM Andrew Bauer wrote: > > I appreciate the response. Would you mind pointing me to Miro's latest FTBS > announcement? > > This list was emailed to me again on July 25, and it still identified a > problem with xmvn-connector-ivy. It was sent to the mailing lists

Re: koji: No space left on device

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 5:02 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > > Am 01.08.23 um 16:55 schrieb Fabio Valentini: > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:49 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Right now, I have a package built in koji, whic

Re: koji: No space left on device

On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 4:49 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > Hi, > > Right now, I have a package built in koji, which is in failed and > success state at the same time: > > Cf. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2267652 > > The link above redirects to >

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 8:26 AM Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > […] > > > > Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a > > commit/build. > > A new version was released yesterday, but Anitya's scratch build never >

Re: Update on DNF05 in Fedora

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 12:05 AM Naheem Zaffar wrote: > > > > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023, 21:23 Kevin Fenzi, wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: >> > Samantha Bueno writes: >> > > We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora >> > > 39 and,

Re: Retiring python-pytest-flake8

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 6:26 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Dear all, > > We are retiring python-pytest-flake8. > > It FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226304 > > and abandoned upstream: https://github.com/tholo/pytest-flake8/issues/98 > (some suggest using ruff instead)

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired (and similar reports)

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 12:54 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > I think the current order is fine. Because if I am not mistaken, should > I be listed in the PACKAGER section, I would also receive personal copy > of this email as an affected maintainer. Otherwise, looking at the > PACKAGE section is the

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired (and similar reports)

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 6:25 PM Frank Dana wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, 10:18 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> Dear maintainers. >> >> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages >> should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching. >>

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, 21:36 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > ok. How big a problem is this? Do we need to schedule another mass > > rebuild (and push back the schedule most likely)? > > > > Or we can/should just rebuild things that failed due to already fixed > > issues? > > I don't

Re: Making sense of golang packaging guidelines

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:22 PM Carlos Rodriguez Fernandez wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am interested in packaging some golang programs for Fedora (and EPEL), and > I read through the guidelines: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/ > > My question is more about the

Re: btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while

Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:07 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Demi Marie Obenour: > > > On 7/17/23 09:51, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Daniel P. Berrangé: > >> > But that still raises the question - why does it look like this > started to happen pretty suddenly around June 30? > The

Re: libarrow (Apache Arrow) soname bump in Rawhide

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 4:07 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:01 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote: >> >> >> >> Now Apache Arrow 12.0.0 has been released. >> >> Rebase landing soon in Rawhide. > > > Apache Arrow (libarrow) 13.0.0 has been released. > > At least within Fedora, only

Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild started

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:04 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on > 2023-07-19 for Fedora 39. We are running this mass rebuild for the > changes listed in: > > https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild > > This

Re: fedora-review workarounds for dnf5

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023, 15:22 Maxwell G wrote: > On Tue Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > Hello Jerry, > > I proposed a workaround a few days ago > > https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/485 > > > > but your patch looks like a proper fix. I'll try it and merge to the > >

Re: fedora-scm-requests email

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 4:38 AM Maxwell G wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems the fedora-scm-requests processor is creating the initial > repository commits with `releng bot ` as the > committer. Does anyone know where this is coming from? Should it be > changed to something @fedoraproject.org? Yeah

Re: Review swaps for easy Rust packages

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi all, > > In order to update the "log" crate (the canonical logging facade for > Rust; packaged as rust-log) to the latest version, I need to package a > few new dependencies. Some have already been updated

Review swaps for easy Rust packages

Hi all, In order to update the "log" crate (the canonical logging facade for Rust; packaged as rust-log) to the latest version, I need to package a few new dependencies. Some have already been updated / built in a rawhide side tag (f39-build-side-69898), but some are still missing. I hope to be

Re: Possible to combine ExclusiveArch?

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 2:30 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > For some virt packages we need to combine 2 or 3 of: > > ExclusiveArch: %{kernel_arches} > ExclusiveArch: %{qemu_sysemu_host_arches} # [1] > ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_native_compiler} > > to mean only compile on the

Re: btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:45 PM Eric Sandeen wrote: > > On 7/14/23 6:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Neal Gompa: > > > >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33

RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

Hi all, I'm opening this thread to trigger discussion of the roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 - whether the switch still looks doable for this release, or whether it should be reverted for F39 and postponed to F40. This is also being tracked in a FESCo ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3039

Re: Flock CFP: Language SIGs discussion

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 6:09 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 7/13/23 11:52, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 7/13/23 11:32, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:25 PM Demi Marie Obenour > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On

Re: Flock CFP: Language SIGs discussion

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 5:25 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 7/5/23 02:22, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for > > (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need > > representatives from various Language

Re: btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:53 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 8:29 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > > Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so &g

Re: btrfs loses 32-bit application compatibility after a while

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:33 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > Fedora lists are hostile to upstream collaboration via cross-posting, so > I can only forward this for your information. > > This causes problems with the i686 builders. I wonder how this only started to happen recently? Has something

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 1:01 PM Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > > Hau idatzi du Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak > (2023 uzt. 12(a), az. (11:53)): > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:06 PM Mikel Olasagasti > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: What is this update waiting on?

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:46 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-129c8286a0 > > This one seems a bit different. There seem to be no tests running. > The test gating status is "ignored" (I didn't do that). And otherwise > it seems to be doing

Re: What is this update waiting on?

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:37 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8d5b08b005 > > > > I don't understand what this update is waiting on / why it

Re: What is this update waiting on?

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8d5b08b005 > > I don't understand what this update is waiting on / why it cannot go > to Fedora immediately. > > I waived the tests. > > There are still apparently 5 tests

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:06 PM Mikel Olasagasti wrote: > (snip) > > > golang-github-moby-spdystreamgo-sig, mikelo2 > > Builds fine in Koschei and no BZ > > > golang-github-openapi-validate alexsaezm, go-sig > > Builds fine in Koschei and no BZ This is usually an

Re: rawhide build errors on i686

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 10:01 AM Paul Howarth wrote: > > Whatever this is, it's intermittent and it's still happening. I'm > getting koschei reports about failed builds with this symptom every > day, and yesterday I had a "real" build fail in that way too: Yeah this is happening pretty frequently

Re: Flock CFP: Language SIGs discussion

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 8:23 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > I have submitted a Flock proposal to have a common discussion session for > (modern) Language SIGs. I think for this to be successful we need > representatives from various Language SIGs to be there (Rust, Haskell, OCaml, > Golang

Re: [HEADS UP] Python 3.12 side tag merging today (and what to do)

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 00:07 Maxwell G wrote: > On Tue Jul 4, 2023 at 23:45 +0200, Sandro wrote: > > > I see one of my packages, python-fvs, in the list of failed builds. I'm > > also one of the maintainers of Bottles, which requires python-fvs. > > Bottles itself is mostly Python code. I would

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:32 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:46:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I don't think there's a formal change filed yet. > > > > Matthew: Did you want to do that? Or would you like me or someone else > > to do so? > > I would love someone else

Re: F39 Change Proposal: No custom Qt theming for Fedora Workstation (Self Contained)

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Jan Grulich wrote: > > Hi, > > po 26. 6. 2023 v 19:26 odesílatel Fabio Valentini > napsal: >> >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: >> > >> >> (snip) >> >> > >> > ==

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Allow Removal of tzdata (System-Wide)

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:15 AM Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > On 6/26/23 16:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > So all this considered, I'm not sure whether this change is actually > > worth it, if tzdata databases of some form will likely be pulled into > > installs anywa

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Allow Removal of tzdata (System-Wide)

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:40 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 26. 06. 23 v 20:24 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > (snip) > > > >> --- > >> > &

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Allow Removal of tzdata (System-Wide)

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 8:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > (snip) > --- > > The current problem with Python without tzdata is: > > === > >>> from zoneinfo import ZoneInfo > >>> ZoneInfo("Europe/Prague") > Traceback (most recent

Re: F39 Change Proposal: No custom Qt theming for Fedora Workstation (Self Contained)

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 6:21 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > (snip) > > == Detailed Description == > [https://github.com/FedoraQt/QGnomePlatform QGnomePlatform] project is > a Qt Platform Theme plugin. It reads GNOME configuration, like fonts > or icons and applies this configuration to Qt

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Retire Modularity (Self Contained)

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 6:31 PM Aoife Moloney wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireModularity > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >