Hi everybody,
It's that time of the year again, and this time there's not that many
downgrades to complain about (packages with "obvious" causes, like
F34FTBFS, already excluded from the list).
However, the list also includes some pretty important "critpath"
packages (ostree (!), rpm-ostree, libu
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 11:19 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> I thought about it some more and realised that using just the date allows me
> to stick everything in one package. Basically, the idea is:
>
> %global branch1_date 20210101
> %global branch2_date 20210202
> %global branch3_date 2021
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:38 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> The activities in my Fedora Package Sources page are no longer
> highlighted. Do you know why?
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/sagitter
It looks like the email address associated with your commits changed,
from:sagit
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 6:17 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> I'm looking to package some GTK themes. Those themes come in several colour
> variants. The author decided on a workflow where, instead of keeping variants
> alongside each other in the tree, each variant has its own git branch.
>
>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:31 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 05:10:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://pagure.io/login/?next=https://pagure.io/
> >
> > It says:
> >
> > "No email address was returned by your OpenID provider, this
> > information is mandatory for
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 5:33 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 17/03/21 11:41, Vít Ondruch ha scritto:
> >
> > I think the problem is that the groups can be removed from package only
> > by the main admin. If the main admin is non-responsive, then the whole
> > group is kind of hostage. Ever
Hi everybody,
I've realized that there's a big mismatch between the permissions that
are necessary and the immediate impact for orphaning and retiring a
package:
orphan:
- is reversible by single button press by anybody in "packager" group
- has no immediate effect / effect only after 6 weeks of
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 7:34 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> I accept the blame here, I didn't closely enough follow the proj
> developments to realize that the old API was not removed in proj-7, but
> in proj-8. I'm not going to land this in F34 at this point given how
> intrusive this change is. Apolo
Hi everybody,
libavif was updated to version 0.9.0 an hour ago, and it bumps soname.
The packager was obviously aware but went ahead regardless and even
removed the guard rails:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libavif/c/6f1a12d20d5e8483ec9470010279b22678cc8f7f?branch=rawhide
This change now b
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 7:10 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 14.03.21 10:15, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:50:42 +0100
> > Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> >> On 14.03.21 01:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >>> On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'll be updating proj t
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 5:14 PM Jonathan Lebon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:54 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:45 PM Jonathan Lebon wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This was mentioned in an
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 4:45 PM Jonathan Lebon wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This was mentioned in an email on the coreos list[1], but wanted to
> raise visibility on this.
>
> In addition to the rawhide FCOS stream previously discussed[2], we now
> have a branched stream which tracks "Fedora CoreOS 34"
Good morning,
I'm initiating the non-responsive maintainer process for nhorman. I
heard on the grapevine that he left Red Hat a few months ago, which -
if true - would explain why some bugs for his packages were modified
by RH employees so he is no longer the Assignee for them (and his
email link
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:27 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for your suggestions, but as you might understand, I do not have
> the capacity to resolve problems of dependent packages when building with
> autoconf-2.71.
>
> I can only prepare autoconf-2.71 and compat package auto
Hi everybody,
I have decided to drop the Online Accounts support from Pantheon,
because it has not been working for a while and it's not even used for
anything (other than optional Last.FM scrobbling support in
elementary-music, which I don't even know if it works).
Which is why I have now retire
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:10 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Upstream has just released a bugfix update for Molsketch and it's the
> kind of update that can't wait for the next fedora release. Among the
> other fixes, the new version has dropped support for Qt4 and with it,
> the -qt
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:31 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 03. 03. 21 21:08, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > I want to run this command:
> >
> >bodhi updates trigger-tests FEDORA-2021-279dee1742
> >
> > But I'm prompted for a username and password. I have a working Kerberos
> > setup for koji/fedpkg
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:20 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:07:44AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 02. 03. 21 22:05, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > The devil is in the details: pre-release, snapinfo, minorbump aren't
> > > really
> > > covered by distance being jus
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:20 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 03:38:35PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 16. 02. 21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:40 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 01:13:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Update here:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-667db9b546
>
> Oh, wow!
>
> This fixes a bunch of FTI issues, right? Can we get a f
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:00 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-667db9b546
>
> Some tests have failed, but as usual there seems to be no easy way to
> work out why. For example the hivex test has this useless console
> output:
>
>
> https://osci
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:38 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Neal is correct that you only need to **query** on different architecture.
That is correct.
However, querying all 25000+ .spec files from fedora every day is more
trouble than I asked for (and I don't even know how to "query on a
differen
Hello everybody,
There's a problem that's been puzzling me for months, since I started
writing the repochecker service (which provides the backend FTI/FTBFS
data for the new packager-dashboard):
There is no correct "source of truth" for BuildRequires / complete
package dependency graphs.
While S
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 3:13 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
> Package: buildah-define.Version-0.10.dev.giteb42398.fc35
> Old package: buildah-define.Version-0.8.dev.gita5e80a5.fc35
> Summary: A command line tool used for creating OCI Images
> RPMs: buildah buildah-tests
> Size:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:19 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 20. 02. 21 10:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try
> > to run:
> >
> ># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> ># next time you run any DNF
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 6:14 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> The elementary OS 6 development is finally heading towards the finish
> line, and the upcoming granite and wingpanel updates will have an
> soname change (granite) and a renamed library (wingpanel-2 -&g
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 16. 02. 21 14:48, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > if version_at(commit) != last_version:
> > return 0
>
> Should this be "return 1"?
No, 0 is correct. If the version does not match, this is
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 5:20 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpmautospec
>
> == Summary ==
> The goal of this change is to deploy in production the
> [https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/ rpmautospec]
> project.
>
> With it, the content of the `Release`
Hi everybody,
With a heavy heart, I have orphaned all my Ruby packages today.
- rubygem-jekyll
- rubygem-jekyll-asciidoc (official, optional AsciiDoc support)
- rubygem-jekyll-feed (dep of the default theme)
- rubygem-jekyll-sass-converter (jekyll dep)
- rubygem-jekyll-seo-tag (dep of the default
Hi everybody,
The elementary OS 6 development is finally heading towards the finish
line, and the upcoming granite and wingpanel updates will have an
soname change (granite) and a renamed library (wingpanel-2 ->
wingpanel-3). In both cases, the ABI change is primarily caused by the
removal of long
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 1:34 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 17:57 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'll update this thread once I've the side tags ready,
> > with compiled evolution-data-server.
>
> Hi,
> the side tags are named f35-gnome and f34-gnome and the
> evolution-data-
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:42 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:53 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:32 PM Milan Crha wrote:
> > > I'll create the side tag on Friday, ...
>
> Hi,
> this might be a stupid questio
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:32 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> Hello,
> the upcoming 3.39.2 release of the evolution-data-server contains a
> soname version bump for its libedataserver-1.2 and libedataserverui-1.2
> libraries due to API and ABI changes. The release is planned for this
> Friday. I'l
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:03 PM Ian McInerney wrote:
>
> I notice now that this change has broken web links to items in the master
> branch of a repo - since there seems to be no forwarding to the rawhide
> branch on the web UI. This is slightly annoying because sometimes links to
> spec files
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 9:00 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 16:17 +1000, David Airlie wrote:
> > Has anyone got a backtrace they could put in a bug? I'm not seeing a
> > crash with X.org here in my test VMs.
>
> Hi,
> I do not see any crash as such, Xorg simply fails to star
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:22 AM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 6:18 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:11 AM Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Fedora 34 has now been branched, ple
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:11 AM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 34 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
> rawhide/f35 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
> this means that anything you
Hi everybody,
Due to lack of time and interest, I have orphaned the elementary
AppCenter applications I have maintained so far:
- agenda (simple todo-list)
- appeditor (GUI .desktop file and menu editor)
- dippi (display DPI / scaling factor calculator)
- harvey (visual WCAG color contrast compli
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 09. 02. 21 11:30, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > I suggest we untag the build before it reaches compose, tag it into a side
> > tag
> > and do a targeted rebuild there.
>
> Untagged.
Maybe this should happen *after* today's f34 branching finish
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 8:04 PM José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Something that I am curious is that the package that was rebuilt on the mass
> rebuild does not show in the stable version of Fedora 34:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-blinker
>
> Is this expected?
You mean it does not show
Hi everybody,
Since the last pagure version was deployed, the API for querying a
group's packages (api/0/group/foo?projects=true) was broken - it is
now paginated, where before it was not:
https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/5110
Note that it does not return any error code, but instead just gives
onl
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 7:24 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> The Lazarus package currently builds three RPMs: "lazarus", which contains
> the IDE, and the "qt5pas" library, along with "qt5pas-devel".
> qt5pas is, technically, a separate project with its own versioning - but
> since its distri
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 5:54 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anybody investigated Jim Salter's claims that Fedora 32 is slow to
> launch applications? Recent article:
>
> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/02/ubuntu-core-20-adds-secure-boot-with-hardware-backed-encryption/
>
> "in my
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 4:10 PM Petr Lautrbach wrote:
>
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
> > Greetings everyone.
> >
> > We finally have everything in place and hopefully tested to make the
> > switch tomorrow from master to rawhide/main branches for
> > src.fedoraproject.org.
> >
> > At 13:30UTC we will a
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 12:42 PM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 15:26 +1000, David Airlie wrote:
> > Please test:
> >
> > mesa-21.0.0~rc3-2.fc34
> >
> > which I just built for rawhide.
>
> Hi,
> for what it's worth, it helped me with gdm, it opens now, but I cannot
> log in to
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:54 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> $ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash
> Cloning into bare repository
> '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'...
> remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done.
> remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done.
> remote: Compressing objects:
Hi everybody,
After updating my rawhide VMs today, it looks like
mesa-21.0.0~rc3-1.fc34 is making all sessions really unstable.
gnome-shell (wayland) repeatedly crashes after opening any windows,
and Xorg based LightDM or Pantheon session crashes at launch with
compositor segfaults. One system was
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 7:24 PM Peter Boy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 30.01.2021 um 17:45 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> > :
> >
> > On 30.01.2021 16:58, Peter Boy wrote:
> >> But it’s perfectly usable for Fedora Workstation or Server and almost
> >> indispensable for some development projects, e.g.
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:19 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> Jonathan Wakely kirjoitti 29.1.2021 klo 18.22:
> > On 29/01/21 17:04 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 29. 01. 21 16:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So if fedpkg clone just added things to .git/info/exclude there would
> >>> be no
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:49 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
>
(snip)
>
> Package: golang-torproject-pluggable-transports-goptlib-1.1.0-6.fc34
> Old package: golang-torproject-pluggable-transports-goptlib-1.1.0-5.fc33
> Summary: Library for writing Tor pluggable transports in Go
> RPM
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:04 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
(snip)
> Is there an easy way to override/add things to the buildroot locally without
> making it a global change for the whole distro?
I seem to remember that there is a mock config option for this. But
looking at the current configs (e.g
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 28. 01. 21 16:05, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Is it possible to still do updates in side-tags for rawhide during the mass
> > rebuild? What are the ramifications if any for this?
>
> I've just did so let's see.
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproj
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:04 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
wrote:
> Great! And you can keep doing that! That's a good thing to have. fedpkg local
> also works without network access, like on a train, if you have all your
> BuildRequires in place.
If that's all you want, why not use plain rpmbuild (e
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:24 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
wrote:
>
> It's needed for testing builds against versions of packages not yet in mock.
> I use it almost every day. Losing it would make things like testing solib
> bumps harder.
I've done local test builds for soname bumps and similar thin
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:17 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder, what would be the sentiment if I proposed to deprecated the
> `fedpkg local` command. I don't think it should be used. Mock should be
> the preferred way. Would there be anybody really missing this functionality?
I would cer
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:47 PM Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
>
> On 25/01/21 15:16 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:10 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:17:28PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> >> > We are delayi
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:57 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:36:09AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello packagers,
> >
> > if you have rpmdevtools-9.3-2.fc33 (or .fc34) installed and you run
> > `spectool -g` on spec files with remote text sources/patches, s
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 4:37 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:31 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 25. 01. 21 16:19, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > I'm fully in favor of this and I'd really like to see us add some
> > > degree of CI gating to support it.
> >
> > Note tha
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 4:00 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> On 1/24/21 7:42 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 23. 01. 21 2:18, Tom Stellard wrote:
> >> On 1/21/21 7:28 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> We are going to be building clang-11.1.0 for rawhide, which changes the
> >>> soname of li
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:48 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
(snip)
>> I think that ELN should try to follow the Rawhide build order. If it can't
>> do that, then it should wait for manual intervention.
>
>
> This is on our todo list, but we have been balancing a lot of things at the
> same time and h
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:10 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 02:17:28PM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > We are delaying the mass rebuild by a day as of now due to bugs in gcc
> > and dwz. As of now, we are expecting to start mass rebuild tomorrow,
> > Jan 21st 2021. There is a ne
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 4:42 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 01. 21 2:18, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > On 1/21/21 7:28 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We are going to be building clang-11.1.0 for rawhide, which changes the
> >> soname
> >> of libclang.so and libclang-cpp.so. This is unusu
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:49 PM Chris wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I got an email that my package failed to build on RawHide, however the error
> is from the mock tool itself and not a problem with my build or test runners
> at all.
>
> What is the procedure to just give the server a kick/retry?
> Lo
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:39 PM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 1/21/21 1:27 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:22 PM Panu Matilainen
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/21/21 9:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>> With rpm-4.15.1-3.fc
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:22 PM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 1/21/21 9:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > With rpm-4.15.1-3.fc32.1.x86_64, I get this error:
> >
> > $ rpm -qip
> > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/aarch64/debug/tree/Packages/m/ModemManag
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:36 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:49 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:22 AM Josh Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/16/21 3:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > > > On Sat
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:57 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:47:36 -
> "Martin Gansser" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the koji build for vdr-live fails on s390x arch with the following error
> > message:
> >
> > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> > rpmlib(
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:23 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:18:41PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:12:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> > On 19. 01. 21 16:06, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> > >(2)
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 5:43 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Gnome40
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Fedora 34 will include the latest upstream GNOME release, GNOME 40
>
> == Owner ==
>
> * Name: [[User:kalev| Kalev Lember]], [[User:mclasen| Matthias Clasen]]
> * Email: klem.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:22 AM Josh Stone wrote:
>
> On 1/16/21 3:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 4:54 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>> See also:
> >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bootupd/c/c6cf7f6492e0d943e8471f867
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:14 PM PGNet Dev wrote:
>
> On 1/16/21 12:35 PM, PGNet Dev wrote:
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip /usr/bin/strip
> > /usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file
> > '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dhcpcd-9.4.0-0.pgnd_20210116_172904.fc33.x86_64/usr/local/dhcpcd/sbin/dhcpcd';
>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:35 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 34 schedule[1] we will start a mass rebuild for Fedora 34
> on Jan 20th 2021. We will run a mass rebuild for Fedora 34 for the
> changes listed in:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:55 PM ElXreno wrote:
>
> I apologize for the possible duplicate message, the past didn't show up
> for reasons I don't understand.
>
> I think it's a bad idea. It is better to make `zram-fraction` equal to
> 0.8 or 0.9, but not 1.0.
> For example, if you run Darktable, lo
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 3:57 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Also, rubygem-eventmachine should be installable after rebuild. But
> certainly, there might happen race conditions a it happened this time.
This reminds me - over a year ago, I triggered discussion about making
the dist.rpmdeplint test bloc
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:16 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly
> changed, notably renamed sections. As such some older config parameters
> won't work anymore.
> However the current config file can't be overwritten
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 8:02 PM Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2021 06:58:43 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > > Explicit "Conflicts" here, at least, in
> > > pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit:
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=24326970
> > >
> > > Conflicts in distr
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:42 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> Howdy,
> One observation (also in the post):
>
> The CLIs for fedpkg and koji is currently meant for human, not machine,
> consumptions. Invoking them from Bash scripts and trying to use the
> output (e.g. getting the name of that
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 2:21 PM Derek Pressnall
wrote:
>
(snip)
Welcome to Fedora!
>
> Meanwhile, a couple additional questions. Right now I have a template
> of the spec file in the project's Git repo. Should the spec file be
> in its own repo (or possibly an orphaned branch of this repo)?
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 4:47 PM Remi Collet wrote:
>
> Le 22/12/2020 à 10:55, Remi Collet a écrit :
> > I've start working on a package update
> > and this will probably become the new upstream
> > for the fedora libmemcached package
>
> A scratch build is available
> https://koji.fedoraproject.or
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:37 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 08:49:13AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 8:47 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> > >
> > > I've noticed for a while now that if I leave one of the above pages open
> > > for an extended period of time tha
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:16 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 21. 12. 20 19:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 09:21:15PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> As Miro mentioned, I've also developed scripts to handle this "does
> >> this up
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:08 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 03:56:25PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> ...snip...
> > So I've written tools for doing this, and Igor has written tools for
> > doing this, but it seems like people think that this is "impossible"
> > and so the effort go
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 8:06 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Enable_Spec_File_Preprocessing
>
>
> == Summary ==
> This change should enable an opt-in spec file preprocessor in Fedora
> infrastructure for the benefit of packagers. The preprocessor allows
> some very
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 6:22 PM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020, at 6:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 16. 12. 20 v 16:47 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> > > * #2519 F34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (decathorpe, 15:09:57)
> > > * AGREE
Good day everybody,
With ever-increasing interest in running the Pantheon DE on fedora, we
decided to create a SIG for Pantheon!
There's the obligatory Wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Pantheon
We have created a dedicated IRC channel: #fedora-pantheon
There's also tracking project
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:37 PM Petr Šabata wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas.
> >
> > - I'm getti
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:14 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 16. 12. 20 v 21:56 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 07:15:21PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>> On 15/12/20 23:46 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12/15/20
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 1:02 AM Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:29:27PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > I am looking for challenges for upcoming year - what I and my team should
> > enhance. I have some ideas, but I want to hear
> > yours.
> >
> > What you - as Fedora packag
Hi everybody,
I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas.
- I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful -
and a lot more failed - ELN builds for my packages (triggered either
by ELN developers or automatically by their CI)
- bodhi is spamming
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:29 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
(snip)
> What I would prefer to do is get a reliable reverse dep check (we may
> have one already, I haven't looked) and gate updates on it. This would
> require soname bumps for Rawhide to be sent out as multi-package
> updates containing
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 8:37 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 09:11:53AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > In the same vein of waste, but of resources rather than time, when I'm
> > updating a package I like to do a local mock build to check that upstream
> > didn't break anything
=
#fedora-meeting-2: FESCO (2020-12-16)
=
Meeting started by decathorpe at 15:04:25 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2020-12-16/fesco.2020-12-16-15.04.log.html
.
Meetin
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:12 PM Artem Tim wrote:
>
> Rust packaging automation. People shouldn't do work which could be done by
> machine in 2020.
rust2rpm is already pretty good, but I have some ideas to make the
possibilities for automation more comprehensive. I still need to write
the code, t
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:13 PM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 12/16/20 1:11 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello Fedora, Panu.
> >
> > I've noticed Koschei starts reporting missing dependencies:
> >
> > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/python3.10?collection=f34
> >
> > "nothing provides lib
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-12-16 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
Hi everybody,
Is it just me or have downloads for the "local" repo (using mock with
"--enablerepo local") been really slow for everybody lately? I'm only
getting 50-100 kB/s download speeds for the repo metadata ... don't
worry, I'm only using this repo when I need to test builds against the
lates
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:12 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> as you may have heared, Fedora is now running on Pinephone and other devices,
> that need bleeding edge versions to function.
>
> Status of Fedora Pine as of 15:15 CET
>
> Cams now working, but app needs rework
> Mobile INET worki
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:34 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> This is a twofold question, a possible xserver 1.21 version and a separate
> release of Xwayland upstream.
>
> Regarding a possible xserver 1.21 release, I guess that would be up to
> someone upstream to step up and coordinate such a relea
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:01 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> Perhaps this is heresy, but we could stop calling our main development
> stream "rawhide", and instead call it "main", then it will be trivially
> aligned with the "main" git branch name :-)
>
> I've never felt "rawhide" was a particula
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 6:48 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 11:14 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > There were a number of people interested in helping with reviving the
> > Server WG, myself included. But we don't know how to have that move
> > forward. We've never really had a situat
801 - 900 of 1743 matches
Mail list logo
