On 07/20/2017 02:09 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 18/07/17 22:55, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 07/18/2017 10:03 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>> On 18/07/17 17:50, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> On 07/18/2017 03:55 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>>>> This
On 07/18/2017 10:03 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 18/07/17 17:50, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 07/18/2017 03:55 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>> This will result in the following:
>>> * OpenVPN 2.4 based clients will automatically upgrade to AES-256-GCM,
>>&
On 07/18/2017 03:55 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> This will result in the following:
> * OpenVPN 2.4 based clients will automatically upgrade to AES-256-GCM,
> regardless if they have --cipher in their configuration file or not.
> For OpenVPN v2.4 configurations not wanting this cipher upgrade, the
On 09/05/2014 06:03 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 05.09.14 11:52, Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
Good news, everyone! We
On 09/05/2014 09:27 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 20:53 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
system-config-lvm was removed from rhel7 while g-d-u is not able to
configure lvm. so it _definitely_ a step forward. and really not agree
with you about the root user usage. you imho
On 06/16/2014 05:06 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:11:43AM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Been using yum-cron for years with good results.
If yum is being phased out, I'll want a dnf-cron replacement
is this version of eclipse be ported to rhel dev tools for rhel-6 and
rhel-7?
On 05/06/2014 09:50 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
One of the biggest offenders (Eclipse) is now happily compiling(always has
been running fine) with Java 8 and while looking at fixing it many other
issues has been
On 05/15/2013 02:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 15.05.13 07:45, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
Is anything waiting on NetworkManager-wait-online in your install? That
target is really intended for servers where you want to block Apache or
Sendmail or Database from starting
On 04/28/2013 10:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Eugene Pivnev wrote:
As I'm trying to create gtk-/gnome-/kde*-free environment (QtDesktop) -
I tested - what about Fedora without them?
So:
1. yum remove gtk3:
...
* gvfs
* qt-mobility
* qtwebkit
* ffmpeg
* ffmpeg-libs
* mplayer
* phonon
*
On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined
with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header files,
On 10/07/2011 09:25 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 10/06/2011 04:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Richard Shaw
On 10/05/2011 12:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 11:38:18PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/04/2011 05:30 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
XFS has been proven at this scale on Linux for a very long time, is all.
the why rh do NOT support it in 32 bit? there're still system
On 10/05/2011 05:42 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
right; for large ext4 fs use (or testing), try
# mkfs.ext4 -E lazy_itable_init=1 /dev/blah
this will cause it to skip inode table initialization, and speed up mkfs a
LOT.
It'll also keep sparse test images smaller.
IMHO this should probably be
On 10/04/2011 01:03 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/3/11 5:53 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/04/2011 12:33 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/3/11 5:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:11:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
I wasn't able to give the VM enough memory to make
On 10/04/2011 01:03 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Large filesystem support for ext4 has languished upstream for a very
long time, and few in the community seemed terribly interested to test it,
either.
why? that's what i simple do not understand!?...
--
Levente Si
On 10/04/2011 05:30 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
XFS has been proven at this scale on Linux for a very long time, is all.
the why rh do NOT support it in 32 bit? there're still system that
should have to run on 32 bit:-(
32-bit machines have a 32-bit index into the page cache; on x86, that
On 10/04/2011 12:33 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/3/11 5:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:11:28PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
I wasn't able to give the VM enough memory to make this succeed. I've
only got 8G on this laptop. Should I need large amounts of memory to
hi,
the same problem happened against which i try to discuss earlier.
gstreamer-java is pure java package so it'd have to package as a noarch
package. which is true and can be working. but it has a subpackage
gstreamer-java-swt which is depend on eclipse-swt but still arch
independent. but when i
On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
I appreciate those who will
On 08/08/2011 07:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Sounds good ... can you give us an update and ballpark timeline of
RAID-5 on btrfs as well if you don't mind?
It requires the larger than page size blocksize work which is slated
for 3.2, I'm not sure what Chris has in mind specifically but I
On 07/13/2011 11:14 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Manuel Escudero jmlev...@gmail.com wrote:
Today I'll be switching from BTRFS to Ext4 again because of the troubles
I've been having with
the New Linux Filesystem. As BTRFS is going to be the Default in F16 I
wanted
On 07/03/2011 10:34 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
FWIW, I think we should actually run autoreconf -i -f in ALL specfiles as a
matter of policy, even if we aren't changing anything, the same way we
require Java JARs to be rebuilt from source.
please no!
curently most of the fedora packages can be
On 06/17/2011 02:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering
e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 05:25, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at said:
Newsflash: the network service is DEPRECATED!!! That's what NetworkManager
is for.
Newsflash: NM doesn't replace the network service yet. Maybe when NM
can do
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 17:30, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Monday 18 January 2010, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Farkas Levente wrote:
the real bottleneck is not the rpmbuild itself (with ccache it cab be
very fast), but the mock surroundings. suppose there is build
On 10/12/2010 09:53 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
the other point of richards is what the whole fedora community and
redhat should have to understand: most users like ubuntu rather then
fedora/redhat. why? because:
-... better is what most user like. period.
Following your simplistic logic,
On 10/11/2010 06:09 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 17:39 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Comparing the Ubuntu 10.04 DVD installer (which I use a couple of weeks
ago) to Fedora 13 DVD installer is like comparing the Cessna to a Boeing
747.
Sure, both can accomplish the same task.
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try
On 10/08/2010 07:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie: fedora-packager-setup i was able to build again. then today
i can't build again
On 10/08/2010 04:03 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to make
differences.
After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
for each available branches something similar:
fedpkg switch-branch
On 10/08/2010 08:49 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:32PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build
On 10/08/2010 08:51 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 01:09:32 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could not log into koji: Opening a SSL connection failed
-
even if i try to remove .fedora.cert and fedora-packager-setup (so it's
not a
kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
On Thursday 27 May 2010, Farkas Levente wrote:
are you sure rhel is defined on rhel-5? imho not by default!
AFAIK, it's defined in the EPEL build system.
Kevin Kofler
--
Levente Si vis pacem para bellum!
--
devel mailing list
hi,
now as ppc was removed from primary arch i try to build gstreamer-java
as a noarch packages. until now it was not possible because of this jdk
bug on ppc:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468831
http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190
On 04/28/2010 07:58 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 06:54:14PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 04:54:18PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
now as ppc was removed from primary arch i try to build gstreamer-java
as a noarch packages. until now it was not possible
On 04/28/2010 06:40 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 16:54 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
now as ppc was removed from primary arch i try to build gstreamer-java
as a noarch packages. until now it was not possible because of this jdk
bug on ppc:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
On 01/18/2010 04:10 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Farkas Levente wrote:
the real bottleneck is not the rpmbuild itself (with ccache it cab be
very fast), but the mock surroundings. suppose there is build which
takes about 2 minutes and in mock it takes about 5 minutes:-(
most
40 matches
Mail list logo
