number of
complaints from python-sphinx, probably related to the new version of
python-sphinx built in Rawhide a few days ago. So documentation may
be in a partially broken state, but that is unrelated to the ntl
soname bump.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
; should work ...
I had to add --enablerepo=local to the mock flags, and now
fedora-review is happy.
> i try to build before in my system and now on koji [1] mathicgb
> but seem there are some problems on i386 arch ...
Okay, I'll look into it. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.or
I need a review for this package:
mathicgb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287183
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists
build them myself, except I
could use some help with the opencsv update. I don't see an updated
spec file anywhere. Or is that not necessary?
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I'd like to swap reviews with somebody for this package:
mathic: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286322
Let me know what I can review for you. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin
hinx
Makefile:56: recipe for target 'html' failed
make: *** [html] Error 1
make: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/networkx-networkx-1.10/doc'
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QfC9Z8 (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QfC9Z8 (%build)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274568
Note that gap-pkg-semigroups BRs gap-pkg-smallsemi. Thanks!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
straight forward.
Sure, will do. Thanks, Sandro!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
free
time. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:22 PM, gil <punto...@libero.it> wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
> Take!
> can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039299 for
> me?
> regards
> gil
Will do. Thanks, gil!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
Some of the GAP packages require TTH (TeX To HTML) to generate their
documentation.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276831
I'll review something for you if you review this for me. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The
CEO replied, "Okay, we can get some more of those. Where do you get
them, [warehouse store]?")
Thanks for the information, Adam.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
d
11560232 buildArch (subunit-1.2.0-1.fc23.src.rpm, armv7hl): open
(arm02-builder12.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> canceled
0 free 0 open 2 done 3 failed
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
packages before finally arriving at the
HAP package, which sagemath wants. Whew!
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
ers in 32-bit
perl yet. Nonetheless, once the problem was identified, they helped
me fix it and promised to add a test for this problem to their test
suite to prevent its reappearance.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
, BLAST itself turned out to have license issues that were
never resolved. It has since been replaced by other tools, which
don't use csisat, so I see no point in keeping this package in Fedora.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
for me,
and tell me what bribe I can send to you in the mail to make it worth
your while. :-)
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org
The license for eclib has changed from GPLv3+ in version 20120830 to
GPLv2+ in version 20150827, which I will build for Rawhide shortly.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
The license for bliss has changed from GPLv3 for version 0.72 to
LGPLv3 for version 0.73, which I will build for Rawhide shortly.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
why some of my packages show up on this list, as
they use %configure or invoke gcc with both $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and
$RPM_LD_FLAGS. For example, memtailor, which I just built yesterday,
shows as lacking a canary, but it uses the %configure macro. What is
going on there?
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://w
in testing for 10 days, and the minimum is only
7, right? The depchecks passed. http://status.fedoraproject.org/ says
that all systems are go. I don't understand what the problem is.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:39 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
take
regards
gil
Thank you! Let me know if you have packages I can review for you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
, and won't build at all against the current
versions. I'll have to dig into it and see how to update for current
versions.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:20:39PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
This sounds like a different issue. On thing we would need is to know which
email you are talking about.
All the emails coming from FMN (https
control?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
with pretty much every perl
update). I am working with polymake upstream to resolve the issue.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
.
--
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
MPIR 2.7.0 has arrived, and brings an soname bump with it. As far as
I can tell, nothing in Fedora uses mpir, so I don't think anything
needs to be rebuilt. If I'm wrong about that, send me some hate mail
and I'll rebuild your package.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing
no clear license.
When I enquired about that, upstream agreed to release it under the
GPL. My thanks to upstream for being so responsive to this issue.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:04 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
taken
can you review this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215080
thanks in advance
gil
Taken, and thank you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
that, give me some reviews to do for you in exchange
for these. Thanks in advance.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
now breaking
lazily loaded modules. I have several packages that have been broken by
that.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
of a chainbuild.
Can you try just bumping the release and doing a new non chain build?
ie, make a 1.6-12...
Okay, will do. Thanks for checking.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
the 1.6-11.fc23 build as still being in progress, which is consistent
with the old build still showing up in the Rawhide report. Can you
check on this again and see what is going on? Thank you,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
.
Ah, so that explains why both builds in the final stage got terminally
confused. No big deal, Kevin. Don't worry about it. All's well that
ends well, eh? :-)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
look on koji, it shows
that all of the subparts are green:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9698461
So why is the build itself not marked as complete? Did this suffer a
similar fate as the sagemath part?
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
was started. I don't see a who anywhere, but maybe I am
overlooking something.
The builder in charge of that build was in a weird state.
I restarted it and koji handed the build to another builder.
Hopefully it will complete as expected now.
Thank you, Kevin. I appreciate the help.
--
Jerry
,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-integrale packages. I will fix the build failures
at the same time.
qepcad-B: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651446
I just fixed this one.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
apparently uninformed brain is not teaching me anything. What
am I supposed to be able to glean from those links? I need a Rosetta
Stone
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
system? If so, could you
please monkey it back to its previous state?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
4 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1 bar
So the asm approach changes the name that is emitted, rather than
aliasing it. Thanks for the suggestion, though.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Moez Roy moez@gmail.com wrote:
When I set the target to f21 it fails on the test:
Yes, the gfan update I have prepared addresses test failures, among
other things. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
but, alas, gfan still
fails to link in exactly the same way.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
? If so, do I have any other option
besides disabling hardening for gfan? Is there some way to get
aliases to play well with the hardening flags?
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
to work out right with gcc 4.x, but the fact that
it doesn't work out right with gcc 5.x is not gcc's fault.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org
. I'm still
experimenting to discover the answer to that question. (Polymake
builds take awhile and gobble memory like it was doughnuts, so this
isn't a fast process.)
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
0
at the top of the spec file, and in both cases, I still see the
hardened specs in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS when %configure is invoked. I've
got the right spec file inside the mock root. I don't understand
why this worked for you and isn't working for me.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org
library.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
useless at this point. Perhaps it could be replaced with a
page that discusses the current state of the hardening flags.
Thank you,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
to reproduce later and
file a bug report.
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
to be
fixed somewhere. It would be good to track down the actual source of
the problem. I'll jump onto gil's thread and comment.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct
/devel/2015-January/207322.html
Also, I just had another instance of this pop up, with an attempt to build csdp:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8909645
Does anybody have any clue as to what is going wrong?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
to inform them of
the nature of the problem. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
the
porting_to
document for more details.
The bigloo failure had nothing to do with -Wimplicit-int. One file
that should have been compiled with -fPIC wasn't. I don't know why
this didn't cause problems before. Fixed in Rawhide.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel
/config.html
Could somebody fix those, please? Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[5] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/libpuzzle/sources/spec
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
1. gap-pkg-atlasrep: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014
2. gap-pkg-browse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185015
3
in mock. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203331.html
That's what this problem looks like to me: something has erroneously
concluded that this is a noarch build. I just don't know what that
something is, or why it reached such a conclusion. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel
I asked the question below on the virt mailing list about 2 weeks ago.
There have been a grand total of zero responses so far. I'll ask the
same question here, in hopes that somebody knows something that could
help.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
1. gap-pkg-atlasrep: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014
2. gap-pkg-browse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185015
3. gap-pkg-io: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185016
4. gap
!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se
wrote:
tor 2015-01-22 klockan 10:48 -0700 skrev Jerry James:
5. gap-pkg-sonata: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185018
Please let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thank you.
Hi
\' + arg + '\'])
return check_output(cmd).decode('utf-8').strip()
# Last (cached?) output from rpmlint, list of lines.
Just a heads up for you other package reviewers.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
a list of package reviews I need. Are you
willing to take the first of those in exchange for this review? That
would be gap-pkg-atlasrep:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
GAP, and GAP has its own
documentation viewer for the contents of doc subdirectories, so both
of those go into the main package.
Please let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thank you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
out there which can give me a hint to solve this issue.
Add this to your spec file:
%global __requires_exclude perl\\\(for\\\)
Yes, you really do need all of those backslashes
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
/pipermail/devel/2014-April/198525.html
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
isn't valid, because you can't tack with exceptions onto the
end of QPL. Off to talk to the licensing folks about that
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-November/191616.html
Alienatedly yours,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
to install a generic access the Internet type of environment
for non-techies? None of the products obviously address that
audience.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Taken.
Could you review ptyprocess, which is a new dependency of python-pexpect:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167830
Taken. Thank you!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
A new version of sympy is available, with a new dependency. Who would like
to swap reviews? I need this one:
python-fastcache: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166919
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
Taken.
Please, review this package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114737.
Taken, thanks!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
CVC4 has a new version with a new dependency. How about yet another
review swap, this time for abc:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169492
Let me know what I can review in exchange. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
-Command (bug #1158536)
- Remove bundled perl-Filter-Simple (bug #1158542)
This change made the version of perl-ExtUtils-Command in Rawhide go
from perl-ExtUtils-Command.noarch 0:1.18-312.fc22 to
perl-ExtUtils-Command.noarch 0:1.18-240.fc22, which is a downgrade.
Is that intentional?
--
Jerry James
it, and an update was pending. I just pushed
the update to stable, so nothing further needs to be done here.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org
, then the dependencies should be generated automatically.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
I will take it later today, if nobody beat me to it :)
Thank you, Tim. Let me know what I can do for you, whether it be a
review or something else. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
One of my packages has picked up a dependency on libpuma in a new release:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135654
Would someone care
of severity?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
One of my packages has picked up a dependency on libpuma in a new release:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135654
Would someone care to do a review swap? Thanks,
I've had some helpful comments on the bug
it, then. Thanks, Panu.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
One of my packages has picked up a dependency on libpuma in a new release:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135654
Would someone care to do a review swap? Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/ArchDependencies
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
and you want to declare a
weak relation between them A - B, you can either declare Recommends:
B in A's spec file, or declare Supplements: A in B's spec file.
HTH. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Dan HorĂ¡k d...@danny.cz wrote:
we know about it, don't have any answer yet :-(
Okay, thanks for letting me know. I'd appreciate a note when you get
the problem resolved. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
:)
I've taken this review. I haven't got anything ready for you to
review right now. I will be doing some package renames soon. Once I
have those ready, perhaps you could do one for me. I'll ping you when
I have something.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted about this 5 days ago on ppc list [1], but have had no
response. I tried to get some attention on #fedora-ppc today, also
with no success. I am failing miserably to get the attention of any
of the PPC folks, so
=2138060
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
broken. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Monday.
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
last night. I'll try to get a couple more of them today.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you review python-dill?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140577
Thank you
Sure. Thanks, Sergio!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Is anyone up for a review swap? I need python-gmpy2, which is a
successor to the existing gmpy package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138892
Let me know what I can review for you in return.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:41:55PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
Asked here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fa.caml/C6_VauENVgo
Thanks.
This was apparently already reported as PR#6300:
http://caml.inria.fr
901 - 1000 of 1270 matches
Mail list logo