Re: systemd in F15 orphaned?

2011-08-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
> > Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >> Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in >> what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the >> above? >> For games, many would argue the pushing the latest and greate

Re: systemd in F15 orphaned?

2011-08-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
> > > Am 20.08.2011 20:49, schrieb Michał Piotrowski: >> 2011/8/20 Reindl Harald : >>> >>> Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering: On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares > about

Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies: vym]

2011-08-18 Thread Jon Ciesla
Iain Arnell wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Iain Arnell wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >>> I do some macro gymnastics with vym to prevent it Requiring a perl module >>> that's named one thing in SuSE a

[Fwd: Broken dependencies: vym]

2011-08-18 Thread Jon Ciesla
I do some macro gymnastics with vym to prevent it Requiring a perl module that's named one thing in SuSE and another in Fedora. With my latest f17 build, that stopped working, while builds of the same code and spec on f15 and f16 seem to be ok. Did rpm's behaviour change? -J -- in your fear

Re: Need input for creating new icon

2011-08-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> Taking into account my total unfamiliarity with the project, is there >> anything about that image that says "Oh, look, it's spacenav!" to those >> who are familiar? Ot

Re: Need input for creating new icon

2011-08-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> I've always made 48x48 PNGs. I don't really know why, but no one's ever >> complained. >> > > I think that's the Gnome 2 default but the icons in gnome shell

Re: Need input for creating new icon

2011-08-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm working on packaging the spacenav group of programs one of which > is a gui app to setup the configuration of the spacenav daemon. It > currently doesn't provide an icon so I thought I'd try my hand at it. > > Which resolutions do I really need to provide? > > Since I'm a

Re: Which db should I build this package against?

2011-08-10 Thread Jon Ciesla
> On 08/10/2011 07:32 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm working on packaging conquest[1] for fedora which can be built >> against dbase,mysql, postgresql *and* mysql. Which one should I build it >> against? Should I build it against all of them and make different >> subpackages?? > > Did

Re: New hardened build support (coming) in F16

2011-08-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
Steve Grubb wrote: > On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 07:51:07 AM Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:16:12PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: >> >>> This list is woefully incomplete. I would advocate a much larger list. >>> For example, sudo is a very important program that we make

Re: Review swaps

2011-08-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
Tom Callaway wrote: > I have two packages that need to be reviewed: > > * gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions > ( This one is a bit colorful, but it should be easy enough to review. ) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 > > * freewrl - X3D / VRML visua

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: gresistor

2011-08-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jon Ciesla wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> >>> Email I have is chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com, don't know if that's right. CCd. >>> >>> http://www.facebook.com/chit

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: gresistor

2011-08-04 Thread Jon Ciesla
Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> Email I have is chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com, don't know if that's right. CCd. >> >> http://www.facebook.com/chitlesh >> http://chitlesh.wordpress.com >> http://twitter.

Re: abiword

2011-08-02 Thread Jon Ciesla
Adam Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:00:43AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Abiword is currently broken in f16/rawhide due to the retiring of >> link-grammar (a FTBFS retiree). >> >> This is currently breaking the Xfce, LXDE, and soas spins. >> >> Would someone be interested in revi

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: gresistor

2011-08-02 Thread Jon Ciesla
Richard Shaw wrote: > I have submitted a bug report[1] for a bundled library I found in the > gresistor package while working on a review request of my own. > > Both my package, and the bundled library, have been accepted which now > means there are two packages that provide the same file. > > I ha

Re: Intent to package GNOME Shell frippery

2011-07-29 Thread Jon Masters
re a lot happier for having made the switch :) Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

2011-07-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: >> > > SO> I believe you forgot to set whenisgood to use timezones :-) > > My understanding is that you have to log in in order to set your > timezone, or that choosing a timezone was something the responder h

No specific armv7hl VFAD today

2011-07-22 Thread Jon Masters
ves redundant due to insanely cool rate of progress, there will be another VFAD next week. We may (hopefully) soon be able to transition over to just a standard package building exercise, once we've got the standard Koji infrastructure up and running. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@list

Re: boost 1.47.0

2011-07-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
> Hi there, > > in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost > maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. Boost > 1.47.0 has been released recently and Denis Arnaud kindly did the > packaging, so it is ready for scratch builds, smoke testing, and related

Re: on /etc/sysconfig

2011-07-18 Thread Jon Ciesla
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> > > On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Hi, >> > >

Re: nonresponsive package maintainer (gget)

2011-07-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
> Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes: > >> Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (Ant Bryan)? >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711629 > > Is there any one interested in taking over this package? If not, what is > the > procedure for dealing with it? (The > https://

Re: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found"

2011-07-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jon Ciesla wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Panu Matilainen wrote: >> >> >> >>> FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which >>> causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) >

Re: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found"

2011-07-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Rex Dieter wrote: > Panu Matilainen wrote: > > >> FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which >> causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) >> found" errors. This happens when recursively included directories in >> %files are marked with trai

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - TODAY

2011-07-15 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 03:20 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora15_HardFP_Bootstrap Please note that this has been updated since last week. It now includes all of the information you need for "stage3" (current). Further, there is an ad

Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - TODAY

2011-07-15 Thread Jon Masters
Be sure you follow the instructions to use an armv7hl-YOUR_FAS_USERNAME or group name branch on the Fedora ARM git repo so that we can track who is doing what, and more easily back out changes if you/we discover a problem with your setup. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY

2011-07-10 Thread Jon Masters
I can think of specific cases where dependent packages failed to rebuild 6 months later because of an earlier change, and I'm sure we can find some involving years at a time. Further, there are some noarch packages that haven't been rebuilt in many releases, but that's another issu

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY

2011-07-10 Thread Jon Masters
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 16:23 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:43:30PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 11:45:33PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > > > > * Fedora should (IMO) institute mandatory mass rebuilds. Either every >

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-10 Thread Jon Masters
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 21:59 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 23:32 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> > >> On 07/08/2011 10:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > >> > Or in other wo

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-10 Thread Jon Masters
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 16:32 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 05:46:18AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > > I disagree. It doesn't suck. It's the way UNIX and Linux have done this > > for dozens of years, and it's the way countless sysadmins kn

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-10 Thread Jon Masters
eekend who's just thinking "gee, what the heck is going on, why won't this just work how it has done for the past twenty years?". In other words "suck" depends on viewpoint. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY

2011-07-10 Thread Jon Masters
On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 00:48 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:52 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > > >> We are hosting another one of our regular Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual > >> Fedora A

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY

2011-07-09 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:52 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > We are hosting another one of our regular Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual > Fedora Activity Day today Friday July 8th, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern > Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is to co-ordinate the > bootstrap o

Re: systemd: Is it wrong?

2011-07-08 Thread Jon Masters
e Fedora distribution should be discussed here. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY

2011-07-07 Thread Jon Masters
nk to below): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora15_HardFP_Bootstrap Be sure you follow the instructions to use an armv7hl-YOUR_FAS_USERNAME or group name branch so that we can track who is doing what, and more easily back out changes if you/we discover a problem with your setup. Jon.

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY

2011-06-29 Thread Jon Masters
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 08:02 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 02:17 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > Join us on Friday to celebrate July with another in our series of VFADs! > Just a heads up that you won't have many Canadians joining

Re: Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY

2011-06-29 Thread Jon Masters
s > there a list of built packages? If you are internal, ping me and I can make available access to a couple of PandaBoards to save building up emulation bits (should be available ahead of Friday but not available yet). We're trying to do this natively, though I've nothing against

Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY

2011-06-28 Thread Jon Masters
chitectures/ARM Which also contains links to canned images you can use to drop onto your own ARM system and hit the ground running without any installation time. Awesomeness! Jon. --- Fedora ARM hardfp activity days --- We are hosting another Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual Fedora Activity Day on Frid

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 09:59 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> Le Lun 27 juin 2011 15:12, Miloslav Trmač a écrit : >> >> > Placing trust in the manufacturer of the hardware puts the user in no >> > worse position than they were before. >> >> I don't call placing absolute vetting power in bios

Re: Orphaning gnet2

2011-06-28 Thread Jon Ciesla
> I orphaned the gnet2 package as workrave does not depend on it anymore. > Feel free to take it - especially if your package depends on it. Even > better would be to drop it as upstream is dead and GIO should be used > instead. > > However these packages still depend on it in Rawhide: > > gcompri

Re: Any takers for package stardict...

2011-06-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
> i want to relinquish ownership. Any takers for package stardict. Though not offically a comaintainer, Jens has been active on it recently and might be a good candidate. -J > Thanks & regards > Naveen Kumar > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-24 Thread Jon Ciesla
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote: >> I am still struggling to see real applications for this. I don't know >> how a networked system using the technology could be differentiated >> from an (insecure) software simulation of the same from a remote >> viewer's perspecti

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:30 PM, JB wrote: >> Miloslav Trmač volny.cz> writes: >> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:21 PM, JB gmail.com> wrote: >>> ... >>> > Will the TPM allow a third party remote access to the machine ? >>> Absolutely not. >> >> You are wrong here. >> >> http://en.wikipedi

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
> Miloslav Trmač volny.cz> writes: > >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:21 PM, JB gmail.com> wrote: >> ... >> > Will the TPM allow a third party remote access to the machine ? >> Absolutely not. > > You are wrong here. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Platform_Module > "... > Overview > ..

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
> On 06/22/2011 03:01 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> > >>> Outside that, is there any other impact? Does tboot perform any >>> verification of the kernels, and if so how is that configured? Is the >>> expectation that an install configured with TXT will only b

Re: [OT] numpy 1.6 on fedora 15

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
> A little OT perhaps, but would installation of numpy1.6 onto fedora15 be > expected to break anything? Hard to say. Lots of things depend on it, but most things have an unversioned requires. You'd probably want to rebuild the SRPM on F15 to minimize breakage. -J > -- > devel mailing list >

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Trusted_Boot is a proposed > feature for F16. We've traditionally had a hard objection to the > functionality because it required either the distribution or downloading > of binary code that ran on the host CPU, but it seems that there'll > shortly be syste

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - TODAY

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Masters
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 00:36 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > We are hosting another Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual Fedora Activity Day > today, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern Daylight Time). The purpose of this > session is to co-ordinate the bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating > point). G

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

2011-06-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
> > xcowsay I'll take this too. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - TODAY

2011-06-21 Thread Jon Masters
you follow the instructions to use an armv7hl-YOUR_FAS_USERNAME or group name branch so that we can track who is doing what, and more easily back out changes if you/we discover a problem with your setup. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

2011-06-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
I'll take atop too. -J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

2011-06-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
> Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of > last > week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from > the > packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will > be > orphaned. > > To try and minimize the problems this co

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-06-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 07:12:56 AM Paul Howarth wrote: >> I propose to retire bittorrent (the original python client) for the >> reasons outlined below. If anyone's interested in taking it over >> instead, please apply on the package database and I'll transfer >> ownership. Think carefully

Re: Review Swaps

2011-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
> On 06/15/2011 08:39 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: >> 712566 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy - the tron-legacy >> gnome-shell theme > > This is a pretty clear trademark infringement concern. I'm about to go > block this as FE-Legal, but you should come up with a different name.

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
> 15.06.2011, 21:37, "Jon Ciesla" : >> My only concern is that there be a command-line replacement available. >> šI >> currently fetch my ISOs with bittorrent-curses and screen. šCan someone >> with experience with any of them offer a recommendation? šPy

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
> On 06/15/2011 01:37 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >>> I propose to retire bittorrent (the original python client) for the >>> reasons outlined below. If anyone's interested in taking it over >>> instead, please apply on the package database and I'll tran

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

2011-06-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
> I propose to retire bittorrent (the original python client) for the > reasons outlined below. If anyone's interested in taking it over > instead, please apply on the package database and I'll transfer > ownership. Think carefully before you act though! > > Dead Upstream: > == > Well,

Re: OpenBUGS program has a pre-compiled )S library from MS Windows. Any possibility to package it?

2011-06-14 Thread Jon Ciesla
> I decided to try to help the cause of Bayesian statistics and the open > source effort of the OpenBUGS group (http://www.openbugs.info/w/) by > making some packages. In case you are not a statistically-inclined > person, it is worth knowing that Bayesian Updating with Gibbs Sampling > (BUGS) ha

SUMMARY - [Fwd: Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - TODAY]

2011-06-11 Thread Jon Masters
--- Begin Message --- On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 04:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > We are hosting a Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual Fedora Activity Day today, at > 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is > to co-ordinate the bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware float

[Fwd: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - TODAY]

2011-06-10 Thread Jon Masters
all the pre-reqs/bits: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora15_HardFP_Bootstrap_Virtual_FAD_20110610 Jon. ___ arm mailing list a...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm --- End Message

Re: [fedora-arm] [Fwd: Activity Day June 10th - ARMv7 F15 hardfp bringup]

2011-06-05 Thread Jon Masters
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 09:54 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Chris Tyler wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > >> [0] We're making a "one time" incompatible ABI switch in F-15 bringup to > >> th

Re: [Fwd: [fedora-arm] Activity Day June 10th - ARMv7 F15 hardfp bringup]

2011-06-04 Thread Jon Masters
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 21:10 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > [0] We're making a "one time" incompatible ABI switch in F-15 bringup to > > the "hard float" ABI defined in section 6 of the ARM AAPCS (common

[Fwd: [fedora-arm] Activity Day June 10th - ARMv7 F15 hardfp bringup]

2011-06-04 Thread Jon Masters
Folks, If you're interested in getting involved in the armv7hl[0] bringup, please do subscribe to the ARM list and follow along/join us Fri for the first of what will hopefully be several sessions dedicated to bootstrap of F15 hardfp bits, followed by building the universe around those. Jon

Re: [fedora-arm] Does anyone care about LSB on arm?

2011-06-04 Thread Jon Masters
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 01:32 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:25 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > sooo... although the situation *right now* is that nobody in the > > commercial world is the slightest bit interested in LSB because they > &g

Re: [fedora-arm] Does anyone care about LSB on arm?

2011-06-03 Thread Jon Masters
d those of larger parts running general a purpose OS. I don't expect to see Fedora running on my cellphone, but I do have it running on a netbook quite nicely - the latter needs LSB more. I'll leave the rest of the rhetoric alone :) Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Request for removal of package from Fedora repositories: dasher.x86_64

2011-06-02 Thread Jon Ciesla
nodata wrote: > Hello, > > dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12. > > The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed. > > dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go > fullscreen. > > What's the procedure to get the package removed? > > Thanks. >

Re: Orphaning my packages...

2011-06-01 Thread Jon Ciesla
Truch, Matthew wrote: >> I need to orphan all of my packages. In most cases, it would be great if >> someone (or more) could pick them up. Let me know if you'd like any of them >> and I'll release them to you. >> >> kst -- A data viewing program for KDE A great program for plotting data >> (espec

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Lubomir Rintel

2011-05-31 Thread Jon Ciesla
Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote: > I'm following the procedure at: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > > Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering > e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports: > > https

Re: orphaning 20

2011-05-27 Thread Jon Ciesla
Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > - frescobaldi: lilypond editor. > - rumor: Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR. required by > frescobaldi. has 1 open FTBFS bug #704535. I proposed a patch for the > bug in the bugzilla. > I took these, since I maintain lilypond. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace

Re: Review Request/Review Swaps Request for writetype, pyttsx, python-timelib

2011-05-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Prabin Kumar Datta wrote: > Hi! > Currently, more then 3 of my packages are under review request. > And 4+ packages are already packaged but not submitted for review > since the dependency packages are not reviewed till now (or some other > issues). > > My packages under review: > 1. python-timelib

Re: How to undo a build

2011-05-17 Thread Jon Ciesla
Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi, > I made a build with a wrong spec file (shame on me) and I've untagged > the builds but when I wan to run fedpkg build, it outputs: > > "Could not initiate build: UpTools-8.5.5-1.fc16 has already been built" > > Is there a way to "undo" or "drop" the build and do it agai

Re: Orphaned python-alsa

2011-05-16 Thread Jon Ciesla
Ok, thanks! Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: > I just means anybody who would like to take this package should > recognize that it is such a minor package that few people would ever > install it. > > Robin > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > &g

Re: Orphaned python-alsa

2011-05-15 Thread Jon Ciesla
Without doing any research (since it's Sunday and I'm tired) does this mean it is no longer needed, or that you won't be maintaining it and someone else probably should if they're so inclined? -J On 05/15/2011 02:33 AM, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: > Not required by any package other than alsa-too

Re: Thunderbird updates mixed up in F14

2011-05-02 Thread Jon Ciesla
Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> Rather find and fix the bug that is the cause of this. There have been >> a few updates like that recently, again. >> >> The 3.1.10-1.fc14 package is tagged dist-f14-updates already: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2412

Re: Retiring perl-Text-Aspell

2011-04-27 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jerry James wrote: > I would like to invoke the EOL process for perl-Text-Aspell in > Rawhide. I will continue to maintain it in Fedora through the F-15 > lifecycle, and in EPEL through the EPEL 6 lifecycle. The package is > already semi-crippled in EPEL 6, since only the aspell-en and > aspell-s

Re: A "whatuses" command for yum?

2011-04-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jeff Garzik wrote: > A humble, basic question for you experts... > > Given a library, such as jansson (C JSON lib), how does one > automatically list all packages in the F14 repo which require jansson? > > Must be able to find packages which are not installed on the current system. > > Thanks, > >

Re: The future of FTBFS?

2011-04-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:02:31 -0500, Matt wrote: > > >> I think FTBFS has been valuable. >> > > But of course! > > >> Sure, I get the occasional "why are you filling my mailbox with this" >> message, [...] >> > > Wow. Unbelievable. > How dare you provide m

Re: The future of FTBFS?

2011-04-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Matt Domsch wrote: > As my job and family responsibilities have shifted over time, I have > been giving less and less attention to the FTBFS (fails to > build from source) process that I started 5 years ago on a "see, it > _can_ be done" lark. > > I think FTBFS has been valuable. Through the pro

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

2011-04-06 Thread Jon Ciesla
Petr Machata wrote: > Bruno Wolff III writes: > > >> I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since >> for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't >> want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too. >> > > It'

Re: Orphaning Package

2011-04-05 Thread Jon Ciesla
Mike McGrath wrote: > Hey all, I'm doing a horrible horrible job of maintaining my packagegs, > some of which people actually use. Please pick up what you can if you're > interested. Here's the list: > > cacti > I've taken cacti. > perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 > perl-Date-Pcalc > perl-File-RsyncP > pe

Re: manually fixing IPs

2011-03-28 Thread Jon Masters
over to routers I was playing with over the weekend. Soldering surface mount bits, placing wires, and poking at serial consoles and firmware setup was trivial. The hardest bit was telling a system service to stay stopped :) Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: manually fixing IPs

2011-03-26 Thread Jon Masters
d. On that other system, adding a manual ARP entry and an interface alias with another IP stuck, didn't change randomly, and did what I wanted. Not very web 2.0 I know, but I like it that way. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: manually fixing IPs

2011-03-26 Thread Jon Masters
I plug/unplug a cable or whatnot. Really, there should be a better way that turning off every network service and script for the 5 minutes I want this. I have other machines, etc. and this is rawhide, but it's also the future. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a

Re: manually fixing IPs

2011-03-26 Thread Jon Masters
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 12:10 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On 03/26/2011 12:05 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > > Then it became necessary to: > > > > /etc/init.d/NetworkManager stop > > > > Then it became necessary to: > > > > systemctl disable

manually fixing IPs

2011-03-26 Thread Jon Masters
go all Windows 95 on this, but...I'd rather not. Thanks, Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: 42 Orphaned packages

2011-03-22 Thread Jon Ciesla
Jon Ciesla wrote: > nucleo wrote: > >> There are some other packages was orphaned today by thomasj: >> >> e_dbus >> ecore >> edje >> eet >> efreet >> embryo >> enlightenment >> epeg >> epsilon >> evas >>

Wordpress(-mu): Big changes coming

2011-03-21 Thread Jon Ciesla
em to testing, and then push to stable one the appropriate period has elapsed. Please redistribute this to anyone you know who might be affected and may not be on this list. Thank you, Jon * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687909 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687911 -

Re: 42 Orphaned packages

2011-03-09 Thread Jon Ciesla
nucleo wrote: > There are some other packages was orphaned today by thomasj: > > e_dbus > ecore > edje > eet > efreet > embryo > enlightenment > epeg > epsilon > evas > ewl > freeciv > Took freeciv. Also, if none of the co-maintainers of SDL_(net,ttf,image,mixer) want to own them, I'll take th

Re: Guile 2.0.0

2011-03-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) said: > >> Suggestions? Do we want to keep this in a special rawhide koji target >> for now? >> > > GnuCash, at least, does not support Guile 2.0 out of the box. We'd have > to run a patched version. (Not sure why it didn't sh

Re: best practices packaging web applications

2011-03-01 Thread Jon Ciesla
Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:34 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > >>> And, what «best practices» would you recommend to review, at least in >>> the form of current packages? I'm considering zarafa, xinha and wordpress. >>> >>&g

Re: best practices packaging web applications

2011-03-01 Thread Jon Ciesla
«best practices» would you recommend to review, at least in > the form of current packages? I'm considering zarafa, xinha and wordpress. > > Thanks. > > -- > Ismael Olea mailto:ism...@olea.org>> > Planeta OLEA > > Hi, I'm Jon Ciesla, I maintain a num

Re: Plans for BTRFS in Fedora

2011-02-28 Thread Jon Masters
n LVM). That is not the way we should be going. I've made my objections known, added a comment on the wiki discussion for the feature, and will raise an objection at the appropriate time that it is proposed to drop LVM use by default. Until then, I'm done :) Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal

2011-02-23 Thread Jon Ciesla
On 02/23/2011 04:26 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan: libsigc++ > TnL requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 > TnL requires libsigc++-devel = 1.2.7-9.fc15 > asc requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 > asc requires libsigc++-devel = 1.2.7-9.fc15 > libasync requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 > qtel r

Re: Plans for BTRFS in Fedora

2011-02-23 Thread Jon Masters
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 07:15 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 14:51 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > > >> 2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use > >> BTRFS's

Re: Plans for BTRFS in Fedora

2011-02-22 Thread Jon Masters
is, with users being able to elect to switch to BTRFS (sub)volumes if they are interested in doing so. Should the switch to BTRFS by default happen, this will be one more thing I will have to fix immediately during installation. The list grows longer and longer over time - please don't make this

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-11 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: > >> I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers >> don't want them. >> > > Rex has said he'd prefer if someone else takes taglib, so go ahead. > &

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-08 Thread Jon Ciesla
Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 02/07/2011 02:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > <38K snipped> > > >> I took Io-language. I'll take odfpy and taglib if the comaintainers >> don't want them. >> >> -J >> >> > > Please trim t

Re: NetworkManager doesn't start on boot

2011-02-08 Thread Jon Masters
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:27 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 08.02.11 05:18, Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:04 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Tue, 08.02.11 04:44, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.c

Re: NetworkManager doesn't start on boot

2011-02-08 Thread Jon Masters
only covers sysv services. We probably should deprecate it or at > least add a bit of code to point out that whether a service is on or off > in sysv is ignored for native systemd services. What utility are you recommending to replace it? Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

2011-02-07 Thread Jon Ciesla
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned > packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where > necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15. > > The following packages are currently orphaned and exist in F-15. As > you can see, t

Re: rawhide woes

2011-02-04 Thread Jon Masters
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 03:09 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2011/02/04 01:26 (GMT-0500) Jon Masters composed: > > > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 18:04 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> I tried to net (minimal) install 40 hours ago and got no initrd and thus > >> no

Re: rawhide woes

2011-02-03 Thread Jon Masters
o network > except via chroot, and even then after installing X and KDE, yum gives errors > about installed packages not actually being installed. Can you run: $ /sbin/ifconfig -a And let us know if you are seeing differently named devices, or if they are simply outright missing? Thanks. J

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >