Re: Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

Christopher píše v St 08. 11. 2017 v 22:33 +: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:27 PM Igor Gnatenko oject.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 18:58 +, Christopher wrote: > > > Hi, I've been reading a lot lately about Fedora modularity, and > > I'm > > > still a > > >

armv7hl: ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Memory exhausted

Hi, I am building mongodb and on armv7hl I got "/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Memory exhausted" error. How to solve this? I would prefer more general solution that forcing to -j1 and hope that I will help... CCFLAGS="%{?optflags} -ggdb3 -fvisibility=hidden"

Re: fedpkg container-build labels error

Thanks for help, but ... Dennis Gilmore píše v Út 25. 04. 2017 v 13:10 -0500: > El lun, 24-04-2017 a las 15:11 +0200, Marek Skalický escribió: > > Hi, > > I am building container using fedpkg and I am getting this error: > > > > FAILED: BuildError: Require

fedpkg container-build labels error

Hi, I am building container using fedpkg and I am getting this error: FAILED: BuildError: Required LABELs haven't been found in Dockerfile: version (or Version).   0 free  0 open  0 done  1 failed But in Dockerfile I have ENV NAME=mongodb \ VERSION=0 \ RELEASE=1 \ ARCH=x86_64 LABEL

Re: Different icu from upstream

So there are no Fedora requirements/recommendations about this? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Different icu from upstream

Hi, packaging guidelines says that bundling should be avoided if upstream supports it (build system has this option). I was dealing with situation with icu. Fedora version differs from bundled versions in packages. Because of this for mozjs45 some tests are failing, so I had to disable them. For

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

Marek Polacek píše v Út 07. 02. 2017 v 22:32 +0100: > It's been a tradition now that every January we rebuild all the > Fedora packages > with the upcoming GCC, to reveal as many bugs as possible before we > release > the new version.  This year is no different. > > There were 18811 packages

Re: MongoDB on Big Endian

Hi, MongoDB upstream does not support ppc64 BE. But there is support for s390x, so code is ported/ready for Big Endian. I've managed to make MongoDB building and passing basic tests on ppc64. So in rawhide in latest build, all fedora primary architectures are functional. Testing is very

[EPEL-devel] Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

> It's starting to look like the official MongoDB repositories might make a > whole lot > more sense for the average admin currently using EPEL MongoDB packages: > > https://docs.mongodb.com/v3.0/tutorial/install-mongodb-on-red-hat/ > > If I find out they aren't doing such a hot job with these,

[EPEL-devel] Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

> 1. We have no access (no pun intended) to those packages.[Yes the > person packages mongodb in Fedora works for Red Hat but that does not > mean they have access to the bits that another group is doing for SCL > work.] First, everyone should have an access to those packages - available source

[EPEL-devel] Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

To note, I've forgotten that MongoDB 2.6 is in RHSCL, so it should be supported till April 2018. Also I have no problem to backport easy fixes for EPEL6 too, but if problem is harder and it is not possible create relatively small patch, I can't manage big patches. Could some user want to

Re: MongoDB in EPEL7

Hi, thanks for answers and suggestion that epel-de...@lists.fp.o would be better - so I've posted it there https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TQPBQ25T6F323WYOGNOB6XYMEZDCSFEK/ Marek ___ devel

[EPEL-devel] MongoDB in EPEL7

Hi, current situation: EPEL6 - MongoDB 2.4.x EPEL7 - MongoDB 2.6.x Upstream supports only upgrade to next major version. So from 2.4 it is supported only to 2.6. Therefore I kept MongoDB 2.6 in EPEL7 (even two next major versions are released). But MongoDB 2.6 is going to EOL (probably this

MongoDB in EPEL7

Hi, current situation: EPEL6 - MongoDB 2.4.x EPEL7 - MongoDB 2.6.x Upstream supports only upgrade to next major version. So from 2.4 it is supported only to 2.6. Therefore I kept MongoDB 2.6 in EPEL7 (even two next major versions are released). But MongoDB 2.6 is going to EOL (probably this

Re: Reserved GID for MongoDB

James Hogarth píše v St 18. 05. 2016 v 20:51 +0100: > > On 18 May 2016 8:27 p.m., "James Hogarth" > wrote: > > > > > > On 18 May 2016 7:19 p.m., "Przemek Klosowski" st.gov> wrote: > > > > > > On 05/18/2016 01:21 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > >> > >

Reserved GID for MongoDB

Hello, I am packaging MongoDB. It a database so it stores files and need reserved UID and GID for it... Today I figured out that for more than 4 years MongoDB does not use reserved GID. In https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/setup.git/tree/uidgid#n151 UID and GID is reserved. However MongoDB uses

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 14:23 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Cxx11AbiCompatibility > > I guess this is what is causing problems if mongo-cxx-driver and an > application using it do not use the same language version. > Does someone know it this could be a problem for F22?

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 11:29 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 26/10/15 11:23, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Marek Skalický <mskal...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, > >> I would like to ask what do you think abou

New package request

Hello everyone, does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works? (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests )- for 6 days I have status of this request "Approved", but I can't do fedpkg clone... What is wrong? What next step I should do? Thanks, Marek -- devel

Re: New package request

On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 06:51 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:53:39 +0200 > Marek Skalický <mskal...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > does someone know how the "Request new package" in pkgdb works? > > (https://fedoraproject

Differences among koji hosts

Hello, what are differences among different koji hosts? Are they really the same? I have problem with building MongoDB. In my point of view some build tests are failing depending on the koji host building it. If hosts name starts buildhw everything is OK. But with buildvm tests are failing...

Re: Review Swap

Thanks. Taken. Marek gil píše v St 06. 05. 2015 v 19:14 +0200: Take! can you review this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214385 ? regards gil Il 06/05/2015 17:53, Marek Skalický ha scritto: Is anyone up for a review swap? I want to get mongo-tools into Fedora: https

Review Swap

Is anyone up for a review swap? I want to get mongo-tools into Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218277 Let me know what I can review for you in return. Thanks, Marek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Review Swap

Jonathan Underwood píše v Po 23. 03. 2015 v 11:39 +: On 23 March 2015 at 11:19, Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com wrote: Is anyone up for a review swap? I need wiredtiger, which is a new storage engine of mongodb 3.0 database. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201662

Review Swap

Is anyone up for a review swap? I need wiredtiger, which is a new storage engine of mongodb 3.0 database. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201662 Let me know what I can review for you in return. Thanks, Marek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]

Hi, I were trying to compile f22 mongoDB package with enabled _hardened_build . And it always failed with: collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] compilation terminated. scons: *** [build/linux2/ssl/use-system-all/usev8/mongo/mongod] Error 1 scons: building terminated because

Re: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]

Dan Horák píše v Čt 19. 02. 2015 v 20:12 +0100: On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:51:38 +0100 Marek Skalický mskal...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I were trying to compile f22 mongoDB package with enabled _hardened_build . And it always failed with: collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 9

Changing default configuration

Hi, does someone know what are Fedora Guidelines (or something similar) saying about this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077369 ? Is is possible to change default configuration file depending on available free space? (this change is about adding smallfile=true into mongod.conf

Re: Changing default configuration

Matthew Miller píše v Út 10. 02. 2015 v 06:19 -0500: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:12:15PM +0100, Marek Skalický wrote: does someone know what are Fedora Guidelines (or something similar) saying about this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077369 ? Is is possible to change

Re: mongodb.conf rename

Honza Horak píše v St 04. 02. 2015 v 11:58 +0100: On 02/02/2015 05:01 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: Hello, in Fedora Rawhide there is a new major version of mongoDB 2.6. With this new version names of mongoDB configuration files will be changed - to reflect names used in upstream rpms

mongodb.conf rename

Hi, in Fedora Rawhide there is a new major version of mongoDB 2.6. With this new version names of mongoDB configuration files will be changed - to reflect names used in upstream rpms (http://downloads-distro.mongodb.org/repo/redhat/os/x86_64/RPMS/ ) mongodb.conf - mongod.conf mongodb-shard.conf