Re: Removal of quagga from Fedora

On 10/12/21 4:13 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 7:54 AM Michal Ruprich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am planning to start a retirement process for quagga in Fedora. The >> package is very outdated since the upstream is dead for a couple of >> years. T

Removal of quagga from Fedora

on. This is more of an FYI message to let you know and to see if anyone would miss quagga. Cheers, -- Michal Ruprich Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic

Sponsorship for non-maintainers

to discuss it here. Any input on this is appreciated. Thanks and regards, Michal -- [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/projects/tests/* [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9490 -- Michal Ruprich Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redh

Re: Moving tcpdump from /usr/sbin to /usr/bin

Good point, thx Zbyszek. On 8/24/20 4:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:54:29PM +0200, Michal Ruprich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> after a discussion with upstream, I will be moving tcpdump binary from >> /usr/sbin to /usr/bin, si

Moving tcpdump from /usr/sbin to /usr/bin

Hi, after a discussion with upstream, I will be moving tcpdump binary from /usr/sbin to /usr/bin, similar to how wireshark does this. If you can think of any reason why not to do this, please let me know. Thanks and regards, -- Michal Ruprich Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web

Re: EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected

; When we get modularity up and working for EPEL-8, we'll need to figure out > how to handle that, as we want to be able to provide alternate versions as > non-default streams. > > > On another note: rsh? Really? :) Unfortunately, yes :( :D :D -- Michal Ruprich Softwar

Re: EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected

-23 at 08:45 +0200, Michal Ruprich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to request epel-8 branch for rsh package but the request >> is >> always closed as invalid with this explanation: "The branch in PDC >> already exists". I have no idea what that means. I

EPEL-8 branches requests being rejected

y point me in the right direction as to where I can find the branch? Thanks and regards. -- Michal Ruprich Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel ma

Re: Looking for an advice on file location in Fedora

On 3/20/19 2:06 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:00 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am preparing FRR so that it could be added to Fedora and s

Re: Looking for an advice on file location in Fedora

On 3/20/19 1:58 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am preparing FRR so that it could be added to Fedora and since there >> are a lot of experienced packagers here, I would like t

Looking for an advice on file location in Fedora

be grateful for any ideas about this. Thanks. Michal Ruprich ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List

Re: Problem with portaudio linking

On 1/4/19 12:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:41:46 +0100, Michal Ruprich wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> has anyone encountered a problem on F28 when building a package that >> uses portaudio? I was building newer version of wireshark a month ago >&

Problem with portaudio linking

: error: Linking with libportaudio failed'. The build still works on F29 and in Rawhide, only F28 hits this issue. Anyone else has seen this happening? Thanks. -- Michal Ruprich Associate Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00

Firefox lost my session after update

into this. -- Michal Ruprich Associate Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel

Broken dependencies for tetex in Rawhide?

-autoaligne needed by texlive-collection-plaingeneric-7:svn44986-4.fc29.noarch Is this package broken in Rawhide? -- Michal Ruprich Associate Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic

Re: [HEADS UP] Changes in wireshark package name

On 03/06/2018 03:40 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michal Ruprich wrote: >> the plan to drop the GTK+ GUI [1] was approved by FESCO, so I will be >> dropping the wireshark-gtk package in rawhide(currently F29). Also I >> would like to propose that we change the

[HEADS UP] Changes in wireshark package name

+_GUI_in_wireshark -- Michal Ruprich Associate Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

[HEADS UP] Package wireshark-gtk going away

. -- Michal Ruprich Associate Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

[HEADS UP] Package wireshark-gtk going away

. -- Michal Ruprich Associate Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of systemd-units

> mruprich net-tools net-tools rsync Done for both packages. -- Michal Ruprich Associate Software Engineer Email: mrupr...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing l