On 8/13/23 17:17, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to
pick them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each
release.Several
On 8/13/23 17:17, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to
pick them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each
release.Several
On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick
them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several
of these packages do not have dependencies
On 8/13/23 16:28, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick
them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several
of these packages do not have dependencies
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick
them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several
of these packages do not have dependencies packaged in Fedora.
spyder
I am going to orphan the following packages unless someone wants to pick
them up. I do not have time to maintain them anymore since the
dependencies have become more and more complex with each release.Several
of these packages do not have dependencies packaged in Fedora.
spyder
On 4/3/23 12:53, Blaise Pabon wrote:
Hi Mukundan, Jonathan,
I have been working on becoming a fedora maintainer and I would love
to help.
When I followed the links to the build logs I got a 404.
Blaise
Hi Blaise,
I will be happy to help you with becoming a packager. I am also happy to
I have been maintaining spyder in Fedora for sometime now. Since the
time I took up maintaining spyder, the dependencies have expanded
considerably (I have packaged several of these dependencies in the
past). Unfortunately, I am not able to devote as much as time as needed
to maintain this
I have been maintaining spyder in Fedora for sometime now. Since the
time I took up maintaining spyder, the dependencies have expanded
considerably (I have packaged several of these dependencies in the
past). Unfortunately, I am not able to devote as much as time as needed
to maintain this
On 9/15/22 21:47, Carl George wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 8:46 PM Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I have a packaging question -
One of the packages I maintain, nextcloud-client, fails to execute in
EPEL-9. It is being blocked by SELinux policy.
getsebool selinuxuser_execmod is off in EL9
I have a packaging question -
One of the packages I maintain, nextcloud-client, fails to execute in
EPEL-9. It is being blocked by SELinux policy.
getsebool selinuxuser_execmod is off in EL9.
Is it even allowed to change SELinux rule in, for example, %post?
I suspect the correct way to do
Hi all,
Can someone please review this package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107842
This is a small library that is needed for python-lsp-server.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> That said, until then I can try and run things on weekends.
Is there a formal process to volunteer to hold the keys to the kingdom?
___
devel mailing list --
I am retiring two packages - python-language-server and python-pyls_black
These were originally packaged for spyder but is no longer maintained.
Instead, we have *-lsp-* packages that are used by spyder and actively
maintained. These are not needed by anything else.
$ dnf repoquery
I am unable to clone repos from src.fpo since this morning.
$ fedpkg co xfce4-power-manager
Cloning into 'xfce4-power-manager'...
nonamed...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
On 3/21/22 20:35, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I will be updating libqalculate (and qalculate-gtk) involving soname
bump on rawhide in the coming days.
The following packages will be affected -
cantor
step
plasma-workspace
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and open bug reports
I will be updating libqalculate (and qalculate-gtk) involving soname
bump on rawhide in the coming days.
The following packages will be affected -
cantor
step
plasma-workspace
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and open bug reports if there are issues.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
--
GPG
I forgot to email about this. Here are official buils of Xfce 4.16 on EPEL8
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3f7925eb01
I am hoping to push this to stable in about a week. Please test.
--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 8/22/21 10:18 AM, Iago Rubio wrote:
On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 09:00 -0400, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 6:25 PM Mukundan Ragavan <
nonamed...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am orphaning rarian (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rarian).
If Mukundan want to take it over
On 8/18/21 3:51 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 18.08.2021 um 10:45 +0200 schrieb Ondrej Mosnacek:
Hello,
I would like to update quazip to version 1.1 in rawhide (i.e. future
F36) [1][2], but since this update will change sonames (libquazip.so
-> libquazip1-qt4.so and
Hi,
I am trying to update spyder on rawhide and F35. The main issue I have
is that pyqt requirements are strict. From the setup file,
'pyqt5<5.13',
'pyqtwebengine<5.13',
Fedora has 5.15.x. If I relax QT versions, built and launch spyder, I
get this error and spyder fails to launch.
I am orphaning rarian (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rarian). As
far as I can tell, nothing in Fedora depends on it anymore.
# dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires librarian\*
Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:50 ago on Wed 11 Aug 2021 06:03:30
PM EDT.
libqalculate 3.20.1 updates soname version to 22. I will rebuild the
affected packages.
$ dnf repoquery --releasever=rawhide --whatrequires libqalculate
cantor-libs-0:21.04.2-2.fc35.x86_64
plasma-workspace-libs-0:5.22.4-1.fc35.x86_64
qalculate-kde-0:0.9.7.10-31.nmu1.fc35.x86_64
Can someone review these three packages? These will be needed to update
spyder to 5.1.0 (expected to be released by the end of this month).
python-lsp-jsonrpc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979275
python-lsp-server: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979315
Hi,
Can someone please review this relatively straightforward package? This
is new dependency for spyder.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977120
Thank you.
Mukundan.
--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I am orphaning the following packages. They should not be needed for
anything else in Fedora (acc. to dnf repoquery --whatprovides).
python-jsonrpcserver (there is another package of similar name that is
needed by spyder)
All these are required by the package above.
python-aiozmq
I am orphaning the following packages. They should not be needed for
anything else in Fedora (acc. to dnf repoquery --whatprovides).
python-jsonrpcserver (there is another package of similar name that is
needed by spyder)
All these are required by the package above.
python-aiozmq
On 2/15/21 7:02 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
Mukundan -
Just a note that as mentioned on the CentOS list here:
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2021-February/353317.html
# dnf group install Xfce
Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:24 ago on Mon 15 Feb 2021
03:41:53 PM MST
On 2/22/21 9:33 PM, Jerry James wrote:
The compiler is telling you that it saw "#include " inside an
extern "C" block, but that glib.h ultimately pulls in headers with C++
definitions. It looks like the glib headers already take care of
defining things correctly depending on whether they are
Hi,
I am trying to update nextcloud-client to 3.1.3. Build keeps failing
with this -
/builddir/build/BUILD/desktop-3.1.3/src/gui/cloudproviders/cloudprovidermanager.cpp:15:1:
note: 'extern "C"' linkage started here
15 | extern "C" {
Can someone please explain how I can fix this
On 2/15/21 5:50 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 2/7/21 8:56 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
Hi all,
I have a COPR containing xfce 4.16 packages for EPEL-8 packages [0]. I
would like to get some testing done using this COPR before getting
into EPEL-8.
Please email if and when you notice
Hi all,
I have a COPR containing xfce 4.16 packages for EPEL-8 packages [0]. I
would like to get some testing done using this COPR before getting into
EPEL-8.
Please email if and when you notice problems and I will try to fix it as
soon as possible.
As a reminder - xfce 4.16 will be
On 12/3/20 6:03 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
Hi,
I am hoping to update nbconvert to ver 6.0.7 on rawhide. This version
introduces several dependencies. Most of the dependencies that I was
able to track down have now been packaged and reside in rawhide (except
pyppeteer I think).
I
Hi,
Can someone please review this package?
python-textdistance:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910822
This should be the last package I need to update spyder to version 4.2.1
(along with other dependencies). I can update spyder once this is approved.
Thank you,
Mukundan.
On 12/4/20 10:34 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi José,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:17 PM José Abílio Matos wrote:
Probably the build was erased, another place where it can be found is:
On 12/4/20 4:56 AM, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Hello.
I'm getting HTTP/404 for
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/nonamedotc/nbconvert-6.0.7/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01795156-python-nbconvert/
Could you please try to rebuild the package?
Have a nice day.
Lumír
Hi! It does look
On 11/25/20 8:51 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
I am still working on updating nbconvert to 6.0.7 and more package
reviews may be "incoming".
Hi folks,
Requesting two more package reviews -
nest-asyncio: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902078
nbcli
Hi all,
Can people please review a few python packages for me? These should be
relatively straightforward.
* dependencies for spyder
pyls_black - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901757
pyls-spyder - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901758
* dependency for nbconvert
Hi,
Can someone please review a simple python package (three_merge) for me?
review request - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901377
This is a new dependency for spyder.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
--
GPG Key: E5C8BC67
OpenPGP_0x713FD4ADE5C8BC67.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
I am trying to fix FTBFS and upgrade engineio to 3.13 (current version
in rawhide is 3.11). Some tests keep failing on koji [0] but not when I
build locally using mock. This is what I see in build log -
_ ERROR collecting tests/common/test_async_eventlet.py _
On 6/23/20 12:26 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit
> BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used.
> nonamedotc python-nmrglue python-rope spyder
I have added buildrequires on setuptools for these three packages.
On 6/23/20 12:26 PM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> We would like to kindly ask you to add explicit
> BuildRequires for python3-setuptools to packages where setuptools is used.
> nonamedotc python-nmrglue python-rope spyder
I have added buildrequires on setuptools for these three packages.
On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit
> changes to it.
>
Hi Antonio,
This is done. Please add gtkhash to your update as well.
On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or let me commit
> changes to it.
>
Hi Antonio,
This is done. Please add gtkhash to your update as well.
On 5/28/20 2:25 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> How is it possible? What happened with the libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 build:
>
> $ koji list-history --build libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31
> Fri May 22 20:48:12 2020 libb2-0.98.1-2.fc31 tagged into
> f31-updates-candidate by sagitter
> Fri May 22 20:54:19 2020
Scratch build of gtkhash does not appear to pull in libb2-0.98.1. Has
the buildroot override expired?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45077601
On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or
Scratch build of gtkhash does not appear to pull in libb2-0.98.1. Has
the buildroot override expired?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45077601
On 5/26/20 1:49 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Mukundan, your package misses.
> Please, rebuild `gtkhash` against `libb2-0.98.1` or
Hi all,
Can someone please review this package for me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826998
This is python-language-server. This is, if I am not mistaken, the last
package I need to update spyder to version 4.x
I can review a package in return.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.8.0.
The following packages are affected -
- qalculate-gtk
- plasma-workspace
- step
- cantor
I will rebuild all these packages on rawhide.
qalculate-kde will also affected but this is already FTBFS. So, I won't
touch this.
Mukundan.
Hi all,
I have two packages that fail to build from source. As far as I can tell
from the build logs, they are gcc-10 failures. The typical "extern"
solution does not work me (or, I am not adding 'extern' at the correct
places).
Can someone give me pointers for fixing this FTBFS? Here are the
On 12/16/19 9:37 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:19:16PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>> It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
>>> architectures. Du
It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
architectures. Due to this, some of my builds fail. This one for example
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39545162
Is using excludearch my only option? How can I get this built?
Thanks,
Mukundan.
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.6.0.
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild all the packages on rawhide.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Can someone review this package for me? This should be fairly
straightforward.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752298
Thanks,
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
python-devel mailing list --
Can someone review this package for me? This should be fairly
straightforward.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752298
Thanks,
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list --
On 9/3/19 5:23 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nbconvert
>
> Fixed in:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nbconvert/c/52600a90bec6fc2fe9ce5fe98a5b076156cdbb10?branch=master
>
>
> And:
>
>
On 9/3/19 5:07 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 09. 19 0:05, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> I am unable to build nbconvert because of build failures. Can someone
>> please take a look at the build log and help me update this?
>>
>> Build log - https://koji.fedoraproje
I am unable to build nbconvert because of build failures. Can someone
please take a look at the build log and help me update this?
Build log - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37430133
Thanks,
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.3 (libqalculate.so.21.2.0).
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild the packages on both rawhide and F31 tomorrow.
Maintainers, if you do not want me to touch F31, please let me know.
The package "itstool" seems to be missing in some architectures (s390x
and aarch64) although it should be provided by RHEL server rpms. It
appears to be available in x86_64 and ppc64le.
I noticed this when building gparted. See the failed build here -
Can someone from releng re-tag these packages and push them to stable?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344119
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344089
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1344114
On 5/19/19 1:58 PM, Andrew Toskin wrote:
>> I'm already a packager, and I'd be willing to take over BleachBit. This way
>> you
>> don't have to wait for Silvia to learn the ropes before handing off control.
> Oops, I'm used to having my email client do the signature for me, but I
> responded
On 5/19/19 5:05 AM, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Yes, I know Python 2 will be soon removed, but I can't just let
> Bleachbit die. It's too useful for that.
> Finding a sponsor seems to be the hard bit. I've been looking for one
> for ages.
> Thanks for the answer.
>
> Kind regards,
>
I intend to orphan bleachbit soon. If anyone is interested please let me
know and I will transfer the package.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bleachbit
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list --
On 5/3/19 9:56 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> nonamedotc python-qtconsole
Can you please give qtconsole 4.4.4 a try on the COPR? I just pushed
this version on rawhide.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
python-devel mailing list
libqalculate soname bump is happening with update to v3.1. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these in the coming days.Note that qalculate-kde is FTBFS
right now.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.0 (libqalculate.so.21).
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed. I did not
build v2.9.x despite my earlier email.
Are there objections if I do this
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.9. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.8.2. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/24/18 1:49 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24.10.2018 01:47, Mukundan Ragavan wrote> I think I can just drop
> python2 version of spyder. Thank you for letting
>> me know.
>
> That would be awesome, it would also unblock:
>
> python-spyder-kernels
> python-clou
On 10/23/18 8:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just orphaned python2-astroid and python2-pylint.
>
> I don't need them and I don't want to maintain legacy python2 packages.
>
> Those are needed for python2-spyder, python2-asttokens,
> python2-flake8-import-order. Please consider
On 9/23/18 4:46 AM, Christian Dersch wrote:
> On 9/23/18 2:23 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> I intent to orphan LabPlot soon. If anyone is interested, I can transfer
>> this package to that person.
>>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LabPlot
> Hi,
>
I intent to orphan LabPlot soon. If anyone is interested, I can transfer
this package to that person.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LabPlot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list --
On 9/9/18 4:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 09/09/2018 06:56 AM, Leigh Scott wrote:
>> I don't use or have the time to maintain blueberry and bluez-tools so I have
>> orphaned them.
> Since the Xfce spin uses these, I'll take em. Co-maintainers welcome.
>
> kevin
I would like to co-maintain. Can
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.6.2. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages for rawhide and F29 before Sunday.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Can someone please review this package for me? This should be relatively
straightforward.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599026
I need this to update python IDE spyder to version 3.3.0. I can review a
package in return.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.6.0. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.5.0. The following
packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages.
Mukundan.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list
On 05/06/2018 07:31 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 6:54 PM Mukundan Ragavan <nonamed...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> fityk (depends on cmpfit)
>> cmpfit (fityk is dependent on this)
> Unless someone else wants these two, I will take them. Co-main
I am orphaning certain packages and retiring some others that are no
longer needed.
Packages being **orphaned**
fityk (depends on cmpfit)
cmpfit (fityk is dependent on this)
rarian
csmith
python-cclib
Unfortunately, I fell behind in maintaining these packages (particularly
csmith and cclib).
Since 2.4.0 is out, soname change will be to libqalculate.so.16. I will submit
pull requests for the affected packages. I might miss F28.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I will be updating libqalculate to the latest upstream release (v2.3.0 instead
of 2.2.1 as per my previous email). This involves a soname change.
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will build qalculate and the affected packages in rawhide and
> On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 20:46 -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>
> Thanks for the notification.
>
> Note F28 is currently in freeze for Beta; this is a long freeze, and
> honestly, might get longer, given the current state of things. So I'm
> not sure whether it'd be optimal t
I will be updating libqalculate to the latest upstream release (v2.2.1).
This involves a soname change. The following packages are affected.
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I have built all these packages for rawhide and F28 in a COPR [0]. Since
we have the same versions on both
I am planning to orphan the four packages (list below) in a few days. If
anyone is interested in maintaining these packages, I can make you the
person admin instead of orphaning.
These are the packages -
autodocksuite
gaussum
qmforge
webcpp
These packages have very little to no development
We would like to update SuperLU to version 5.x in EPEL 7. This would
introduce a soname change for libsuperlu. The packages that depend on
SuperLU are armadillo and hypre.
I have created a COPR [1] where we have built all three packages. They
seem to build fine. If they are issues that others
I noticed in comps that the group "hardware support" is set to false under
tag. This group is also not shown as "add ons" for minimal
installation in anaconda.
Why is the group hidden? Can we show "hardware support" group in Anaconda
(non-live installers, of course)? Installing this group is
libqalculate-2..0.0 is now built on rawhide.
I have submitted pull requests for cantor, qalculate-kde and plasma-workspace
to rebuild for the soname bump. I have not touched step (I could not get it to
build in mock so I did not touch the package).
The COPR is now deleted.
I will be updating libqalculate and qalculate-gtk for rawhide on
Tuesday. This will involve libqalculate soname bump.
The following packages will be affected -
cantor
step
plasma-workspace
qalculate-kde
I have setup COPR for building against the update library [1]. Packages
other than step
I am building spyder 3.1.3 on *rawhide* right now. We do not have py3
version of rope yet and jedi is one version too recent in rawhide at the
moment. But, this should be fixed with 3.1.4 (when upstream releases it).
please test this version of spyder. I am looking at pushing this to F26
absent
On 04/02/2017 05:46 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> the problem with build from source under Fedora distro of the last
> Spyder IDE
>
> https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/4318
>
Yes. Some of spyder dependencies were recently built and I was away. I
will update to 3.x this week.
--
On 02/07/2017 03:30 AM, andr...@benzlerweb.de wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> bluetooth is broken. I installed all xfce4 package and xfe-bluetooth did not
> installed (dependency).
The package can be straight forward compiled from fedora.
>
>
On 01/29/2017 12:37 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I applied a patch sent by upstream but some odd reason, the build kept
> on failing
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17472254
>
> I include the patch for preview so someone can see what went wrong.
>
>
I recently update libqalculate to latest upstream version 0.9.10.
Unfortunately, I forgot to send out a soname bump email (I emailed one
affected package maintainer though) - which I realized only when I saw
the broken dependency emails.
The list of affected packages are
1/ step
2/
On 09/30/2016 06:52 AM, Björn Esser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there is another small python-package from me that needs review [1].
> Any offers?
>
> Cheers
> Björn
>
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380671
Taken.
--
GPG Key - E5C8BC67
---
signature.asc
On 09/24/2016 06:30 PM, gil wrote:
> hi
>
> Il 25/09/2016 00:00, Mukundan Ragavan ha scritto:
>> 1/ python-qtconsole
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379090
> take!
> have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366845 ?
> thanks in
Hi folks,
Spyder 3 was released recently and several runtime dependencies are not
present in Fedora repositories (as far as I can tell).
I have review requests that will address these runtime dependencies
(below). Please take up the packages for review. I am, of course,
willing to swap
4.12 packages on EL-7
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:57:17 -0400
From: Mukundan Ragavan <nonamed...@fedoraproject.org>
To: EPEL Development List <epel-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, Fedora
Xfce users and developers <x...@lists.fedoraproject.org>,
centos-de...@centos.org
I had
On 05/02/2016 08:44 PM, Michael Cullen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've just submitted a review request here
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332344
>
> I'm a software developer from the UK currently living and working in
> London on Linux-based set top box middleware. I've been a Linux user
I had written earlier [0] about the availability of Xfce 4.12 packages
in EPEL testing repositories. This is a reminder for the same.
Link to update -
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-262a3f39e1
Some notes from [0] are worth repeating here -
- libxfce4ui obsoletes
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
