tunnelvision attack

I'm assuming Fedora systems are vulnerable: https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/05/novel-attack-against-virtually-all-vpn-apps-neuters-their-entire-purpose/ I hope we can find a fix soon! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Optimized Binaries for the AMD64 Architecture (System-Wide)

On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 6:43 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 05:07:09PM +, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > > > > On 28 Dec 2023, at 16:58, Chris Adams wrote: > > > > > > Anything that depends on PATH entries is IMHO doomed to failure. > > >

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:12 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 9:57 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > Some apps that are not open source and we are required to use don't > cooperate: see attached > > > > According to this VMware forum post, the warni

Re: F40 Change Proposal: KDE Plasma 6 (System Wide)

Some apps that are not open source and we are required to use don't cooperate: see attached On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:58 AM Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 9/18/23 11:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:12 AM Steven A. Falco > wrote: > >> > >> On 9/17/23 05:48 PM, Kevin

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

at 7:40 PM Neal Becker wrote: > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 > - package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided > by ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64 > - ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong t

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 - package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided by ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64 - ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - conflicting requests

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version would only be offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora. The potential problem I see is this depends on Fedora and Flathub being totally consistent in their naming. ___

Re: RFI/RFC: Fedora Linux graphical recovery environment

There are several recovery disks available that could serve as examples. https://www.system-rescue.org/ On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 7:12 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > Earlier this week, the Fedora Workstation WG discussed a

Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 2:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:45 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker > wrote: >

Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:45 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker wrote: > >> I believe it is failing on the line: >> File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298, >> in upload >> i

Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Neal Becker wrote: > I believe it is failing on the line: > File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyrpkg/lookaside.py", line 298, > in upload > if self.remote_file_exists(name, filename, hash): > File "/usr/lib/p

Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)

f.raise_upload_error(status) So maybe the file already exists in the cache? But then, sources has not been updated, and if I try fedpkg local it will attempt to build the old version 1.8.1, not the new 1.9.0. On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:44 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 16,

Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:28 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 10:46:43 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for > moderation. > > > > $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz > > Could

Re: Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:57 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 3:47 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for > moderation. > > > > $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz >

Can't fedpkg new-sources (403)

Sorry if this is a duplicate message, previous one was held for moderation. $ fedpkg new-sources ~/Downloads/unuran-1.9.0.tar.gz Could not execute new_sources: Fail to upload files. Server returns status 403 I haven't been active in packaging for some time, did I miss something? -- *Those who

python3.11a4 pulled in as weak dep

On my update yesterday on F35, python3.11a4 got pulled in as a 'weak' dependency. How can I trace where this dep came from? Thanks, Neal -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it* ___ devel mailing list --

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

Does this modified openvpn support all the same features/options as the stable release version? Thanks, Neal On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 5:04 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > On 03/02/2022 05:52, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 2/2/22 13:34, David Sommerseth wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> An OpenVPN

Re: F36 Change: Default To Noto Fonts (System-Wide Change proposal)

Sorry, don't understand the question. I was testing with non-variable fonts, all were "mono". On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:45 PM Akira TAGOH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 1:08 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > After seeing this proposal I tried playing with Noto Sans Mon

Re: F36 Change: Default To Noto Fonts (System-Wide Change proposal)

After seeing this proposal I tried playing with Noto Sans Mono. I find that while it comes with many weights, none look right to me. Language is English. I'm testing in emacs. My usual default is Source code sans semibold and I find that very pleasing. I also tried Dejavu Sans Mono semibold,

I'm assuming this is a temporary build failure?

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=79571245 Thanks, Neal ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Plasmashell: Alt+F2 not working

Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi folks, > > Since a few days ago, the keyboard shortcut Alt+F2 for opening "run > command" box is not working. > > journalctl shows complaints as follows: > > plasmashell[231184]: Could not open library 'libkdeinit5_'. > plasmashell[231184]: Cannot load library

Re: F34 update experience

rpm -qa | wc - reports 5939 On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:13 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > Dnia Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 04:08:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > napisał(a): > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:04:34AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > > Updated F33 -> F34

Re: F34 update experience

0:04:34AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > > Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is one thing which > > could be better. This is not new to F34 but has been there since the > > dnf system-upgrade. > > > > Running on a pretty decent laptop (core i7, 8GB, SSD

F34 update experience

Updated F33 -> F34. Mostly went well, except there is one thing which could be better. This is not new to F34 but has been there since the dnf system-upgrade. Running on a pretty decent laptop (core i7, 8GB, SSD). The issue is that the installation hangs a long time with no evidence of

Re: [HEADS UP] Mercurial without Python 2

> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 1:01 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > > > It would be nice to have a version of tortoisehg to go with it. > Currently I've tried thg-5.6 built as: > > pip install --user tortoisehg-5.6.tar.gz > > And using mercurial-5.6 installed as

Re: [HEADS UP] Mercurial without Python 2

It would be nice to have a version of tortoisehg to go with it. Currently I've tried thg-5.6 built as: pip install --user tortoisehg-5.6.tar.gz And using mercurial-5.6 installed as pip install --user --upgrade mercurial (IIRC) And using system versions of PyQt etc. It segfaults on many

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

Might be interesting to try logging in as a new user to see if some older kde settings are messing things up. On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 6:24 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:30 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefaultForPlasma > > > >

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:33 AM Dominique Martinet wrote: > Neal Becker wrote on Wed, Sep 09, 2020: > > I have tested kde/wayland on F32 but have hit a roadblock. We are all > > working from home and need to share screens. Using google chrome, on X11 > > when I try t

Re: F34 Change proposal: Wayland by Default for KDE Plasma Desktop (System-Wide Change)

I have tested kde/wayland on F32 but have hit a roadblock. We are all working from home and need to share screens. Using google chrome, on X11 when I try to share an app window (which is my usual choice) there are no problems, but on wayland only some of the windows are given as choices to

BTRFS, relatime vs. noatime

If BTRFS is to become fedora default, we should consider this? "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux" https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp_medium=_content=post_body -- *Those who don't understand

btrfs default partitioning/subvolume

I wonder if there's any information or discussion on the default partitioning and subvoluming scheme to be used for btrfs install? The only scheme I've used so far in the past is a single large partition with one subvolume for /home and another for /root. I think it might be good to have another

if we want to advocate btrfs

I think if we really want to advocate for btrfs, we also should provide the tools to take full advantage of it. I've been using btrfs since it was offered as an option on Fedora. On Ubuntu, there is a tool "snapper" to help manage snapshots. Unfortunately I didn't manage to get this setup on

fedpkg broken (pycurl issue?)

Maybe the problem is that my local pycurl is not compatible with fedpkg? fedpkg fedpkg Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 11, in load_entry_point('fedpkg==1.38', 'console_scripts', 'fedpkg')() File

Re: dnf unable to download source due to rpmfusion-free-source

Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 11/10/19 7:44 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-free-source download --enablerepo=rawhide >> --source mercurial enabling fedora-modular-source repository >> enabling rawhide-source repository >> enabling updates-modular-so

dnf unable to download source due to rpmfusion-free-source

dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-free-source download --enablerepo=rawhide --source mercurial enabling fedora-modular-source repository enabling rawhide-source repository enabling updates-modular-source repository enabling updates-source repository enabling fedora-source repository enabling

Upgrade F30->F31 fails on speech-tools-libs

Error: Transaction test error:   file /usr/lib64/libeststring.so.1.2 from install of speech-tools- libs-2.5-8.fc31.x86_64 conflicts with file from package festival- speechtools-libs-1.2.96-39.fc29.x86_64 OK, can we remove speech-tools-libs? [nbecker@nbecker2 ~]$ sudo dnf remove speech-tools-libs

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

Petr, I am sorry to hear of your health problems. I hope you recover soon. I have been following this situation but have little time to spend on this. I personally use mercurial and depend on extensions: evolve and hg-git. I have been quiet while working on getting these extensions ported.

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

Seems evolve (tip) is not installable on python3: python3 setup.py install --user Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 37, in version=get_version(), File "setup.py", line 15, in get_version return get_metadata()['__version__'] File "setup.py", line 10, in

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

ss and at least attach my latest solution to the BZ so someone can > continue > instead of start from the scratch again. > > Petr > > On 20. 08. 19 19:54, Neal Becker wrote: > > I agree that subpackages for py2 and py3 seems best, but I'll have to > > see if mercurial can be

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

. The current blocker for Fedora packaging of tortoisehg is the > lack of Python 3 Mercurial, and the biggest risk is that the Python 2 > Mercurial package goes away before I had time to transition the > tortoisehg package to depend on Python 3 Mercurial. > > /Mads > > > > On 8/1

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

I think tortoisehg is not ported to python3 On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:39 PM Neal Becker wrote: > > I just tested hg-5.1.0 with the latest git version of hg-evolve on > python3 and at least some basic things seem to be working. One > problem: > hg > *** failed to impo

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

I just tested hg-5.1.0 with the latest git version of hg-evolve on python3 and at least some basic things seem to be working. One problem: hg *** failed to import extension hggit: No module named 'compat' That's with the latest pip version of hg-git (0.8.12). hg-git is a supported fedora

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

Petr Stodulka wrote: > > > On 07. 08. 19 19:31, Petr Stodulka wrote: >> >> On 07. 08. 19 3:34, Mads Kiilerich wrote: >>> On 8/6/19 9:35 PM, Petr Stodulka wrote: So it's question, should I rebase it in rawhide and setup for Python3 already even when it is so broken, or >>> >>> >>> Hi

Re: python-zstd?

According to the discussion here: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2019-April/130061.html I think maybe we may instead ask to bundle a statically linked zstd with mercurial 4.9. Thanks, Neal Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:21 AM Neal Becker wr

Re: python-zstd?

Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:36 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> On 08. 04. 19 13:28, Neal Becker wrote: >> > mercurial 4.9 packages zstd and python wrapper. >> > >> > I think we need to use system zstd. But I don't see python2-zstd. >&g

Re: hg + zstd packaging

Neal Becker wrote: > Hi, I'm helping to maintain hg on Fedora. > > Fedora has a policy of using system libraries where possible. > > Fedora currently has libzstd (1.3.8), but does not appear to have python2- > zstd module. > > I think we need to build hg to use the sys

hg + zstd packaging

Hi, I'm helping to maintain hg on Fedora. Fedora has a policy of using system libraries where possible. Fedora currently has libzstd (1.3.8), but does not appear to have python2- zstd module. I think we need to build hg to use the system libzstd, and to also package python2-zstd seperately.

python-zstd?

mercurial 4.9 packages zstd and python wrapper. I think we need to use system zstd. But I don't see python2-zstd. Is anyone working on packaging python2-zstd? It would be needed to proceed with mercurial 4.9. (I haven't yet checked on version number compatibility). Thanks, Neal

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F29 to F30

Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size:

Re: F30 change: update mercurial to version 4.9

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 09:19:08AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> I'm proposing to update to mercurial 4.9 for F30. > > What is the effect on those dependent packages? How many need > adjustments? > > Zbyszek tortoisehg for sure won't

Re: fedpkg push fails

Scott Talbert wrote: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, Neal Becker wrote: > >> I haven't done any fedora packaging work for some time. I tried to fix >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674789 >> today, but I get: >> >> fedpkg push >> Enumerating obje

fedpkg push fails

I haven't done any fedora packaging work for some time. I tried to fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674789 today, but I get: fedpkg push Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads Compressing objects: 100% (3/3),

F30 change: update mercurial to version 4.9

I'm proposing to update to mercurial 4.9 for F30. The following packages are reported by dnf repoquery --whatrequires to depend on mercurial: git-cinnabar-0:0.5.0-1.fc29.x86_64 git-remote-hg-0:0.3-9.fc29.noarch gitifyhg-0:0.8.4-11.fc29.noarch golang-bin-0:1.11-1.fc29.x86_64

Clear Linux's make-fmv-patch Eases The Creation Of GCC FMV-Enabled Code Paths

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=GCC-Clear-make-fmv-patch Sounds like interesting tech. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: dnf download misbehaving?

mirrors from the list and the content of primary metadata > file is somewhat unsatisfying (basically it is empty): > > > http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/common; xmlns:rpm=" > http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/rpm; packages="0"> > > > Marek > > -- > M

dnf download misbehaving?

dnf download --source wireshark [...] No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available. Exiting due to strict setting. Error: No package wireshark-2.6.5-1.fc29.src available. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

dnf: update julia would remove dnf??

sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide julia Dependencies resolved. Problem: The operation would result in removing the following protected packages: dnf

Re: [HEADS UP] mercurial rebase for F29

I have no bandwidth to work on this in the next several weeks, so if anyone else would like to take the lead that would be very helpful. On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 7:05 AM Petr Stodulka wrote: > Hi folks, > we want to do rebase of mercurial for F29 before beta freeze yet. Currently > we have

proposal to update mercurial to 4.5.3 for f28

Inline with this request: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mercurial/pull-request/3 I am proposing to update mercurial to 4.5.3 for f28. Any objections? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: DNSSEC, DoH, dnscrypt-proxy 1 vs 2

A nice article on dns security: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2018/04/how-to-keep-your-isps-nose-out-of-your-browser-history-with-encrypted-dns/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

package built for rawhide, but not available?

As shown here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2518 mercurial-4.4.2-1.fc28 is built, but dnf --enablerepo=rawhide --show info mercurial doesn't show it. Is there now another step needed beyond just fedpkg build? ___ devel

Re: mercurial: look for testers and karma

Petr Stodulka wrote: > Hi folks, > I have there builds of mercurial in testing that fixes few CVEs. > Someone who uses mercurial and want to test it yet? > Thanks, > I use it (lightly) :) What do you have to test? ___ devel mailing list --

mercurial CVEs - plan for f25 and f26 updates

CVE-2017-1000115: Mercurial's symlink auditing was incomplete prior to 4.3, and could be abused to write to files outside the repository. CVE-2017-1000116: Mercurial was not sanitizing hostnames passed to ssh, allowing shell injection attacks by specifying a hostname starting with

can I "watch" a project in bodhi?

If not, it would be a handy feature - to be notified of any updates. I didn't see it looking at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

mercurial 4.1.3 for f26

Mercurial < 4.1.3 has a security issue, and an update is highly recommended https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-packaging/2017-April/000202.html I propose to update f26 for 4.1.3. torgoisehg 4.1.3 is (just now) also available. It would be advisable to backport patches to earlier

Re: Warning before sudo pip'ing?

Having been badly burned by sudo pip install in the past, I agree that a warning is appropriate, with a suggestion to use pip install --user On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:28 PM Tomas Orsava wrote: > Hi! > On the last FESCo meeting while discussing the sudo pip Fedora [Change], >

Re: kinit OK, but howto ssh?

Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 19 December 2016 at 16:48, Jonathan Underwood > <jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 19 December 2016 at 15:47, Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> kinit nbec...@fedoraproject.org >>> Password for nbec..

kinit OK, but howto ssh?

kinit nbec...@fedoraproject.org Password for nbec...@fedoraproject.org: [nbecker@nbecker2 ~]$ ssh nbec...@fedoraproject.org Permission denied (publickey). ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Making sudo pip Safe

Currently, pip3 --user installed stuff can be updated with: pip3 install --upgrade --user $(pip3 list --user -o | cut -f 1 --delim=' ') But that isn't obvious/discoverable On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/12/2016 01:39 PM, Neal Bec

static linking a library

Mercurial upstream is asking about a compression library zstd. Specifically: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-packaging/2016-November/000178.html I believe the proposed solution here: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-packaging/2016-December/000182.html which is

f25 builds in copr?

It seems at this time f25 builds are not yet turned on in copr. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

test dnf system-upgrade (failed?)

I tried to test upgrade f24->f25: sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=25 --allowerasing but it wanted to downgrade a large number of packages, particularly texlive: [hundreds of downgrades...] texlive-zlmtt noarch

emacs patched for x2go on copr

Many of us have experience that emacs cannot run under x2go. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349412 There is no actual fix, but we can't live without emacs, so I am putting up a version on copr which has a workaround (configure options). It is named: e.g.,

update mercurial to 4.0 in rawhide

I'm planning to update mercurial to 4.0 for rawhide. Any objections? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

dnf should not update debuginfo if not updating packgages

sudo dnf update ... updates 77 k mercurial-debuginfo x86_64 4.0-1.fc24 ... nbecker-mercurial-3 190 k Skipping packages with broken dependencies: mercurial x86_64 4.0-1.fc24

“Side channel” in Haswell CPUs lets researchers bypass protection known as ASLR.

http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/10/flaw-in-intel-chips-could-make-malware-attacks-more-potent/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

problem with gmp f24? undefined reference to symbol '__gxx_personality_v0@@CXXABI_1.3'

cc -c test_gmp.cpp cc -o a.out test_gmp.o -lgmp -lgmpxx /usr/bin/ld: test_gmp.o: undefined reference to symbol '__gxx_personality_v0@@CXXABI_1.3' /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Here is test_gmp.cpp:

Re: having trouble with bodhi

Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 15:32:44 -0400, > Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>[nbecker@nbecker2 Cython]$ bodhi -n -r F23 -t bugfix -b 1343331 >>Cython-0.23.4-3.fc23 >>No handlers could be found for logger "fedora.client.bodhi&

having trouble with bodhi

[nbecker@nbecker2 Cython]$ bodhi -n -r F23 -t bugfix -b 1343331 Cython-0.23.4-3.fc23 No handlers could be found for logger "fedora.client.bodhi" Creating a new update for Cython-0.23.4-3.fc23 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/bodhi", line 537, in main() File

build stuck?

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14421664 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:09:33AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >> Once upon a time, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek said: >> > Also note that running jobs in a systemd service has advantages on the >> > server: better accounting, more

rpm: %patch needs --fuzz

In an rpm .spec I need a patch with more fuzz %patch macro doesn't seem to accept --fuzz=xxx What's a good solution? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

can't login to koji - ssl error

chrome is refusing to login to: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/login This site can’t provide a secure connection koji.fedoraproject.org sent an invalid response. Try: Reloading the page Learn more about this problem. ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR Appears to be a deprecation in chrome 50:

update mercurial to 3.7.1 in rawhide and F24

I'd like to update to latest mercurial. I built 3.7.1 in rawhide, and AFAICT there's no problem using it with tortoisehg-3.7.1-fc24. I'd like to update mercurial in F24 - AFAIK there should not be any compatibility issues. Any objections? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Peter T. wrote: >>> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> >>> DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it >>> disabled until fairly recently, but this update should

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Fedora support for Vulkan

Peter T. wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 11:34 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> >> >> DRI3 is a prerequisite, yes. The F23 builds of the intel driver had it >> disabled until fairly recently, but this update should sort you out: >> >>

Re: Cython is failing to build (%check) on f24 (gcc6)

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:43:24AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> Running %check is giving a compile error. What's the easiest way to see >> what the error message is? >> >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3468/

Cython is failing to build (%check) on f24 (gcc6)

Running %check is giving a compile error. What's the easiest way to see what the error message is? https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3468/12893468/build.log -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Boost 1.60?

Jan Kurik wrote: > There is an approved Change for F24 to upgrade boost: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F24Boost160 > Perhaps someone started to work on it. > > Regards, > Jan > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Peter Robinson > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016

Update mercurial in rawhide to 3.6.2

I'd like to update to the current mercurial version 3.6.2. Affected packages are: dnf repoquery --whatrequires mercurial Last metadata expiration check performed 0:02:51 ago on Thu Dec 24 14:05:58 2015. fusionforge-plugin-scmhg-0:6.0.2-1.fc23.noarch git-remote-hg-0:0.2-6.fc23.noarch

Re: F24 System Wide Change: GCC6

Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: GCC6 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC6 > > Change owner(s): > * Jakub Jelínek < jakub AT redhat DOT com > > > Switch GCC in Fedora 24 to 6.x.y, rebuild all packages with it, or > optionally rebuild just some packages with it and

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

P J P wrote: >> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 6:33 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287607 > > > Thank you for filing the bug. > > >> * howto prevent dnsmasq from starting (right now I'm just manually >&g

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 09:33:18AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> P J P wrote: >> >> >> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 6:33 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> > >> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

>>> Really, the biggest issue people fear is their split view DNS. Which is >>> easilly solved by extending the concept of firewalld zones into Network >>> Manager, and always use broken DNS forwarders on "trusted networks". >> >> Hmmm... "easily solved" is not "solved": >> * Has this "biggest

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

P J P wrote: > Hello Neal, > >> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 1:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> For example, when I'm at work, I can access hostA.work.com >> where resolving hostA only works by talking to dnsserverA.work.com, >> which was setup by the usual

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

P J P wrote: > Hello Neal, > >> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 1:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> For example, when I'm at work, I can access hostA.work.com >> where resolving hostA only works by talking to dnsserverA.work.com, >> which was setup by the usual

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

Neal Becker wrote: > P J P wrote: > >> Hello Neal, >> >>> On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 1:03 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >>> For example, when I'm at work, I can access hostA.work.com >>> where resolving hostA only works by talking to dnsserverA.wo

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

I think in order to make dnssec/local resolver the default, it should be required to work for a naive user who works in a changing environment such as: moving between work, which has it's own private dns and home, which has usual, public dns without that user needing to understand anything

python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:

python-cycler has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 On i386: python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.4 On armhfp: python3-cycler-0.9.0-4.fc24.noarch requires python(abi)

What is Source0 tag for this?

What is syntax for Source0 tag for git tag v0.9.0 tarball for this? https://github.com/matplotlib/cycler/tree/v0.9.0 And how can I verify it works? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

  1   2   3   4   >