On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 7:30 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for this. I agree this is a good solution, and that uapi group
> is clearly the right place for the successor to FHS.
>
Hardly. The reason that the FHS evolution has been slow is because the
FHS project just moved from the Linux
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 5:55 AM Pavol Sloboda wrote:
>
> > But it's already done? It's right there.
>
> Well as my email mentions it is done for FHS 2.3 (and not even that really
> cause the version of the Standard is not mentioned anywhere).
> And what I am trying to ask about is either switching
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 12:46 AM Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> On 7/29/25 2:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 6:30 PM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Jul 24, 2025, at 7:02 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> >>
On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 6:19 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> The FSH standard 3.0 was introduced in 2015.
> The changes in FSH 3.0 seem to me as a natural evolution, and
> clarification of existing practices after the 2.3 version.
>
> I believe we should officially adopt the 3.0 version and update the
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:46 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> per
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FoomaticRipRejectsUnknownValues
> I've got feedback about turning RPM scriptlet into systemd service to
> have the change applied even on immutable systems, like bootable
> containers, Fed
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 6:30 PM Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > On Jul 24, 2025, at 7:02 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> > wrote:
> >
> > Wiki -
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Hardlink_identical_files_in_packages_by_default
> > Discussion thread -
> > https://discussion.fedor
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 8:20 AM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Michal Schmidt said:
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2025 at 10:38 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > I'd rather we show extra care towards Fedora developers who are still
> > > using Fedora, if there are any. If we make Fedora development
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 3:56 AM Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> On 25/07/2025 00:21, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > look at those benchmark results:
> > https://www.phoronix.com/review/framework-12-linux-os/7
> >
> > As you can see, Fedora and Ubuntu, which both decided to enable frame
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 7:11 AM Peter Oliver
wrote:
>
> Dear edition maintainers, what would be the most suitable Emacs for your
> edition?
>
> We build four different GNU Emacs binaries in Fedora. From newest to oldest:
>
> • emacs-pgtk - “Pure” GTK. Wayland (and Broadway) native. Is reported
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 11:38 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 10:56 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> wrote:
> >
> > > So, I'm proposing to remove the support code (and templates, etc.) for
> > > this mode of operation from rust2rpm with the next major version, and
> > > to replace
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 8:45 PM Mateus Rodrigues Costa
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As you guys know Secure Boot is supported by Fedora Linux and it
> relies on the Microsoft signing keys.
> Well, recently I was looking at this month's Windows 11 cumulative
> update and noticed this warning:
>
> Impor
On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 6:43 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa writes:
>
> > [...] So my semi-naive interpretation of the problem here is that
> > glibc is special in that it doesn't provide any support for real-time
> > tracing or profiling. [...]
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 3:11 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while packaging GTK 4.19.2 with the GLES2 patchset from my GitHub fork, I
> ran into a file list error, which made me stumble upon this upstream GTK
> commit:
> https://github.com/GNOME/gtk/commit/e8694e0e7f71aa2e1a3ac4299ab
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 4:20 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>
> With Wine solved, it sounds like Steam is the only remaining concern.
>
Wine is not solved yet, though.
> I think we could actually remove all 32-bit libraries *not* required by
> Steam for Fedora *43*. That should probably be uncont
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 11:43 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> We currently use -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer on various architectures.
> I think we should remove it because it does not work as expected.
>
> Obviously, this does not work for many glibc string functions because
> they use hand-written a
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:50 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to unretire kmscon and libtsm
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kmscon
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtsm
>
> I currently maintain them on my copr:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jfalempe/kmsc
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:40 AM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
>
> "Review Request: faad2 - Library and frontend for decoding MPEG2/4 AAC"
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2370973
>
> Was this reviewed by Fedora Legal (I did not see
> it in the email list archives, but I might have used
>
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 1:21 AM Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:05:32AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 03:27:49PM +1000, Peter Hutterer napsal(a):
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > A tricky (for me) packaging question:
> > > xkeyboard-config 2.45 upstream changed
On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 8:39 AM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> > The issue is that these
> > macros must be available during the BuildFromSRPM stage, and I have no
> > idea how to make that happen. I looked at the pyproject macros and
> > noticed they use *-macros-srpm package (y
On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 7:38 AM Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have to admit — I almost gave up! I can’t figure out how to add
> declarative macros to another build system, and it’s nowhere to be
> found in the documentation. Let me share my sad story.
>
> I added the necessary macro
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 5:50 AM wrote:
>
> So during a recent Anaconda installer bug triage we encountered the
> following bug report:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366967
>
> "Installation media is not recognised by the 32-bit EFI of the 64-bit-
> CPU LINX 1010."
>
> What it bo
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 4:56 PM wrote:
>
[...]
> yarnpkg @epel-packagers-sig, ngompa, 2 weeks ago
> orphan, smani
Took this one since it's kind of critical, but co-maintainers welcome!
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 10:59 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 04:51:33 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams
> > li...@cmadams.net wrote:
> > > This package is for playing one particular encoding of videos (and
> > > only
> > > certain profiles of that encoding fr
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 7:28 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:34 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 5:42 AM Alexander Sosedkin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 6:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> [This is a general moan / observation ... Sorry!]
>
> SELinux policy is sometimes now split so that packages can carry their
> own policy subpackage. Examples include:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/passt/blob/rawhide/f/passt.s
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 5:42 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 12:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 5:52 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> > >
> > > Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said:
> > > > On Wed, M
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 5:52 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said:
> > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 03:19:49 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams
> > wrote:
> > >So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know
> > >people
> > >on the Fedora side have been trying (d
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:50 PM Pramod V U via devel
wrote:
>
> I am extremely sorry if I am posting to the wrong mailing list, kindly point
> that out to me if that's the case.
>
> I'll be referring to /etc/{passwd,group,shadow,gshadow} as "legacy file
> bundle" or "legacy bundle" or "legacy f
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 9:09 PM Antonio Voza wrote:
>
> Hello Fabio, JT, thank you for your messages.
>
> Currently I have a pentesting OS project that is based on Arch Linux and
> NixOS called Athena OS (https://athenaos.org) that aims to be more focused on
> Cyber Security learning part. I am
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 3:45 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 02:23, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:06 PM Kevin Fenzi via devel-announce
> > wrote:
> > >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > >
> > > Pac
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:06 PM Kevin Fenzi via devel-announce
wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Packages that have been orphaned are:
>
[...]
> rpms/bluez
> rpms/dm-zoned-tools
> rpms/dnf-plugin-cow
> rpms/open-vm-tools
> rpms/osc-source_validator
> rpms/unifying-receiver-udev
> rpms/zonefs-tools
I've grabb
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 10:49:26AM -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > Yesterday there was a build of grub2 (2.12-17) from the f40 branch which was
> > also built for rawhide/f43 and ELN. This was an NVR regression, as the
> > previous
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:53:17PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:55:53PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> > wrote:
> > > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > > This aligns us with the effort going on
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:36 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 18:13 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:11 PM Michel Lind
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 17:53 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > >
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:11 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 17:53 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:55:53PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-
> > announce wrote:
> > > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > > This aligns us with the effort going on upstre
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 4:45 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
>
> Roy Bekken recently quoted Fedora version usage data from
>
> https://data-analysis.fedoraproject.org/csv-reports/images/summary.html
>
> but on inspection it looks that, while the analysis and plotting of the
> results are upd
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:02 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 14:57 +0200, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> > >
> > > One thing that would need to be figured out is whether each of the
> > > Wayland-based console implementations actually provides a mechanism to
> > > switch between mul
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:14 PM Marc Deop i Argemí
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 24 April 2025 15:12:42 Central European Summer Time Peter Boy Uni
> wrote:
> > Interesting. Could you perhaps elaborate on which of our standards
> > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/#_our_stan
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 6:26 PM Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>
> On 23/04/2025 19:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 18:17 +0200, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> >> On 23/04/2025 18:01, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 11:43 -0400, Neal G
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 12:02 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 11:43 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:42 AM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2025-04-22 at 11:51 +0200, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> &g
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:42 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2025-04-22 at 11:51 +0200, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've packaged 3 userspace consoles, on my copr repository for Fedora.
> > They can replace fbcon (The default kernel-based console), have more
> > features (like sc
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:11 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 09:37:24AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 9:28 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 03:57:42PM +0200,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 9:28 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 03:57:42PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > I don't follow? The UID assignments are stored in /etc/passwd,
> > i.e. your example config file and the UID assignment are stored at the
> > same place, s
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 9:24 AM Pramod V U via devel
wrote:
>
> Sorry for poking in, but why have kmscon, a complete re-implementation, run
> over then DRM when a generic and well-tested combination of a wayland
> compositor and a terminal emulator, like cage+foot, do the work just as well?
To
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:46 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>
> On 22/04/2025 13:25, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 5:52 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've packaged 3 userspace consoles, on my copr repository
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 5:52 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've packaged 3 userspace consoles, on my copr repository for Fedora.
> They can replace fbcon (The default kernel-based console), have more
> features (like scrolling) and are more secure as they run in userspace.
>
> * Kmscon:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:01 PM Sérgio Basto via devel
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I need to reduce my workload
>
[...]
>
[...]
> - libcomps
> - atf
> - libphonenumber
>
[...]
>
> - tofrodos
> - smb4k
>
Thanks for maintaining them, I grabbed these as I need/use them in
various contexts.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Al
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 2:24 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 06:52:43PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> > The problem stems entirely from UIDs and GUDs being numbers
> > and not strings. I see this as a peculiarity of some of the filesystems,
> > you target. Sa
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:05 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 3:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:37 AM Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> >
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 9:37 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:09 PM Björn Persson wrote:
> >
> > > On upgrade to Fedora 43, some non-essential GnuPG utilities will no
> > > longer be available by default, and instead moved to the optional
> > > `gnupg2-g13`, `gnupg2-utils`,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 4:28 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 16/04/2025 13:47, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > == Benefit to Fedora ==
> > * Avoid packaging issue due to the current assumption that the the
> > paths used are meant to be absolute paths.
> > * Encourage upstream build system mode
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 7:50 AM Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_drop_install_vars
> Discussion thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-cmake-drop-non-standard-variables-system-wide/148864
>
> This is a pr
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 7:50 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> Hi,
> just out of interest, I tried Fedora 42 Beta image on Raspberry Pi 4
> with 2GB RAM and it was, well, more than sluggish. Their OS based on
> the Debian Bookworm was lightning fast, using the same SD card and all
> the hardware fo
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Has anyone gone through the effort
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 5:28 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 14-Apr-25 5:49 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Does it mean we will finally have common history for DNF5 and G-S?
> >
> > Hi,
> > yes, it means both the history and the ca
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:57 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Common history was always a thing.
>
> Hi,
> are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`, is
> it? I cannot imagine how that c
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 12:14 PM wrote:
>
> Quick question: why not using dnf5 backend for PackageKit?
>
It doesn't exist yet. I haven't been able to write it because I
haven't been able to figure out how to use the DNF5 API. I've asked
for some introductory documentation on how to use the C++ AP
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:31 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 14. 04. 25 v 10:02 Milan Crha napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> > I'd like to switch gnome-software in rawhide to use a dnf5 plugin
>
>
> Does it mean we will finally have common history for DNF5 and G-S? That
> would be sweet.
>
Common histo
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 7:54 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> A few years ago we had the initalitive to get rid of problematic terms
> like "master"/"slave". Git changed its default branch name to 'main',
> we changed our default dist-git name to 'rawhide' (*). We also
> adj
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 12:16 PM JT wrote:
>
> I tested a bunch of TTS in the past, but within the past year there's been a
> bunch of additional ones that have come out that I havent had time to tinker
> with.
> How do you think Piper compares with the others currently available? Parler
> TTS,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 6:22 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:48:49 -0400
> Peter Martuccelli wrote:
>
> > Hi Davide,
> >
> > Please work with Dan, Cc'd, on any issues for Doug.
>
> ack, I believe most of Doug's packages are Infiniband related and
> should have a backup maintainer a
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 3:55 PM W. Michael Petullo wrote:
>
> Is there any hope of running the awesome X11 window manager [1,2] on
> Fedora 42? I am presently testing Fedora 42 Beta. I have been limping
> along with awesome through Fedora 41, and it always worked until now.
>
> I submitted a bug re
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 11:46 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is there any interest in text to speech?
>
> On my desktop system I needed text to speech output to get calendar reminders
> read to me that I don't miss any meetings or appointments. However most of
> what is available sounds li
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 10:07 AM Benson Muite
wrote:
>
> Aspell was deprecated with the reason that it is no longer under active
> development:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AspellDeprecation
>
> However, it is undergoing maintenance and improvements:
> https://github.com/GNUAspell/asp
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 7:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:36:09AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:23:53AM -04
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:42 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 20. 03. 25 v 11:23 dop. Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > It's also notreally hermetic either. Hermetic builds require true
> > isolation and there is no Mock backend that provides that right now.
> > All it doe
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:33 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:23:53AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 4:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:04:57AM +0100,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 4:40 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:04:57AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 19. 03. 25 v 7:48 odp. Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
> > > == Scope ==
> > > * Proposal owners:
> > > ** Package [https://github.com/keszybz/
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 6:19 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Alexander Sosedkin writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:42 AM Dan Čermák
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Panu Matilainen writes:
> >>
> >> > On 3/13/25 10:56 AM, Dan Čermák wrote:
> >> >> Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> >> >> writes:
> >> >>
>
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:54 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:02:52PM -, Filip Bartmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I update Fedora 41 to Fedora 42 prerelase and I have some problems, notably
> > * in GDM are not listen non wayland sessions
>
> That might be becaus
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:44 AM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 8 2025 at 06:27:19 AM -08:00:00, Neal Gompa
> wrote:
> > If I'm answering that question for myself, I would say that the
> > biggest feature gap that we have from a modern build system like the
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 7:40 AM Filip Bartmann wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I mean, that in gdm aren't listed other X11 sessions such as IceWM and
> others. So GDM don't support these sessions in future? So I must switch to
> lightdm?
>
Yes. You can use LightDM if you need to use X11 sessions.
--
真実はい
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 7:35 PM Michel Lind wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 9:46 PM, Peter Boy Uni wrote:
> >> Am 09.03.2025 um 00:44 schrieb Chris Adams :
> >>
> >> Once upon a time, Peter Boy Uni said:
> >>> We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for
> >>> x86_64.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 10:24 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 07:27:59AM -0800, Michel Lind wrote:
> > - how easy is it to bootstrap the different options (Konflux, Koji, OBS
> > etc)?
> > - how easy is it to run each locally for those who want to dogfood the
> > process
On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 12:57 PM Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> With all this in mind, the big question is: When and how is it the right time
> to officially bring up Konflux in the Fedora community context? If it happens
> too early, it won’t look credible or be useful. If it happens too late, there
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 7:02 AM Sérgio Basto via devel
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 06:15 -0800, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:54 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:02:52PM -, Filip Bart
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 1:08 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> Hi, I am wondering if it is possible to use 'fedpkg mockbuild' to
> easily build for a side tag.
>
> I know that it's possible by using 'koji mock-config' and then 'fedpkg
> mockbuild --mock-config' but this is not easy since it requires
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 8:16 AM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:54 PM Benson Muite
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as
> > OpenHarmony support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on
> > devices with a wide range of
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 6:48 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:04 PM Peter Boy Uni wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Am 25.02.2025 um 09:09 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy :
>> >> ...
>> >> == Detailed Description ==
>> >> We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines ar
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:03 PM Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
wrote:
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwitchToJXLforDefaultWallpaper
> Discussion thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-disabling-support-of-building-openssl-engines-system-wide/1459
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:04 AM Simon Farnsworth via devel
wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 23 February 2025 18:14:21 Greenwich Mean Time Benson Muite wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025, at 9:55 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> > > On 2/22/25 6:50 PM, Benson Muite wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Fedora has a policy to s
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 5:22 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 09:06:15AM -0500, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > I would also point out that incompatible updates are still supposed to be
> > announced a week in advance, with all impacted packages’ maintainers CC’ed
> > or BC
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 6:42 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 1:17 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > With the recent discussions about provenpackagers in Fedora, I recently got
> > an
> > idea.
> >
> > One of the common needs for provenpackagers is to simply "bum
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 7:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 20. 02. 25 13:51, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> >>> With the wide adoption of %autorelease, such bump commits are empty,
> >>> which should be easy to verify.
> > Wide, well, ...
>
> Roughly 39% based on a simple grep for %\{?autorelease
>
Wh
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 8:32 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 13:04, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:46 AM Clement Verna
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 10:13
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:46 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 10:13, Dan Horák wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:32:06 +0100
>> Clement Verna wrote:
>>
>> > cross posting from
>> > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/gating-fedora-updates-on-fedora-coreos-ci/144566
>>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 9:29 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Hi python folks,
>
> I have a package [1] (you can toggle the with_python var at the top) that now
> builds the python bindings in an isolated venv+pip environment, and hence
> fails, [2].
>
> It seems, at least in the way upstream curren
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:48 PM Tom Rix wrote:
> >
> > I am glad the gcc change came in before the branch.
> > But I would rather it have come into rawhide after the branch so the last
> > weeks before the branch could have been spent o
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 1:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:41:07PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I started replying to everything, but then I realized it's probibly not
> worth me doing so. :)
>
> ...snip...
>
> > To sum this up, I can see 3 benefits of mass rebuild:
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 7:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at early system installation, and we have filesystem,
> basesystem, and setup, all competing for the title of the early
> filesystem setup… It seems that basesystem is the easiest to
> eliminate: it has no
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:58 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:04:33AM +0100, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Right, we need a way for the build system to count the number of times
> > a commit was built and export that as an rpm macro that we can use to
>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:51 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:13:24PM +0100, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:18:23AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:05 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:18:23AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 08:21:26AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > If Koschei could trigger non-scratch rebuilds, that would go a long
> > >
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 4:40 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 10:20, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
>>
>> Hi Neal (and Dusty),
>>
>> On 1/15/25 11:53 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
>> > EROFS is considerably more actively developed than SquashFS, and
>> > offers more
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 7:18 AM wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 11:19 +0100, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> > Hi Neal (and Dusty),
> >
> > On 1/15/25 11:53 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
> > > EROFS is considerably more actively developed than SquashFS, and
> > > offers more modern file s
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 9:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:09:51PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Workflow with non-vendored dependencies:
> > - update library or backport fix
> > - submit rebuilds of dependent applications (with rpmautospec, those
> > are
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:16 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21 2025 at 05:13:07 AM -05:00:00, Neal Gompa
> wrote:
> > We know it's possible because this is how openSUSE works today. They
> > never schedule mass builds because they always happen automa
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 4:58 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Gerd Hoffmann:
>
> >> We would also need to consider what our committement is to security
> >> updates when apps are bundling stuff, as the same reasons that make
> >> unbundling huard, also make fixing security issues hard.
> >
> > Note
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 6:07 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 3:28 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried building mame against sdl2-compat which has replaced SDL2 in
> > rawhide. After some fixes I managed to get f
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 3:28 AM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried building mame against sdl2-compat which has replaced SDL2 in
> rawhide. After some fixes I managed to get further but the build still
> fails:
>
> Compiling src/osd/sdl/window.cpp...
> g++-MMD -MP -MP -DPTR64=1 -DNDE
1 - 100 of 1750 matches
Mail list logo
