On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:21 PM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:14 Stephen Smoogen <ssmoo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Has anyone gone through the effort of removing i686 from a wide reaching
>>> > non-leaf package? Any advice appreciated
>>>
>>> Can we just stop building for i686 in Fedora in general, instead of burning
>>> maintainer time figuring out deps problems like this... ? What's the
>>> blocker and how much longer do we have to put up with its burden in Fedora ?
>>>
>>
>> The blocker is someone making a Change Request and then going to the Fedora
>> 43 CR meetings with FESCO :). I think the only blocker has been Steam games.
>
>
> Steam is mostly a solved problem with the Steam Flatpak on Flathub. ("But
> boohoo, I want to use the RPM" - I don't care. Valve should make a 64-bit
> compatible client already, it's 2025.)
>
This is rude and uncalled for. The Flatpak is an unsupported way to
use Steam since it has issues with gamepads, can't access game drives,
and messes with the built-in sandbox provided by Steam.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
