On 07/20/2015 02:13 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday, July 20, 2015 01:00:34 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
There was an issue ticket filed against the Fedora Docker Base
Images[0] github repo requesting that older End-Of-Life'd (EOL'd)
Fedora rel
On 07/16/2015 01:19 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on
my machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock
but it did say that it was waiting on a process. So unless it broke
from an update last night / this morning t
On 07/15/2015 12:05 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:05:40 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I do understand where you're coming from: the Fedora workflow is quite
complicated
What exactly do you find "quite complicated"?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_R
On 07/11/2015 08:40 PM, Les Howell wrote:
I have experience in coding and design of projects in more than 20
languages and 9 operating systems. But always as support for existing
systems, and always as tightly coupled code (basically every thing I
wrote ran in real time with multiple har
On 06/25/2015 09:41 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Koschei is a continuous integration service for Fedora packages.
..
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koschei
Cool project!
Tiny heads-up: the link for the presentation returns 404:
http://mizdebsk.fedorapeople.org/koschei/koschei-pp-20140711.pdf
On 06/24/2015 07:31 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 24 June 2015 at 08:01, Jan Synacek wrote:
Managing Emacs packages by the distribution makes, IMHO, no sense at
all. Users can easily manage the packages themselves via Emacs'
package.el user interface.
Well, that's the way I'm leaning too. B
On 06/10/2015 09:04 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
Am I the only one who is constantly locked out of their X session on
fedora 22? Once the screen locks, it refuses my actual password to
unlock. Even killing X with ctrl-alt-backspace doesn't help because
it will just startup again in locked screen mode.
On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I think we're already at the point where -- at least for Fedora
Workstation (not sure about Server/Cloud), and except for
infrastructure issues -- we can stop branding our releases with a
version number, and simply have a particularly big offline u
On 05/28/2015 02:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.05.2015 um 20:39 schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
Do you think the tech could stabilize enough to obviate the first
reason? The 6-month workflow cadence remains a good idea, of course,
but could result in a major offline upgrade, instead of an
On 05/28/2015 11:42 AM, Will Woods wrote:
Here's how it should work:
1) Download packages for the new system
2) Use the systemd Offline Updates[2] facility to install packages
This is really simple - simple enough that it should probably be
provided by the system packaging tools themselves.
A
On 05/18/2015 07:44 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
That way, we'd have a standardized way for applications to find and
download/launch/whatever various Fedora images. This is a definite need
(see https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/93) and rather than
inventing a new wheel, maybe we could see if we
On 05/13/2015 08:03 PM, Les Howell wrote:
I created a new UI for GRBL using Python with tkinter. Not bad, but it
won't work on an Android Notepad (GX10 from a company called EKEN),
which was my target.
Are you running the entire show from the notepad? I am asking because a
popular architecture
On 04/29/2015 11:14 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 29.04.15 16:46, Lubomir Rintel (lkund...@v3.sk) wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:00 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/28/2015 03:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
And no, this *never* worked fully on Linux, and it never will,
sorry.
B
On 04/15/2015 09:07 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Maybe swap space should simply be max(4GB, $PhysicalMemory).
Actually, isn't 'swap to filesystem' still an option? if so, maybe
swap should be a constant 4GB, and hibernation should create an
appropriately sized file on the fly, join it
On 04/15/2015 11:02 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think that conflating "memory-to-disk swap space" with "I can
hibernate my machine" is unacceptable. We need a new partition type
that Anaconda would setup, or a whitelist of laptops with firmwares
that support rapid start (and again, Anaconda to
On 04/13/2015 11:34 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
OK, so swap 2x memory seems excessive. Actually swap with the same as
memory should work *most* of the time. There's no guarantee that any
amount swap will be enough, since it could all be filled by the time
hibernation is requested, but
On 04/09/2015 11:05 AM, Michal Luscon wrote:
On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015
^^^ the key part of DNF output
Well, OK, but when I just re-run 'dnf update' it updates firefox now:
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:
On 04/08/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote
I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear message that
we will be as compatible as possible in terms of CLI but we never wanted to
have just another yum. If that was the case, we wouldn't call the project
differently.
I am concerned
On 04/08/2015 08:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 8. 4. 2015 at 10:26:51, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.04.2015 um 08:41 schrieb Jan Zelený:
Putting the opinion of myself and the dnf team aside, I'd like to point
out
that the information you want is still available - dnf check-update will
show you all
On 02/26/2015 09:46 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
If you really think that old JDK should be removed during update and
insist on that
I believe that at least on Windows apps, including browser apps, can
request a specific version of Java runtime. Malware asks for versions
that are vulnerable to w
On 01/27/2015 07:03 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
All those are warnings, not "garbage" or debug output. File bugs about those,
there should be zero warnings in normal usage.
Shouldn't they trigger abrt then? more importantly, is it possible to
capture that in the QA process during distribution com
First of all, I agree with you that PermitRootLogin without-password is
preferable.
The discussion I am interested in is whether direct password root login
should remain enabled.
On 01/12/2015 10:02 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
- improves
On 01/12/2015 08:05 AM, P J P wrote:
Again, issue being addressed is not of brute force attacks. But that
of such attacks resulting in gaining 'root' access to remote machines.
They are two distinct issues.
There still needs to be an administrative access to the system, and the
most common im
On 01/08/2015 06:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
in my "serious" environments which are all virtualized it is simple:
* a central VMware vCenter Server for the HA cluster
* that thing is sadly a windows machine, don't matter
because it's only purpose is to run a RDP session
and all day long
On 01/08/2015 08:42 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
== Detailed Description ==
Sshd(8) daemon allows remote users to login as 'root' by default. This
provides remote attackers an option to brute force their way into a
system.
If you want to fight that, you ne
On 01/02/2015 08:48 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
Okay, lets do a thought experiment. Is a console application anything
that exists in /usr/bin? If not, what additional rules are required
for a "sane" set? Are all files in /usr/bin "applications"?
Actually, yes, I believe that every one of them se
I have a fairly standard FC20 setup which I started upgrading by
fedup --network 21 --product=workstation
There were 109 packages for which there was no upgrade; 62 are
*-debuginfo, 12 are from various oddball repos (adobe, simulavr, etc),
but 36 are I believe regular Fedora Core 20 packa
On 12/09/2014 12:28 PM, Radek Holy wrote:
Please share with me the use cases, not the description of the "install"
command. Think twice before you share something because I believe it's not as easy as it
might seem. As an example I think it might be something like:
- "I call YUM install, becau
On 12/08/2014 06:41 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
the security community is usually very clear:
* forbid as much as you can by default
* allow only what *really* is needed to get the work done
...and this is the tricky part---you want tightly defined functionality,
and other people want to install a
On 10/18/2014 07:14 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.10.2014 um 09:10 schrieb Miroslav Suchy:
On 10/17/2014 08:31 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
You can say something like "I'm not sure I understand the point you are
making. Particularly, I don't see how __ follows. Can you
explain
that in
On 10/11/2014 09:44 PM, John Reiser wrote:
bug velocity (increase in the bug number divided by the time
>> interval) over time
> That quotient is a scalar. Please use "bug rate" instead of "bug
> velocity".Easy mnemonic: Velocity is a Vector, Speed is a Scalar.
> "Velocity" has multiple syllab
On 10/10/2014 06:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did
this quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks
here who either work on the infrastructure or
I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did this
quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks here who
either work on the infrastructure or are curious about long-term
collaboration trends in Fedora.
I checked the date of reporting of every 10,000th bug (bu
On 09/22/2014 12:53 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
For the journal you always keep all log history in it's original
state
On low-bandwidth systems, like laptops or diskless nodes, it's a
performance hit to generate the log entry in the first place. It's
really important to be able to configure the syste
On 09/16/2014 06:33 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
I've triaged many bugs to do with online and offline update failures,
and if we're going to say that we actually care about the users data,
it becomes increasingly hard to defend the "old" way of doing it. I'm
sure I could find numerous bugs numbers
On 09/04/2014 05:38 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
wouldn't it make sense to integrate a check into the processes, when people
leave Redhat, that the packages in fedora are properly orphaned or get a new
owner?
Why would even someone'
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:29 AM, ottos wrote:
Since this topic is here. There is an error in Makefile when you do a make
modules_install. It attempts to delete a directory with a delete file command.
This occurs in two places. If you are fixing fix this problem.
Typically, something like t
On 06/23/2014 11:51 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
This has got to be the silliest thing I've ever seen, but whatever. You enter
the command dnf remove dnf, and guess what? It removes dnf. You enter the
command dnf remove kernel, and guess what, it removes the kernel. What a
concept, it does wha
On 06/18/2014 02:16 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
If I may vent for a moment, I'd like to point out exactly how spurious
the blocks usage was (and, implicitly, troll for code review):
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/hfsplus-tools.git/plain/hfsplus-tools-no-blocks.patch
That's right kids, the C89
[I posted it once already, but it ended up buried in another discussion
thread due to a botched InReplyTo]
Is libatasmart a going concern? The functionality overlaps with
smartmontools, and the development seems to have stalled [1]. I
originally started using libatasmart few years ago because
On 06/11/2014 03:09 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Przemek Klosowski said:
Fedora simply must support ARM because it ensures future viability.
The progress in ARM hardware platforms is amazing---ARM device sales
overtook x86 in 2010 [1] and of course the total number of ARM
On 06/11/2014 11:20 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
The transition period is one reason why we want to keep the name dnf. We'd
basically like to keep current yum around for users that have various scripts
and stuff depending on it so they have some time to migrate to dnf.
I think this is a mistake---if d
On 06/10/2014 04:12 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
So at the moment there's around 15,000 source packages in Fedora
mainline and you're getting depressed over exactly 24 of them? I'm not
sure how 24 packages is providing a inconsistent experience.
Fedora simply must support ARM because it ensures futu
Is libatasmart a going concern? The functionality overlaps with
smartmontools, and the development seems to have stalled [1]. I
originally started using libatasmart few years ago because it had better
support for USB bridges, i.e. it allowed reading SMART data from USB
external enclosures, whic
On 05/16/2014 12:02 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014 08:26:23 -0300
Henrique Junior wrote:
MOPAC7 is still in good shape despite the age.
Also, I'm active in the field of computational chemistry myself.
So is MOPAC7 viable for Fedora? it's been dormant since 2006; is there a
bett
of course---I do get that too many
spokes on install are confusing and hard to test, so maybe OS install
should defer the choice to an already running system.
Ceterum censeo, it's all about a well-oiled, flexible software
installation/removal mechanism at the center of the OS administratio
On 04/21/2014 01:27 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 04/21/2014 01:07 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>
> We should think on how we could improve collaboration with
> third-party repos, fedmsg/copr might be part of the technical
> solution. How about a Fedora Partnership Program ? We could open up
>
On 04/11/2014 03:14 PM, P J P wrote:
On Saturday, 12 April 2014 12:40 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
It looks like your proposal is going to break things for people using
some wifi hotspots.
Why, how?
It's a hack designed to handle someone that just connected to the
network and opened a browser,
On 04/11/2014 05:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:32:53AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/10/2014 05:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:23:07PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
To investigate runtime rather than compile time
issues, please consider
On 04/03/2014 11:27 PM, William Brown wrote:
What is the software that is used to make images like :
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/images/IPA_arch.png
Or
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administrators_Guide/images/Network_Inte
On 04/03/2014 10:32 AM, quickbooks office wrote:
"3.1.4.2.2. Disabling Root Logins
To further limit access to the root account, administrators can
disable root logins at the console by editing the /etc/securetty file.
This is done in the name of accountability, by forcing an administrative
log
On 03/20/2014 01:21 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 19, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-03-19 at 15:57 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
More complex than trying to mirror a FAT ESP partition across multiple
boot disks, keeping it properly synchronized, because RAID isn't
s
On 03/20/2014 12:24 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/19/2014 02:56 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 02:32:40PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Hmm, I like this alternative a lot. I'm probably taking this too
far, but I'm thinking of:
fail2ban-server - core components with minim
On 03/19/2014 04:05 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
fltk has been blocked from F-21
Huh? What are you refering to? indeed there are no recent builds for 21
in the main koji (last one is from August)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?buildOrder=nvr&packageID=1740&tagOrder=name&tagStart=0
On 03/07/2014 11:21 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 7 March 2014 14:08, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Microsoft, Apple, and Google set requirements that apps must follow if
they want to appear in the software center in order to ensure a good
user experience.
This is something I absolutely want to do.
On 02/28/2014 03:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
As a server WG member I voted +1 on XFS as I have no particular
objection to XFS as a filesystem, but I do think it seems a bit
sub-optimal for us to wind up with server and desktop having defaults
that are very similar but slightly different, for
On 02/20/2014 12:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
One app "with simple default choice and advanced options" effectively
*is* two apps, uncomfortably shoehorned into one UI. You get all the
disadvantages of complexity with none of the benefits of simplicity.
This is why it's a model most apps have
On 02/19/2014 01:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 14:38 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 14 February 2014 21:43, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
If we are providing a next-generation UI for installing, to replace yum
That's not what we're doing.
To expand a bit:
On 02/14/2014 01:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 13:02 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 01/28/2014 03:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 28 January 2014 18:43, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
There are two separate issues here: 'abandonment', and 'GUIness'.
On 01/28/2014 03:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 28 January 2014 18:43, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
There are two separate issues here: 'abandonment', and 'GUIness'. As to the
latter, I think it's a mistake to have a primary application installation
tool that only deals
On 02/11/2014 11:57 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Conversely, there are some directories in /usr/share that look like
doc files:
/usr/share/gtk-doc belongs to
gnome-desktop-devel-2.32.0-12.fc19.x86_64
gnome-desktop3-devel-3.8.4-1.fc19.x86_64
gtk-doc-1.19-1.fc19.noarch
/usr/share
On 02/09/2014 03:21 PM, John Morris wrote:
On 02/09/2014 01:53 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
OpenCASCADE should be in fedora soonish actually, see [1].
Woo hoo, news to me! You made my day. (I'm actually one of the
OpenCASCADE & FreeCAD maintainers in RPMFusion.)
Ditto!! and thanks for your work.
On 02/09/2014 03:16 AM, John Morris wrote:
The Fedora Packaging Guidelines are clear that these files must not be
marked as %doc [1]. However, neither source I found for documentation
packaging [1,2] said clearly whether files not marked as %doc are
allowed in %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version
On 02/04/2014 06:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
And then we can definitely justify making them bigger. 550MB, or even
1GB. It's neutral to plus for performance for either HDDs or SSDs
(faux short stroked in the former, and overprovisioned for the
latter). Does anyone know why the convention is to c
On 02/05/2014 03:34 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
It's not just that, actually. It has to do with the fact that the
majority of the scientific-focused applications are built atop the QT4
and other KDE libraries, making it much better suited to operating
atop the KDE desktop environment. Certainly
On 02/04/2014 06:15 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
honestly going back to only a install DVD with a sane user-UI and
dedicate all the time wasted for the spin/products/discrimination
discussions for documentations, screenshots and howtos would have more
benefit for Fedora there is nothing you can't s
On 01/29/2014 07:10 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 29 January 2014 23:58, Josh Boyer wrote:
I consider myself squarely in the middle of those two camps. I think
they have value to people. I think they fill a niche, however large
or small it might be. I also think they can be done by the people
wi
On 01/25/2014 05:08 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
I can think
of several programs that I use daily that are simple enough so that there's
not much development happening to them. For example, the 'units' program,
which I showed recently to some mechanical engineers who use Linux and they
went 'OMG t
On 01/23/2014 03:26 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
I don't think we need to drop any packages, unless keeping that
package is actually making our life harder in a significant way. What
I think it's makes a lot of sense doing is -hiding- the applications
that are abandonware. Users that really want s
On 01/09/2014 07:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.01.2014 22:16, schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
By the way, currently the protected list seems to be 'yum, systemd and running
kernel'.
I don't have a system to try it on
what about the machine you sitting in front of?
without -y f
On 01/09/2014 01:58 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
Latest installed is almost exactly not what you want, I've had plenty
(where plenty in this case is probably >5) of cases where a kernel
update broke something, in quite a few of those cases to a state where
the system wouldn't boot. If the most recent on
On 01/05/2014 08:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
"yum remove kernel" is a clean and sane way to remove all but not the running
kernels
"distribute-command.sh 'yum -y remove kernel'" is used here for years on a ton
of machines
why do you think that a *replacement* should come up not support this?
w
I haven't seen anything related to Request Tracker v.4 on Fedora sites.
bestpractical.com claims it's a major update with lots of bug fixes and
improvements:
http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/whats-new/
What is the status---is anyone working on / planning to package v.4? I
suppose it won't be a
On 12/06/2013 09:21 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
printf(string) is legitimate C, forcing "printf("%s", string) is just
silly.
My apologies for being repetitive, but the original point is that
printf(string) is insecure unless you can guarantee that you control
'string' now and forever. Also,
On 12/05/2013 08:27 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
The vast majority of those warnings are actually false positives, not actual
security issues. Putting my upstream hat on, if asked to "fix" such a false
positive, I'd do one of:
(a) close the bug as INVALID/NOTABUG/WONTFIX or
(b) hardcode -Wno-error=for
On 11/20/2013 11:13 AM, Jerry James wrote:
path_sprintf(), which is static in Game.c. All callers of that
function are visible in the same file, and all pass constant strings
into the function, which passes those constant strings to sprintf().
The function's purpose is to produce a pathname for
On 11/14/2013 03:56 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I had a bug filed that a Python package I'm maintaining cannot be
rebuilt using 'rpmbuild --rebuild'. The failure was that the *.pyc
and *.pyo files are missing.
After a lot of head-scratching and debugging it turns out that
brp-python-bytecompi
On 11/12/2013 07:47 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
2) if you know that some machines change fingerprint and you *trust
it* you can do:
~/.ssh/config:
Host 192.168.1.1
UserKnownHostsFile /dev/null
It always bugged me that the choice was to either disable or manually
edit an obscure file, so
On 11/06/2013 05:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.11.2013 23:03, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
We don't have a way of telling which updates REQUIRE reboot(*)--but solving
this problem by rebooting always is not right, in my opinion.
On 11/03/2013 08:23 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Scherer wrote:
However, since you didn't explained at all what are the issues you are
facing with the new approach, and since you have only explained how you
are doing on your 20 servers ( which is totally unrelated to the
question of desktops,
On 10/31/2013 02:03 AM, rran...@ihug.com.au wrote:
I have run into an issue which seems to call into question the udev
paradigm for USB devices. In my case it has ramifications in
ModemManager and gpsd packages, but I see it as a fundamental problem
with udev which is in all current versions of
On 10/29/2013 02:07 PM, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno mar, 29/10/2013 alle 09.38 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
Sorry for cross post, but I would avoid to reinstall my notebook
Someone can help me?
Since I had not gotten any suggestion, today I have tray this command:
# yum update --bugfix --s
On 10/28/2013 02:08 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2013-10-28 at 11:28 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Exists for a longer time already, added in of the .fc16 builds:
* Tue Jun 07 2011 Roman Rakus <…> - 4.2.10-3
- Added $HOME/.local/bin to PATH in .bash
On 09/23/2013 08:46 AM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 14:34:50 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
Actually, what ATLAS upstream intends is for the program to be
recompiled on every installation (or boot, even). I think we used
to have packages that did that; this is a co
On 09/11/2013 05:27 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Well, yes, but it ought to work regardless of the xorg.conf setting,
because that setting has been effectively hardwired to true for about
six years now. I rewrote the backing store implementation to use
Composite internally, which is always available
On 09/10/2013 10:06 AM, 80 wrote:
as an emacs user, splitting emacs-common has little value to me, and
without a package requiring most of the splitted packages, it might
even turn into an annoyance (much like texlive).
Yeah, 4872 packages reported by repoquery texlive*. That's over 12% of
On 09/05/2013 02:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so, no whatever macro is repsonsible for this exactly at the release
with a non well thought release name this happens -why in the world
does Fedora again and agin make decisions which are *not* tested and
months before release the impact is known ar
On 08/07/2013 01:53 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
I'm trying to track down a problem I'm having with ps2pdf in Rawhide,
whereby it can't find the Times-Italic font. I know very little about
fonts and in fact I don't even know where (in which package, or on the
filesystem) this font should live. The Raw
On 07/22/2013 03:53 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 07/22/2013 06:13 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
But it's not an objective of Fedora to have long-term-stable releases
suitable for running servers!
Says who?
That is because Fedora has a 13 month support policy
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
On 07/16/2013 07:33 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Note that the feature includes that we add in a README file to /var/log/
which explains the situation and suggests the command lines to get the
logs with journalctl.
Perhaps also add /var/log/messages containing this line:
May 16 17:37:20 Fed
On 07/15/2013 11:20 PM, Dan Fruehauf wrote:
By all means any windows person I know would much rather have logs as
plain text. Not the other way around.
I am not a windows person but I liked the way event viewer allowed to
select and re-sort entries, even with their very limited capabilities.
On 07/15/2013 07:25 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:13:24AM +1000, Dan Fruehauf wrote:
Another question while we're at it - what happens if and when you decide to
change your binary format for storing files for whatever reason? Is that
when we understand that we should have
On 06/29/2013 05:12 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
I do agree that the RPM changelog is completely useless in the case of
most of my packages, and if there is something interesting there it
would benefit from a slightly longer description in the update summary
rather than some magical automatic i
On 06/28/2013 01:31 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Yee, I just _love_ me some Macs. Thanks; I'll take that into
account for commonbugs. When did Macs stop having ethernet ports?
When the MacBook Air became the flagship Mac.
We just got a MacBook Air and it came with a Thunderbolt pigtail
Eth
On 06/19/2013 01:29 AM, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
Some recent news,
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/06/14/java_june_critical_patch_update/
"The majority are vulnerable through browser plugins, 11 of which are
exploitable for complete control of the underlying operating system,"
said Ross Barrett,
On 06/05/2013 03:37 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
What does work, and has been tested is logging in as root and simply
typing this:
realm join mydomain.com
I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975182 because of
confusing error messages when there is no pre-existing AD computer acct:
On 06/12/2013 08:44 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
To test / bench / verify old behaviour of PHP4, I need to install FC6
in a chroot.
My approach for non-standard versions is to pull the relevant source RPM
and just build it in the existing/convenient environment. If RPMs are
not your bread-and-b
On 06/04/2013 10:28 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 06/04/2013 02:26 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
('winbind crashed with no error messages; restart it; oops crashed
again; restart samba maybe; YAY, success, don't touch anything')
Pre systemd winbind/samba m
On 06/03/2013 09:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We all know what devel@ does best, so let's fire up the power of the
bikeshedding machine :)
We had https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965883 on the list of
release blocker candidates that we evaluated at the blocker review
meeting this mor
On 06/04/2013 10:02 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 06/04/2013 09:55 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What's even weirder is that some folks are explicitly mentioned (such as
Jon Masters) in the descriptions, so the playing field isn't actually
that levelled after all?
Only people who refer to themsel
301 - 400 of 604 matches
Mail list logo
