Re: 'endless' stream of "greenwave is a GO on glusterfs-4.0.0-2...." emails

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 05:34:23PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 03/21/2018 01:52 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > On 03/21/2018 04:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On 03/20/2018 11:02 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >>> > >>> I've rec'd about 30 of these in the last hour or so, fedora-28, > >>>

Re: notificati...@fedoraproject.org

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 07:15:36PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > > I have a suggestion. After some confusions that I have made related > with notifications with a big delay . > > Please add the date of notification on the notification . > > Thanks, > -- > Sérgio M. B. Makes sense. Can you

Re: Trouble with Waivers

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 08:53:41AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I have attempted to create waivers for two updates, but they are still > unable to be pushed. What have I done wrong? > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c5a0e704d6 >

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:23:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 15:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:41:15PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:06:56 +0100 > > > Dan Horák wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, 18

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:33:01PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 at 20:16, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:25:56PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > There are three tests that must pass in order for updates to go to > > > > stable:

Re: Test gating enabled in Bodhi

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:35:45PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote: > I get this error after clicking the authorization link: > > [16450:16491:0123/182437.407698:ERROR:browser_gpu_channel_host_factory.cc(120)] > Failed to launch GPU process. > Created new window in existing browser session. >

Re: ABI gate: internal-only shared object

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:37:56PM +0100, Rafael dos Santos wrote: > On 23 January 2018 at 18:20, Ralph Bean <rb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I've removed the abicheck requirement from the greenwave policies for > > now until we know more: > > https://infrastructure.fedorap

Re: ABI gate: internal-only shared object

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:13:02AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this. > > > > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install > >

Re: ABI gate: internal-only shared object

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:21:02PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > We just sent an announcement about this, sorry for being late on this. > > > > Basically, you can "waive" test results using waiverdb-cli (dnf install > >

Re: ABI gate: internal-only shared object

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:32:49AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:57:34PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > > Here's something I didn't expect from the new ABI gate. Which, before > > I go further, I think will be a great idea nearly all of the time. I > > think avoiding

Re: Bugzilla auto-CC

:) Pierre was able to hotfix pagure prod with the watchers fix. I confirmed that the sync script worked correctly on the nodejs-accepts package - it set the default cc list to the nodejs sig mailing list stored in FAS. I started a full run to reset all projects, but it takes quite a while to

Re: Bugzilla auto-CC

Found it. The fix needs to land in pagure itself. See the infra ticket for more details. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6315 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Module Stream "Expansion"

This is a writeup on a problem we’re facing with modularity, and some ideas on how to resolve it. # The "Problem" Imagine I have an **httpd module**. To simplify things, let’s say that this module has only one stream: **2.4**. Today, in the modulemd for this module, I declare build and runtime

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

> Is there an active plan on figuring out these Service Levels? Is there > a ticket? Is there a specific person who owns this? I think we need at > least a preliminary understanding of what goes here for the F27 beta > (freeze on Sept. 9th, so... I guess by then?) Thanks for starting this. I'm

Re: btw and Monitoring functionality ? Re: PkgDB search / info functionality

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:09:28PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hello , pkgdb also have Monitoring settings, Koschei integration, > timeline and Anitya , where do we have this on  Pagure over Dist-Git ? The Koschei integration is going to move into Koschei's web UI. (Koschei actually already has

Re: PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:41:57PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 26.5.2017 v 21:42 Ralph Bean napsal(a): > > Any feedback before that would be > > greatly appreciated. > > PkgDB handles Koschei and upstream monitoring settings too. How I can do that > after the migr

PkgDB and the ArbitraryBranching Change

Hello, As part of the Factory 2.0 and Modularity efforts[1], we’ve been developing a plan to migrate to an “arbitrary” branching model from our current model of one branch per release (as had been discussed at Flock and DevConf[2]). The main motivation behind this is to enable functionality

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Module Build Service

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:55:21PM -0500, Ben Rosser wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > > > For the Fedora 26 timeframe, we will lock down the users who can > > submit to the MBS to a small number of Modularity WG members. This is > > not ideal, but

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Module Build Service

e Build Service = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModuleBuildService > > > > Change owner(s): > > * Ralph Bean <rb...@redhat.com> > > > > > > We will deploy an instance of the Module Build Service to production > > in Fedora Infrastru

Re: [Modularity] Messing around with building modules

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:32:39AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > We definitely needed something like that, great! > > Do you think it would make sense to split the instructions into two parts? > Something like: > > 1. Prepare your environment to make it work with our dev infra - "the stuff > you

[Modularity] Messing around with building modules

Hi all! First, check out the logs/minutes from today's Modularity WG meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/modularity_wg/modularity_wg.2016-08-30-15.00.html We identified that we needed a doc on how to fool around with our prototype build infrastructure (partly staging, partly a dev

Re: [Modularity] BPO - the great UI that shows you everything

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 06:14:00PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > Thanks for the response. I agree, asking you "I am building something I > haven't described, how do you want to use it?" might have not been the best > idea... So please, let me try that again and better. :-) Thanks Adam :) > I have

Re: RFC: Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:59:40PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:52:44PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > Another point to note is that we need to determine how this should be > > handled > > in BZ components for bug reporting as well as for filing review requests. > >

Re: changing project homepage in apps and pkgdb

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 07:44:21PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:12:19PM +0100, Dave Love wrote: > > How do you change the homepage listed in a project's apps page and > > "upstream" in pkgdb (e.g. in > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/powerman and the

Re: Koschei false positives?

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 08:59:24PM +, Christopher wrote: > I occasionally get notifications from Koschei about my packages failing to > build. When I look ( > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13071213), I see a > python stack trace which looks like it has nothing to do with

[EPEL-devel] EPEL-ANNOUNCE python-psutil-2.2.1 in epel7

Hello all, python-psutil-2.2.1 has been in epel7-testing for over a month now, and I intend to push it to stable in the coming weeks. It is needed for the letsencrypt tools. There are a few small incompatibilities, but none of the dependencies that we found in EPEL7 itself would be affected.

Re: Fw: the-new-hotness saw an update for eiciel, but pkgdb says the maintainers are not interested in bugs being filed

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:00:48PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Anyone knows what this cryptic message is trying to tell? > What kind of "update" does it refer to? > Is this a belated notification about 0.9.11 which is in koji > since Dec 2015 already? > > [...] > > Begin forwarded message:

Re: the-new-hotness saw an update for eiciel, but pkgdb says the maintainers are not interested in bugs being filed

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 06:37:25PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:19:07 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote: > > > > https://release-monitoring.org/project/8847/ > > > > Yeah, looking at the message history for eicil helps show what &

Re: How do you unsubscribe from mdapi meta-data update?

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:44:54AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:19:50 -0500 > Steve Grubb wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Something started sending me emails about $SUBJECT. The email says > > this is due to my preferences and give an URL. Clicking on that

Outage: Pkgdb2 and dist-git upgrade (namespacing) 2015-12-17 15:00 UTC

Outage: Pkgdb2 and dist-git upgrade (namespacing) 2015-12-17 15:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2015-12-17 15:00 UTC, which will last approximately 1.5 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-12-17 15:00

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:01:49PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Adam Miller > wrote: > > If we were to go with the former rather than the latter, we would need > > to find a way to "namespace" container images so they can be >

Re: fedora-packages out of sync with bugzilla

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:41:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We are planning a re-work/re-write of the application entirely, but > it's not happened yet. ;( Small correction, we started on it at the end of last week! https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedora-packages/pulse/weekly We'll put out

Re: To someone with power to push packages on Fedora 21

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:00:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I'd suggest all maintainers should periodically check: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?user==testing > For their updates that are in testing. Noting here that there's an easy link to that url from your Bodhi profile page

Erroneous automated comments on some Review Request tickets

. -Ralph Bean [1] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure%40lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5AGAHCBFUTGDIK7LQV6U6QHLZKQRG2WZ/ [2] - https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/pull/69 [3] - https://apps.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper/raw?category=hotness=1443010402

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy ralph > nodejs-grunt-saucelabs ralph, piotrp > nodejs-proxy-agent ralph, piotrp These three got rebuilt this morning (made possible by piotrp's hard work on the rest of the dep chain). signature.asc

Re: Fedora Notifications - howto?

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:10:29AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:15:41 +0200 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: I'm still in search of a howto. A howto about the user-interface, the various filters and rules, and real documentation about how to use it. I don't

More packager notifications migrated to FMN

Recall that the infrastructure team has been working on a new notifications system[1] in an attempt to unify some of the notifications that get pushed out by our infrastructure. As the new system improves (and as we get time to clean house), we will be turning off the native notifications of

More packager notifications migrated to FMN

Recall that the infrastructure team has been working on a new notifications system[1] in an attempt to unify some of the notifications that get pushed out by our infrastructure. As the new system improves (and as we get time to clean house), we will be turning off the native notifications of

Re: New Upstream Release Monitoring Systems

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote: In our project called rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper we would like to analyze a new upstream version against an old upstream version and let user now what is changed. E.g. Binaries are missing, soname bump

New Upstream Release Monitoring Systems

I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of systems[1] now used to coordinate upstream release monitoring on

New Upstream Release Monitoring Systems

I'm proud to announce that the Infrastructure team has finished deploying the first iteration of our replacement for the older, wiki-based Upstream Release Monitoring tools this week. You can read about the details of the trio of systems[1] now used to coordinate upstream release monitoring on

All packagers to be added to the new notifications system

it in the web interface. The cut-over will happen next week on Wednesday, February 11th. Thank you, Ralph Bean [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2014-September/001434.html [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ pgpGFpMitqgdo.pgp Description: PGP

Re: Claiming Fosdem 2015 Badge

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:55:40AM +0100, Remi Collet wrote: Hi, Is there any way to get the Fosdem 2015 badge ? The URL retrieved on the Fedora booth is already not working anymore.. Here's the original ticket for the badge: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/334 eischmann,

Re: Taskotron Fedmsgs Format

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:53:22AM -0700, Tim Flink wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 13:42:23 -0500 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:29:29PM -0500, Martin Krizek wrote: Please find proposed format for taskotron fedmsgs below. { 'i': 1, 'msg': {'check

Re: Taskotron Fedmsgs Format

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:29:29PM -0500, Martin Krizek wrote: Please find proposed format for taskotron fedmsgs below. { 'i': 1, 'msg': {'check': {'name': 'upgradepath',                      'type': 'bodhi_update',                       'item': 'wireshark-1.10.12-1.fc20',              

Planned Outage: Rebuild fedora-packages xapian db - 2015-01-21 18:00 UTC

There will be an outage of the 'fedora-packages' service starting at 2015-01-21 18:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-01-21 18:00' Reason for outage:

Planned Outage: Rebuild fedora-packages xapian db - 2015-01-21 18:00 UTC

There will be an outage of the 'fedora-packages' service starting at 2015-01-21 18:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-01-21 18:00' Reason for outage:

Re: Planning: Fedmsg Integration

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:10:55PM -0700, Tim Flink wrote: Almost forgot about this, even though I was talking about it earlier today. The current plan for bodhi2, as I understand it, is shooting for production deployment in January or February. This affects us because we will no longer be

Re: koji rawhide broken: ImportError: cannot import name ProtocolError

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:44:18AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 11/05/2014 11:35 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7943/8047943/mock_output.log Something is broken. fedpkg maybe? Rich. missing/incompatible dep for

Re: Bumping python-requests in f20?

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 01:15:14PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: On 10/23/2014 10:57 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:16:29PM -0700, Ed Marshall wrote: Is it API-compatible? Not exactly https://github.com/kennethreitz/requests/blob/master/HISTORY.rst#230-2014-05-16 I

Bumping python-requests in f20?

There have been some people asking if we can update python-requests in f20 from 1.2.3 to 2.3.0. I'll create an update for it in a few days unless there are any objections. pgpTysJSbVd8l.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Bumping python-requests in f20?

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:16:29PM -0700, Ed Marshall wrote: Is it API-compatible? Not exactly https://github.com/kennethreitz/requests/blob/master/HISTORY.rst#230-2014-05-16 pgpwJFv1un9XY.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Flock 2014 attendee badge

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:44:01AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: ​https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/flock-2014-attendee I would like to know how to add the Flock 2014 attendee badge to my list of badges. Is this something I could do myself? Leonardo Menezes Vaz and Toshio

FMN Announcement: Plans for a (near) future

Dear all, We would like to invite you to take a closer look at the Fedora Notification service: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ This service will allow you to customize the notifications you receive, you may ask it to send you IRC notification for successfull koji builds and email

FMN Announcement: Plans for a (near) future

Dear all, We would like to invite you to take a closer look at the Fedora Notification service: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ This service will allow you to customize the notifications you receive, you may ask it to send you IRC notification for successfull koji builds and email

Re: Call for testers for FMN

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:04:48PM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:22:59PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: So please, register on FMN: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ Test it and open bug tickets and RFEs here: https://github.com/fedora-infra

Re: Call for testers for FMN

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 09:33:01AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 07/18/2014 05:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:59:12PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 17.7.2014 16:22, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): Why is the filter called filter? Isn't filter supposed to remove

Re: Call for testers for FMN

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 04:22:59PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: So please, register on FMN: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ Test it and open bug tickets and RFEs here: https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn/issues As a result of surge of new users, FMN is performing

ACLs granted in error

The fedora-apps team identified a security hole in the new pkgdb application this morning that may have inadvertently granted the 'approveacls' permission to ktdreyer on the perl-Time-Duration-Parse package. We do not think this was intentional, but was an unintentional side-effect of the

Re: Project Locations and Basic Setup

On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 03:19:41AM -0400, Martin Krizek wrote: - Original Message - From: Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 4:50:25 PM Subject: Project Locations and Basic Setup I think most of this came up in an

Retiring my gnome-shell search providers

Hello, A while ago, I wrote a trio of gnome-shell search providers: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-fedora-packages https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-github-repositories https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-shell-search-pinboard They

Re: RFC: Simply the retirement procedure - trigger on dead.package

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:46:28PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:35:13PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 19:21:53 +0100, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: What are your opinions about this? I already checked with Dennis Gilmore, he is ok

Re: fedmsg for voting?

?) I had thought that this would trigger off of someone hitting submit on the election page. That should vote 0 for all candidates if no votes are assigned but still meet the trigger condition. Not sure if that meets the criteria for objectors, though. Ralph bean should weigh in here

A fresh idea (was: fedmsg for voting?)

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:30:43PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:55:51AM -0500, inode0 wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote: Hm, its not worth doing if we're going to make it complex like this. I think we should just drop

fedmsg for voting?

A question has come up in #fedora-apps as to whether or not we should publish fedmsg messages for voting. In particular, we're looking now at the new nuancier webapp[0] that will be used to vote on supplemental wallpapers. It is in development. There is a demo instance[1]. There is a pull

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 02:46:17PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 10 September 2013 14:24, inode0 ino...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote: If we are able to add fedmsg messages to this, then we will be able to award badges

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:57:45PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: you can opt out of all badge-stuff in one click (Deactivate Account). =20 Does this deactivate your FAS account, or just the badges? Just the badges. You won't show up on the badges.fp.o frontpage, or the badges.fp.o

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:00:11PM -0500, inode0 wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:06:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: Does this deactivate your FAS account, or just the badges? Just the badges. You won't show up

Re: fedmsg for voting?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:06:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: FWIW, if you log in to https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ and visit your profile, I got Internal Server Error when I tried this... and now I'm on the home page, when what I really wanted was to make sure I had nothing to do

Re: New Fedora Tagger

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:43:34PM +0200, Richard Marko wrote: On 05/14/2013 05:32 AM, Ralph Bean wrote: Try it out, help improve package search, and climb your way to the number-one tagger spot! It takes too long to load the next card after user clicks. You should probably preload more

New Fedora Tagger

Last week the infrastructure team launched a new version of Fedora Tagger[1]. It is a webapp that allows users to upvote/downvote tags on packages as well as rate packages themselves. The data will end up getting pulled into yum repo metadata by the bodhi masher and into the Fedora Packages[2]

Re: Login to Koji

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:37:16AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: - Setup your own fedmsg consumer to look for the messages and do whatever you want on getting them. email you? If you want help doing this, feel free to ask in #fedora-apps on freenode.

Re: Login to Koji

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 07:51:37PM +0200, Thomas Moschny wrote: 2013/4/19 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com: It's true that you cannot do that from the command line interface. However, there's a bunch of other ways to get that info: - Subscribe to the koji recent builds rss feed:

Re: review swap

Hi, this is a test message. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F18, efi-bootable live images

This is just a test message. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Review Swap Request

I'm working on the unbundling effort for python-requests. One stepping stone in that path is the following review request (for which I am soliciting potential reviewers): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688 That one is the highest priority, but there are a few other reviews

Updating python-requests in epel6

I'm going to be bumping python-requests in epel6 from 0.11.1 to 0.14.1. If you are using python-requests and think this will cause issues for you, let me know so we can work out a solution. pgpRRqi0OEQnf.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Changing bugz.fp.o's alias (again)

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 05:11:34PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote: I've since done some work to fix bugs and speed up the new app and would like some feedback if you could provide it. It is up in our staging environment

Changing bugz.fp.o's alias (again)

A month ago, I switched over the http://bugz.fedoraproject.org alias from the current pkgdb bugs app[1] to the new packages app[2]. There was a response from the community that this shouldn't have happened during that phase of the release cycle and that the new app was broken and too slow[3][4].

Re: bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename MIA?

On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:54:07PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 08:42 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: In fact in some area it takes me 1 min to finish loading the page.. Bugzilla has been veeery slow for the last week or two. Painfully slow. Incredibly

Re: bugz.fedoraproject.org trouble

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:57:00PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: There used to be http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/SOURCE-RPM-NAME e.g. http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gnome-packagekit Whoever has installed the new non-working software on that server, could it be replaced with the

Re: bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename MIA?

On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:01:32PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: Hello, http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename URLs no longer work, they redirect to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/error which appears to be some kind of a 404 Not Found page. Known issue? Sorry for the troubles. I

Solicitation: Review Swap

Anyone interested in a package review swap? python-logutils: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884041 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: New Online search for the Fedora Source

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:38:29PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 11/30/2012 12:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code. I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it. For details including search syntax, please see:

Re: Orphaning many packages

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:08:22PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: python-offtrac I'll take this one! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Release of fedora-review 0.3.0 done, 0.3.1 hotfix on the way

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:37:31PM +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: fedora-review development team proudly presents :-) Release of fedora-review 0.3.0 [1-3] Exciting! Thanks for working on this! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Package Review Swap Request: datanommer

Hello, Anyone interested in swapping package reviews? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853252 Thanks in advance- -Ralph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Scheduling new meeting time for Messaging SIG

The Messaging SIG has been meeting on Tuesdays at 16.00 UTC. Turnout has been a little low and we concluded that it's not the best time. If you're interested in participating in meetings, please fill out the following survey so I can get a good idea of when to place them:

Seeking bold, intrepid package reviewers

The Messaging SIG has been working on building a messaging bus for Fedora Infrastructure and the main obstacle to testing stuff in our staging environment is a boatload of package reviews. If anyone is up to help, it would be much appreciated. I'm willing to swap reviews as well if you need a

Re: Seeking bold, intrepid package reviewers

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:33:20AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: Just FYI, you probably want to set the fedora-review flag to '?' on those so they're more visible to potential reviewers Done. Thank you. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Seeking bold, intrepid package reviewers

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:39:27AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:37:04AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com wrote: Just FYI, you probably want to set the fedora-review flag to '?' on those so they're more

Re: Seeking bold, intrepid package reviewers

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:03:54AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote: If anyone is up to help, it would be much appreciated.  I'm willing to swap reviews as well if you need a reviewer for yours. I offered a review swap a couple