l>
Also, you can verify with:
udevadm test $SYSPATH
for example:
udevadm test /sys/class/net/wlan0
HTH
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2013/5/21 Przemek Klosowski
> On 05/21/2013 08:50 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> I know that is somehat OT, but I was looking for trying to discover what
>> does mean the size column of lsmod. Some people says is memory used by
>> the module, but if I run strace lsmod I fo
/ABI/testing/sysfs-module and
it says "Module size in bytes" but if I see the filesize using ls don't
match
So what does really mean coresize?
TIA
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
dev
I was looking for through udisks/udev/systemd and I haven't found
nothing at all, apologise my ingnorance, but how that task is
performed?
Please could you enlighten me?
Thanks in advance
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certif
2013/4/28 Nico Kadel-Garcia
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 07:13:59PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> > ls -l /dev/console\!
>> > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 abr 27 13:55 /dev/console!
>>
>&
2013/4/27 Richard W.M. Jones
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 06:56:03PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > 2013/4/27 Nico Kadel-Garcia
> > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Sergio Belkin
> wrote:
> > >> What is used /dev/console! file for (note exclamation mark) ?
2013/4/27 Nico Kadel-Garcia
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What is used /dev/console! file for (note exclamation mark) ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>>
>
> It's documented, type "man consol
Hi,
What is used /dev/console! file for (note exclamation mark) ?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Thanks guys
2013/2/19 Miroslav Suchý
> On 02/19/2013 03:43 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> Hi, rpmlint complains about cron files, is that a bug?
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> tmpwatch.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-**file
>> /etc/cron.daily/tmp
executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig.
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
2013/1/22 Przemek Klosowski
> On 01/20/2013 11:43 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Ray Strodewrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > I find it easier (and smaller) to download the netinst.iso (like
>> > Fedora-18-x86_64-netinst.iso)
>> > Loop-back moun
x27;s already
> there.
>
> --Ray
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Good point Ray, but even so I guess that in many of us have a /home
directory so we can install the new version freshly...
--
--
Ser
Greetings
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
LiveCD.
Is that the expected behaviour? Should I download the repo file using a
%post section?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
2012/6/25 Dennis Gilmore :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:49:54 -0300
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> 2012/6/24 Michael Schwendt :
>> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:09:34 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> >
>> >&g
2012/6/24 Michael Schwendt :
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:09:34 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just I am somewhat surprised that I submitted package cdw for testing
>> and still is in status
In Pending status I meant :)
(I remember in previous updates tha
Hi,
Just I am somewhat surprised that I submitted package cdw for testing
and still is in status (I remember in previous updates that in a few
hours it went to testing) . It's not a reproach, only a question, if
something is wrong...
Thanks in advance...
--
--
Sergio Belkin
2012/6/20 Michael Schwendt :
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:59:26 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> Hi Fedora community,
>>
>> I know that I can fix the new address of sources files with sed
>> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Wrong_FSF_address). I
>>
think?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
com/2010/06/01/fedora-package-maintainers-want-test-results/
is that right?
I've run:
autoqa-optin UpTools F-15
Tell me if I'm wrong
TIA
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
version
- Build against libtorque
But I think that torque support was removed somewhen I've found this too:
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/torqueus...@supercluster.org/2009-12/msg00167.html
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk
2012/3/23 Reindl Harald :
>
> Am 23.03.2012 19:00, schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev:
>> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>>> http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that FAQ entry is a bit outdated by now, too. Basically,
>> if it came from linux-stable.git an
2012/3/23 Adam Williamson :
> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a):
>> > Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release
>> > available of kernel for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.
2012/3/23 Michal Schmidt :
> Dne 23.3.2012 16:24, Sergio Belkin napsal(a):
>
>> I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is
>> mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat
>> risky...
>
>
> What exactly are you ta
Hi folks
I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is
mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat
risky...
What do you think? Correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks in advance
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV
2012/3/16 Bryn M. Reeves :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>>> Perhaps and stupid question:
>>>
>>> After upload new-sources to repo, it
2012/3/16 Jon Ciesla :
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>>> Perhaps and stupid question:
>>>
>>> After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs:
>>> Uploaded and added to .gitignore:
thing that I misunderstood?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/9/25 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:19:45 -0300
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've read the examples about updates allowed and I've read in
>> examples section:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#E
ith foo 5.5
c. Submit foo 6.0 only for rawhide.
What is the right option?
Sorry if I did 2 questions at once.
Thanks in advance
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
2011/9/19 Jason L Tibbitts III :
>>>>>> "SB" == Sergio Belkin writes:
>
> SB> I'd want to notify that rmplint warns about "BSD with
> SB> attribution",
>
> Please file a bug against rpmlint.
OK, I will do it:)
>
>
Hi,
I'd want to notify that rmplint warns about "BSD with attribution", I
mean it hasn't the complete list of valid licenses of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses.
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http:/
I will fix the license of UpTools package, it was mistagged as "BSD"
but is "BSD with attribution".
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
Hi
Is it OK include a compiler (eg gcc-c++) for a "-devel" subpackage?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
2011/8/2 Adam Williamson
> On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 15:37 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > I've read
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs/Common#Laptop_screen_dims_when_switching_to_battery_power_or_idle_mode_but_never_brightens_again
> >
> > My system suffers the same
2011/7/31 Rajeesh K Nambiar :
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> I've reported a X11 bug system, I'm using KDE on F15, if you suffers
>> the same problem, it could be great take a look at
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726
eters/policy
default performance [powersave]
any ideas?
TIA
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I've reported a X11 bug system, I'm using KDE on F15, if you suffers
the same problem, it could be great take a look at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726982
Sorry if it's duplicated
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blog
I'd like to port UpTools package to sparc architecture.
By chance is some test sparc machine there running Fedora?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
2011/6/11 Miloslav Trmač :
> Hello,
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> ./configure LDFLAGS="-no-install"
>
>> configure:3659: gcc -no-install conftest.c >&5
>> gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-install'
>
&g
2011/6/10 Kevin Kofler :
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> | int
>> | {
>> |
>> |;
>> |return 0;
>> | }
>
> This is not a valid C program. Maybe GCC 4.5 accepted this junk?! GCC 4.6 is
> right to error on it.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
> --
Sorry, I was typing on a netbook :P and the mail it was sent without subject
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
uot;UpTools"
| #define VERSION "8.5.4"
| /* end confdefs.h. */
|
| int
| {
|
| ;
| return 0;
| }
configure:3705: error: in `/tmp/UpTools-8.5.4':
configure:3707: error: C compiler cannot create executables
The same script doesn't fail on F14.
Do you have any idea?
2011/6/1 Rex Dieter
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> > What does it occur when an update is revoked and is deleted?
> > I've done an updated version of package, made a build and when I write
> > the name in Package field I've found a bit odd that new build doesn'
think?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
fonts hand been
affected. Fonts on Firefox looked terrible, I had to set hintstyle to
none in ~/.fonts.conf
HTH
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
n-everything
Can be this considered a bug?
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/5/26 Kevin Kofler :
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath
>> device: dm-0
>> May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath
>> device: dm-1
>
> Try booting the instal
26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... udevadm settle --timeout=300
May 26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... modprobe scsi_wait_scan
May 26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... rmmod scsi_wait_scan
May 26 09:23:15 localhost program: Running... udevadm settle --timeout=300
Thanks in advan
and do it again?
Thanks in advance
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/5/16 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 18:11:15 -0300
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Let's say I have package X 1.0 I'd want to upload an srpm of X 1.1 and
>> make build a newer version of X but
>
> For rawhide/master?
Hmmm, yes, is it n
4. fedpkg update
Is that right?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
There was an error in License tag in UpTools package it was wrongly
mislabeled as "BSD with advertisement", it was replaced by "BSD with
attribution". Fixed on 8.5.4-15 and newer releases.
Greets.
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http:/
2011/5/13 Kalev Lember :
> On 05/13/2011 03:51 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> I'd want to know if makes sense disable dependecy tracking at build
>> stage, I mean, put in spec file:
>>
>> ./configure --disable-dependency-tracking
>>
>> Because it speeds b
Hi,
I'd want to know if makes sense disable dependecy tracking at build
stage, I mean, put in spec file:
./configure --disable-dependency-tracking
Because it speeds build. What do you think?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV
2011/5/10 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Tue, 10 May 2011 09:59:12 -0300
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Let's say that you make a RPM for fedora, and then you want to make
>> for epel5. Should I keep the fedora entries on changelog?
>
> I usually do, yes
roject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
that I should add set something as 1%{?dist}.1 on Release to make
older that epel6 package. Should I add the same for the changelog
entry on epel5 package?
I mean:
* Tue Mar 01 2011 Sergio Belkin - 1%{?dist}.1 ?
Th
Sorry... Did I miss something?
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/4/2 Ville Skyttä :
> On 04/02/2011 05:02 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> Hi fedora community,
>>
>> I maintain ftop package. I've made fedora and el6 packages. Taking
>> account different requirements for epel5 packages, now I'd want to
>> make an el e
.e. blindly rejecting packages which carry *.la's would be wrong.
>
> Ralf
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch M
nd
el6 but does make sense increase EVR only for it?
2. If I create a modified spec for el5, should I increase the EVR? Can
a package have a different EVR of el6 and fedora ones? Or can an el5
package has the same EVR that el6 and fedora ones but different
content?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Serg
ding -Werror by themselves are poorly designed.
>
Just to learn: Ralf, Why do you say that? :-)
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/3/24 Tom Lane :
> Sergio Belkin writes:
>> FWIW Should We not my dependant package the rest of packages because
>> have been already rebuilt?
>
> If you have a package that uses libmysqlclient.so, and it's not already
> listed in "koji list-tagged dist-f1
> FWIW
I meant FWIU :)
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I can rebuilt the rawhide branch
>> too
>
> The F-15 and rawhide rebuilds are finished now with some failures
>
> collectd
> gmyth
> grass (f15 only)
> gstreamer-plugins-bad-free
> mapserver (f15 only)
> pure-ftpd
> ser
> snort
> zoneminder (Jason knows abo
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
> On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> 2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová :
>>> On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> I wrote:
>>>>> The ticket is here:
>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/tic
11.fc16.i686 requires libmysqlclient.so.16
Please resolve this as soon as possible."
Has this has to do with the topic of this thread?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/3/17 Jason L Tibbitts III
>
> >>>>> "SB" == Sergio Belkin writes:
>
> SB> I've made yesterday a Package SCM admin request and I haven't
> SB> received a notification yet.
>
> Well, you made your request just after I had proc
Hi Fedora devel community :)
I've made yesterday a Package SCM admin request and I haven't received a
notification yet. I'm not in a hurry but on earlier requests I had receive
answer after a few hours:
The ticket is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683684
TIA
--
-
drea,
AFAIK, this page is what you are looking for:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package_Procedure
HTH
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
-
spanish, all sugesstion are welcome :)
HTH
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I've read on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables
that mtune=atom. Just because I'm curious, why? :)
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified
101 - 174 of 174 matches
Mail list logo