Re: LibreOffice packages

On 6/7/23 15:15, Michael Catanzaro wrote: [1] https://github.com/flathub/flatpak-external-data-checker Oh, thanks, didn't know about that. Will try to make use of it for LibreOffice, "Add metadata for

Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig

On 6/7/23 08:00, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: As for admin privileges on the FAS group and ML, I'd like to ask 3-4 people to be set up. @decathorpe, @limb, @sharkcz ? @caolanm and @sbergmann would you like to continue helping in your great work on LO packages outside RH assignment? Yes, you

Re: LibreOffice packages

On 6/6/23 18:07, Fabio Valentini wrote: In general, I do like having software available as flatpaks, especially if it's not available from Fedora repositories. However, there's also the question of *trust* - do I trust the software source and / or the people / projects providing them? Let's

Re: more distinct default bash prompt?

On 5/22/23 16:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: FWIW Haiku uses bash and has a prompt which changes colour (green/red) depending on whether the status code of the last command was good or bad. I found this surprisingly useful. They use: \[`if [ $? = 0 ]; then echo "\e[32m"; else echo "\e[31m";

Re: libpq-devel and postgresql-private-devel providing conflicting libpq.so symlink

filed "postgresql-private-devel conflicts with libpq-devel over pkgconfig(libpq), blocks rebuild of LibreOffice flatpak" ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: libpq-devel and postgresql-private-devel providing conflicting libpq.so symlink

On 24/08/2022 08:21, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Seen at least on F36 x86_64:  The package libreoffice-postgresql-7.3.4.2-4.fc36.x86_64 (built 2022-07-12) contains a library /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/libpostgresql-sdbc-impllo.so that links against libpq (built with -lpq), so the library has

libpq-devel and postgresql-private-devel providing conflicting libpq.so symlink

Seen at least on F36 x86_64: The package libreoffice-postgresql-7.3.4.2-4.fc36.x86_64 (built 2022-07-12) contains a library /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/libpostgresql-sdbc-impllo.so that links against libpq (built with -lpq), so the library has 0x0001 (NEEDED)

Re: Incomprehensible rpmlint error messages

On 08/12/2021 09:33, Dan Horák wrote: On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 08:32:10 +0100 zxing-cpp.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error 1 zxing-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libZXing.so.1.2.0 libZXing.so.1.2.0 === 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings, 2

Incomprehensible rpmlint error messages

Trying to review "Review Request: zxing-cpp - C++ version of ZXing ("Zebra Crossing") barcode scanning library" on Fedora 35, `fedora-review -b 2029219` produces a 2029219-zxing-cpp/review.txt that states Rpmlint --- Cannot parse

Re: hamcrest update to 2.2 in Fedora rawhide

On 01/06/2021 05:42, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 1:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: [...] Seems like the configure script (or whatever that is) fails to find hamcrest. That's because libreoffice hardcodes path to hamcrest JAR in the configure script, instead of using one of the

Re: /usr/include/c++/11/type_traits:3164:1: error: template with C linkage

On 09/02/2021 12:24, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Kalev Lember wrote: The glib upstream MR got rejected, which means all consumers are going to have to fix their use of glib headers to not include them in an extern "C" block. That is extremely unhelpful. What is the point of rejecting a

Re: Fwd: Re: CppunitTest_sw_htmlexport failing due to zlib variation?

On 31/08/2020 23:05, Adenilson Cavalcanti wrote: Joining the discussion, since I worked on the original optimization patches and I'm one of the maintainers of Chromium's zlib. Just seconding what Jeremy mentioned, it is possible to generate a valid DEFLATE stream wrapped with GZIP format that

Fwd: Re: CppunitTest_sw_htmlexport failing due to zlib variation?

mlexport failing due to zlib variation? Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:37:15 +0200 From: Stephan Bergmann To: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org On 25/08/2020 11:07, Stephan Bergmann wrote: At least when building recent master on recent Fedora rawhide aarch64 with (among others) --

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

On 24/07/2020 10:31, Fabio Valentini wrote: Other errors look like this one from switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts: src/libonline-accounts.so.p/Authentification/Server.c: In function ‘online_accounts_server_on_bus_acquired’: src/libonline-accounts.so.p/Authentification/Server.c:498:2: error:

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

On 05/06/2020 15:16, Ian McInerney wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:51 PM Stephan Bergmann <mailto:sberg...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 05/06/2020 10:15, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > [...] Apart from > browsers, LibreOffice is going to use LLVM/Clang from Release 7.0

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: CompilerPolicy Change

On 05/06/2020 10:15, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: [...] Apart from browsers, LibreOffice is going to use LLVM/Clang from Release 7.0 too, so that would potentially be another added work to LibreOffice packagers in the future. Just to clarify, upstream LibreOffice supports both GCC and Clang on

Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO

On 02/05/2020 19:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 11:51:57AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 12:36:29PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm stuck on the following build failure of the aarch64 build here [1] /usr/bin/ld: .libs/geod: hidden

Re: Strange covert module builds [sbergmann ?]

On 02/03/2020 13:30, Michal Schorm wrote: Can you please brief me really quick on how does the flatpack work from maintainer POV? (what does it need for build / creation; what does it need for runtime ) If the flatpack uses the packages from base Fedora; 'rpms/mariadb-connector-c', which I'm

Re: Strange covert module builds [sbergmann ?]

On 02/03/2020 12:48, Michal Schorm wrote: I'm the maintainer of 'mariadb' & 'mariadb-connector-c' packages (rpms) and also 'modules/mariadb'. Recently, I discovered a 'modules/mariadb-connector-c' exists. Created by my colleague years ago, discontinued in 2017. This is correct - as we don't want

Re: Who maintains the service at mbs.fedoraproject.org:443?

On 17/02/2020 13:54, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:46:17PM +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: mbs.fedoraproject.org is maintained by Infrastructure Team [1]. You can report issues at [2]. I don't think that we do, but we may know who does and help you redirect your question

Who maintains the service at mbs.fedoraproject.org:443?

I am trying to do a build of LibreOffice from Fedora RPMs (à la ), but `fedpkg module-build` keeps failing with The modulemd libreoffice.yaml is invalid. Please verify the syntax is correct. after

Re: c++ std=c++14 in EPEL7

On 14/12/2019 18:00, Nathanael Noblet wrote: Not strictly a fedora devel question but I’m hoping all the experience and knowledge will be able to help. I need a newer poppler in epel 7. I’ve managed to bring it up to 0.68. However moving past that results in a compilation error. It seems

Re: glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31

On 25/09/2019 18:12, Stephan Bergmann wrote: (At least partly; /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h has only 540 lines, there's no line 913; so whatever #line tricks get played there...) Ha, that part was easy: I looked at the file with Emacs, but had no Emacs installed on the F31 system

Re: glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31

On 25/09/2019 17:16, Stephan Bergmann wrote: ~ gcc $(pkg-config -cflags glib-2.0) -c test.c test.c:2:13: warning: const     2 | G_CONST_RETURN char * f();   | ^~~ emits a cryptic warning (and gets the positioning of the squiggly underline wrong). On both F30 and F31

glib-2.0 G_CONST_RETURN causing GCC "warning: const' on F31

After switching to F31 beta I came across a GCC warning that looks like it is useful, trying to warn about misguided uses of the G_CONST_RETURN macro from glib-2.0. However, it leaves me puzzled: $ cat test.c #include "glib.h" G_CONST_RETURN char * f(); On F30: ~ gcc --version gcc (GCC)

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Enable Compiler Security hardening flags by default in G

On 21/03/2019 09:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: "-fstack-protector-strong" is the only one that has a clearly beneficial effect. But then there's the overall counterargument from Jakub that we start deviating from upstream defaults and some users will need to add counter-options to go

F28 `dnf update` "Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-debuginfo'"

On F28, `dnf update` recently started to fail for me with "Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-debuginfo'": $ sudo dnf -vv --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=fedora-debuginfo --refresh makecache Loaded plugins: builddep, config-manager, copr, debug, debuginfo-install, download,

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Binutils version 2.29.1

On 23.01.2018 09:28, Tom Hughes wrote: None the less the man page for ld (at least on F27) says:     defs     Disallows undefined symbols in object files.  Undefined symbols     in shared libraries are still allowed. which says that undefined symbols are allowed when linking a

Re: F28 System Wide Change: Hardening Flags Updates for Fedora 28

On 01/05/2018 12:41 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:36:27PM -0800, John Reiser wrote: 2) The explicit write by the stack probe can mask a memcheck(valgrind) violation, at least until memcheck groks the probe. That should not be true. The probe is done after the stack

Re: RFC: -Wl,--as-needed by default (and glibc ldconfig file trigger)

On 11/21/2017 04:12 PM, David Tardon wrote: On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 01:54:13PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On 21 November 2017 at 10:43, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:26 +, Tomasz Kłoczko

Re: C++ build errors

On 12/07/2016 11:08 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:04:37AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 12/06/2016 04:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:51:14PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote: Anyone have any idea what causes these errors? Trying to update a package

Re: C++ build errors

On 12/06/2016 04:16 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:51:14PM -, Jeremy Newton wrote: Anyone have any idea what causes these errors? Trying to update a package and it failed during a local test build in mock (f25): In file included from

Re: ABRT, Faf and current state of bug reporting

On 04/23/2013 03:27 PM, Richard Marko wrote: This allows us to get accurate statistics of crashing applications while not forcing every user to report to bugzilla. This is a trade-off between getting accurate statistics and quality of the reports as automated reports are anonymous which is also

GCC produced wrong code in gvfs-1.14.2-3.fc18.x86_64

I happened to run across a problem with current gvfsd-sftp in x86_64 Fedora 18 that is apparently due to bad code generated by GCC. The function void g_vfs_read_channel_send_seek_offset (GVfsReadChannel *read_channel, goffset offset) {

Re: GCC produced wrong code in gvfs-1.14.2-3.fc18.x86_64

On 03/15/2013 04:23 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: I happened to run across a problem with current gvfsd-sftp in x86_64 Fedora 18 that is apparently due to bad code generated by GCC. The function void g_vfs_read_channel_send_seek_offset (GVfsReadChannel *read_channel

Re: GCC produced wrong code in gvfs-1.14.2-3.fc18.x86_64

On 03/15/2013 05:06 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Grr, sorry for the noise; appears to be rather a bug in glib2-devel-2.34.2-2.fc18.x86_64 See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695925 GUINT32/64_SWAP_LE_BE macros do not enclose val argument in parentheses. Stephan -- devel mailing

Problem in rawhide with ld and weak symbols?

Building LibreOffice for x86_64 starting to fail in an odd way recently, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=5091173name=build.logoffset=-4000, I stripped that down to what I would assume is a newly introduced bug in how ld resolves weak references? Given a test.s of

Re: Problem in rawhide with ld and weak symbols?

On 03/07/2013 08:31 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com mailto:sberg...@redhat.com wrote: Building LibreOffice for x86_64 starting to fail in an odd way recently, http://koji.fedoraproject.__org/koji/getfile?taskID

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

On 02/06/2013 02:36 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: About the soffice alias, it still breaks parallel installation in F18 (just tried, the desktop integration from OpenOffice conflicts with libreoffice-core). It seems that the upstream LibreOffice packages no longer use the soffice alias (at least,

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

On 02/03/2013 09:15 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 01.02.2013 00:17, drago01 wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote: I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant and you can't

Re: using rpms for non-root installs

On 01/31/2013 08:40 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote: You actually may have an option. It's dirty, and here be dragons. I know this from working on RPM on AIX, so again, it's hacky. I did this on a CentOS 6.3 box for my example, should work on Fedora. You can do something like: ls

grub2-tools and UEFI/GPT

When my UEFI/GPT-based Fedora 17 box refused to boot yesterday, I ran into the following trouble. The disk looked reasonably well from a rescue system, so I naively figured that something might be wrong with its initial sectors, and that grub2-install might magically fix that again. First,

Re: grub2-tools and UEFI/GPT

On 12/12/2012 10:39 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: UEFI is not BIOS. The command you were looking for is grub2-efi-install, whereas grub2-install is for BIOS systems. The package you should already have is grub2-efi. And on UEFI systems there are no boot sectors, there is a partition dedicated for

Re: C++ ABI rebuilds for rawhide too?

On 02/28/2012 09:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as well as f17? Btw, does anybody have a pointer to that ABI breakage in gcc 4.7 for c++ (i.e., was it an inadvertent breakage, or is there a planned incompatibility for GCC

Self Introduction

Hi all, I've recently joined Red Hat's OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice team, so I'll probably want to get my hands dirty with the corresponding Fedora packages in the future. My background: I've been a core member of OpenOffice.org development for 14 years. I'm mostly taking care of the lower