Re: Summary/Minutes from yesterday's FESCo meeting (2018-08-20)

On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 17:02, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > #1957 F29 Change: Liberation Fonts 2 > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1957 > > DECISION (+6, 0, 0) > > Sigh! > > Really nothing has changed since the decision in Fedora 19 to stick with > Liberation 1,

Re: Liberation fonts plan

On 20 June 2017 at 22:37, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:46:31PM +0530, pravin@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:35:24PM +0530, pravin@gmail.com wrote: > > > >- In Fedora we will have b

Re: Liberation fonts plan

On 20 June 2017 at 18:42, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 06:35:24PM +0530, pravin@gmail.com wrote: > >- In Fedora we will have both packages liberation2-fonts and > >liberation-fonts > > Will the actual fonts ha

Liberation fonts plan

Hi All, Presently as you know, we have liberation-2 and liberation 1.07.4. i am maintaining both in single git repo. [1] I am thinking to create different project for liberation2, reasons as follows - liberation 2 - It initially forked from google-croscore-fonts and now independent

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Transdiff

On 12 January 2017 at 14:33, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote: > On 12/01/17 06:59, pravin@gmail.com wrote: > > On 10 January 2017 at 14:39, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu >> <mailto:t...@compton.nu>> wrote: >> >> I don't really understa

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Transdiff

On 10 January 2017 at 16:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Tuesday, 10 January 2017 at 09:39, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Transdiff = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Transdiff > > > > Change owner(s): > > *Sundeep Anand

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Transdiff

On 10 January 2017 at 14:39, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 10/01/17 08:39, Jan Kurik wrote: > > Often even after 100% translation in Zanata, few packages do not get >> build with latest translations in Fedora. This result in poor >> localization experience. >> > > I don't really

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: IBus Emoji Typing

On 11 July 2016 at 16:55, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > On 07/08/16 20:41, Bastien Nocera-san wrote: > > > I think that the emoji input method should be a separate input method, > so > > > that most users would have the choice between inputting

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Unicode 9.0 support

missed this email :( On 5 July 2016 at 23:19, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Is there any point in updating fonts in rawhide to their Unicode 9.0 > versions, before the change is implemented? > With Unicode 9.0 update libraries will be updated with latest UCD stuff.

L10N String Breakage monitoring

Hi all, Bringing this topic from meeting discussion to mailing list for wider audience. Often after completion of translation package get updated with more string or sometime translated .po file does not get pulled while building package. This causes L10N string breakage. Anaconda is

Re: [Test-Announce] 2015-03-19 Fedora 22 I18N Test Day

On 19 March 2015 at 08:57, Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, We have a test day event for Internationalization on f22 as usual to make sure if f22 has any issues around i18n. Please join Freenode #fedora-test-day and try if your primary language works on f22 when you have a bit of

Re: Can you help with making fonts awesome in Fedora 21?

On 16 October 2014 15:14, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement AppStream metadata[1] for all the fonts we want to show in the software center. I've

Re: Can you help with making fonts awesome in Fedora 21?

On 16 October 2014 15:14, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement AppStream metadata[1] for all the fonts we want to show in the software center. I've

Re: system-config-language-2.1.0 released

cc'ing to devel list as well. On 29 May 2014 11:26, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote: Glad to see this happening after long time. On 29 May 2014 10:25, Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, It took some time but finally we have a working system-config-language[1

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming

On 11 March 2014 19:25, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Le Jeu 6 mars 2014 05:28, pravin@gmail.com a écrit : Valid point. I will fix this by adding fontconfig Aliases. We can keep it for couple of releases. It costs little to keep them forever now Documents

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming

Regards, Pravin Satpute On 6 March 2014 10:00, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote: On 6 March 2014 09:26, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming

On 4 March 2014 19:12, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote: Hello, 2014-03-03 15:31 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Lohit_Odia_Gurumukhi snip This Other developers:

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming

On 5 March 2014 16:51, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote: 2014-03-05 9:17 GMT+01:00 pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com: On 4 March 2014 19:12, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote: Formally, the process calls for either making this a system-wide change, or for making the anaconda

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming

On 6 March 2014 09:26, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Lohit Odia Gurumukhi font naming = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Lohit_Odia_Gurumukhi Change owner(s): Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com According to:

Re: Source string contextualization

On 24 January 2014 17:52, Nilamdyuti Goswami ngosw...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, While translating some of the fedora packages we often come across some source strings whose context or meaning is not clear. This results in wrong translations which is discovered later while using the actual

Re: Calibri/Cambria replacements Carlito/Caladea

On 10 October 2013 14:19, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: I see that recently chromium appears to have commissioned two fonts claimed to be metrically equivalent to Calibri and Cambria. Which is super great from the perspective of giving LibreOffice a decent shot at laying out

Re: Fonts with default Fedora installation

On 27 August 2013 14:04, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.netwrote: Le Mar 27 août 2013 06:34, pravin@gmail.com a écrit : Yeah. If someone does specific request for SMP we should go ahead with it. At the end of days it is going to take only some kb's space in ISO's. I know

Re: Fonts with default Fedora installation

Added devel list proper email id. Regards, Pravin S On 26 August 2013 17:15, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Recently i done packaging of google-noto-fonts [1] for Fedora. With this font we got number of new script fonts of Unicode which were not available earlier

Re: Fonts with default Fedora installation

On 27 August 2013 00:57, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: pravin@gmail.com (pravin@gmail.com) said: Recently i done packaging of google-noto-fonts [1] for Fedora. With this font we got number of new script fonts of Unicode which were not available earlier. [2

Re: Liberation 2.0 font development plan based on croscore fonts.

On 21 May 2012 11:53, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Most of you aware regarding liberation license problem we are facing from long time. Looks like time came when we can get rid of it. Google has recently released google-croscore fonts. - These are from

Re: Liberation 2.0 font development plan based on croscore fonts.

On 11 July 2012 18:55, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: On 07/11/2012 02:58 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 07/11/2012 08:51 AM, pravin@gmail.com wrote: I have completed initial work. Yet not able to solve LiberationSansNarrow licensing stuff might be it will take some

Liberation 2.0 font development plan based on croscore fonts.

Hi All, Most of you aware regarding liberation license problem we are facing from long time. Looks like time came when we can get rid of it. Google has recently released google-croscore fonts. - These are from same vendor ascendar with OFL license and more glyph coverage than existing

Re: Liberation 2.0 font development plan based on croscore fonts.

On 21 May 2012 23:08, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Le Lun 21 mai 2012 08:23, pravin@gmail.com a écrit : - Use base of croscore fonts and apply enhancements available in liberation and call new entity liberation 2.0 That would be great ! (but please don't