Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
We have begun to remove content from the wiki. The old pages should all
now have links to the new docs site. As we continue to work on the new
documents, the corresponding wiki pages will be emptied and left only
with the link to
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
We have begun to remove content from the wiki. The old pages should all
now have links to the new docs site. As we continue to work on the new
documents, the corresponding wiki pages will be emptied and left only
with the link to
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The Python packaging guidelines have been updated to reflect the fact
that Python 2 is deprecated. All relevant information for legacy Python
2 packaging has been moved to the appendix. Together with this change,
the rule for
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The Python packaging guidelines have been updated to reflect the fact
that Python 2 is deprecated. All relevant information for legacy Python
2 packaging has been moved to the appendix. Together with this change,
the rule for
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The packaging guidelines for enabling services by default were
significantly revised to emphasize that services starting by default
should fail only in exceptional conditions, and to provide additional
guidance for services related
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The packaging guidelines for enabling services by default were
significantly revised to emphasize that services starting by default
should fail only in exceptional conditions, and to provide additional
guidance for services related
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
In Fedora 28 (and rawhide), the texinfo scriptlets (which call
install-info) are no longer necessary and should be removed or, for
cross-release specfiles, wrapped in conditionals. Note that there are
nearly 300 specs currently
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
Many changes have been made to the Ruby packaging guidelines to reflect
the current state of Ruby packaging.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
* https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710
Note that the macros
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
Many changes have been made to the Ruby packaging guidelines to reflect
the current state of Ruby packaging.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
* https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710
Note that the macros
On 24.4.2018 15:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23.4.2018 21:37, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
On 04/23/2018 01:06 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
The Python guidelines now more clearly indicate that use of %{__python},
%{python_sitelib} and %{python_sitearch} is forbidden.
*
On 23.4.2018 21:37, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
On 04/23/2018 01:06 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
The Python guidelines now more clearly indicate that use of %{__python},
%{python_sitelib} and %{python_sitearch} is forbidden.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros
*
On 04/23/2018 01:06 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
The Python guidelines now more clearly indicate that use of %{__python},
%{python_sitelib} and %{python_sitearch} is forbidden.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros
* https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/745
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
A note was added to the Python guidelines indicating that the python2
stack may go away and that upstreams should be contacted about software
not yet ported to python3.
*
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
A note was added to the Python guidelines indicating that the python2
stack may go away and that upstreams should be contacted about software
not yet ported to python3.
*
Just this one change, but it has implications for many packages.
The Scriptlet guidelines have received several changes regarding the
installation of shared libraries and ldconfig. Use of the new macros
is detailed, and there is a new section on the scriptlets required when
linker configuration
Just this one change, but it has implications for many packages.
The Scriptlet guidelines have received several changes regarding the
installation of shared libraries and ldconfig. Use of the new macros
is detailed, and there is a new section on the scriptlets required when
linker configuration
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
We have more things coming in concert with various distro changes that
are happening, but I wanted to get these two out there now.
-
The icon cache scriptlets were removed from the scriptlet guidelines, as
no live Fedora release needs
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
Following releng approval, the restrictions on the use of rich/Boolean
dependencies have been lifted.
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rich.2FBoolean_dependencies
*
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The guidelines for enabling services by default modified to indicate
that FESCo approval is required for services which change the behavior
of other services.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices#Restrictions
*
On 07/03/17 13:41 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"JW" == Jonathan Wakely writes:
JW> The template at
JW>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#SPEC_templates_and_examples
JW> still shows %install cleaning the buildroot as the first step,
JW>
> "JW" == Jonathan Wakely writes:
JW> Sure. I was checking whether I should make the change myself, not
JW> complaining it hadn't been done.
You are of course welcome to change any page that isn't in one of the
protected hierarchies (Packaging:, Legal:). We
> "JW" == Jonathan Wakely writes:
JW> The template at
JW>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#SPEC_templates_and_examples
JW> still shows %install cleaning the buildroot as the first step,
JW> should that be corrected?
There are probably any
On Ter, 2017-03-07 at 14:29 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > The Tags and Sections section of the main guidelines was modified
> > to
> > use "SHOULD" and "MUST" language throughout, and to either
> > discourage
> > or prohibit the use of certain tags and sections. The section is
> > short,
> The Tags and Sections section of the main guidelines was modified to
> use "SHOULD" and "MUST" language throughout, and to either discourage
> or prohibit the use of certain tags and sections. The section is short,
> so I've included it below.
>
> "
> * The Copyright:, Packager:, Vendor: and
Dne 3.3.2017 v 02:33 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
>
>
>
> The guidelines on versioning packages were completely rewritten in order
> to make them (hopefully) more comprehensible. This rewrite was not
> intended to introduce
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> * Allowing "MMDD.commithash" (instead of requiring mention of
> the SCM in use) in the "snapshot information" field.
What's the point of allowing that format?
1. It destroys consistency (and the fact that the formats are now
"suggested" rather than required
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
The guidelines on versioning packages were completely rewritten in order
to make them (hopefully) more comprehensible. This rewrite was not
intended to introduce functional changes, but during the draft process
the following small
> "TK" == Tomasz Kłoczko writes:
TK> And now someone should add to git filtering off above, process all
TK> spec files in git repos and commit necessary changes adding in
TK> commit comment link to updated guidelines.
Yes, I have some scripts brewing but I am not
On 17 February 2017 at 03:35, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> * The Copyright:, Packager:, Vendor: and PreReq: tags MUST NOT be used.
> * The BuildRoot: tag and %clean section SHOULD NOT be used.
> * The contents of the buildroot SHOULD NOT be removed in the first line
> of
Oops, one additional change was made which I left out of the previous
announcement.
A section was added to the Python guidelines describing the automatic
generation of Provides: which was added in Fedora 25. Descriptions of
three new macros were also added.
*
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The systemd section of the scriptlet guidelines was updated to indicate
situations where the %systemd_ordering macro may be used instead of
%systemd_requires.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Systemd
*
Oops, one additional change was made which I left out of the previous
announcement.
A section was added to the Python guidelines describing the automatic
generation of Provides: which was added in Fedora 25. Descriptions of
three new macros were also added.
*
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The systemd section of the scriptlet guidelines was updated to indicate
situations where the %systemd_ordering macro may be used instead of
%systemd_requires.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Systemd
*
On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 2:27:44 PM CEST Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Here are the recent changes to the
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
> wrote:
>>
>> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
>>
>> -
>>
>> The Filesystem Layout section of the guidelines
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
>
> -
>
> The Filesystem Layout section of the guidelines was simplified and
> outdated information was removed.
>
> *
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The Filesystem Layout section of the guidelines was simplified and
outdated information was removed.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout
*
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The section on the use of pregenerated code was amended to indicate the
preference for having tools necessary to regenerate such code be free
software and packaged in Fedora.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
*
> "RD" == Rex Dieter writes:
RD> Perhaps fpc folks missed my recent related post:
That change was actually made quite some time before I sent the
announcement. Sometimes I get behind.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
...
> The use of rich (or Boolean) dependencies is now OK for F23+.
> *
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rich.2FBoolean_dependencies
> * https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593
Perhaps
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 07:15:31PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> The use of rich (or Boolean) dependencies is now OK for F23+.
> *
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rich.2FBoolean_dependencies
> * https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593
Exciting. A little scary. :)
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The use of rich (or Boolean) dependencies is now OK for F23+.
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rich.2FBoolean_dependencies
* https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593
-
The ban on the use of the
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
Some PHP scriptlets are now unnecessary in F24 due to the use of file
triggers.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PECL_Modules
* https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/597
-
A page describing the implementation of
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
Some PHP scriptlets are now unnecessary in F24 due to the use of file
triggers.
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PECL_Modules
* https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/597
-
A page describing the implementation of
On 22 February 2016 at 17:38, Corey Sheldon wrote:
>
> Kevin, et al.
>
> I am willing to help with the re-write but admittedly some of it will
require a crash course for me.
>
>
> On 02/22/2016 11:31 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:02:45 +
> Mat
On 22 February 2016 at 16:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:02:45 +
> Mat Booth wrote:
>
> > Wow, that "HOWTO" is a really old page -- not changed since being
> > imported from the old moin moin wiki. My feeling is that page should
> >
Kevin, et al.
I am willing to help with the re-write but admittedly some of it will
require a crash course for me.
On 02/22/2016 11:31 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:02:45 +
> Mat Booth wrote:
>
>> Wow, that "HOWTO" is a really old page -- not changed
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:02:45 +
Mat Booth wrote:
> Wow, that "HOWTO" is a really old page -- not changed since being
> imported from the old moin moin wiki. My feeling is that page should
> be deleted and the "How to create an RPM package" page should be
> updated.
>
>
On 22 February 2016 at 10:54, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > RWMJ> Is that new?
> >
> > Not really. The change relating to what's in the buildroot was made
> > about nine months ago: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/497
>
> I created my first COPR over this weekend. I worked
> RWMJ> Is that new?
>
> Not really. The change relating to what's in the buildroot was made
> about nine months ago: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/497
I created my first COPR over this weekend. I worked according to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package
because
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 09:29:16AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:07:29 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > Here's a video demonstrating this:
> >
> > http://oirase.annexia.org/tmp/packaging-caching/
>
> I think this is fallout from some problems
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:07:29 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> Here's a video demonstrating this:
>
> http://oirase.annexia.org/tmp/packaging-caching/
I think this is fallout from some problems we had with a memcached
server yesterday. I've cleared out our varnish cache,
Here's a video demonstrating this:
http://oirase.annexia.org/tmp/packaging-caching/
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 09:29:56AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 18-02-16 08:33, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
> >
> >-
> >
> >A section on the treatment of pregenerated code has been added to the
> >main guideline
> "HdG" == Hans de Goede writes:
HdG> I was specifically interested in this one, but this seems to be
HdG> missing from the wiki page ?
That URL certainly works for me. Here's the text:
Use of pregenerated code
Often a package will contain code which was itself
Hi Jason,
On 18-02-16 08:33, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
A section on the treatment of pregenerated code has been added to the
main guideline page.
*https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Use_of_pregenerated_code
> "RWMJ" == Richard W M Jones writes:
RWMJ> Is that new?
Not really. The change relating to what's in the buildroot was made
about nine months ago: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/497
RWMJ> I'm fairly sure I've got a lot of packages that assume gcc is
RWMJ> there as
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:04 AM Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
> *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_for_EPEL
> *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging
>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 01:33:28AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> A new page for guidelines specific to C and C++ has been added.
>
> *https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:C_and_C%2B%2B?rd=C_and_C++
> *https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/540
"If your application is a C or C++
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
A section on the treatment of pregenerated code has been added to the
main guideline page.
*https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Use_of_pregenerated_code
*https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/580
-
Text was
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
A section on the treatment of pregenerated code has been added to the
main guideline page.
*https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Use_of_pregenerated_code
*https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/580
-
Text was
Hey Jason,
In regards to boolean/rich dependencies, DNF should support them fine,
because libsolv (the depsolver library) does. During the F23 development
cycle, libsolv's support for them was switched on, and as of F23 release,
they should work. As for the build system, Koji should be able to
> "NG" == Neal Gompa writes:
NG> In regards to boolean/rich dependencies, DNF should
NG> support them fine, because libsolv (the depsolver library)
NG> does.
This ban came a the direct request of one of the DNF project managers
during Flock. The final syntax hadn't even
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The guidelines were updated to reflect the current policy that Fedora
packages are no longer permitted to carry SysV-style initscripts. The
relevant guidelines page has been moved to the EPEL hierarchy.
*
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The guidelines were updated to reflect the current policy that Fedora
packages are no longer permitted to carry SysV-style initscripts. The
relevant guidelines page has been moved to the EPEL hierarchy.
*
] Changes to the packaging guidelines
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available which
simplify packaging by removing some
VS == Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi writes:
VS I have a bug report about the macros. Where should I file it, FPC
VS ticket or Bugzilla against the python* packages that ship the
VS affected macro files?
Oops, I didn't see your mailing list post until well after I saw the
ticket.
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:03:00AM -0400, Robert Kuska wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 11:34:06 PM
Subject: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines
- Original Message -
From: Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 11:34:06 PM
Subject: [Guidelines change] Changes to the packaging guidelines
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available which
simplify packaging by removing some of the boilerplate which was
previously
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:11:26 +0300
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:11:26 +0300
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available which
simplify packaging by removing some of the boilerplate which was
previously required
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available which
simplify packaging by removing some of the boilerplate which was
previously required
On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 21:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
If that is not what the word means, then a definition
in the introduction would be very helpful, since there is no
definition anywhere on that page.
A hint is a weak dependency that does not affect the default package
suggestion: Suggests
Jerry James wrote:
First, what is a hint? Does that word refer collectively to all weak
dependencies? The wiki page doesn't say, so I'm left to guess.
That seemed perfectly clear to me. Note how the word is introduced:
“They come in two strengths: weak and hint [...]”
The meaning of “weak”
On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 10:32 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 11:22 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Is there any case to allow Supplements: in the Fedora Collection?
It
seems to me like this could be problematic. (e.g. I write a plugin
for
a popular engine and
On 10. 7. 2015 at 09:45:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 10:32 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 11:22 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Is there any case to allow Supplements: in the Fedora Collection?
It
seems to me like this could be problematic.
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 20:13 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. Note that
there is also a set of Python guideline changes pending which I will
send in a separate announcement.
-
Guidelines for making use of weak dependencies
On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 11:22 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Is there any case to allow Supplements: in the Fedora Collection? It
seems to me like this could be problematic. (e.g. I write a plugin
for
a popular engine and package it, then add Supplements: so that it
gets
pulled in by
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:13:58PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:WeakDependencies
Awesome -- thanks, FPC! This is really exciting.
That is exciting! Thanks to
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 08:13:58PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:WeakDependencies
Awesome -- thanks, FPC! This is really exciting.
--
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. Note that
there is also a set of Python guideline changes pending which I will
send in a separate announcement.
-
Guidelines for making use of weak dependencies (Recommends:, Suggests:,
etc.) have been added.
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. Note that
there is also a set of Python guideline changes pending which I will
send in a separate announcement.
-
Guidelines for making use of weak dependencies (Recommends:, Suggests:,
etc.) have been added.
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the
exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to
define the buildroot and rpm is free to
On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
The BuildRequires section of the guidelines has been revised; the
exceptions list is gone. The release engineering folks are free to
define the buildroot and rpm is free to change its dependency list.
*
Yes, that's the way I understand it too. The distinction between local
and remote is that remote attacks are in general more likely and thus
dangerous.
This is a good assumption - I'm sure that on most installations of Fedora
there's just one or a few trusted users, and they outnumber
Hello,
Nevertheless, you raise an interesting question in general. The way
I understand the motivation for the restriction is to avoid any
chance of attack or unexpected access over the network. [...]
OK, so the question is - are we (still) trying to preclude -local-
On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 14:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 07:24:07AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
zbyszek wrote:
[...]
Clarification: this change did not touch this part of the policy:
that
definition got copied over from the guidelines
sgallagh wrote:
[...] Yes, I thought my new phrasing was more clearly expressing
the original intent of the statement as I understood it. [...] I
think we should perhaps discuss this at the weekly FESCo meeting.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1446
This is what I get for trying to
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 07:24:07AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
zbyszek wrote:
[...]
Clarification: this change did not touch this part of the policy: that
definition got copied over from the guidelines [1]. [...]
(The previous wording said a package that ...does not listen on a
zbyszek wrote:
[...]
Clarification: this change did not touch this part of the policy: that
definition got copied over from the guidelines [1]. [...]
(The previous wording said a package that ...does not listen on a
network socket... can be enabled by default, which was a broader
restriction
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 07:24:07AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
OK, so the question is - are we (still) trying to preclude -local-
escalation-of-privileges type problems? If not, then many more
services can be enabled by default - as long as they bind only to
unix-domain sockets and/or
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:26:48AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
I'd personally prefer to assume the best intentions of our packagers;
specifically I'd assume that if there's a question as to the safety of
starting something by default, either they'd bring it up voluntarily or
someone
sgallagh wrote:
[...]
The definition of public was intentionally vague, but perhaps we
could try to find a better way to say it. I was trying to treat it as
network interfaces that accept connections from arbitrary sources.
OK ...
I'm not sure that there's a tremendously meaningful
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines:
The policy for systemd presets has been modified to merge the
individual treatments of service, socket and timer units into one
policy. The policy page was also moved into the packaging guidelines
proper.
*
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines:
The policy for systemd presets has been modified to merge the
individual treatments of service, socket and timer units into one
policy. The policy page was also moved into the packaging guidelines
proper.
*
Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu writes:
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines:
[...]
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices
[...]
In this context (1.1 locally running services), what is a public
network socket? Is the idea that localhost
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 21:03 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu writes:
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines:
[...]
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DefaultServices
[...]
In this context (1.1 locally running services),
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines:
The guidelines for packaging static libraries were amended to indicate
that the -static package should require the -devel package:
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries_2
*
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo