Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

I'll take autodocksuite. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27) - js-jqeury1

On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 08:16, Björn Persson wrote: > > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 28.8.2018 v 15:58 Christopher napsal(a): > > > Given the security vulnerabilities in jQuery 1 (and 2) and the fact > > > that upstream dropped them a long time ago, I strongly recommend the > > > packages be retired

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27) - js-jqeury1

Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 28.8.2018 v 15:58 Christopher napsal(a): > > Given the security vulnerabilities in jQuery 1 (and 2) and the fact > > that upstream dropped them a long time ago, I strongly recommend the > > packages be retired than kept alive. Packagers depend on the newer > > js-jquery

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:43 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > ghc-pretty-show (maintained by: mathstuf) > > ghc-pretty-show-1.6.16-1.fc29.i686 requires js-jquery1 = > 1.12.4-6.fc29 > I opened https://github.com/yav/pretty-show/issues/32 for this: so this will likely get fixed for

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27) - js-jqeury1

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:44 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 28.8.2018 v 15:58 Christopher napsal(a): > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:49 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> >> So this is the email announcing orphaning js-jquery1: >> >> >>

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Excerpts from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek's message of 2018-08-28 08:38 +00:00: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:56:58PM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote: > > What does it mean for a package to be owned by orphan while it still > > has other admins who are real people? > > > > Is this some kind of edge

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 08/28/2018 02:56 PM, Zamir SUN wrote: > Seems zopfli is used for fedora-logos[1], and this causes a lot of > package to be listed here. I've just adopted rpms/zopfli. > > I am just curious if there are any plan for fedora-logos to switch to > new optimizing tools, or the better choice can be

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 08/28/2018 06:04 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > ZJ> Unfortunately there is no "button" in pagure, and the process to > ZJ> take a package is a manual releng ticket. > > If you're an admin then you can click the "Give the XXX project"

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: ZJ> Unfortunately there is no "button" in pagure, and the process to ZJ> take a package is a manual releng ticket. If you're an admin then you can click the "Give the XXX project" button at the bottom. That will change the "main admin", and I'm

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 00:03 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > waffle orphan 24 weeks ago Dependency for piglit, taken. - ajax ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Dne 28.8.2018 v 16:15 Till Maas napsal(a): > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:04:37PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> I'd like to keep the packages above. >> >> And I'll be very happy if the packages listed bellow are retired. Most >> of them are orphaned without comaintainers, that is fine. However

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27) - js-jqeury1

Dne 28.8.2018 v 15:58 Christopher napsal(a): > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:49 AM Vít Ondruch > wrote: > > > So this is the email announcing orphaning js-jquery1: > > >

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 28.8.2018 16:04, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.8.2018 v 00:03 Till Maas napsal(a): The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:04:37PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I'd like to keep the packages above. > > And I'll be very happy if the packages listed bellow are retired. Most > of them are orphaned without comaintainers, that is fine. However some > appears to have co-maintainers, which is not

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:49 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > So this is the email announcing orphaning js-jquery1: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MI7W7TT3MUGMQTLYZYE5FKXUJCKFUXU7/ > > But apparently it is used by more packages then just a few.

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Dne 28.8.2018 v 00:03 Till Maas napsal(a): > The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package > and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that > the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 08/28/2018 06:03 AM, Till Maas wrote: > Depending on: zopfli (22), status change: 2017-11-05 (42 weeks ago) > fedora-logos (maintained by: alexl, caillon, caolanm, johnp, mbarnes, > rhughes, rstrode, spot, ssp) > fedora-logos-28.0.3-2.fc29.src requires zopfli =

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Dne 28.8.2018 v 00:03 Till Maas napsal(a): > > Package(co)maintainers Status Change > === > js-jquery1 ctubbsii, jamielinux, 5 weeks ago >

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Hello everyone. > sagitter: lzma Although LZMA Utils are no longer developed and replaced by XZ, they're still required by other packages on Fedora. lzma package is still correctly compiled on fedora 28+, it can endure for a little while yet as long as all dependent software migrate to XZ.

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:03:26AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > dpkg 0 weeks ago So this one has caused us trouble. virt-dib depends on debootstrap (a Debian tool for installing chroots), and debootstrap obviously depends quite

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

I think that this list way longer. It is other quite easy method to filter all those packages which are now under thread to be removed, Below oneliner has been executed in directory with yesterday synced rawhide src.rpm mirror: [tkloczko@domek fedora]$ for i in {20..30}; do echo "fc$i $( ls -1

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:04 AM Till Maas wrote: > VLGothic-fonts orphan 55 weeks ago This has been renamed to vlgothic-fonts quite while ago so we could safely remove it. > The following packages require above mentioned packages: > Depending on: Canna

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

- Original Message - > So audiofile has eight current maintainers (plus all of gnome-sig) but > somehow none of those maintainers has admin privileges on the > repository. Would any of the maintainers like be made an admin so that > SDL and everything that depends on it can drop out of

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Hi, On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:00:54AM +0200, Bob Mauchin wrote: > > Can someone reassign dnscrypt-proxy to me, eclipseo, I have updated the > project recently and I follow upstream closely. What's the procedure to > adopt it? I assigned it to you. The usual process is to file a releng ticket

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Hi, On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:56:58PM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote: > Excerpts from Till Maas's message of 2018-08-28 00:03 +02:00: > > python-configobj fale, lmacken, orphan, 45 weeks ago > >terjeros >

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On 28.8.2018 11:00, Bob Mauchin wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, 00:04 Till Maas, > wrote: The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, 00:04 Till Maas, wrote: > The following packages are orphaned or depend on an orphaned package > and will be retired, soon, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure that > the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:56:58PM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote: > Excerpts from Till Maas's message of 2018-08-28 00:03 +02:00: > What does it mean for a package to be owned by orphan while it still has > other admins who are real people? > > Is this some kind of edge case where the package was

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

Excerpts from Till Maas's message of 2018-08-28 00:03 +02:00: > python-configobj fale, lmacken, orphan, 45 weeks ago >terjeros [...] I will take python-configobj if nobody else will... BUT I don't quite

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2018-08-27)

So audiofile has eight current maintainers (plus all of gnome-sig) but somehow none of those maintainers has admin privileges on the repository. Would any of the maintainers like be made an admin so that SDL and everything that depends on it can drop out of this report? Just let me know and I'll