On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:15 AM William Moreno
wrote:
> Just my 2 cents
>
> A minimal fedora iso with @base and @core packages can the tool for a
> advanced user to build it own fedora experience on top a minimal install.
>
> If I want just lightdm and i3, openbox,
Just my 2 cents
A minimal fedora iso with @base and @core packages can the tool for a
advanced user to build it own fedora experience on top a minimal install.
If I want just lightdm and i3, openbox, awesome etc a minimal installable
fedora iso than do not requiere internet access at install
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 11:31 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El lun, 20-02-2017 a las 08:10 -0800, Adam Williamson escribió:
> > On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:45 +, Personal (open) wrote:
> > > DVD IS ALSO in Workstation and is routinely given out at events.
> >
> > That's the live image. When we
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 04:47 +, Fa Be wrote:
>
> It does not, no.
Why? Do you know how Debian can do it and what is differences between CentOS
and Debian in the field of default software?
I can guess some:
SELinux, Installer
___
devel mailing
Allright everybody, thanks for your response, I became convinced that there is
no need to Minimal CD of Fedoa.
I understand that if a system is so old that does not have USB port, Fedora in
not siutable for it, and must try CentOS or something lighter and LEGACY!, and
1.3GB for DVD is not too
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 04:47 +, Fa Be wrote:
> First of all I must say I assume that the Minimal CD of CentOS
> provides the GNOME Desktop like Debian #1 CD
It does not, no.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 23:45 +, Personal (open) wrote:
> DVD IS ALSO in Workstation and is routinely given out at events.
That's the live image. When we say 'DVD' we don't just mean 'any ISO
written to a DVD', it has a specific meaning for Fedora (and RH)
images: it's an installer image
Replies inline
On 20.02.2017 04:47, Fa Be wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:29:37AM -, Fa Be wrote: But then you need to
>> add more stuff later, right? Isn't the network install + downloading
>> specifically what you want a better option anyway?
>
> First of all I must say I
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 03:50:33PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:29:37AM -, Fa Be wrote:
> > It will be very beneficial for people if the Fedora project provides
> > the Minimal CD images of Fedora. It can attract more users to Fedora
> > and is very useful for
> And build your own kernel and compile other applications from source?
> Wouldn't that fragment the system? That might lead to dependency issues!
> CentOS is only good enough if he doesn't want the latest and greatest of
> everything! Or if he runs on old hardware.
>
Almost all is available for
> Le 2017-02-20 05:47, Fa Be a écrit :
>
> Have you tried to use Fedora Cloud Base images?
> https://alt.fedoraproject.org/cloud/
> It's about 128Mo
>
> You may convert qcow2 image with:
> * sudo apt-get install qemu-kvm
> * qemu-img convert test.qcow2 -O raw disk.img
>
> Here is the howto:
>
And build your own kernel and compile other applications from source?
Wouldn't that fragment the system? That might lead to dependency issues!
CentOS is only good enough if he doesn't want the latest and greatest of
everything! Or if he runs on old hardware.
On Feb 20, 2017 17:21, "Samuel
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 18:08 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:29:37AM -, Fa Be wrote:
> > > It will be very beneficial for people if the Fedora project
> > > provides
> > > the
Le 2017-02-20 05:47, Fa Be a écrit :
1. It is huge for people of developing and un-developed countries.
2. It need to a DVD disc and DVD ROM for install via Optical Disc Drive
(ODD).
3. It is a traffic wasting option, because all the software inside it
is not necessarily used, like Libre
Quite frankly, I don't think Fedora is suitable for people with low
bandwidth, simply because of its nature of updating policy. Even when using
proxy with squid cache for packages, packages updates constantly and cache
becomes obsolete very quickly. CentOS is much better choice.
On So, 2017-02-19 at 16:30 +, Fa Be wrote:
> Excuse me, I mean the network traffic. I have a internet service with
> only 4GB per month, and I must use it carefully due to various needs.
> Minimal CD is the excellent option for people like me, Net Install is
> not good enough, because it need
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:29:37AM -, Fa Be wrote:
>
> But then you need to add more stuff later, right? Isn't the network
> install + downloading specifically what you want a better option
> anyway?
First of all I must say I assume that the Minimal CD of CentOS provides the
GNOME Desktop
On 19.02.2017 16:50, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Dom, 2017-02-19 at 11:29 +, Fa Be wrote:
>
>> Hello, CentOS and Debian provides installation images in four options, but
>> fedora provides two options: == All is for AMD64 ==
>> -- Net install: -- *
Replies below.
On 19.02.2017 15:36, Radka Janekova wrote:
>> I think a netinstall would be what you're looking for Radka, but I don't
>> know from where you can download it.
>
> Me - not looking for anything - merely providing resources to "the other guy"
> :P
>
> Best regards,
>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:29:37AM -, Fa Be wrote:
>> It will be very beneficial for people if the Fedora project provides
>> the Minimal CD images of Fedora. It can attract more users to Fedora
>> and is very
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 11:29:37AM -, Fa Be wrote:
> It will be very beneficial for people if the Fedora project provides
> the Minimal CD images of Fedora. It can attract more users to Fedora
> and is very useful for people who have the internt with
> low-bandwidth. Currently I use Debian due
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 14:03 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> There's the network installer which is fairly minimal
>
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/25/Everything/x86_64/iso/
It's not the same thing. The 'minimal' image for CentOS (and RHEL? Not
sure if RHEL ships it) is
On Dom, 2017-02-19 at 11:29 +, Fa Be wrote:
> Hello, CentOS and Debian provides installation images in four
> options, but fedora provides two options:
>
> ==
> All is for AMD64
> ==
> --
> Net install:
> --
> * CentOS v7 (1611) = 377M
> * Debian v8.7
Excuse me, I mean the network traffic. I have a internet service with only 4GB
per month, and I must use it carefully due to various needs. Minimal CD is the
excellent option for people like me, Net Install is not good enough, because it
need to internet and huge data for every install, but
> I think a netinstall would be what you're looking for Radka, but I don't
know from where you can download it.
Me - not looking for anything - merely providing resources to "the other
guy" :P
Best regards,
Radka
--
*Radka Janeková*
*radka.ja...@redhat.com
Hello everyone,
Well... some Latin American countries have really bad and unstable
connection so the smaller an ISO is the better for them.I think a
netinstall would be what you're looking for Radka, but I don't know
from where you can download it.
Cheers, Sylvia
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 13:15
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Radka Janekova
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fedora has to offer these:
> Workstation - https://getfedora.org/en/workstation
> Server - https://getfedora.org/en/server
> Cloud - https://getfedora.org/en/cloud
> Atomic -
>Do you mean like data limit? I doubt that there is anyone with too low
speed to not download 1GB overnight these days...
That used to be the case in India a few months ago, thanks to the pathetic
3G service and super slow broadband. Now, with 4G, things are getting
better.
On 19 February 2017 at
Hi,
Fedora has to offer these:
Workstation - https://getfedora.org/en/workstation
Server - https://getfedora.org/en/server
Cloud - https://getfedora.org/en/cloud
Atomic - https://getfedora.org/en/atomic/
Spins - https://spins.fedoraproject.org
Labs - https://labs.fedoraproject.org
ARM -
29 matches
Mail list logo