On 24. 07. 20 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 07. 20 16:19, Vít Ondruch wrote:
In this context, I'd be more than happy if the documentation discouraged
use of the default streams. Something along these lines: "Modularity
have default
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 24. 07. 20 16:19, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > In this context, I'd be more than happy if the documentation discouraged
> > use of the default streams. Something along these lines: "Modularity
> > have default stream feature, but use it with
On 24. 07. 20 16:19, Vít Ondruch wrote:
In this context, I'd be more than happy if the documentation discouraged
use of the default streams. Something along these lines: "Modularity
have default stream feature, but use it with caution only if you know
what you do and what is the impact."
In
Just FTR, I don't think I am going to reveal too much saying that for
RHEL9, the sentiment is (at least in the context of Ruby, Node.js and
Python) that we are very likely not going to use default streams. Plain
old RPMs do mostly the same job.
In this context, I'd be more than happy if the
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:01 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 23. 07. 20 16:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 23. 07. 20 16:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > >> I like Neal's proposal of "Fedora ELN may use default streams at this
> > >>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 23. 07. 20 16:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 23. 07. 20 16:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> I like Neal's proposal of "Fedora ELN may use default streams at this
> >> time, and default streams for ELN [...] are delegated to the ELN SIG
On 23. 07. 20 16:53, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 07. 20 16:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I like Neal's proposal of "Fedora ELN may use default streams at this
time, and default streams for ELN [...] are delegated to the ELN SIG
with a report for review by FESCo on the progress of using modularity
On 23. 07. 20 16:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I like Neal's proposal of "Fedora ELN may use default streams at this
time, and default streams for ELN [...] are delegated to the ELN SIG
with a report for review by FESCo on the progress of using modularity
technology in this manner" in the FESCo
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:26 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 22. 07. 20 14:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > ...
> >> As said in the modularity docs PR (but I cannot find it now, because
> >> pagure.io
> >> is down), I am not sure what is the
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:30 AM Remi Collet wrote:
>
> Le 09/07/2020 à 20:00, Ben Cotton a écrit :
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
>
> > There is a preview of the new policy available at
> > https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/
>
>
> I
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:15 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> But I think it should be voted at FESCo after a week? The change process is
> vague here, because it only says "no sooner than a week". Ben?
>
Huh. I have no idea how this slipped through the several places I
should have noticed it, but I
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:29:17AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 09/07/2020 à 20:00, Ben Cotton a écrit :
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
>
> > There is a preview of the new policy available at
> > https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/
>
Le 09/07/2020 à 20:00, Ben Cotton a écrit :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
> There is a preview of the new policy available at
> https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/
I think this part may be confusing
Packages provided at runtime by the
On 22. 07. 20 14:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
...
As said in the modularity docs PR (but I cannot find it now, because pagure.io
is down), I am not sure what is the outcome wrt default streams. Default streams
are not allowed now. If this
On 23. 07. 20 10:10, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Is this supposed to be voted on by FESCo? The Wiki page was moved into
the "ChangeAnnounced" category but I don't seem to find either a FESCo
ticket, and I don't remember voting on it, or an announcement.
ChangeAnnounced is for the mailing list
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:01 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
>
> == Summary ==
> Establish a set of rules for Modular content in Fedora to ensure an
> optimal user and packager experience.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Sgallagh| Stephen Gallagher]]
Dne 22. 07. 20 v 14:55 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:06 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Is this just about the specific URL or also about the "Naming Policy"?
> The Naming Policy is not currently under discussion in this proposal.
> Only the URL provided in the Change
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:06 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Is this just about the specific URL or also about the "Naming Policy"?
The Naming Policy is not currently under discussion in this proposal.
Only the URL provided in the Change Proposal is applicable right now.
If you want to submit a
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
...
> As said in the modularity docs PR (but I cannot find it now, because pagure.io
> is down), I am not sure what is the outcome wrt default streams. Default
> streams
> are not allowed now. If this change proposal and the policy is approved,
Is this just about the specific URL or also about the "Naming Policy"?
I am asking, because I already had a lot of arguments about the
branching on this list and various different places but this guideline
still insist that "using upstream major versions as branches is
recommended". This is not
On 09. 07. 20 20:00, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
== Summary ==
Establish a set of rules for Modular content in Fedora to ensure an
optimal user and packager experience.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Sgallagh| Stephen Gallagher]]
*
21 matches
Mail list logo
