Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 16:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Yes, I'm well aware of the plans but it doesn't help us now. There was > over 3500 package updates in the compose, it shows how quickly we got > behind. FWIW I really see this as a resource/priority problem, not a process problem. We

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 14:58 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:11:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed > > rawhide > > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > > > This has been due to

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/14/2017 10:00 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:36 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> * Composes are really slow (likely related to storage slowness), if they >> were faster or could fail faster we could untag/fix/iterate more. Right >> now we are lucky to get 2 chances a day.

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/14/2017 04:16 AM, Martin Kolman wrote: > I agree with that - for example the Anaconda installer CI broke due to > a rawhide package change in the last "working" compose. There is a > fixed package available and built in Koji, but it's not reaching the > Rawhide repos due to the broken

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 09:36 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * Composes are really slow (likely related to storage slowness), if they > were faster or could fail faster we could untag/fix/iterate more. Right > now we are lucky to get 2 chances a day. When you're mentioning storage slowness, are we

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 06/13/2017 03:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> For actual artifacts such as cloud/disk/installer images I agree but >> at least pushing out individual packages so people can do "dnf >> upgrade" picks up issues such as

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/13/2017 03:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > For actual artifacts such as cloud/disk/installer images I agree but > at least pushing out individual packages so people can do "dnf > upgrade" picks up issues such as dependency issues that also kill the > compose and allows people to still test

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:11:21AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now > failing composes that

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 22:47 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > Greetings. > > > > > > > > > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed > > > > > rawhide > > > > > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > > > > > > > > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:31:37PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I know we're already at new-deliverable explosion, but this seems like > > a place where it'd be nice to have Rawhide and Bikeshed (or whatever we > > want to call "tested and believed-to-be basically functional Rawhide"). > (Side

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

Greetings. Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide composes in a while (13 days as of today). This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now failing composes that don't have all required release blocking

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 13 June 2017 at 17:28, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 06/13/2017 08:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> Greetings. >>> >>> Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide >>> composes in a

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/13/2017 08:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:10:58PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now >>> failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items. >> >> Is there a way we can loosen

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On 06/13/2017 08:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Greetings. >> >> Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide >> composes in a while (13 days as of today). >> >> This has been due to a variety of bugs

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

You keep using that word — where for [sic] — I do not think it means what you think it means. (As inconceivable as it may seem.) -- Kaleb ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > I know we're already at new-deliverable explosion, but this seems like > a place where it'd be nice to have Rawhide and Bikeshed (or whatever we > want to call "tested and believed-to-be basically functional Rawhide"). > That doesn't

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:10:58PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now > > failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items. > > Is there a way we can loosen that up for rawhide and have it tightened > down

Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide > composes in a while (13 days as of today). > > This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now > failing composes