Blaise Pabon kirjoitti 29.11.2021 klo 18.38:
Hi Otto
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 7:17 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
The first link is about other docs than the Package Maintainer Docs,
with some critical comments from you about the use of Antora in
docs.fp.o. The latter two are about Pagure. So
Hi Otto
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 7:17 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> The first link is about other docs than the Package Maintainer Docs,
>
with some critical comments from you about the use of Antora in
> docs.fp.o. The latter two are about Pagure. So if I understand
> correctly, when you say that
Blaise Pabon kirjoitti 26.11.2021 klo 18.01:
Hi Otto,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:27 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Blaise Pabon kirjoitti 25.11.2021 klo 5.43:
When the docs were migrated, the intent was, of course, to make them
better, not worse. If things have regressed in some way, I would
Hi Otto,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 2:27 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Blaise Pabon kirjoitti 25.11.2021 klo 5.43:
>
> When the docs were migrated, the intent was, of course, to make them
> better, not worse. If things have regressed in some way, I would like to
> fix them. Could you be more
Blaise Pabon kirjoitti 25.11.2021 klo 5.43:
I appreciate all the constructive suggestions, particularly those that
acknowledge the, uh , inconsistencies in the documentation.
(snip)
Regarding the docs, yes the older ones are more useful.
IMHO, it would be better for the new docs to paint a
I appreciate all the constructive suggestions, particularly those that
acknowledge the, uh , inconsistencies in the documentation.
I'll keep plugging away. I dropped into the infra office hours and got
someone to offer to review my PR. There are a few python packages I will
eventually maintain
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 08:54:43AM +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> >{{#fedoradocs:
> >https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/}}
> >... but we don't have a consistent policy about when to use it.
>
> Should this be read as "I would
Matthew Miller kirjoitti 21.11.2021 klo 20.45:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 04:27:18PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
That page seems substantially (if not completely?) identical to the current
doc at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
On 21/11/2021 13:11, Stephen Snow wrote:
And I login with my FAS ID and cannot "Take" the package since I am not
a packager.
So I ask again what steps am I missing here? I want to take over
packaging something that is about to be removed from Fedora Linux since
it has been orphaned, I have
On 21/11/2021 15:01, Stephen Snow wrote:
But actually I think the old wiki version is much more useful
in explaining how things work, especially if you're not coming
at it from the position of submitting a new package:
And it tells me to read a document that doesn't apparently exist
anymore.
Matthew Miller kirjoitti 21.11.2021 klo 18.18:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 08:11:19AM -0500, Stephen Snow wrote:
So I am back here to ask again if I can take a package on that is
currently orphaned as per
On Sun, 2021-11-21 at 11:18 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
-snip-
>
> I don't think we have a good process for the situation you're in. If
> the
> package you were interested in were entirely new, or if you were
> reinstating
> a package which wsa retired (the step beyond "orphan"), you'd file
>
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 04:27:18PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >That page seems substantially (if not completely?) identical to the current
> >doc at
> >https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/
>
> Ah you're quite right. That was a
On Sun, 2021-11-21 at 15:08 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> That's why I gave a link to the old version from the wiki history
> before it was replaced by a pointer to the new page.
>
It did help for some info. Thank you.
> > >
On 21/11/2021 16:06, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 10:01:00AM -0500, Stephen Snow wrote:
Thanks read that back then.
But actually I think the old wiki version is much more useful
in explaining how things work, especially if you're not coming
at it from the position of
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 08:11:19AM -0500, Stephen Snow wrote:
> So I am back here to ask again if I can take a package on that is
> currently orphaned as per
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5FCP5OSV6XXFCAXN5KPKQFBCDLGJSRB6/
>
> And I
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 10:01:00AM -0500, Stephen Snow wrote:
> Thanks read that back then.
>
> > But actually I think the old wiki version is much more useful
> > in explaining how things work, especially if you're not coming
> > at it from the position of submitting a new package:
> >
> And it
On Sun, 2021-11-21 at 13:55 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
-snip-
> You say you have "asked to become a packager" but what exactly
> do you mean by that?
>
I've asked to be sponsored before.
> The official documentation on becoming a packager is here:
>
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
