Message: 13
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:35:50 +0200
From: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
Message-ID: mghqtm$lq9$2...@ger.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* dnf-yum
- Original Message -
From: Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 5:18:15 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
On Apr 13, 2015 5:07 AM, Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com wrote
On Apr 13, 2015 5:07 AM, Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:31:08 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf
- Original Message -
From: Rave it chat-to...@raveit.de
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:45:41 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
Message: 13
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:35:50 +0200
From: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
To: devel
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 10:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 08:47 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
Le dimanche 12 avril 2015 à 17:06 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
It's hard to see how you build a perfect dep check other than
trying
to solve the deps of *every
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* dnf-yum is installed by default. By that I mean it is in the 'core'
group in comps next to dnf.
[snip]
* If you wish to still use yum, the yum package provides now
a /usr/bin/yum-deprecated command that is the old yum
command renamed. It also has the notice message
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 08:47 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
Le dimanche 12 avril 2015 à 17:06 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
It's hard to see how you build a perfect dep check other than
trying
to solve the deps of *every single package in the distro* against
every proposed update.
On 10. 4. 2015 at 17:50:08, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.04.2015 um 17:48 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
W dniu 10.04.2015 o 16:29, Reindl Harald pisze:
well, that so called crap was in the past helpful to find out *which*
package pulls a cross-dep-chain while in the past 2 years yum also more
Le dimanche 12 avril 2015 à 17:06 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
It's hard to see how you build a perfect dep check other than trying
to solve the deps of *every single package in the distro* against
every proposed update.
Can't we run repoclosure on (at the same time) the fedora repo,
Am 13.04.2015 um 10:00 schrieb Jan Zelený:
We are talking about information that is irrelevant in 90+% of yum runs
(allegedly, I wouldn't dare estimating this number myself). Hiding such
information by default while making it available to people who really care
about it sounds like a nice
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 at 10:22 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Now, I admit that the second half is limping a bit. The information is
available but it's not as easily accessible as you want it to be. If you
want
to help us, I invite you to write a plugin that will show the
information
On 10. 4. 2015 at 16:21:14, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 03:52:32PM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
I've been using just `dnf update` to update my system for almost a year
now
and there is not a single package on my system that is not updated to the
latest version in the
- Original Message -
From: Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:31:08 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
On Apr 10, 2015 4:39 AM, Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com wrote
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 14:56 +0200, drago01 wrote:
It is not so simple, you have to test all combinations for packages
requiring an updated package and all the packages there requires
someting
provided by previous version of the package, with thousend of
packages and
multiple
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 7. 4. 2015 at 18:34:49, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Pardon, folks - But haven't we been told dnf was supposed to be yum
compatible?
I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear message that
we will be as compatible as possible in
On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015
^^^ the key part of DNF output
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 09/04/15 10:30, Radek Holy wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08:22:53 -0400,
Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com wrote:
AFAIK, YUM's --skip-broken does two things:
1) it selects another version of the requested package if the most suitable
cannot be installed
2) it skips the requested package if
On 04/08/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote
I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear message that
we will be as compatible as possible in terms of CLI but we never wanted to
have just another yum. If that was the case, we wouldn't call the project
differently.
I am concerned
On 09/04/15 11:10, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 09/04/15 10:30, Radek Holy wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08:22:53 -0400,
Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com wrote:
AFAIK, YUM's --skip-broken does two things:
1) it selects another version of the requested package if the most
suitable
cannot be installed
On 2015-04-08 11:17, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 08.04.2015 o 11:05, drago01 pisze:
We do have dep solvers otherwise no one would notice that a dep is
broken ever. (like libsolv + hawkey).
So what bodhi should do is to ask has this package all dependencies
satisfied with base + updates +
- Original Message -
From: Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 5:01:19 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
On 04/08/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote
I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
To: Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com
Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:03:46 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08
On 04/09/2015 11:05 AM, Michal Luscon wrote:
On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015
^^^ the key part of DNF output
Well, OK, but when I just re-run 'dnf update' it updates firefox now:
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015
- Original Message -
From: Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 5:13:49 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
On 04/09/2015 11:05 AM, Michal Luscon wrote:
On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski
Am 09.04.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
On 04/08/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote
I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear message that
we will be as compatible as possible in terms of CLI but we never wanted to
have just another yum. If that was the case, we
On 7. 4. 2015 at 18:34:49, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/07/2015 06:09 PM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 at 17:54 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
mailto:br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
On 7. 4. 2015 at 17:53:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:38:57 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300,
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 at 11:05 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:33 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am
W dniu 08.04.2015 o 11:05, drago01 pisze:
We do have dep solvers otherwise no one would notice that a dep is
broken ever. (like libsolv + hawkey).
So what bodhi should do is to ask has this package all dependencies
satisfied with base + updates + other packages in this push for every
package
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 5:51:41 PM
Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
dnf's default behavior
Am 08.04.2015 um 08:41 schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 7. 4. 2015 at 17:53:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:38:57 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300,
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
On 7 April 2015 at 17:37, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
This is easier said than done. We don't have a perfect dependency
checker and it's not at all easy to write one.
From someone that's actually written a yum-compatible dependency
checker in C several years ago[1] I can
Dne 8.4.2015 v 08:41 Jan Zelený napsal(a):
On 7. 4. 2015 at 17:53:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:38:57 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300,
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
On 04/08/2015 08:39 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 8. 4. 2015 at 10:26:51, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.04.2015 um 08:41 schrieb Jan Zelený:
Putting the opinion of myself and the dnf team aside, I'd like to point
out
that the information you want is still available - dnf check-update will
show you
On 04/08/2015 08:41 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 7. 4. 2015 at 17:53:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already.
WHAT?
--skip-broken is a band-aid to work around packaging mistakes and bugs
and NOT be the
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 at 11:05 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:33 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7,
On 8. 4. 2015 at 11:05:20, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:33 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 07.04.2015 um 17:53
On 8. 4. 2015 at 14:44:25, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 04/08/2015 08:41 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 7. 4. 2015 at 17:53:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already.
WHAT?
--skip-broken is a band-aid
On 8. 4. 2015 at 10:26:51, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.04.2015 um 08:41 schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 7. 4. 2015 at 17:53:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:38:57 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at
Am 08.04.2015 um 14:39 schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 8. 4. 2015 at 10:26:51, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.04.2015 um 08:41 schrieb Jan Zelený:
Putting the opinion of myself and the dnf team aside, I'd like to point
out
that the information you want is still available - dnf check-update will
show you
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08:22:53 -0400,
Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com wrote:
AFAIK, YUM's --skip-broken does two things:
1) it selects another version of the requested package if the most suitable
cannot be installed
2) it skips the requested package if none of its versions can be installed
MJ == Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com writes:
MJ When I was Debian/Ubuntu developer it was easy. Pbuilder had hooks
MJ and one of them in my setup was once built, install all resulting
MJ packages.
MJ This way as a developer I could check are results usable. Not found
MJ something
On 3. 4. 2015 at 08:34:16, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try
and clear up things. In the event I am wrong on any of the below, please
do feel free to correct me. ;)
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:38:57 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300,
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
I had also switched back to yum in rawhide due to --skip-broken,
and
in a few updates not
2015-04-07 9:53 GMT-03:00 Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com:
[...]
I think you might have misunderstood what's happening. We don't want to offer
Hopefully I did not :)
dnf as an alternative to yum. Dnf is its successor. Yum is deprecated by dnf
in F22 and is very likely going to be removed in
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300,
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had also switched back to yum in rawhide due to --skip-broken, and
in a few updates not even needing it (I would first see what is broken,
and if not something vital, use
Am 07.04.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Paulo =?iso-8859-1?b?Q+lzYXI=?= Pereira
de Andrade
=?us-ascii?q?=3Cpaulo=2Ecesar=2Epereira=2Ede=2Eandrade=40gmail=2E?=
=?us-ascii?q?com=3E?=:
2015-04-07 9:53 GMT-03:00 Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com:
[...]
I think you might have misunderstood what's happening.
Am 07.04.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already.
WHAT?
--skip-broken is a band-aid to work around packaging mistakes and bugs
and NOT be the default.
IMO, this kind of behavior is not
On 04/07/2015 06:09 PM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 at 17:54 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
mailto:br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com mailto:ke...@scrye.com wrote:
dnf's default behavior is like yum with
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:33 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 07.04.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 18:55:38 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
it masks the existence of a security update with broken deps and we
*really* don't need another flamewar thread - it is a bad attitude to
make such options the default
I think it's much more likely there is
W dniu 07.04.2015 o 18:39, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
skip broken
- is pushing fedora users into chaotic situations.
- to cheat fedora users and to play down the real problems.
In a perfect world skip-broken should not even exist.
In a perfect world all Fedora packages would be always
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 16:09:46 +,
Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
afaik, --best don't erase stuff, you need --allowerasing for that
--bestTry the best available package versions in transactions. Specifically
during dnf upgrade, which by default skips over updates that can
On 04/07/2015 06:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 18:00:47 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
that's unacceptable and leads in burry *real* problems resulting in
sonner or later security updates are broken and nobody take snotice
soon enough
The skip
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:38:57 -0500
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300,
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
I had also switched back to yum in rawhide due to
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 18:00:47 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
that's unacceptable and leads in burry *real* problems resulting in
sonner or later security updates are broken and nobody take snotice
soon enough
The skip broken feature is more likely to help someone get
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already.
Not when installing packages.
If thats not working and you need to find out more, add '--best' to see
things without 'skip-broken'.
My understanding
Am 07.04.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 18:00:47 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
that's unacceptable and leads in burry *real* problems resulting in
sonner or later security updates are broken and nobody take snotice
soon enough
The skip
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 at 17:54 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:07:08 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already.
Not when installing packages.
If thats not working and you need to find out
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 07.04.2015 um 17:53 schrieb Ralf Corsepius:
On 04/07/2015 05:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already.
WHAT?
--skip-broken is a band-aid to work around
Am 07.04.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
W dniu 07.04.2015 o 18:39, Ralf Corsepius pisze:
skip broken
- is pushing fedora users into chaotic situations.
- to cheat fedora users and to play down the real problems.
In a perfect world skip-broken should not even exist.
In a perfect
Am 07.04.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 18:55:38 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
it masks the existence of a security update with broken deps and we
*really* don't need another flamewar thread - it is a bad attitude to
make such options
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try
and clear up things. In the event I am wrong on any of the below, please
do feel free to correct me. ;)
In the past the proposal was to have a yum-dnf
2015-04-03 11:24 GMT-03:00 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com:
On 04/03/2015 03:41 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
DEBUG util.py:388: No such command: builddep. Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help
DEBUG util.py:388: It could be a DNF plugin command.
I will review using a release other
2015-04-03 12:04 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
2015-04-03 11:24 GMT-03:00 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com:
On 04/03/2015 03:41 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
DEBUG util.py:388: No such command: builddep. Please use /usr/bin/dnf
On 2015-04-03 21:18, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 12:18 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2015-04-03 12:04 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
2015-04-03 11:24 GMT-03:00 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com:
On 04/03/2015
2015-04-03 16:18 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org:
As msuchy said, the best thing to do when you encounter something that
has been affected by the transition is to file a bug and get it fixed,
not just use an older release.
I opened two bug reports:
[mock with default dnf
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 12:18 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2015-04-03 12:04 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
2015-04-03 11:24 GMT-03:00 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com:
On 04/03/2015 03:41 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2015-04-03 16:18 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org:
Hmm, let me see if I understand :)
mock should be adapted to dnf or changed to call yum-deprecated on F22
and F23.
the 'resolvedep' command was already marked as deprecated *in yum*:
* resolvedep dep1 [dep2]
On 04/03/2015 03:41 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
DEBUG util.py:388: No such command: builddep. Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help
DEBUG util.py:388: It could be a DNF plugin command.
I will review using a release other than rawhide.
Just install dnf-plugins-core.
But suddenly
2015-04-01 16:40 GMT-03:00 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try
and clear up things. In the event I am wrong on any of the below, please
do feel free to correct me. ;)
In the past the proposal was to have a yum-dnf package that
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jiří Konečný jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try
and clear up things. In the event I am wrong on any of the below, please
do feel free to
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try
and clear up things. In the event I am wrong on any of the below, please
do feel free to correct me. ;)
In the past the proposal was to have a yum-dnf package that
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try
and clear up things. In the event I am wrong on any of the below, please
do feel free to correct me. ;)
In the past the proposal was to have a yum-dnf package that provided
/usr/bin/yum,
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 13:32 +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jiří Konečný jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try
and clear up things. In the event
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 09:50:05 +0200, Jiří Konečný wrote:
When I'm using this command I get information which package contains
this library.
$ yum provides *libnetapi.so
but when I'm using dnf command
$ dnf repoquery --provides *libnetapi.so
Besides other replies to make it clear: There is a
On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 14:23 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 09:50:05 +0200, Jiří Konečný wrote:
rpm/repoquery just do not support wildcards so one has to type:
repoquery --whatprovides 'libnetapi.so.0()(64bit)'
dnf repoquery --whatprovides
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:23:45 +0200
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
rpm/repoquery just do not support wildcards so one has to type:
repoquery --whatprovides 'libnetapi.so.0()(64bit)'
dnf repoquery --whatprovides 'libnetapi.so.0()(64bit)'
Jan
Is this a
Hi
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* When you run 'yum' you get:
% sudo yum list foobar
Yum command has been deprecated, use dnf instead.
See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information.
To transfer transaction metadata from yum to DNF, run 'dnf migrate'
79 matches
Mail list logo
