On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 21:36 +, John5342 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 19:33, Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:14:09 PM drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Steve Grubb wrote:
For example,
Hi all,
I'd like to swap these reviews with some other
(not-so-complicated) ones:
Saaghar[1]- A Cross-Platform Persian
Poetry Software
This is a Qt based application, and should not be complicated.
jcal[2] - Unix cal-like
interface to
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 01:45:25PM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
html style=direction: ltr;
head
meta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;
charset=UTF-8stylebody
p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; } /style
/head
body style=direction: ltr;
Hello List,
I'm a newcomer to this list. My native language is french, so forgive me
if my English is not correct at all. I'm also a newcomer to the
packaging activity for Fedora. As suggested on the contributors page of
the Fedora site, here's the thread containing the package change request
I
I've taken them.
Here is mine (SpliX - Driver for QPDL/SPL2 printers)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755069
Thanks,
Jiri
On 11/21/2011 11:15 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to swap these reviews with some other (not-so-complicated) ones:
Saaghar[1]- A
* Sorry, it was supposed to be in both HTML and text formats *
Hi all,
I'd like to swap these reviews with some other (not-so-complicated) ones:
Saaghar[1]- A Cross-Platform Persian Poetry Software
This is a Qt based application, and should not be complicated.
jcal[2] - Unix cal-like
On ۱۱/۱۱/۲۱ 03:06, Jiri Popelka wrote:
I've taken them.
Here is mine (SpliX - Driver for QPDL/SPL2 printers)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755069
Thanks,
Jiri
Thanks, I took yours.
Hedayat
On 11/21/2011 11:15 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to swap
Adrian Reber wrote:
gvfs
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3527348name=build.log
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gvfs-1.11.0-4.fc17.x86_64/usr/libexec/gvfsd-smb
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gvfs-1.11.0-4.fc17.x86_64/usr/libexec/gvfsd-smb-browse
File
Hello fellow devs,
I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought Hey,
a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
information that can be automatically gathered. Some of you even
wrote your own tools to do some of these things.
Yet there is no unified tool, nor
On 11/21/2011 01:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hello fellow devs,
I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought Hey,
a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
information that can be automatically gathered. Some of you even
wrote your own tools to do
Looking for a swap reviewer
I think it's a non complex review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755066
Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/chromaprint-rpms/chromaprint.spec
SRPM URL:
http://olea.org/tmp/chromaprint-rpms/chromaprint-0.5-2.fc15.src.rpm
A deeply related review is pending in
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Ismael Olea ism...@olea.org wrote:
Looking for a swap reviewer
I think it's a non complex review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755066
Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/chromaprint-rpms/chromaprint.spec
SRPM URL:
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 13:25 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/21/2011 01:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hello fellow devs,
I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought Hey,
a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
information that can be
Note: The FESCo election townhall occurs simultaneously with today's
meeting.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
Excerpts from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson's message of Mon Nov 21 14:25:22 +0100
2011:
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/browser/api/README
Is this not something that releng/autoqa could use as well as in run
against all already existing specs
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Nikos Roussos ni...@autoverse.net wrote:
Here is mine for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754698
deal!
--
Ismael Olea
http://olea.org/diario/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/17/2011 04:10 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Main package syslinux does:
Obsoletes: syslinux-devel %{version}-%{release}
Provides: syslinux-devel
However, a syslinux-devel subpackage definition is present. A -devel
package is built. No comment explains above Obs/Prov pair.
I want to remind everyone of the upcoming FESCo town hall meeting today,
Monday November 21st at 18:00 UTC. For more details, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections#IRC_Town_Halls.
If you have questions you'd like to ask the candidates but can't
attend the meeting, please email them to me
I talked to some of the active Wesnoth developers and they told me it (the
BOOST_FOREACH problem affecting Wesnoth) is an upstream bug with a fix already.
Can we get this fix cherry picked for rawhide?
See the upstream ticket:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6131
--
devel mailing list
Hi!
A new bugfix release of bodhi has just hit production.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
Changes
---
- A new URL structure implemented, based on discussions from fedora devel
list[0]. Testing stable updates will now have the following URLs:
/updates/unique
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755638
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Odd number of hash elements passed to XML::RPC-new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755638
Summary: Odd number of hash elements passed to
Greetings everyone,
A few updates on the upcoming FUDCon in Blacksburg, VA in January 2012:
* We will be having our second subsidy meeting on Wednesday, November
23rd. This meeting will be for evaluating and processing any available
subsidy monies for international attendees, as well as
2011/11/21 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
I talked to some of the active Wesnoth developers and they told me it (the
BOOST_FOREACH problem affecting Wesnoth) is an upstream bug with a fix
already.
Can we get this fix cherry picked for rawhide?
Yes, we shall add the patch into the Boost
Is anyone willing to swap a couple of reviews? I need reviews for:
cryptominisat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721174
In spite of the name, there's nothing cryptographic about this
package. The author thinks it would be a useful tool for
cryptographers, but it is just another SAT
On my iMac using refit I have triplebooted MacOS, Windows 7 and F15.
Yesterday I tried to upgrade (with preupgrade) to F16. In the end of
that updgrade process (when all rpm files have been installed and
cleaned up) process anaconda crashed leaving me with and unbootable
Linux partition. (I could
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 13:59 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
It's a common complaint that it's too difficult to get updates to
critpath packages through the update system at the moment. We've been
looking into trying to make that easier without just dropping the
critpath requirements, and one
Greetings.
As we recently announced, we are working on migrating fedorahosted.org
over to a newer instance or instances. We announced and held a activity
day:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-November/000857.html
Which resulted in the following plans:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:32:06 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
That's about all the concrete thoughts / suggestions I can filter out of
the log.
I don't remember which meeting I noted it at, but another idea is to
weight proventester feedback higher (maybe count as +2 or
Jared K. Smith (jsm...@fedoraproject.org) said:
I want to remind everyone of the upcoming FESCo town hall meeting today,
Monday November 21st at 18:00 UTC. For more details, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections#IRC_Town_Halls.
In the future, can we ensure that the FESCo town hall
Folks,
Can someone please push the update that I made (with permission) to
shared-mime-info? I'm getting jcm does not have commit access when I
try to make the F16 update. This fix is required to actually be able to
play many MP3 files (including all purchased from Amazon.com) on F16.
Tested
On 21/11/11 20:36, Jon Masters wrote:
Can someone please push the update that I made (with permission) to
shared-mime-info? I'm getting jcm does not have commit access when I
try to make the F16 update. This fix is required to actually be able to
play many MP3 files (including all purchased
Le 21/11/2011 21:32, Till Maas a écrit :
Hi,
a recent kernel update[0] broke Fedora's ability to be a VirtualBox
host, because asm/amd_iommu.h was removed. The removal of the file was
noticed during testing, but it seems nobody noticed that this affects
VirtualBox. Is this kind of change
Am 21.11.2011 21:32, schrieb Till Maas:
Hi,
a recent kernel update[0] broke Fedora's ability to be a VirtualBox
host, because asm/amd_iommu.h was removed. The removal of the file was
noticed during testing, but it seems nobody noticed that this affects
VirtualBox. Is this kind of change
Given that I'm migrating bunch of legacy init script to native systemd
ones and I have come many packages that seem that maintainer(s) have
deserted them but for some bizarre reason we still continue to package
and keep rolling them between release and now I came across bug 738442
which
Till Maas wrote:
a recent kernel update[0] broke Fedora's ability to be a VirtualBox
host, because asm/amd_iommu.h was removed. The removal of the file was
noticed during testing, but it seems nobody noticed that this affects
VirtualBox. Is this kind of change sanctioned by the
current update
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: /etc/rc.d/init.d/mldonkey BY DEFAULT FOR A PID FILE CALLS
/var/run/mldonkey/ THAT DOES NOT EXIST...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755720
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes:
With
pkgconfig(libpng) = 1.2.46
pkgconfig(libpng12) = 1.2.46
once libpng12.pc gets removed from the distribution, the dep-chains
break, of course.
As a temporary work-around, you could have provided that thing manually
in the libpng-devel
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:56:02 +, JBG (Jóhann) wrote:
Instead of everybody that are doing needed work in the distribution
having to run around after maintainers trying to find out if they are
still active or not and initiate the unresponsive maintainer policy,
cant we revert the process
I'm working on improving how akmods are built and had an idea[1] I
need input/confirmation on.
Instead of the akmods packaging assuming when it needs to run, why
can't each akmod driver package provide it's own unit file?
Since the service would run as type oneshot, am I correct in
assuming that
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:26:02 -0500, TL (Tom) wrote:
With
pkgconfig(libpng) = 1.2.46
pkgconfig(libpng12) = 1.2.46
once libpng12.pc gets removed from the distribution, the dep-chains
break, of course.
As a temporary work-around, you could have provided that thing manually
in
On 11/21/2011 09:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Unconvincing. To reassure ownership periodicially won't be sufficient.
It would be just another button to click (like FAS password or cert
renewal) and would not guarantee that the packages would be maintained
properly and that tickets would be
Am 21.11.2011 22:53, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 11/21/2011 09:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Unconvincing. To reassure ownership periodicially won't be sufficient.
It would be just another button to click (like FAS password or cert
renewal) and would not guarantee that the packages
On Nov 21, 2011, at 1:53 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/21/2011 09:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Unconvincing. To reassure ownership periodicially won't be sufficient.
It would be just another button to click (like FAS password or cert
renewal) and would not guarantee that the
On 11/21/2011 10:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
This has come up nearly every release cycle. Problem is that nobody can seem
to agree on what an appropriate sign of life would be, no has made a
serious FESCo proposal for a contrived sign of life.
I don't think anybody disagrees (well maybe
On 11/21/2011 09:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
+1
nothing is more frustrating for users as ignored bugreports reintroduced from
release to relase while th eonly response is from bugzapper about EOL of the
release
That's one symptom of the underlying problem and with my QA hat on I can
tell
JBG == Jóhann B Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com writes:
JBG How does FPC handle packagers that violate the packaging
JBG guidelines?
FPC is not tasked with enforcing the packaging guidelines.
- J
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/21/2011 10:24 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
JBG == Jóhann B Guðmundssonjohan...@gmail.com writes:
JBG How does FPC handle packagers that violate the packaging
JBG guidelines?
FPC is not tasked with enforcing the packaging guidelines.
So who's ultimately responsible for making sure
On Nov 21, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
So who's ultimately responsible for making sure that packagers are
following the current guidelines set by FPC releng?
the community. You see, the problem with a volunteer community is that
enforcement basically boils down to A)
On Nov 21, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
So if you are serious about wanting this fixed, draft a proposal, figure out
who's going to do the coding work, and bring it to FESCo.
I would think this work directly falls under releng jurisdiction ( given
that releng is
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:03:43 -0800
Jesse Keating jkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
This has come up nearly every release cycle. Problem is that nobody
can seem to agree on what an appropriate sign of life would be, no
has made a serious FESCo proposal for a contrived sign of life.
I don't
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 22:22:56 +,
\Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\ johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Well comes logically to me that at least the maintainer would be
stripped of those packages he is ignoring.
That doesn't help. It is reasonable to orphan a package that isn't being
adequately
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 02:03:43PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
This has come up nearly every release cycle. Problem is that nobody
can seem to agree on what an appropriate sign of life would be, no
has made a serious FESCo proposal for a contrived sign of life.
I remember that there has been
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:58:50 +0100, RH (Reindl) wrote:
+1
nothing is more frustrating for users as ignored bugreports reintroduced from
release to relase while th eonly response is from bugzapper about EOL of the
release
Well, that's not the same problem as this thread is about.
There a
Hi,
I want to offer a review swap for hxtools:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683610
It is a dependency I need to update and probably fix several bugs in
pam_mount.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 21 November 2011 14:43, Jonathan Underwood
jonathan.underw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have just started looking at packaging Yorick[1][2], an interpreted
programming language for scientific simulations. It seems that this is
BSD licensed and so would be suitable for packaging in Fedora.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing is in place to detect inactive maintainers automatically.
We don't really need absolute automation - if a package is not
actively maintained but nobody notices, does it really matter?[1]
The case that has
Am 21.11.2011 23:50, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:58:50 +0100, RH (Reindl) wrote:
+1
nothing is more frustrating for users as ignored bugreports reintroduced from
release to relase while th eonly response is from bugzapper about EOL of the
release
Well, that's not
On 11/21/2011 10:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:03:43 -0800
Jesse Keatingjkeat...@j2solutions.net wrote:
This has come up nearly every release cycle. Problem is that nobody
can seem to agree on what an appropriate sign of life would be, no
has made a serious FESCo
On 11/21/2011 11:00 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
[1] It does matter because there is a risk of security vulnerabilities
being unaddressed - but, hopefully, at least for the frequently used
packages somebody would notice.
This in itself should be valid enough point to have proper clean up
process
On 11/21/2011 10:50 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I understand this thread as a comment on improving the detection of
inactive maintainers and unmaintained packages.
It is indeed intended as such.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/21/2011 11:21 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/21/2011 10:50 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
I understand this thread as a comment on improving the detection of
inactive maintainers and unmaintained packages.
It is indeed intended as such.
BTW does anyone have any insight on how
I picked up gdk-pixbuf because freetennis supposedly depended on it but
actually doesn't. (Though freetennis if also FTBFS for another reason so
clearing the dependency isn't simple.) Though only thing that really
depends on it is xosd-xmms and I have checked with Kevin about that and
he will
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:40:14 -0600
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I picked up gdk-pixbuf because freetennis supposedly depended on it
but actually doesn't. (Though freetennis if also FTBFS for another
reason so clearing the dependency isn't simple.) Though only thing
that really
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 02:58:32PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Till Maas wrote:
a recent kernel update[0] broke Fedora's ability to be a VirtualBox
host, because asm/amd_iommu.h was removed. The removal of the file was
noticed during testing, but it seems nobody noticed that this
Well there may be a chance this tool may eventually become officially
adopted by QA after it gets tested and used long enough to consider it
safe/stable.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
Excerpts from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson's message of Mon Nov
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Instead of everybody that are doing needed work in the distribution
having to run around after maintainers trying to find out if they are
still active or not and initiate the unresponsive maintainer policy,
cant we revert the process and have maintainer(s) having
I was rather surprised to find a routine yum update on my F14 system
suddenly wanting to pull in a lot of mysql stuff that I'd not had
installed at the moment. Investigation showed that if I try to remove
MySQL-python again, yum wants to take all this stuff with it:
Removing:
MySQL-python
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 01:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I was rather surprised to find a routine yum update on my F14 system
suddenly wanting to pull in a lot of mysql stuff that I'd not had
installed at the moment. Investigation showed that if I try to remove
MySQL-python again, yum wants to take
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:16:01AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I was rather surprised to find a routine yum update on my F14 system
suddenly wanting to pull in a lot of mysql stuff that I'd not had
installed at the moment. Investigation showed that if I try to remove
MySQL-python again, yum wants
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2:
bc55e03436da034c632c06740c1979db Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.043.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 63e26eb88b89071d5f5bf55ddcfedcc770099f5a
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Nov 21 10:11:41 2011 +
Update to 2.043 (no changes)
perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib:
fd5feb084e40497dd0da98534ce87f92 Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.043.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 69e06b78ac4adae228ed278ef3fbb9987c1cf62b
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Nov 21 10:13:46 2011 +
Update to 2.043 (no changes)
perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.043-1.fc17' was created pointing
to:
63e26eb... Update to 2.043 (no changes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma:
eeb0c746fb8c48e846037565666ebb08 Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.043.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 80c3c9c7e1b5e6e7195f4132eed80811f68da70f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Nov 21 10:20:25 2011 +
Update to 2.043 (no changes)
perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.043-1.fc17' was created pointing
to:
69e06b7... Update to 2.043 (no changes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Compress:
004f3d4c041ea1dbbbfdd536e5ff7012 IO-Compress-2.043.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma-2.043-1.fc17' was created pointing
to:
80c3c9c... Update to 2.043 (no changes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 00cd5012afd55b1de08ba0ab92ee89c09202472d
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Nov 21 10:25:10 2011 +
Update to 2.043
- New upstream release 2.043
- IO::Compress::Base:
- Fixed issue that with handling of Zip files with two (or more) entries
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Compress-Lzma:
19861571fb299f4c0fc65503f8990306 IO-Compress-Lzma-2.043.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Compress-2.043-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
00cd501... Update to 2.043
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Test-Able-0.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755523
Summary: perl-Test-Able-0.11 is available
Product: Fedora
commit 98ca5a8833008e4d9a2e2794da20b60678cf09b0
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Nov 21 10:40:01 2011 +
Update to 2.043 (no changes)
perl-IO-Compress-Lzma.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit dec227f78fbde89b01c39008d189addac935508d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 21 13:02:12 2011 +0100
0.11 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Able.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
commit 334076a0e3c5cb14a71924a64aed242bcdfc0f21
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 21 13:04:47 2011 +0100
Teach rpmlint orthography
.rpmlint |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.rpmlint b/.rpmlint
new file mode 100644
index
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Compress-Lzma-2.043-1.fc17' was created pointing
to:
98ca5a8... Update to 2.043 (no changes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755523
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 2e595698b551d6c7ed3989f730ac483144718230
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Nov 21 18:41:41 2011 +0100
0.76 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-RPC-XML.spec | 26 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-RPC-XML:
731aaf588e6bd45b3a9cece8d4223e48 RPC-XML-0.76.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Greetings everyone,
A few updates on the upcoming FUDCon in Blacksburg, VA in January 2012:
* We will be having our second subsidy meeting on Wednesday, November
23rd. This meeting will be for evaluating and processing any available
subsidy monies for international attendees, as well as
Greetings.
As we recently announced, we are working on migrating fedorahosted.org
over to a newer instance or instances. We announced and held a activity
day:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-November/000857.html
Which resulted in the following plans:
Minutes and logs from today's town hall for the FESCo candidates can be
seen here:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-townhall/2011-11-21/fedora_townhall.2011-11-21-18.01.html
Log:
95 matches
Mail list logo
