Dne 25.1.2012 00:52, Rex Dieter napsal(a):
Mo Morsi wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:50 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi,
since we finally got our Ruby 1.9.3 feature page [1] approved, we are
starting rebuild for Ruby 1.9.3. Everyone who owns a package that depends
on Ruby or Rubygems should rebuild it
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:53 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
Having looked at the way releasing packages and versions in linux has
been moving in a number of distributions it is interesting that there
are several that now have a
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Bryan Quigley gqu...@gmail.com wrote:
It's worth noting that the following already appear to rolling components:
LibreOffice
Not true.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Bryan Quigley gqu...@gmail.com wrote:
It's worth noting that the following already appear to rolling components:
LibreOffice
Not true.
Oh David already said that ... should probably read the
Hi,
Microsoft has changed the way of prerelease version naming
Alpha - Developer Preview
Beta - Consumer Preview
Release Candidate - Enterprise (or Business) Preview
http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-8-beta-may-be-called-the-consumer-preview
It seems to me that this is a very good change for
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Microsoft has changed the way of prerelease version naming
Alpha - Developer Preview
Beta - Consumer Preview
Release Candidate - Enterprise (or Business) Preview
2012/1/25 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Microsoft has changed the way of prerelease version naming
Alpha - Developer Preview
Beta - Consumer Preview
Release Candidate - Enterprise (or Business) Preview
http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-8-beta-may-be-called-the-consumer-preview
2012/1/25 Jos Vos j...@xos.nl:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Microsoft has changed the way of prerelease version naming
Alpha - Developer Preview
Beta - Consumer Preview
Release Candidate - Enterprise (or Business) Preview
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:22:37 +0100, MP (Michał) wrote:
Hi,
Microsoft has changed the way of prerelease version naming
Alpha - Developer Preview
Beta - Consumer Preview
Release Candidate - Enterprise (or Business) Preview
The name is irrelevant. Its definition just needs to be clear and
On 01/25/2012 11:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:22:37 +0100, MP (Michał) wrote:
Hi,
Microsoft has changed the way of prerelease version naming
Alpha - Developer Preview
Beta - Consumer Preview
Release Candidate - Enterprise (or Business) Preview
I don't think
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:01:07PM +0100, Swapnil Bhartiya wrote:
I don't think Fedora is for 'consumers'. Due to the policy to not
include many non-free components and missing apps from main repos, I
don't consider it a consumer OS. I tried it myself and also tried to put
it on average
2012/1/25 Jos Vos j...@xos.nl:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:01:07PM +0100, Swapnil Bhartiya wrote:
I don't think Fedora is for 'consumers'. Due to the policy to not
include many non-free components and missing apps from main repos, I
don't consider it a consumer OS. I tried it myself and also
On 25/01/12 11:01, Swapnil Bhartiya wrote:
I don't think Fedora is for 'consumers'. Due to the policy to not
include many non-free components and missing apps from main repos, I
don't consider it a consumer OS. I tried it myself and also tried to put
it on average user's PCs but it refuse to
Some parts of the rsyslog source code were relicensed from 'GPLv3+' to
'ASL 2.0' in version 5.8.7.
http://blog.gerhards.net/2012/01/rsyslog-licensing-update.html
Tomas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello.
I opened review request for my psi-plus package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328 . But nobody want to
take it. I am looking somebody who will do this review. Review exchange
is possible.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c00da1fd0ae965337d144392a7f0ce58850ca14d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 25 13:52:14 2012 +0100
Do not export dependency on private module DateTimeX::Easy::DateParse
perl-DateTimeX-Easy.spec |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 01/25/2012 03:48 AM, drago01 wrote:
Exactly releases have the advantage of being a well tested set of
updates where you have a window to decide whether you want to update
yet or not.
So I don't see what a rolling
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Ivan Romanov dr...@land.ru wrote:
Hello.
I opened review request for my psi-plus package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328 . But nobody want to take
it. I am looking somebody who will do this review. Review exchange is
possible.
It would be
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-Mock:
e7a43b6d20a5ab7f4f469e2dcc5ddc4e DBD-Mock-1.43.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit df73019ec400ab00559ef4003e80edffa0ea3244
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 25 15:37:04 2012 +0100
1.43 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBD-Mock.spec | 42 +++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 21
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784247
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 08:54 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
Great idea, I would also love to see a clear out of the packages that
aren't core/part of particular categories. MTAs in minimal would be
one that comes to mind but there's lots of other
commit 2090f284c05eded0f0e998197ddbb89855884718
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 25 16:17:34 2012 +0100
0.16 bump
.gitignore |1 +
.rpmlint|2 ++
perl-GStreamer.spec | 34 +++---
sources |2 +-
4
commit 13b66f822a3d6604f2734ee7a32d1d91af482cb2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 25 16:34:28 2012 +0100
Enable tests at build time
perl-GStreamer.spec | 10 ++
test.patch | 19 ---
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
---
On 25.1.2012 15:32, Richard Shaw wrote:
The summary from the spec file says:
Summary:Jabber client based on Qt
which is much better, but the extended description could be more clear.
Is this package both a IM client and a collection of plugins?
Also, what's the difference from
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784248
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hey,
I'm going to build new libarchive in rawhide, bumping the soname. I'll
also rebuild packages which depend on libarchive, see below.
Affected packages are:
$ repoquery --whatrequires libarchive
PackageKit-0:0.7.2-2.fc17.x86_64
PackageKit-command-not-found-0:0.7.2-2.fc17.x86_64
James Antill (ja...@fedoraproject.org) said:
. Doing install @core is actually smaller, and less packages than the
above² 8. Which makes me assume something is missing from @core.
The kernel; it's brought in by anaconda for a minimal *install*, but not
explicitly mentioned because it's not
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Nathanael Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca wrote:
So far I've seen lots of discussion about can we do it, but no proposal nor
any real set of why it would be better. Does it reduce packaging work? Does
it do X Y Z? Why would I *want* a rolling release?
So far I'm not
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:30:57 +, Scott Tsai wrote:
Alain, once the boost-polygon / gcc-4.7 bug in RHBZ 784654 is fixed you
can pull the packaging changes from https://www.gitorious.org/fedora-
packages/kicad/
In case you want to update kicad to the latest bzr revision, I've
uploaded:
On 01/25/2012 09:47 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 25.1.2012 15:32, Richard Shaw wrote:
The summary from the spec file says:
Summary:Jabber client based on Qt
which is much better, but the extended description could be more clear.
Is this package both a IM client and a collection of
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/35
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/35/0001-Trac-Ticket-35-Log-not-clear-enough-on-schema-errors.patch
Comment:
Fix description: Cryptic error message:
dse - parsing dse entry [attributeTypes]
is now replaced with:
dse - Parsing
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Personally I'd rather see the effort go into making it easier to update
between Fedora releases. That provides a way to remain fairly current without
starting from scratch and allowing you to choose the timing of when you want
to deal with disruption.
What's wrong with
On 1/25/12 8:47 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 01/24/2012 11:56 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I've filed a few defects against different issues with clamav not installing
correctly, missing files, and having the wrong permissions that precludes
interactions with collaborating software such as
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/35
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/35/0001-Trac-Ticket-35-Log-not-clear-enough-on-schema-errors.patch
Thanks to Rich for his review. The new patch logs the lineno of the
corrupted entry in the input ldif file.
Comment:
Improved the error
Hi All,
So I saw a rpm update and a number of other builds today when dealing
with various packaging bits. Checking the update [1] and reading the
attached bug [2] I was a little shocked to find that yum upgrade
between releases would be explicitly broken due to this feature.
Yes, I know that
Hi.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:33:49 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote
What's wrong with preupgrade?
Every other release doubles the space needed in /boot for it to
work?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 13:33:49 -0600,
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Personally I'd rather see the effort go into making it easier to update
between Fedora releases. That provides a way to remain fairly current without
starting from scratch and allowing
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
What's wrong with preupgrade?
Preupgrade makes no effort to verify the authenticity of the new release it
downloads, so it's only usable for throw-away boxes where you don't care too
much if you get a backdoor or two installed together with your new Fedora
release.
2012/1/25 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se:
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
What's wrong with preupgrade?
Preupgrade makes no effort to verify the authenticity of the new release it
downloads, so it's only usable for throw-away boxes where you don't care too
much if you get a backdoor or
I don't know if you're aware of this or not, but a user managed to
port Ubuntu's Unity to OpenSUSE 12.1 as you can see here:
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:GNOME_Ayatana
And also I've been told this desktop is available for
ArchLinux now as well... As for this facts I was wondering
how feasible
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:37:36 -0200
Henrique Junior henrique...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to see Fedora following the path of rolling release.
openSUSE is doing a great job with the Tumbleweed, still keeping the
same old system of releases and letting users choose whether or not
using
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:48:27PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
So I saw a rpm update and a number of other builds today when dealing
with various packaging bits. Checking the update [1] and reading the
attached bug [2] I was a little shocked to find that yum upgrade
between
Am 25.01.2012 23:48, schrieb Peter Robinson:
So I saw a rpm update and a number of other builds today when dealing
with various packaging bits. Checking the update [1] and reading the
attached bug [2] I was a little shocked to find that yum upgrade
between releases would be explicitly broken
On 01/26/2012 06:52 AM, Bryan Quigley wrote:
Oh, then I guess I would like to see LibreOffice be a rolling
component. I guess one of the questions is why rolling for these:
Linux Kernel
Firefox (forced by upstream policies)
Wine
and not for others?
You answered your own question really
On 26/01/2012 12:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i made several HUNDRED of dist-upgrades with yum since FC3 and
upgrade via DVD/Preupgrade is simply UNACEPPTABLE
i don't have any problems downloading a DvD, or a LiveCD
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I can understand exceptions for Firefox (but you don't want to switch
to the enterprise slow release right?), and Wine, but...
I've read it several times and I don't quite understand the major
kernel version bumps. 3.2.1 just got released to Fedora 16, yet it
started with 3.1.0.
Don't get me
Am 26.01.2012 03:03, schrieb Greg:
On 26/01/2012 12:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i made several HUNDRED of dist-upgrades with yum since FC3 and
upgrade via DVD/Preupgrade is simply UNACEPPTABLE
i don't have any problems downloading a DvD, or a LiveCD
for one simple desktop, but realize your
On 01/26/2012 07:47 AM, Bryan Quigley wrote:
I can understand exceptions for Firefox (but you don't want to switch
to the enterprise slow release right?), and Wine, but...
I've read it several times and I don't quite understand the major
kernel version bumps. 3.2.1 just got released to
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 03:22 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.2012 03:03, schrieb Greg:
On 26/01/2012 12:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i made several HUNDRED of dist-upgrades with yum since FC3 and
upgrade via DVD/Preupgrade is simply UNACEPPTABLE
i don't have any problems
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Bryan Quigley gqu...@gmail.com wrote:
I can understand exceptions for Firefox (but you don't want to switch
to the enterprise slow release right?), and Wine, but...
I've read it several times and I don't quite understand the major
kernel version bumps. 3.2.1
On 01/25/2012 10:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Bryan Quigley gqu...@gmail.com wrote:
It's pretty simple, really. Basically, if we don't keep the kernel on at
least a somewhat recent release the amount of work required to support
that release grows beyond what we
Am 26.01.2012 04:48, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
On 01/26/2012 08:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.2012 03:57, schrieb Mathieu Bridon:
And realize that Fedora is a community project with no guarantee
whatsoever.
and that is a valueable argument for breaking things
without really good
On 01/26/2012 09:23 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i see really nothing wrong in demanding not break things randomly without
VERY good reasons and in this context it does relly not matter
if opensource /paid / whatever
Nobody breaks things randomly. Sometimes changes have unintentional
side
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:46:42PM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/25/2012 10:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Bryan Quigley gqu...@gmail.com wrote:
It's pretty simple, really. Basically, if we don't keep the kernel on at
least a somewhat recent release the
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 7:15:51 AM
Subject: Re: UsrMove feature breaking yum upgrade upgrades from older
releases to F17?
Am 26.01.2012 05:02, schrieb Rahul
Am 26.01.2012 08:06, schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov:
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 7:15:51 AM
Subject: Re: UsrMove feature breaking yum upgrade upgrades fromolder
releases to F17?
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
8b977c33592246d34721e1aca49b78df Mojolicious-2.45.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 1d7987e229bd7b9e160fdeaf8d2418191365dfc6
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Jan 25 16:44:02 2012 +0800
Update to 2.45
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
commit a06036735ab7ec9327f59bf40b94028a608402b5
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Jan 25 10:50:23 2012 +
Spec clean-up
- Can run spelling test unconditionally now
- BR: perl(ExtUtils::Manifest)
- Don't BR: perl(Test::Perl::Critic) if we're bootstrapping
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Synopsis-0.06-9.fc17' was created pointing to:
a060367... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784252
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784252
--- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2012-01-25 06:46:49
EST ---
*** Bug 754091 has been marked as a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754091
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-DateTimeX-Easy has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.089-1.fc17.noarch requires
perl(DateTimeX::Easy::DateParse)
On i386:
perl-DateTimeX-Easy-0.089-1.fc17.noarch requires
perl(DateTimeX::Easy::DateParse)
Please resolve this as soon
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Debug-Client:
2f85645a4388040c2eb601303c4c0a9e Debug-Client-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ccf12a36dc26aa8c5f08fdc7d6b0ffdfe206fcea
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Jan 25 14:12:21 2012 +0100
clean specfile, add missing BR
perl-Debug-Client.spec | 13 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-Flexible:
513c033bb61f2c9bbf581da99e650f76 DateTime-Format-Flexible-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784246
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hey, all.
I was going to update perl-opts from 0.042 to 0.05 when I realized that rpm was
going to give me a hard time over the version number (0.042 0.05).
Choices are:
- Introduce Epoch in the rpm
- Use 0.050 as the version number
- Wait until upstream introduces a 0.05x version
The third
commit 631dcddf96357c729240a2726432b539de12ed1d
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Jan 25 23:07:59 2012 +
Spec clean-up
- BR: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl(File::Find), perl(File::Spec) and
perl(Pod::Perldoc)
- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Find-0.10-4.fc17' was created pointing to:
631dcdd... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
72 matches
Mail list logo
