Dne 28.2.2012 02:59, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
On 2/27/12 5:53 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
I was looking for a way to determine the behavior of the master branch
(for the sake of dist values) without hitting the network, as that
would
break git's ability to work offline. The
Hi,
2) yum is currently downloading repository information separately for
each user.
It can use the same downloaded repository information for all users.
Wrong, information are cached in /var/lib/yum.
When you run yum as user it doesn't use the cache though. It creates
its own cache
There is a filed bug regarding this behavior. But so far no explanation or
cause for this behavior.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771043
Johannes
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
2) yum is currently downloading repository information
On 2012-02-27, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be better to walk through this list [1] which was designed
specifically with PP participation in mind as discussed with Toshio
during the F16 development cycle.
Just add your name to Proven Packager and flag it passed
3 - we got this message on /var/log/message systemd[1]: PID
file /run/sendmail.pid not readable (yet?) after start.
Probably:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748171
IMHO this message should be harmless because there is inotify
workaround in systemd.
I thing we want read
On 02/26/2012 07:37 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 2012-02-24 4:22, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
So I installed the official Fedora version of cloud-init but the
service startup ordering is broken there too:
[root@342 ~]# dmesg | grep cloud | grep About
[ 91.668396] systemd[1]: About to execute:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2012-02-27, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be better to walk through this list [1] which was designed
specifically with PP participation in mind as discussed with Toshio
during the F16 development
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Action-REST:
3817a9a2514f76bf853aac0427678fae Catalyst-Action-REST-0.99.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2012-02-09, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
It's long time since PCRE (Perl-Compatible Regular Expression) library
has changed API or ABI. Version 8.30 is different.
[...]
Result is pcre library has changed SONAME from libpcre.so.0 to
libpcre.so.1.
I'm pleased to announce all reverse
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/26/2012 07:37 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 2012-02-24 4:22, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
So I installed the official Fedora version of cloud-init but the
service startup ordering is broken there too:
[root@342
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:42 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seconded.
And if anyone has gcc47 or libpng FTBFS issues, this is a great place
to ask for help on them.
Well, pulseaudio doesn't currently build, and that's
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:17:00PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
I already re-set it to Canada, and it seemed to make no changes, and I
mailed ad...@fedoraproject.org a week or so ago.
What is generating these, and who to contact to fix these?
See
Hot dog! The Fedora 17 Beefy Miracle Alpha Release is available! This
release offers a preview of some of the best and meatiest free and open
source technology currently under development. Relish in a glimpse of
the future:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease
== What is the Alpha release?
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:42 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seconded.
And if anyone has gcc47 or libpng FTBFS issues, this is a great place
to ask
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 20:22:56 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, pulseaudio doesn't currently build, and that's preventing us from
fixing the bug that audio doesn't work in F17. The problem is apparently
in assembler code, though, so fixing it is unlikely to be
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 20:22:56 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, pulseaudio doesn't currently build, and that's preventing us from
fixing the bug that audio doesn't work in F17. The problem is
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:06:21 -0600,
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure, reading that, if the fix is on it's way to pulseaudio or
not. Which makes me hesitant to commit a patch, though I would be
happy to if needed.
Bluez has a build from today with the fix.
I'll grab
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:07:14 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:06:21 -0600,
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure, reading that, if the fix is on it's way to pulseaudio or
not. Which makes me hesitant to commit a patch, though I
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:10:36 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:07:14 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:06:21 -0600,
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure, reading that, if the fix is on
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:14:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 2/27/12 8:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes:
On 02/27/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
WTF? Do I need to fix this, and if so how?
git pull
(to bring in the f17 branch and mark devel as f18)
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 04:52 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/28/2012 02:09 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
3 things
1- I like have help on convert:
vboxweb-service from VirtualBox on rpmfusion.
On Feb 28, 2012 6:12 AM, Juerg Haefliger jue...@gmail.com wrote:
[ 92.376121] systemd[1]: cloud-init-local.service changed start -
failed
Of interest here is the fact that the script that cloud-init-local.service
runs currently has a bug that causes it to return the wrong return code.
Since
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
So far there is only an f18 bluez build. That will work for my testing,
but that won't let me easily to an f17 build.
Nottingham appears to be getting an F17 bluez rebuild ready right now.
Yes, the only F18 change over F17 was the change to fix this
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
So far there is only an f18 bluez build. That will work for my testing,
but that won't let me easily to an f17 build.
Nottingham appears to be getting an F17 bluez rebuild
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Even though this is in bluez, it looks like it is probably inlined into
pulseaudio as the file has the same name in pulseaudio.
You still need to apply the same patch to the pulseaudio package, just
rebuilding against the updated bluez won't magically fix it.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:31:09 -0500,
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
So far there is only an f18 bluez build. That will work for my testing,
but that won't let me easily to an f17 build.
Nottingham appears to be getting an F17
Vít Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote machine? Why it takes the %{?dist} from local machine instead? It
makes no sense. It might work for other branches, but master is
Dne 28.2.2012 17:23, Garrett Holmstrom napsal(a):
Of interest here is the fact that the script that
cloud-init-local.service runs currently has a bug that causes it to
return the wrong return code. Since cloud-init.target Requires that
service (cloud-config.service does not function correctly
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:14:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 2/27/12 8:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes:
On 02/27/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
WTF? Do I need to fix this, and
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media.html
2nd sentence reads: Note that you cannot install Fedora on UEFI-based AMD64 and
Intel 64 systems from a USB flash drive, although you can use a USB flash drive
to boot the Fedora installer on UEFI-based
On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:19 AM, elison.ni...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
wrote:
What's the expectation of a user hitting control-c in the middle of a yum
update anyway? My first inclination is it makes zero sense, like habaneros
in
Has there been any more tests getting F17 to boot on macs, with or without
refit? I would love to test, but if macs are not any target hardware for
fedora it would be pretty pointless.
/Andreas
On Dec 27, 2011 4:09 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Dec 26, 2011, at 5:55 PM,
On 02/28/2012 08:51 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
*shrug* OK I'm not going to deny you a feature. I still don't understand
why it would be started in the first place if you didn't intend to finish it.
The Fedora mirror system doesn't always behave nicely
(timeouts, bad sync, slow transfer rate, ...)
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:02 AM, John Reiser wrote:
On 02/28/2012 08:51 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
*shrug* OK I'm not going to deny you a feature. I still don't understand
why it would be started in the first place if you didn't intend to finish it.
The Fedora mirror system doesn't always
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Has there been any more tests getting F17 to boot on macs, with or without
refit? I would love to test, but if macs are not any target hardware for
fedora it would be pretty pointless.
Yes, F17's current media should be pretty
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:07 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
== Issues and Details ==
For more information including common and known bugs, tips on how to
report bugs, and the official release schedule, please refer to the
release notes:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:41:25 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:31:09 -0500,
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
So far there is only an f18 bluez build. That will work for my testing,
but that
On 02/27/2012 04:11 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/181
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/181/0001-ticket-181-Allow-PAM-passthru-plug-in-to-have-multip.patch
Here is a revised patch that avoids some unnecessary DN normalization as
well as addresses
On 02/27/2012 07:04 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:44 AM, elison.ni...@gmail.com:
I forgot to add: 8) Yum cannot use an iso image as a repo without
mounting it. Yast in suse allows to directly use iso images as
repos.
You also forgot to add:
1) A proposed alternative 2)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:22:22PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Has there been any more tests getting F17 to boot on macs, with or without
refit? I would love to test, but if macs are not any target hardware for
fedora it would
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 17:57 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Has there been any more tests getting F17 to boot on macs, with or
without refit? I would love to test, but if macs are not any target
hardware for fedora it would be pretty pointless.
I didn't really manage to make time to get anywhere
On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Chris Murphy is pretty active testing various things in regards to Mac
booting, and I've been meaning to get in touch and ask if he's taken a
look at F17 Alpha.
I just downloaded the LiveCD, installed it in VM so I can use the latest
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 12:23 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Chris Murphy is pretty active testing various things in regards to Mac
booting, and I've been meaning to get in touch and ask if he's taken a
look at F17 Alpha.
I just
Den 28 februari 2012 18:22 skrev Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Has there been any more tests getting F17 to boot on macs, with or without
refit? I would love to test, but if macs are not any target hardware for
fedora it
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:34:22PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Den 28 februari 2012 18:22 skrev Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org:
Yes, F17's current media should be pretty close to working.
Is this on native/basic Apple EFI, not reFit?
Yes. I'm mostly working on the netinst isos, and
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 19:53 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:34:22PM +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Den 28 februari 2012 18:22 skrev Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org:
Yes, F17's current media should be pretty close to working.
Is this on native/basic Apple
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Yes, when they've finished.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Yes. I'm mostly working on the netinst isos, and right now if you take
that and dd it onto a USB stick, then insert that and hold down alt on
boot, you'll get a Mac install.
1.
Prior attempt, I mentioned at the very bottom of the email, easy to miss, was a
Macbook Pro 4,1 (2008) model.
---
Attempt 2 with different hardware: Apple Macbook Pro 8,2 (2011).
1.
Starting with a USB stick produced with the following:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788123
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Starting with a USB stick produced with the following:
http://mirrors.yocum.org/fedora/releases/test/17-Alpha/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-netinst.iso
dd if=Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-netinst.iso of=/dev/rdisk1
I'm not sure if this is expected or not, but I make the following
I don't have access to edit this[1] so I hope someone who does will.
I've noticed with several packages lately that frequently the wrong
build flags are used or appened to the ones the cmake macro sets.
Sometimes this can happen because the main cmake configuration file
forces the type to Release
On Feb 28, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Starting with a USB stick produced with the following:
http://mirrors.yocum.org/fedora/releases/test/17-Alpha/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-netinst.iso
dd if=Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-netinst.iso of=/dev/rdisk1
I'm not sure if
Noticed that x86_64 tree is still NOT installable, as in no boot.iso or
anything. Is this going to remain that way for awhile?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
Best little town on Earth!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Richard Shaw wrote:
I've noticed with several packages lately that frequently the wrong
build flags are used or appened to the ones the cmake macro sets.
Sometimes this can happen because the main cmake configuration file
forces the type to Release (bad!) but not always.
I've found that
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
I've noticed with several packages lately that frequently the wrong
build flags are used or appened to the ones the cmake macro sets.
Sometimes this can happen because the main cmake configuration file
forces the type to Release (bad!) but not always.
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
VÃt Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote machine? Why it takes the %{?dist} from local machine instead? It
makes no sense.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/260
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/260/0001-Trac-Ticket-260-389-DS-does-not-support-multiple.patch
Fix description:
1. Connection object holds the paged results related values.
Now they are packaged in one PagedResults object. And the
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
I've noticed with several packages lately that frequently the wrong
build flags are used or appened to the ones the cmake macro sets.
Sometimes this can happen because the main
Following applies to a 2008, Macbook Pro 4,1
1.
Used livecd-tools-17.6-1.fc17 to successfully create an EFI bootable USB stick
of Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso.
2.
Due to this bug: EFI boot fails on Macs with NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751147
Following applies to a 2011, Macbook Pro 8,2
1.
Used livecd-tools-17.6-1.fc17 to successfully create an EFI bootable USB stick
of Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso.
2.
I get to the GRUB menu. Times out and starts to boot. Same result as: EFI boot
failure to properly initialize graphics
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 20:22:56 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:42 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Seconded.
And if anyone has gcc47 or libpng FTBFS issues, this is a great place
to ask for help on them.
Well, pulseaudio doesn't currently
Richard Shaw wrote:
Hmm... I guess we shouldn't add it to the cmake macro then :) I
usually wait and see if there's a problem first and then try that as
the fix. I haven't had a situation where it gave me bad flags yet, but
I did have a package that hard coded Release with bad flags (-O3
Richard Shaw wrote:
Hmm... I guess we shouldn't add it to the cmake macro then :) I
usually wait and see if there's a problem first and then try that as
the fix. I haven't had a situation where it gave me bad flags yet, but
I did have a package that hard coded Release with bad flags (-O3
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
VÃt Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote machine? Why it takes the %{?dist} from local machine instead? It
On 02/27/2012 02:14 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 08:07 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote on 27.02.2012 04:21:
#topic #810 Clarify our position on forks .fesco 810
It's just a statement that is asked for in the ticket, but nevertheless:
Shouldn't issues
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 05:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
VÃt Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:37:50 -0600
Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote:
Noticed that x86_64 tree is still NOT installable, as in no boot.iso
or anything. Is this going to remain that way for awhile?
Well, it's going to stay that way until the bug that prevents it
working is fixed. :)
It
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:37 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
Noticed that x86_64 tree is still NOT installable, as in no boot.iso or
anything. Is this going to remain that way for awhile?
Is there a reason you can't use the Alpha boot.iso?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw |
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 16:36 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Following applies to a 2008, Macbook Pro 4,1
1.
Used livecd-tools-17.6-1.fc17 to successfully create an EFI bootable USB
stick of Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso.
2.
Due to this bug: EFI boot fails on Macs with NVIDIA
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
I would certainly be very confused if `fedpkg mockbuild` produced a f17
rpm but `fedpkg build` produced an f18 one.
build is the common case and should always work; srpm, mockbuild etc. are
extras, I don't care if they break.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I suppose it might be interesting to see if grub2-efi works any
better...
It's been a year since I've tested it so it needs to be retested. But I do know
that doesn't fix bug 765954, so the machine is, for me, functionally useless as
a
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 23:30 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I suppose it might be interesting to see if grub2-efi works any
better...
It's been a year since I've tested it so it needs to be retested. But I do
know that doesn't fix bug
On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 23:30 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I suppose it might be interesting to see if grub2-efi works any
better...
It's been a year since I've tested it so it needs to
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 00:22 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 23:30 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I suppose it might be interesting to see if grub2-efi works any
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750805
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794711
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791078
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit e246452eaa62ab7d49d45364d8aff51ef675f346
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Feb 28 10:59:53 2012 +
Spec clean-up
- Separate build requirements and runtime requirements
- Drop redundant %{?perl_default_filter}
- Fix permissions verbosely
- Use
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746941
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-GStreamer-0.17 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798235
Summary: perl-GStreamer-0.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Wx-0.9904 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798239
Summary: perl-Wx-0.9904 is available
Product: Fedora
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Critic-1.117-3.fc18' was created pointing to:
e246452... Spec clean-up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-GStreamer:
8fe097daf0e2534452a3f69af05ec9fd GStreamer-0.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9191f33d19cbd26411a8cee0815c81d2c207bdfe
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Feb 28 13:34:11 2012 +0100
0.17 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-GStreamer.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798235
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2012-02-28 07:33:13 EST ---
This release fixes memory leak in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798235
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
9191f33... 0.17 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798235
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-28
07:51:02 EST ---
perl-GStreamer-0.17-1.fc17 has
commit 4a8d39503cfb1adf35d000375ff6935720898fbe
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Feb 28 07:02:43 2012 -0700
update to 0.99
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Catalyst-Action-REST.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798235
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788123
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-02-28
16:00:25 EST ---
perl-Module-Runtime-0.012-1.el5
94 matches
Mail list logo
